NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
vs
AMD Radeon R9 270

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
AMD Radeon R9 270
GTX 1660 R9 270 区别
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 AMD Radeon R9 270
价钱 ¥ 1,524.6 ¥ 1,905.8 381.2 (25%)
2019 2013 6 (0%)
最高记录温度 61C 66C 5 (8%)
最大风扇噪音 45.6dB 48.3dB 2.7 (6%)
推荐电源 470W 500W 30 (6%)
基准CPU Intel Core i7-8700K @ 3.70GHz ($369.89) Intel Core i7-3770K @ 3.50GHz ($248.98)
CPU对FPS的影响 +0.0 FPS +0.0 FPS 0 (0%)
CPU对FPS的影响% 0.0% 0.0% 0 (0%)
基准质量设置 Ultra Quality Settings Ultra Quality Settings
平均1080p性能 89.4 FPS 35.7 FPS 53.7 (60%)
平均1440p表现 65.2 FPS 23.2 FPS 42 (64%)
平均4K性能 38.1 FPS 14.0 FPS 24.1 (63%)
记忆 6 GB 2 GB 4 (67%)
每帧1080p成本 ¥ 17.0 ¥ 34.7 17.7 (104%)
1440p每帧成本 ¥ 23.4 ¥ 53.5 30.1 (129%)
每帧4K成本 ¥ 40.0 ¥ 88.6 48.6 (121%)
Variant NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 AMD Radeon R9 270
总体组合分数 89/100 53/100 36 (40%)
我们的判决: 对于1440p游戏, GTX 1660 更快 181% 。 GTX 1660 的价格/性能比要好得多。

选定质量设置下的游戏性能

更改质量设置

1920x1080

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
AMD Radeon R9 270
游戏 每秒帧数
2019 Apex Legends
81
90.3
24
27.0
2019 Anthem
52
58.2
15
17.4
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
76
85.3
22
25.5
2019 Resident Evil 2
93
104.2
34
38.4
2019 Metro Exodus
41
46.5
15
17.1
2019 World War Z
70
78.0
34
38.0
2019 Gears of War 5
64
72.0
22
24.9
2019 F1 2019
81
90.4
28
31.2
2019 GreedFall
73
81.4
25
28.1
2019 Borderlands 3
51
57.2
17
19.8
2018 Just Cause 4
60
67.1
22
24.7
2018 Monster Hunter: World
65
72.3
23
26.6
2018 Strange Brigade
104
116.1
36
40.1
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
83
92.9
30
34.2
2017 For Honor
111
123.9
41
45.6
2017 Project CARS 2
79
87.8
29
32.3
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
95
106.3
35
39.1
2016 Dishonored 2
57
64.0
21
23.6
2015 Rocket League
325
361.4
119
133.0
2015 Need For Speed
90
100.2
33
36.9
2015 Project CARS
86
96.1
31
35.3
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
168
187.0
58
64.6
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
223
247.8
82
91.2
2009 League of Legends
418
464.6
153
171.0

2560x1440

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
AMD Radeon R9 270
游戏 每秒帧数
2019 Apex Legends
53
67.2
16
20.1
2019 Anthem
36
46.1
11
13.8
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
52
66.2
15
19.8
2019 Resident Evil 2
56
70.2
20
25.8
2019 Metro Exodus
28
36.1
10
13.3
2019 World War Z
45
56.9
22
27.7
2019 Gears of War 5
41
52.2
14
18.1
2019 F1 2019
51
64.0
17
22.1
2019 GreedFall
47
58.8
16
20.3
2019 Borderlands 3
32
40.1
11
13.9
2018 Just Cause 4
39
49.6
14
18.2
2018 Monster Hunter: World
40
50.6
14
18.6
2018 Strange Brigade
64
80.8
22
27.9
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
53
67.1
19
24.7
2017 For Honor
57
72.3
21
26.6
2017 Project CARS 2
49
61.9
18
22.8
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
76
96.1
28
35.3
2016 Dishonored 2
43
54.8
16
20.1
2015 Rocket League
123
154.9
45
57.0
2015 Need For Speed
61
77.4
22
28.5
2015 Project CARS
58
73.3
21
27.0
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
96
121.0
33
41.8
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
165
206.5
60
76.0
2009 League of Legends
206
258.1
76
95.0

