RX Vega 56 在 超级品质 质量设置下使用 i7-7700K 基准

很明显, RX Vega 56 是一款功能更强大的高端卡,可以1080p / 1440p播放AAA级游戏,每秒50-60帧。 值得注意的是, RX Vega 56 是一个非常耗电的卡,需要一个像样的电源单元。 在内存方面, RX Vega 56 的 8192 MB RAM对现代游戏来说已经绰绰有余,不应该造成任何瓶颈。 总之,性能非常出色,毫无疑问这是 2017 最强大的单GPU之一。

 RX Vega 56 在 超级品质 质量设置下使用 i7-7700K 基准
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
价钱 ¥ 1,864.2
2017
最高记录温度 75C
最大风扇噪音 55.2dB
推荐电源 560W
基准CPU Intel Core i7-7700K @ 4.20GHz ($354.99)
CPU对FPS的影响 + 0.0 FPS
CPU对FPS的影响% 0.0%
基准质量设置 Ultra Quality Settings
平均1080p性能 100.7 FPS
平均1440p表现 74.5 FPS
平均4K性能 43.4 FPS
记忆 8 GB
每帧1080p成本 ¥ 27.4
1440p每帧成本 ¥ 37.1
每帧4K成本 ¥ 63.7
系列 RX Vega 56
Variant AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
总体组合分数 81/100 优秀

RX Vega 64 可能是最新 GCN 5.0 图形卡的 high-end 旗舰产品,但它们的价格使它们 high-end 超出了大多数 mid-range PC游戏玩家的 mid-range 。另一方面, RX Vega 56 更接近价格 ¥ 2765.1 合理 ¥ 2765.1 。 AMD 的 xx56 卡片总是由 mid-range 价格定义,其性能会敲响 high-end 显卡的大门 - 特别是在超频时。在花时间全面测试 RX Vega 56 内的 GCN 5.0 显卡之后,我们可以毫无疑问地说它继续这种趋势。

对于 1080p Full HD ,我们能够以 63 fps到 76 fps玩 Borderlands 3, Anthem, Need For Speed: Heat, Final Fantasy XV, Just Cause 4 , 保持帧率在 71 fps附近徘徊。 对于 1440p Quad HD ,我们能够以 65 fps到 80 fps玩 GreedFall, F1 2019, Forza Horizon 4, Far Cry New Dawn, Resident Evil 2 , 保持帧率在 73 fps附近徘徊。

Assassin's Creed Odyssey (2018)

超级品质

解析度 1920x1080

显卡 价钱 每秒帧数
2019 AMD Radeon RX 5700 ¥ 2,419
63.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER ¥ 2,772
60.0 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 ¥ 3,458
59.8 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 ¥ 3,458
57.0 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 ¥ 2,765
56.2 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 ¥ 2,426
54.4 FPS
2017 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti ¥ 2,834
53.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti ¥ 1,934
50.3 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 ¥ 2,765
47.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER ¥ 1,587
47.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 ¥ 1,525
44.3 FPS
2018 AMD Radeon RX 590 ¥ 1,934
43.5 FPS

RX Vega 56 位于 RX Vega 64 和 RTX 2060 ,慢于 RX Vega 64 1.4 %,比 RTX 2060 3.3 %。 它具有与此处每个图形卡相对的平均相对性能。 RX Vega 56 在这场比赛中的表现徘徊在60fps左右。 其结果实际上与 RX Vega 64 结果无法区分。 RX Vega 56 和它的竞争对手 GTX 1070 Ti 之间的距离很小。

Forza Horizon 4 (2018)

超级品质

解析度 1920x1080

显卡 价钱 每秒帧数
2019 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER ¥ 2,772
121.0 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 ¥ 3,458
117.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 ¥ 2,426
111.1 FPS
2017 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti ¥ 2,834
105.0 FPS
2019 AMD Radeon RX 5700 ¥ 2,419
100.8 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti ¥ 1,934
99.8 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 ¥ 2,765
96.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER ¥ 1,587
94.0 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 ¥ 3,458
91.0 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 ¥ 2,765
89.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 ¥ 1,525
87.8 FPS
2018 AMD Radeon RX 590 ¥ 1,934
75.5 FPS

RX Vega 56 位于 RX Vega 64 和 GTX 1660 ,慢于 RX Vega 64 2.2 %,比 GTX 1660 1.4 %。 它的每张显卡的相对性能低于平均水平。 其结果实际上与 RX Vega 64 结果无法区分。 对抗其竞争对手 - GTX 1070 Ti , RX Vega 56 要慢得多。

Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018)

