RX Vega 56 在 中等质量 质量设置下使用 i7-7700K 基准

很明显, RX Vega 56 是一款功能更强大的高端卡,可以1080p / 1440p播放AAA级游戏,每秒50-60帧。 值得注意的是, RX Vega 56 是一个非常耗电的卡,需要一个像样的电源单元。 在内存方面, RX Vega 56 的 8192 MB RAM对现代游戏来说已经绰绰有余,不应该造成任何瓶颈。 总之,性能非常出色,毫无疑问这是 2017 最强大的单GPU之一。

 RX Vega 56 在 中等质量 质量设置下使用 i7-7700K 基准
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
价钱 ¥ 1,864.2
2017
最高记录温度 75C
最大风扇噪音 55.2dB
推荐电源 560W
基准CPU Intel Core i7-7700K @ 4.20GHz ($354.99)
CPU对FPS的影响 + 0.0 FPS
CPU对FPS的影响% 0.0%
基准质量设置 Medium Quality Settings
平均1080p性能 213.3 FPS
平均1440p表现 169.1 FPS
(Ultrawide) 平均1440p表现 148.6 FPS
平均4K性能 110.4 FPS
记忆 8 GB
每帧1080p成本 ¥ 27.9
1440p每帧成本 ¥ 37.7
(Ultrawide) 1440p每帧成本 ¥ 44.4
每帧4K成本 ¥ 64.4
系列 RX Vega 56
Variant AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
总体组合分数 90/100 优秀

RX Vega 64 可能是最新 GCN 5.0 图形卡的 high-end 旗舰产品,但它们的价格使它们 high-end 超出了大多数 mid-range PC游戏玩家的 mid-range 。另一方面, RX Vega 56 更接近价格 ¥ 2765.1 合理 ¥ 2765.1 。 AMD 的 xx56 卡片总是由 mid-range 价格定义,其性能会敲响 high-end 显卡的大门 - 特别是在超频时。在花时间全面测试 RX Vega 56 内的 GCN 5.0 显卡之后,我们可以毫无疑问地说它继续这种趋势。

对于 1080p Full HD ,我们能够以 63 fps到 76 fps玩 Borderlands 3, Anthem, Need For Speed: Heat, Final Fantasy XV, Just Cause 4 , 保持帧率在 71 fps附近徘徊。 对于 1440p Quad HD ,我们能够以 65 fps到 80 fps玩 GreedFall, F1 2019, Forza Horizon 4, Far Cry New Dawn, Resident Evil 2 , 保持帧率在 73 fps附近徘徊。

Assassin's Creed Odyssey (2018)

中等质量

解析度 1920x1080

显卡 价钱 每秒帧数
2018 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 ¥ 3,458
186.3 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER ¥ 3,458
164.9 FPS
2019 AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT ¥ 2,765
160.9 FPS
2019 AMD Radeon RX 5700 ¥ 2,419
150.1 FPS
2020 AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT ¥ 1,934
144.4 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER ¥ 2,772
144.4 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 ¥ 3,458
144.0 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 ¥ 3,458
138.6 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 ¥ 2,765
137.1 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 ¥ 2,426
133.6 FPS
2017 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti ¥ 2,834
130.8 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti ¥ 1,934
125.5 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 ¥ 2,765
118.9 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER ¥ 1,587
118.9 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 ¥ 1,525
113.3 FPS
2018 AMD Radeon RX 590 ¥ 1,934
111.7 FPS
2019 AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 8GB ¥ 1,379
103.5 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 580 ¥ 1,587
102.9 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER ¥ 1,109
101.8 FPS
2019 AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 4GB ¥ 1,171
95.2 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 390X ¥ 2,973
91.5 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB ¥ 1,760
91.5 FPS
2016 AMD Radeon RX 480 ¥ 2,772
89.3 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB ¥ 1,178
87.7 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 ¥ 1,033
80.3 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 570 ¥ 1,171
76.2 FPS
2014 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 ¥ 2,280
75.1 FPS
2016 AMD Radeon RX 470 ¥ 1,241
73.4 FPS

