RX Vega 56 cu i7-7700K criterii de referință Calitate ultra la setările de calitate

Este clar că RX Vega 56 este o carte de high-end semnificativ mai capabilă, care poate reda titluri AAA la 1080p/1440p cu 50-60 de cadre pe secundă. Este demn de remarcat faptul că RX Vega 56 este o carte foarte putere foame și necesită o unitate de alimentare decente. În ceea ce privește memoria RX Vega 56 , 8192 RAM MB este mai mult decât suficient pentru jocuri moderne și nu ar trebui să cauzeze blocaje. Pe scurt, performanța este excepțională, nu există nici o îndoială că aceasta este una dintre cele mai puternice singur GPU- 2017 ului acolo inch

 RX Vega 56 cu i7-7700K criterii de referință Calitate ultra la setările de calitate
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
Preț lei 1,097.5
An 2017
Temperatura maxima inregistrata 75C
Max ventilator de zgomot 55.2dB
Sursă de alimentare recomandată 560W
CPU Benchmark Intel Core i7-7700K @ 4.20GHz ($354.99)
Impactul CPU pe FPS + 0.0 FPS
Impactul CPU pe FPS% 0.0%
Setări calitate Benchmark Ultra Quality Settings
Performanță medie de 1080p 100.2 FPS
Performanța medie a 1440p 74.2 FPS
Performanță medie 4K 43.2 FPS
Memorie 8 GB
Costul pe 1080p pe cadru lei 16.2
Costul 1440p pe cadru lei 22.0
Cost 4K pe cadru lei 37.7
Serie RX Vega 56
Variant AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
Scor combinat general 81/100 Fabulos

RX Vega 64 ar putea fi high-end flagship-ul celui mai recent set de GCN 5.0, dar prețurile lor le țin la îndemâna celor mai mulți jucători de la mid-range. Pe de altă parte, RX Vega 56 este mai aproape de a fi rezonabil la un preț rezonabil de lei 1627.9. Cardurile AMD xx56 au fost întotdeauna definite prin prețuri mid-range cu performanțe care bat la ușa high-end plăci grafice - mai ales atunci când sunt overclockate. După ce ne-am ocupat de timp pentru testarea completă a plăcii grafice GCN 5.0 din RX Vega 56, putem spune fără îndoială că aceasta continuă tendința.

Pentru 1080p Full HD, am putut juca Borderlands 3, Anthem, Final Fantasy XV, Just Cause 4, Gears of War 5 la 63 fps la 79 fps și menținut ratele cadrelor în jurul valorii de 72 fps. Pentru 1440p Quad HD, am putut juca GreedFall, F1 2019, Forza Horizon 4, Far Cry New Dawn, Resident Evil 2 la 65 fps la 80 fps și menținut ratele cadrelor în jurul valorii de 73 fps.

Assassin's Creed Odyssey (2018)

Calitate ultra

Rezoluţie 1920x1080

An Placă grafică Preț Cadre pe secundă
2019 AMD Radeon RX 5700 lei 1,424
63.0 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 lei 2,036
59.8 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 lei 2,036
57.0 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 lei 1,628
56.2 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 lei 1,428
54.4 FPS
2017 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti lei 1,669
53.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti lei 1,138
50.3 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 lei 1,628
47.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 lei 898
44.3 FPS
2018 AMD Radeon RX 590 lei 1,138
43.5 FPS

RX Vega 56 se află între RX Vega 64 și RTX 2060 , scăzând mai lent decât RX Vega 64 cu 1.4 % și mai repede decât RTX 2060 cu 3.3 %. Are o performanță relativă medie față de fiecare placă grafică aici. Performanța RX Vega 56 în acest joc se ridică în jurul valorii de 60fps. Rezultatele sale sunt de fapt RX Vega 64 de cele ale RX Vega 64 . Este un apel strâns între RX Vega 56 și rivalul său GTX 1070 Ti printr-o marjă mică.