超级品质

解析度 1920x1080

显卡 价钱 每秒帧数
2019 AMD Radeon RX 5700 ¥ 2,419
99.8 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER ¥ 2,772
94.0 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 ¥ 3,458
91.0 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 ¥ 3,458
90.0 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 ¥ 2,765
85.7 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 ¥ 2,426
85.7 FPS
2017 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti ¥ 2,834
84.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti ¥ 1,934
79.8 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER ¥ 1,587
75.0 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 ¥ 2,765
74.0 FPS
2018 AMD Radeon RX 590 ¥ 1,934
71.9 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 ¥ 1,525
70.2 FPS

RX Vega 56 位于 RX Vega 64 和 RTX 2060 ,慢于 RX Vega 64 5 %,比 RTX 2060 0 %。 它具有与此处每个图形卡相对的平均相对性能。 RX Vega 56 和它的竞争对手 GTX 1070 Ti 之间的距离很小。

PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (2017)

超级品质

解析度 1920x1080

显卡 价钱 每秒帧数
2019 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER ¥ 2,772
100.0 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 ¥ 3,458
95.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 ¥ 2,426
92.6 FPS
2017 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti ¥ 2,834
85.0 FPS
2019 AMD Radeon RX 5700 ¥ 2,419
80.8 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti ¥ 1,934
80.8 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 ¥ 2,765
80.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER ¥ 1,587
76.0 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 ¥ 3,458
73.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 ¥ 1,525
71.1 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 ¥ 2,765
71.0 FPS
2018 AMD Radeon RX 590 ¥ 1,934
56.0 FPS

RX Vega 56 位于 GTX 1660 和 RX 590 ,慢于 GTX 1660 0.1 %,比 RX 590 26.8 %。 它与大多数显卡的相对性能不足。 其结果实际上与 GTX 1660 结果无法区分。 对抗其竞争对手 - GTX 1070 Ti , RX Vega 56 要慢得多。

Battlefield V (2018)

超级品质

解析度 1920x1080

显卡 价钱 每秒帧数
2019 AMD Radeon RX 5700 ¥ 2,419
137.6 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 ¥ 3,458
125.0 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 ¥ 2,765
123.1 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 ¥ 3,458
121.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER ¥ 2,772
120.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 ¥ 2,426
114.6 FPS
2017 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti ¥ 2,834
111.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti ¥ 1,934
105.4 FPS
2018 AMD Radeon RX 590 ¥ 1,934
103.5 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 ¥ 2,765
99.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER ¥ 1,587
99.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 ¥ 1,525
92.8 FPS

RX Vega 56 位于 RX Vega 64 和 GTX 1080 ,慢于 RX Vega 64 1.5 %,比 GTX 1080 1.7 %。 它在这里对每一块显卡都有很强的相对性能。 其结果实际上与 RX Vega 64 结果无法区分。 那些拥有高刷新率监视器的人将享受 RX Vega 56 所提供的平均 123.1 fps。 的 RX Vega 56 平均 123.1 fps, GTX 1070 Ti 。

超级品质 设置下的游戏性能

更改质量设置

解析度 1920x1080

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
游戏 每秒帧数
2019 Apex Legends
104
116.6
2019 Anthem
60
67.6
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
89
99.1
2019 Resident Evil 2
106
118.5
2019 Metro Exodus
47
52.8
2019 World War Z
111
124.0
2019 Gears of War 5
71
78.9
2019 F1 2019
89
99.1
2019 GreedFall
80
89.2
2019 Borderlands 3
56
62.7
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
108
120.5
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
41
46.4
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
65
72.9
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
116
129.2
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
50
56.2
2018 Final Fantasy XV
68
76.3
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
77
85.7
2018 Forza Horizon 4
80
89.0
2018 Fallout 76
91
101.7
2018 Hitman 2
71
79.5
2018 Just Cause 4
68
76.3
2018 Monster Hunter: World
73
82.1
2018 Strange Brigade
114
127.1
2018 Battlefield V
110
123.1
2017 Dawn of War III
90
100.9
2017 Ghost Recon Wildlands
61
68.4
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
51
57.2
2017 Destiny 2
113
126.2
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
63
71.0
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
80
89.0
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
94
105.5
2017 For Honor
126
140.7
2017 Project CARS 2
89
99.7
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
108
120.8
2016 Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
69
77.5
2016 Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
70
77.9
2016 Doom
162
180.3
2016 F1 2016
95
106.0
2016 Total War: Warhammer
88
97.9
2016 Battlefield 1
120
133.5
2016 Overwatch
124
138.0
2016 Dishonored 2
65
72.7
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
75
83.6
2015 Rocket League
369
410.6
2015 Need For Speed
102
113.9
2015 Project CARS
98
109.1
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
184
204.8
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
253
281.7
2009 League of Legends
475
528.0