RX Vega 56 位于 RX Vega 64 和 RTX 2060 ,慢于 RX Vega 64 1.1 %,比 RTX 2060 2.6 %。 它具有与此处每个图形卡相对的平均相对性能。 其结果实际上与 RX Vega 64 结果无法区分。 那些拥有高刷新率监视器的人将享受 RX Vega 56 所提供的平均 137.09536247052 fps。 RX Vega 56 和它的竞争对手 GTX 1070 Ti 之间的距离很小。

Forza Horizon 4 (2018)

中等质量

解析度 1920x1080

显卡 价钱 每秒帧数
2018 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 ¥ 3,458
298.1 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER ¥ 3,458
270.2 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER ¥ 2,772
248.8 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 ¥ 3,458
242.5 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 ¥ 2,426
233.2 FPS
2019 AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT ¥ 2,765
230.9 FPS
2017 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti ¥ 2,834
223.3 FPS
2019 AMD Radeon RX 5700 ¥ 2,419
216.4 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti ¥ 1,934
214.8 FPS
2020 AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT ¥ 1,934
213.5 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 ¥ 2,765
208.5 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER ¥ 1,587
205.1 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 ¥ 3,458
200.1 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 ¥ 2,765
196.7 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 ¥ 1,525
194.6 FPS
2018 AMD Radeon RX 590 ¥ 1,934
173.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER ¥ 1,109
171.2 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB ¥ 1,760
163.4 FPS
2019 AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 8GB ¥ 1,379
162.5 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 580 ¥ 1,587
159.8 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB ¥ 1,178
156.8 FPS
2014 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 ¥ 2,280
150.8 FPS
2019 AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 4GB ¥ 1,171
148.6 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 390X ¥ 2,973
138.6 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 ¥ 1,033
133.8 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 390 ¥ 2,280
128.9 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 570 ¥ 1,171
128.9 FPS
2016 AMD Radeon RX 470 ¥ 1,241
114.8 FPS

RX Vega 56 位于 RX Vega 64 和 GTX 1660 ,慢于 RX Vega 64 1.7 %,比 GTX 1660 1.1 %。 它具有与此处每个图形卡相对的平均相对性能。 其结果实际上与 RX Vega 64 结果无法区分。 那些拥有高刷新率监视器的人将享受 RX Vega 56 所提供的平均 196.65079146162 fps。

Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018)

中等质量

解析度 1920x1080

显卡 价钱 每秒帧数
2018 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 ¥ 3,458
276.1 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER ¥ 3,458
231.4 FPS
2019 AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT ¥ 2,765
229.5 FPS
2019 AMD Radeon RX 5700 ¥ 2,419
214.8 FPS
2020 AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT ¥ 1,934
208.5 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER ¥ 2,772
205.1 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 ¥ 3,458
200.1 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 ¥ 3,458
198.4 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 ¥ 2,765
191.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 ¥ 2,426
191.0 FPS
2017 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti ¥ 2,834
188.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti ¥ 1,934
180.7 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER ¥ 1,587
172.1 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 ¥ 2,765
170.3 FPS
2018 AMD Radeon RX 590 ¥ 1,934
166.5 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 ¥ 1,525
163.4 FPS
2019 AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 8GB ¥ 1,379
156.4 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 580 ¥ 1,587
153.6 FPS
2019 AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 4GB ¥ 1,171
144.8 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER ¥ 1,109
144.2 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 390X ¥ 2,973
136.7 FPS
2016 AMD Radeon RX 480 ¥ 2,772
132.8 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 570 ¥ 1,171
128.9 FPS
2016 AMD Radeon RX 470 ¥ 1,241
120.9 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB ¥ 1,760
118.4 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB ¥ 1,178
113.5 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 ¥ 1,033
111.9 FPS
2014 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 ¥ 2,280
111.9 FPS

RX Vega 56 位于 RX Vega 64 和 RTX 2060 ,慢于 RX Vega 64 3.9 %,比 RTX 2060 0 %。 它具有与此处每个图形卡相对的平均相对性能。 那些拥有高刷新率监视器的人将享受 RX Vega 56 所提供的平均 190.97827012726 fps。 RX Vega 56 和它的竞争对手 GTX 1070 Ti 之间的距离很小。

PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (2017)