Forza Horizon 4 (2018)

Calitate ultra

Rezoluţie 1920x1080

An Placă grafică Preț Cadre pe secundă
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 lei 2,036
117.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 lei 1,428
111.1 FPS
2017 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti lei 1,669
105.0 FPS
2019 AMD Radeon RX 5700 lei 1,424
100.8 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti lei 1,138
99.8 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 lei 1,628
96.0 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 lei 2,036
91.0 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 lei 1,628
89.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 lei 898
87.8 FPS
2018 AMD Radeon RX 590 lei 1,138
75.5 FPS

RX Vega 56 se află între RX Vega 64 și GTX 1660 , scăzând mai lent decât RX Vega 64 cu 2.2 % și mai repede decât GTX 1660 cu 1.4 %. Are o performanță relativă medie față de fiecare placă grafică aici. Rezultatele sale sunt de fapt RX Vega 64 de cele ale RX Vega 64 . Față de rivalul său - GTX 1070 Ti , RX Vega 56 este mult mai lent.

Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018)

Calitate ultra

Rezoluţie 1920x1080

An Placă grafică Preț Cadre pe secundă
2019 AMD Radeon RX 5700 lei 1,424
99.8 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 lei 2,036
91.0 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 lei 2,036
90.0 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 lei 1,628
85.7 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 lei 1,428
85.7 FPS
2017 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti lei 1,669
84.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti lei 1,138
79.8 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 lei 1,628
74.0 FPS
2018 AMD Radeon RX 590 lei 1,138
71.9 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 lei 898
70.2 FPS

RX Vega 56 se află între RX Vega 64 și RTX 2060 , scăzând mai lent decât RX Vega 64 cu 5 % și mai repede decât RTX 2060 cu 0 %. Are o performanță relativă medie față de fiecare placă grafică aici. Este un apel strâns între RX Vega 56 și rivalul său GTX 1070 Ti printr-o marjă mică.

PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (2017)

Calitate ultra

Rezoluţie 1920x1080

An Placă grafică Preț Cadre pe secundă
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 lei 2,036
95.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 lei 1,428
92.6 FPS
2017 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti lei 1,669
85.0 FPS
2019 AMD Radeon RX 5700 lei 1,424
80.8 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti lei 1,138
80.8 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 lei 1,628
80.0 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 lei 2,036
73.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 lei 898
71.1 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 lei 1,628
71.0 FPS
2018 AMD Radeon RX 590 lei 1,138
56.0 FPS

RX Vega 56 se află între GTX 1660 și RX 590 , scăzând mai lent decât GTX 1660 cu 0.1 % și mai repede decât RX 590 cu 26.8 %. Rămâne scurt în ceea ce privește performanțele relative față de majoritatea plăcii grafice de aici. Rezultatele sale sunt de fapt GTX 1660 de cele ale GTX 1660 . Față de rivalul său - GTX 1070 Ti , RX Vega 56 este mult mai lent.

Battlefield V (2018)

Calitate ultra

Rezoluţie 1920x1080

An Placă grafică Preț Cadre pe secundă
2019 AMD Radeon RX 5700 lei 1,424
137.6 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 lei 2,036
125.0 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 lei 1,628
123.1 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 lei 2,036
121.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 lei 1,428
114.6 FPS
2017 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti lei 1,669
111.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti lei 1,138
105.4 FPS
2018 AMD Radeon RX 590 lei 1,138
103.5 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 lei 1,628
99.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 lei 898
92.8 FPS

RX Vega 56 se află între RX Vega 64 și GTX 1080 , scăzând mai lent decât RX Vega 64 cu 1.5 % și mai repede decât GTX 1080 cu 1.7 %. Are o performanță relativă puternică față de fiecare placă grafică aici. Rezultatele sale sunt de fapt RX Vega 64 de cele ale RX Vega 64 . Cei care au un monitor de rata de actualizare ridicat se vor bucura de ceea ce RX Vega 56 are de oferit, deoarece media 123.1 fps. RX Vega 56 înregistrat o medie de 123.1 fps în , depășind GTX 1070 Ti cu o marjă bună.