解析度 2560x1440

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
游戏 每秒帧数
2019 Apex Legends
69
86.9
2019 Anthem
42
53.6
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
61
76.9
2019 Resident Evil 2
63
79.9
2019 Metro Exodus
32
41.0
2019 World War Z
72
90.5
2019 Gears of War 5
45
57.2
2019 F1 2019
56
70.1
2019 GreedFall
51
64.5
2019 Borderlands 3
35
44.0
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
69
86.8
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
30
38.0
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
45
57.2
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
65
81.5
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
28
36.1
2018 Final Fantasy XV
43
54.2
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
45
57.2
2018 Forza Horizon 4
60
75.1
2018 Fallout 76
69
86.9
2018 Hitman 2
41
51.9
2018 Just Cause 4
45
56.3
2018 Monster Hunter: World
45
57.4
2018 Strange Brigade
70
88.6
2018 Battlefield V
72
91.1
2017 Dawn of War III
71
89.4
2017 Ghost Recon Wildlands
48
61.0
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
41
51.9
2017 Destiny 2
86
108.1
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
43
54.2
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
46
57.8
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
61
76.3
2017 For Honor
65
82.1
2017 Project CARS 2
56
70.3
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
87
109.1
2016 Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
42
52.5
2016 Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
51
64.3
2016 Doom
99
124.9
2016 F1 2016
76
95.2
2016 Total War: Warhammer
58
72.6
2016 Battlefield 1
80
100.3
2016 Overwatch
75
94.9
2016 Dishonored 2
49
62.1
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
46
58.0
2015 Rocket League
140
176.0
2015 Need For Speed
70
88.0
2015 Project CARS
66
83.3
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
106
132.6
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
187
234.7
2009 League of Legends
234
293.3

解析度 3840x2160

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
游戏 每秒帧数
2019 Apex Legends
32
46.6
2019 Anthem
20
29.2
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
28
40.8
2019 Resident Evil 2
27
39.4
2019 Metro Exodus
18
25.9
2019 World War Z
36
52.1
2019 Gears of War 5
25
36.1
2019 F1 2019
31
44.6
2019 GreedFall
18
26.5
2019 Borderlands 3
16
22.9
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
36
51.8
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
16
24.1
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
25
36.1
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
24
34.9
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
17
25.5
2018 Final Fantasy XV
22
31.7
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
20
29.7
2018 Forza Horizon 4
34
49.8
2018 Fallout 76
33
47.6
2018 Hitman 2
21
30.8
2018 Just Cause 4
20
29.4
2018 Monster Hunter: World
19
27.5
2018 Strange Brigade
33
48.2
2018 Battlefield V
34
49.8
2017 Dawn of War III
31
45.6
2017 Ghost Recon Wildlands
25
36.7
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
23
33.9
2017 Destiny 2
37
54.2
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
21
30.8
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
21
31.2
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
36
52.8
2017 For Honor
28
41.0
2017 Project CARS 2
41
58.7
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
63
91.4
2016 Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
19
27.5
2016 Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
38
55.1
2016 Doom
45
65.7
2016 F1 2016
42
60.0
2016 Total War: Warhammer
28
41.4
2016 Battlefield 1
39
56.6
2016 Overwatch
34
49.0
2016 Dishonored 2
34
49.3
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
21
30.3
2015 Rocket League
57
82.1
2015 Need For Speed
41
58.7
2015 Project CARS
41
58.7
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
43
61.5
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
147
211.2
2009 League of Legends
82
117.3
RX Vega 56 with i7-7700K at 1080p and 超级品质 settings

RX Vega 56 规格

RX Vega 56 Board Design

Board NumberD050-03
Length10.5 inches 267 mm
Outputs1x HDMI3x DisplayPort
Power Connectors2x 8-pin
Slot WidthDual-slot
TDP210 W

RX Vega 56 Clock Speeds

Boost Clock1474 MHz
GPU Clock1138 MHz
Memory Clock800 MHz 1600 MHz effective

RX Vega 56 Graphics Card

Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16
GenerationVega (RX Vega)
Launch Price399 USD
ProductionActive
Release DateAug 14th, 2017

RX Vega 56 Graphics Features

DirectX12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL2
OpenGL4.6
Shader Model6.1
Vulkan1.1.82

RX Vega 56 Graphics Processor

ArchitectureGCN 5.0
Die Size510 mm²
GPU NameVega 10
GPU VariantVega 10 XL (215-0894216)
Process Size14 nm
Transistors12,500 million