3840x2160

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
AMD Radeon R9 270
游戏 每秒帧数
2019 Apex Legends
28
40.1
8
12.0
2019 Anthem
17
25.1
5
7.5
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
24
35.1
7
10.5
2019 Resident Evil 2
24
34.6
8
12.7
2019 Metro Exodus
15
22.7
5
8.4
2019 World War Z
22
32.8
11
16.0
2019 Gears of War 5
23
33.0
7
11.4
2019 F1 2019
28
40.7
9
14.1
2019 GreedFall
16
24.2
5
8.4
2019 Borderlands 3
14
20.9
5
7.2
2018 Just Cause 4
18
25.8
6
9.5
2018 Monster Hunter: World
16
24.2
6
8.9
2018 Strange Brigade
30
44.0
10
15.2
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
32
46.5
11
17.1
2017 For Honor
25
36.1
9
13.3
2017 Project CARS 2
36
51.6
13
19.0
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
56
80.5
20
29.6
2016 Dishonored 2
30
43.4
11
16.0
2015 Rocket League
50
72.3
18
26.6
2015 Need For Speed
36
51.6
13
19.0
2015 Project CARS
36
51.6
13
19.0
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
39
56.1
13
19.4
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
130
185.8
47
68.4
2009 League of Legends
72
103.2
26
38.0
GTX 1660 vs R9 270 with i7-8700K vs i7-3770K at 1080p and ultra vs ultra settings

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 / i7-8700K

很明显, GTX 1660 是一款功能更强大的高端卡,可以1080p / 1440p播放AAA级游戏,每秒50-60帧。 对于预算中档卡的竞争, GTX 1660 的价格/性能比非常出色。 在内存方面, GTX 1660 的 6144 MB RAM对现代游戏来说已经绰绰有余,不应该造成任何瓶颈。 关于最大负载温度, GTX 1660 的冷却非常适合保持冷却和控制。

AMD Radeon R9 270 / i7-3770K

使用当前 2048 MB RAM, R9 270 可能会在更现代的游戏中出现与内存相关的严重瓶颈。 R9 270 和 Intel Core i7-3770K @ 3.50GHz 之间的这种组合在许多游戏中的瓶颈不到8%,并且完全匹配以避免FPS丢失。 R9 270 和 Intel Core i7-3770K @ 3.50GHz 之间的这种组合是避免FPS丢失的完美匹配。 使用当前 2048 MB RAM, R9 270 在更现代的游戏中可能只有很少的与内存相关的瓶颈。

GTX 1660 vs R9 270 Specifications Comparison

Board Design

GTX 1660 R9 270
Board NumberPG165 SKU 0C630, C631, C632
Length9 inches 229 mm8.28 inches 210 mm
Outputs1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x DisplayPort2x DVI1x HDMI1x DisplayPort
Power Connectors1x 8-pin1x 6-pin
Slot WidthDual-slotDual-slot
TDP120 W150 W

Clock Speeds

GTX 1660 R9 270
Boost Clock1785 MHz925 MHz
GPU Clock1530 MHz900 MHz
Memory Clock2001 MHz 8004 MHz effective1400 MHz 5600 MHz effective

Graphics Card

GTX 1660 R9 270
Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
GenerationGeForce 16Volcanic Islands (R9 200)
Launch Price219 USD179 USD
ProductionActiveEnd-of-life
Release DateMar 14th, 2019Nov 13th, 2013

Graphics Features

GTX 1660 R9 270
DirectX12.0 (12_1)12.0 (11_1)
OpenCL1.21.2
OpenGL4.64.5
Shader Model6.25.1
Vulkan1.1.961.1.77

Graphics Processor

GTX 1660 R9 270
ArchitectureTuringGCN 1.0
Die Size284 mm²212 mm²
GPU NameTU116Curacao
GPU VariantTU116-300-A1 Curacao PRO (215-0848000)
Process Size12 nm28 nm
Transistors6,600 million2,800 million

Memory

GTX 1660 R9 270
Bandwidth192.1 GB/s 179.2 GB/s
Memory Bus192 bit 256 bit
Memory Size6144 MB2048 MB
Memory TypeGDDR5GDDR5

Render Config

GTX 1660 R9 270
ROPs4832
Shading Units14081280
TMUs8880

Theoretical Performance

GTX 1660 R9 270
FP32 (float) performance5,027 GFLOPS 2,368 GFLOPS
FP64 (double) performance157.1 GFLOPS (1:32)148.0 GFLOPS (1:16)
Pixel Rate85.68 GPixel/s29.60 GPixel/s
Texture Rate157.1 GTexel/s 74.00 GTexel/s

讨论和评论

分享您的评论