Performanță joc la Calitate ultra setări

Modificarea setărilor de calitate

Rezoluţie 1920x1080

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
An Joc Cadre pe secundă
2019 Apex Legends
104
116.6
2019 Anthem
60
67.6
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
89
99.1
2019 Resident Evil 2
106
118.5
2019 Metro Exodus
47
52.8
2019 World War Z
111
124.0
2019 Gears of War 5
71
78.9
2019 F1 2019
89
99.1
2019 GreedFall
80
89.2
2019 Borderlands 3
56
62.7
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
116
129.2
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
50
56.2
2018 Final Fantasy XV
68
76.3
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
77
85.7
2018 Forza Horizon 4
80
89.0
2018 Fallout 76
91
101.7
2018 Hitman 2
71
79.5
2018 Just Cause 4
68
76.3
2018 Monster Hunter: World
73
82.1
2018 Strange Brigade
114
127.1
2018 Battlefield V
110
123.1
2017 Dawn of War III
90
100.9
2017 Ghost Recon Wildlands
61
68.4
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
51
57.2
2017 Destiny 2
113
126.2
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
63
71.0
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
80
89.0
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
94
105.5
2017 For Honor
126
140.7
2017 Project CARS 2
89
99.7
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
108
120.8
2016 Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
69
77.5
2016 Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
70
77.9
2016 Doom
162
180.3
2016 F1 2016
95
106.0
2016 Total War: Warhammer
88
97.9
2016 Battlefield 1
120
133.5
2016 Overwatch
124
138.0
2016 Dishonored 2
65
72.7
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
75
83.6
2015 Rocket League
369
410.6
2015 Need For Speed
102
113.9
2015 Project CARS
98
109.1
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
184
204.8
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
253
281.7
2009 League of Legends
475
528.0

Rezoluţie 2560x1440

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
An Joc Cadre pe secundă
2019 Apex Legends
69
86.9
2019 Anthem
42
53.6
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
61
76.9
2019 Resident Evil 2
63
79.9
2019 Metro Exodus
32
41.0
2019 World War Z
72
90.5
2019 Gears of War 5
45
57.2
2019 F1 2019
56
70.1
2019 GreedFall
51
64.5
2019 Borderlands 3
35
44.0
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
65
81.5
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
28
36.1
2018 Final Fantasy XV
43
54.2
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
45
57.2
2018 Forza Horizon 4
60
75.1
2018 Fallout 76
69
86.9
2018 Hitman 2
41
51.9
2018 Just Cause 4
45
56.3
2018 Monster Hunter: World
45
57.4
2018 Strange Brigade
70
88.6
2018 Battlefield V
72
91.1
2017 Dawn of War III
71
89.4
2017 Ghost Recon Wildlands
48
61.0
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
41
51.9
2017 Destiny 2
86
108.1
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
43
54.2
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
46
57.8
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
61
76.3
2017 For Honor
65
82.1
2017 Project CARS 2
56
70.3
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
87
109.1
2016 Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
42
52.5
2016 Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
51
64.3
2016 Doom
99
124.9
2016 F1 2016
76
95.2
2016 Total War: Warhammer
58
72.6
2016 Battlefield 1
80
100.3
2016 Overwatch
75
94.9
2016 Dishonored 2
49
62.1
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
46
58.0
2015 Rocket League
140
176.0
2015 Need For Speed
70
88.0
2015 Project CARS
66
83.3
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
106
132.6
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
187
234.7
2009 League of Legends
234
293.3