RX Vega 56 Memory

Bandwidth409.6 GB/s
Memory Bus2048 bit
Memory Size8192 MB
Memory TypeHBM2

RX Vega 56 Render Config

Compute Units56
ROPs64
Shading Units3584
TMUs224

RX Vega 56 Theoretical Performance

FP16 (half) performance21,131 GFLOPS (2:1)
FP32 (float) performance10,566 GFLOPS
FP64 (double) performance660.4 GFLOPS (1:16)
Pixel Rate94.34 GPixel/s
Texture Rate330.2 GTexel/s

Critics Reviews

• See the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 at Best Buy The Verdict If this were two separate reviews the Vega 56 would get a higher score than the Vega 64, but since it's one review I'm labeling both of ...
Conclusion. Radeon RX Vega 56 is a close derivative of Vega 64, so its behaviors largely carry over from AMD’s flagship. The company does cut this card’s board power rating by almost 30% ...
Years in development, the new Radeon RX Vega line is finally arriving - AMD's return to the higher-end of GPU performance after concentrating its efforts more on the mainstream and budget sectors ...
Similar to AMD's Radeon RX Vega 64, the Vega 56 offers two BIOSes with corresponding power profiles that can be selected using a switch on the card. If you don't change the driver-based profiles ...
Perhaps the most telling comparison, however, is that despite the 20 percent price reduction compared to the RX Vega 64, the RX Vega 56 is slower by less than 10 percent on average.
Radeon RX Vega 56 is the second AMD Vega card launched today. It comes at an affordable 9 price point, with a slightly reduced shader count that actually improves things greatly. For example, power efficiency now trades blows with some Pascal cards, which means less heat and noise, too.
On the AMD side of things, it is the AMD Radeon RX 480, or that card's successors, the Radeon RX 580 and Radeon RX 570. Therefore, the Vega 56 should be more than adequate for today's VR ...
Conclusion (RX Vega 56) The Radeon RX Vega 56 is easily the best card of this launch. It is cooler, quieter, and more efficient than the Radeon RX Vega 64 and delivers only 10 percent less ...
The AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 is the little sister of Vega 64. It comes in at a 20% lower price than the RX Vega 64, but only has 12.5% fewer stream processors, and runs lower operating frequencies.
Meet Radeon RX Vega 56 and RX Vega 64 Brad Chacos/IDG AMD sent PCWorld every version of Vega for testing, including both the air-cooled and liquid-cooled versions of the Radeon RX Vega 64.
The AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 is an upper mid-range graphics card, intended to beat Nvidia's GeForce GTX 1070 - a job it performs admirably as the benchmarks on this page demonstrate.
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 - the Digital Foundry verdict. If you're looking for an alternative to the GTX 1070, the bottom line is that you're generally getting around 10 to 12 per cent of additional ...
The Radeon RX Vega 56 is a high-end graphics card by AMD, launched in August 2017. Built on the 14 nm process, and based on the Vega 10 graphics processor, in its Vega 10 XL variant, the card supports DirectX 12.0.
Launching today is the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64, or just Vega 64 for short. Based on a fully enabled Vega 10 GPU, the Vega 64 will come in two physical variants: air cooled and liquid cooled.
Radeon RX Vega 56 utilizes the same Vega 10 processor found in Vega 64. It’s a 486 mm² behemoth sporting 12.5 billion transistors manufactured on GlobalFoundries’ 14LPP platform.
Vega 56 vs GTX 1070, Vega goes 6-2-2 = Winner Vega! Good job AMD, hopefully next gen you can make more headway in power efficiency. But this is a good card, even beats the factory OC 1070.
The AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 and Vega 64 preview. ... so thanks AMD! RX Vega vs. the World: a 15-round heavyweight battle ... The RX Vega 56 is the more compelling choice, given the lower price and ...

讨论和评论

分享您的评论
M
murreletrapunzel 11 months ago
Rx580 or vega 56 or gtx 1070I will buy a new gaming pc in march with a ryzen 7 2700, but i dont know which graphics card should i buy. In my country i can get the rx 580 around 120k ft, the vega 56 around 185k ft, and a gtx 1070 about 150-160k ft. Which should I buy? I already have my monitor, it supports freesync. (75hz, 1080x2560 resolution)
0 0
D
debugkenzi 11 months ago
Should I buy the RX Vega 56 over the GTX 1070?I'll be building a new rig in a few weeks. For a few days, I've been having trouble deciding on which graphics card I want to get. For a while, I was decided that I'd go with the 1070, but then I realized that Vega 56 performs just as well or better while offering Freesync, which my monitor does offer. For some reason, I still can't decide whether or not I should go for the Vega 56. Should I?
0 0
D
dubbedshear 11 months ago
On much smaller case blower type cooler is better due to heat being dump outside the case directly. But on much bigger case "open air" cooler usually end up being better. Also noise. Those blower type cooler can be very loud when the fan speed start ramping up.
0 0