中等质量

解析度 1920x1080

显卡 价钱 每秒帧数
2018 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 ¥ 3,458
253.4 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER ¥ 3,458
231.4 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER ¥ 2,772
215.1 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 ¥ 3,458
206.8 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 ¥ 2,426
202.8 FPS
2019 AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT ¥ 2,765
196.1 FPS
2017 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti ¥ 2,834
189.8 FPS
2019 AMD Radeon RX 5700 ¥ 2,419
182.4 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti ¥ 1,934
182.4 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 ¥ 2,765
181.0 FPS
2020 AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT ¥ 1,934
175.7 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER ¥ 1,587
173.9 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 ¥ 3,458
168.5 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 ¥ 1,525
165.1 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 ¥ 2,765
164.9 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER ¥ 1,109
142.1 FPS
2018 AMD Radeon RX 590 ¥ 1,934
136.7 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB ¥ 1,760
129.3 FPS
2019 AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 8GB ¥ 1,379
127.7 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 580 ¥ 1,587
126.1 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB ¥ 1,178
124.1 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 390X ¥ 2,973
122.9 FPS
2014 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 ¥ 2,280
119.9 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 390 ¥ 2,280
118.9 FPS
2019 AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 4GB ¥ 1,171
116.6 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 570 ¥ 1,171
110.7 FPS
2016 AMD Radeon RX 470 ¥ 1,241
106.5 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 ¥ 1,033
104.2 FPS

RX Vega 56 位于 GTX 1660 和 GTX 1650 SUPER ,慢于 GTX 1660 0.1 %,比 GTX 1650 SUPER 16 %。 它具有与此处每个图形卡相对的平均相对性能。 其结果实际上与 GTX 1660 结果无法区分。 那些拥有高刷新率监视器的人将享受 RX Vega 56 所提供的平均 164.9001767689 fps。

Battlefield V (2018)

中等质量

解析度 1920x1080

显卡 价钱 每秒帧数
2018 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 ¥ 3,458
345.1 FPS
2019 AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT ¥ 2,765
293.3 FPS
2019 AMD Radeon RX 5700 ¥ 2,419
274.1 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER ¥ 3,458
273.2 FPS
2020 AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT ¥ 1,934
270.2 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 ¥ 3,458
255.0 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 ¥ 2,765
252.0 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 ¥ 3,458
248.8 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER ¥ 2,772
247.2 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 ¥ 2,426
238.7 FPS
2017 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti ¥ 2,834
233.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti ¥ 1,934
224.0 FPS
2018 AMD Radeon RX 590 ¥ 1,934
220.9 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 ¥ 2,765
213.5 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER ¥ 1,587
213.5 FPS
2019 AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 8GB ¥ 1,379
207.3 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 580 ¥ 1,587
204.3 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 ¥ 1,525
203.1 FPS
2019 AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 4GB ¥ 1,171
191.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER ¥ 1,109
186.3 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 390X ¥ 2,973
164.9 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 570 ¥ 1,171
164.9 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB ¥ 1,760
160.1 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 ¥ 1,033
154.4 FPS
2016 AMD Radeon RX 480 ¥ 2,772
153.8 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB ¥ 1,178
153.6 FPS
2016 AMD Radeon RX 470 ¥ 1,241
148.2 FPS
2014 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 ¥ 2,280
145.2 FPS

RX Vega 56 位于 RX Vega 64 和 GTX 1080 ,慢于 RX Vega 64 1.2 %,比 GTX 1080 1.3 %。 它在这里对每一块显卡都有很强的相对性能。 其结果实际上与 RX Vega 64 结果无法区分。 那些拥有高刷新率监视器的人将享受 RX Vega 56 所提供的平均 252.03237002848 fps。 RX Vega 56 和它的竞争对手 GTX 1070 Ti 之间的距离很小。

中等质量 设置下的游戏性能

更改质量设置

解析度 1920x1080

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
游戏 每秒帧数
2019 Apex Legends
217
241.9
2019 Anthem
142
158.7
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
192
213.6
2019 Resident Evil 2
220
244.9
2019 Metro Exodus
117
130.4
2019 World War Z
228
253.4
2019 Gears of War 5
161
179.1
2019 F1 2019
192
213.6
2019 GreedFall
177
197.0
2019 Borderlands 3
134
149.5
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
223
248.0
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
105
117.6
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
151
168.4
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
235
261.4
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
123
137.1
2018 Final Fantasy XV
157
174.5
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
171
191.0
2018 Forza Horizon 4
176
196.7
2018 Fallout 76
196
217.9
2018 Hitman 2
162
180.1
2018 Just Cause 4
157
174.5
2018 Monster Hunter: World
166
184.7
2018 Strange Brigade
232
258.2
2018 Battlefield V
226
252.0
2017 Dawn of War III
194
216.6
2017 Ghost Recon Wildlands
144
160.1
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
125
139.0
2017 Destiny 2
231
256.8
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
148
164.9
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
176
196.7
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
201
224.1
2017 For Honor
250
278.7
2017 Project CARS 2
193
214.6
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
223
248.5
2016 Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
158
176.6
2016 Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
159
177.3
2016 Doom
301
334.7
2016 F1 2016
202
224.9
2016 Total War: Warhammer
190
211.7
2016 Battlefield 1
241
267.9
2016 Overwatch
247
274.7
2016 Dishonored 2
151
168.0
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
168
187.3
2015 Rocket League
534
593.3
2015 Need For Speed
213
237.6
2015 Project CARS
206
230.0
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
330
367.2
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
414
460.1
2009 League of Legends
626
696.6

解析度 2560x1440

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
游戏 每秒帧数
2019 Apex Legends
154
193.0
2019 Anthem
105
132.0
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
140
175.5
2019 Resident Evil 2
144
180.9
2019 Metro Exodus
85
106.5
2019 World War Z
159
199.2
2019 Gears of War 5
111
139.0
2019 F1 2019
130
163.3
2019 GreedFall
122
152.9
2019 Borderlands 3
90
112.7
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
154
192.9
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
80
100.1
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
111
139.0
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
146
183.7
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
76
96.1
2018 Final Fantasy XV
106
133.2
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
111
139.0
2018 Forza Horizon 4
137
172.3
2018 Fallout 76
154
193.0
2018 Hitman 2
102
128.7
2018 Just Cause 4
109
137.3
2018 Monster Hunter: World
111
139.4
2018 Strange Brigade
156
196.0
2018 Battlefield V
160
200.2
2017 Dawn of War III
157
197.3
2017 Ghost Recon Wildlands
117
146.3
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
102
128.7
2017 Destiny 2
182
228.3
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
106
133.2
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
112
140.2
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
139
174.5
2017 For Honor
147
184.7
2017 Project CARS 2
130
163.6
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
183
230.0
2016 Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
103
129.9
2016 Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
122
152.5
2016 Doom
203
254.8
2016 F1 2016
165
207.1
2016 Total War: Warhammer
134
167.8
2016 Battlefield 1
172
215.6
2016 Overwatch
165
206.6
2016 Dishonored 2
118
148.4
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
112
140.6
2015 Rocket League
263
328.9
2015 Need For Speed
155
194.9
2015 Project CARS
149
186.8
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
213
266.6
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
323
404.8
2009 League of Legends
378
473.2

解析度 3440x1440

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
游戏 每秒帧数
2019 Apex Legends
125
165.6
2019 Anthem
86
113.3
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
114
150.1
2019 Resident Evil 2
115
151.6
2019 Metro Exodus
72
95.4
2019 World War Z
132
174.5
2019 Gears of War 5
94
124.7
2019 F1 2019
111
147.1
2019 GreedFall
92
122.3
2019 Borderlands 3
72
95.4
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
129
170.7
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
68
89.7
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
94
124.7
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
113
148.8
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
67
89.3
2018 Final Fantasy XV
88
116.8
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
89
117.8
2018 Forza Horizon 4
119
157.2
2018 Fallout 76
126
166.7
2018 Hitman 2
85
113.1
2018 Just Cause 4
88
116.4
2018 Monster Hunter: World
87
115.6
2018 Strange Brigade
128
168.9
2018 Battlefield V
131
172.9
2017 Dawn of War III
126
167.1
2017 Ghost Recon Wildlands
98
129.5
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
88
116.6
2017 Destiny 2
146
192.9
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
88
115.8
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
91
120.1
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
122
161.4
2017 For Honor
118
155.5
2017 Project CARS 2
122
161.2
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
172
227.1
2016 Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
83
110.2
2016 Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
115
151.8
2016 Doom
166
218.4
2016 F1 2016
141
186.3
2016 Total War: Warhammer
111
146.3
2016 Battlefield 1
142
187.9
2016 Overwatch
133
175.7
2016 Dishonored 2
109
143.6
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
90
119.3
2015 Rocket League
208
274.8
2015 Need For Speed
135
178.4
2015 Project CARS
132
173.9
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
168
221.4
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
311
409.6
2009 League of Legends
293
386.2

解析度 3840x2160

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
游戏 每秒帧数
2019 Apex Legends
82
118.0
2019 Anthem
56
80.8
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
74
106.1
2019 Resident Evil 2
72
103.1
2019 Metro Exodus
51
73.2
2019 World War Z
90
129.1
2019 Gears of War 5
67
96.1
2019 F1 2019
79
114.0
2019 GreedFall
52
74.6
2019 Borderlands 3
46
66.1
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
89
128.5
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
48
69.0
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
67
96.1
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
65
93.4
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
50
72.3
2018 Final Fantasy XV
60
86.4
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
57
81.9
2018 Forza Horizon 4
87
124.5
2018 Fallout 76
84
120.1
2018 Hitman 2
59
84.4
2018 Just Cause 4
56
81.2
2018 Monster Hunter: World
53
76.9
2018 Strange Brigade
84
121.3
2018 Battlefield V
87
124.5
2017 Dawn of War III
81
116.0
2017 Ghost Recon Wildlands
68
97.3
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
63
91.3
2017 Destiny 2
93
133.2
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
59
84.4
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
59
85.3
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
91
130.4
2017 For Honor
74
106.5
2017 Project CARS 2
99
141.9
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
140
200.7
2016 Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
53
76.9
2016 Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
94
135.0
2016 Doom
108
155.1
2016 F1 2016
101
144.4
2016 Total War: Warhammer
75
107.3
2016 Battlefield 1
96
137.9
2016 Overwatch
86
122.9
2016 Dishonored 2
86
123.5
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
58
83.3
2015 Rocket League
129
184.7
2015 Need For Speed
99
141.9
2015 Project CARS
99
141.9
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
103
147.3
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
262
375.4
2009 League of Legends
170
243.0
RX Vega 56 with i7-7700K at 1080p and 中等质量 settings

与竞争对手比较

RX Vega 56 规格

RX Vega 56 Board Design

Board NumberD050-03
Length10.5 inches 267 mm
Outputs1x HDMI3x DisplayPort
Power Connectors2x 8-pin
Slot WidthDual-slot
TDP210 W

RX Vega 56 Clock Speeds

Boost Clock1474 MHz
GPU Clock1138 MHz
Memory Clock800 MHz 1600 MHz effective

RX Vega 56 Graphics Card

Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16
GenerationVega (RX Vega)
Launch Price399 USD
ProductionActive
Release DateAug 14th, 2017

RX Vega 56 Graphics Features

DirectX12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL2
OpenGL4.6
Shader Model6.1
Vulkan1.1.82

RX Vega 56 Graphics Processor

ArchitectureGCN 5.0
Die Size510 mm²
GPU NameVega 10
GPU VariantVega 10 XL (215-0894216)
Process Size14 nm
Transistors12,500 million

RX Vega 56 Memory

Bandwidth409.6 GB/s
Memory Bus2048 bit
Memory Size8192 MB
Memory TypeHBM2

RX Vega 56 Render Config

Compute Units56
ROPs64
Shading Units3584
TMUs224

RX Vega 56 Theoretical Performance

FP16 (half) performance21,131 GFLOPS (2:1)
FP32 (float) performance10,566 GFLOPS
FP64 (double) performance660.4 GFLOPS (1:16)
Pixel Rate94.34 GPixel/s
Texture Rate330.2 GTexel/s

Critics Reviews

• See the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 at Best Buy The Verdict If this were two separate reviews the Vega 56 would get a higher score than the Vega 64, but since it's one review I'm labeling both of ...
Conclusion. Radeon RX Vega 56 is a close derivative of Vega 64, so its behaviors largely carry over from AMD’s flagship. The company does cut this card’s board power rating by almost 30% ...
Years in development, the new Radeon RX Vega line is finally arriving - AMD's return to the higher-end of GPU performance after concentrating its efforts more on the mainstream and budget sectors ...
Similar to AMD's Radeon RX Vega 64, the Vega 56 offers two BIOSes with corresponding power profiles that can be selected using a switch on the card. If you don't change the driver-based profiles ...
Perhaps the most telling comparison, however, is that despite the 20 percent price reduction compared to the RX Vega 64, the RX Vega 56 is slower by less than 10 percent on average.
Radeon RX Vega 56 is the second AMD Vega card launched today. It comes at an affordable 9 price point, with a slightly reduced shader count that actually improves things greatly. For example, power efficiency now trades blows with some Pascal cards, which means less heat and noise, too.
On the AMD side of things, it is the AMD Radeon RX 480, or that card's successors, the Radeon RX 580 and Radeon RX 570. Therefore, the Vega 56 should be more than adequate for today's VR ...
Conclusion (RX Vega 56) The Radeon RX Vega 56 is easily the best card of this launch. It is cooler, quieter, and more efficient than the Radeon RX Vega 64 and delivers only 10 percent less ...
The AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 is the little sister of Vega 64. It comes in at a 20% lower price than the RX Vega 64, but only has 12.5% fewer stream processors, and runs lower operating frequencies.
Meet Radeon RX Vega 56 and RX Vega 64 Brad Chacos/IDG AMD sent PCWorld every version of Vega for testing, including both the air-cooled and liquid-cooled versions of the Radeon RX Vega 64.
The AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 is an upper mid-range graphics card, intended to beat Nvidia's GeForce GTX 1070 - a job it performs admirably as the benchmarks on this page demonstrate.
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 - the Digital Foundry verdict. If you're looking for an alternative to the GTX 1070, the bottom line is that you're generally getting around 10 to 12 per cent of additional ...
The Radeon RX Vega 56 is a high-end graphics card by AMD, launched in August 2017. Built on the 14 nm process, and based on the Vega 10 graphics processor, in its Vega 10 XL variant, the card supports DirectX 12.0.
Launching today is the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64, or just Vega 64 for short. Based on a fully enabled Vega 10 GPU, the Vega 64 will come in two physical variants: air cooled and liquid cooled.
Radeon RX Vega 56 utilizes the same Vega 10 processor found in Vega 64. It’s a 486 mm² behemoth sporting 12.5 billion transistors manufactured on GlobalFoundries’ 14LPP platform.
Vega 56 vs GTX 1070, Vega goes 6-2-2 = Winner Vega! Good job AMD, hopefully next gen you can make more headway in power efficiency. But this is a good card, even beats the factory OC 1070.
The AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 and Vega 64 preview. ... so thanks AMD! RX Vega vs. the World: a 15-round heavyweight battle ... The RX Vega 56 is the more compelling choice, given the lower price and ...

讨论和评论

分享您的评论
F
frarchedalfred 1 year ago
Rx580 or vega 56 or gtx 1070I will buy a new gaming pc in march with a ryzen 7 2700, but i dont know which graphics card should i buy. In my country i can get the rx 580 around 120k ft, the vega 56 around 185k ft, and a gtx 1070 about 150-160k ft. Which should I buy? I already have my monitor, it supports freesync. (75hz, 1080x2560 resolution)
0 0
P
prudishlydrizzly 1 year ago
If you want to use freesync you would have to go for either of the amd cards. you could get a vega 56 but its a pricey and can draw quite a lot of power than a 1070, which give almost similar performance which run much cooler with a third party cooler. So you would be good with the gtx 1070 and save some bucks for some of performance and there are cases where the gtx 1070 outperforms the vega 56,and you could overclock it to get vega like performance but or if that isn't the case you don't mind the extra power draw and heat, and want to make use of the free sync you can surely go for the vega 56. The rx 580 doesn't come anywhere these two so it is out if the question.Check this link out for comparison of two cards at stock and overclocked- http://blog.logicalincrements.com/2017/08/rx-vega-56-vs-gtx-1070-gtx-1080/
1 0
V
vireodrove 1 year ago
Should I buy the RX Vega 56 over the GTX 1070?I'll be building a new rig in a few weeks. For a few days, I've been having trouble deciding on which graphics card I want to get. For a while, I was decided that I'd go with the 1070, but then I realized that Vega 56 performs just as well or better while offering Freesync, which my monitor does offer. For some reason, I still can't decide whether or not I should go for the Vega 56. Should I?
0 0
F
fakesquiggle 1 year ago
On much smaller case blower type cooler is better due to heat being dump outside the case directly. But on much bigger case "open air" cooler usually end up being better. Also noise. Those blower type cooler can be very loud when the fan speed start ramping up.
0 0