Rezoluţie 3840x2160

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
An Joc Cadre pe secundă
2019 Apex Legends
32
46.6
2019 Anthem
20
29.2
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
28
40.8
2019 Resident Evil 2
27
39.4
2019 Metro Exodus
18
25.9
2019 World War Z
36
52.1
2019 Gears of War 5
25
36.1
2019 F1 2019
31
44.6
2019 GreedFall
18
26.5
2019 Borderlands 3
16
22.9
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
24
34.9
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
17
25.5
2018 Final Fantasy XV
22
31.7
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
20
29.7
2018 Forza Horizon 4
34
49.8
2018 Fallout 76
33
47.6
2018 Hitman 2
21
30.8
2018 Just Cause 4
20
29.4
2018 Monster Hunter: World
19
27.5
2018 Strange Brigade
33
48.2
2018 Battlefield V
34
49.8
2017 Dawn of War III
31
45.6
2017 Ghost Recon Wildlands
25
36.7
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
23
33.9
2017 Destiny 2
37
54.2
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
21
30.8
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
21
31.2
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
36
52.8
2017 For Honor
28
41.0
2017 Project CARS 2
41
58.7
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
63
91.4
2016 Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
19
27.5
2016 Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
38
55.1
2016 Doom
45
65.7
2016 F1 2016
42
60.0
2016 Total War: Warhammer
28
41.4
2016 Battlefield 1
39
56.6
2016 Overwatch
34
49.0
2016 Dishonored 2
34
49.3
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
21
30.3
2015 Rocket League
57
82.1
2015 Need For Speed
41
58.7
2015 Project CARS
41
58.7
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
43
61.5
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
147
211.2
2009 League of Legends
82
117.3
RX Vega 56 with i7-7700K at 1080p and Calitate ultra settings

RX Vega 56 Specificatii

RX Vega 56 Board Design

Board NumberD050-03
Length10.5 inches 267 mm
Outputs1x HDMI3x DisplayPort
Power Connectors2x 8-pin
Slot WidthDual-slot
TDP210 W

RX Vega 56 Clock Speeds

Boost Clock1474 MHz
GPU Clock1138 MHz
Memory Clock800 MHz 1600 MHz effective

RX Vega 56 Graphics Card

Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16
GenerationVega (RX Vega)
Launch Price399 USD
ProductionActive
Release DateAug 14th, 2017

RX Vega 56 Graphics Features

DirectX12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL2
OpenGL4.6
Shader Model6.1
Vulkan1.1.82

RX Vega 56 Graphics Processor

ArchitectureGCN 5.0
Die Size510 mm²
GPU NameVega 10
GPU VariantVega 10 XL (215-0894216)
Process Size14 nm
Transistors12,500 million

RX Vega 56 Memory

Bandwidth409.6 GB/s
Memory Bus2048 bit
Memory Size8192 MB
Memory TypeHBM2

RX Vega 56 Render Config

Compute Units56
ROPs64
Shading Units3584
TMUs224

RX Vega 56 Theoretical Performance

FP16 (half) performance21,131 GFLOPS (2:1)
FP32 (float) performance10,566 GFLOPS
FP64 (double) performance660.4 GFLOPS (1:16)
Pixel Rate94.34 GPixel/s
Texture Rate330.2 GTexel/s

Critics Reviews

• See the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 at Best Buy The Verdict If this were two separate reviews the Vega 56 would get a higher score than the Vega 64, but since it's one review I'm labeling both of ...
Conclusion. Radeon RX Vega 56 is a close derivative of Vega 64, so its behaviors largely carry over from AMD’s flagship. The company does cut this card’s board power rating by almost 30% ...
Years in development, the new Radeon RX Vega line is finally arriving - AMD's return to the higher-end of GPU performance after concentrating its efforts more on the mainstream and budget sectors ...
Similar to AMD's Radeon RX Vega 64, the Vega 56 offers two BIOSes with corresponding power profiles that can be selected using a switch on the card. If you don't change the driver-based profiles ...
Perhaps the most telling comparison, however, is that despite the 20 percent price reduction compared to the RX Vega 64, the RX Vega 56 is slower by less than 10 percent on average.
Radeon RX Vega 56 is the second AMD Vega card launched today. It comes at an affordable 9 price point, with a slightly reduced shader count that actually improves things greatly. For example, power efficiency now trades blows with some Pascal cards, which means less heat and noise, too.
On the AMD side of things, it is the AMD Radeon RX 480, or that card's successors, the Radeon RX 580 and Radeon RX 570. Therefore, the Vega 56 should be more than adequate for today's VR ...
Conclusion (RX Vega 56) The Radeon RX Vega 56 is easily the best card of this launch. It is cooler, quieter, and more efficient than the Radeon RX Vega 64 and delivers only 10 percent less ...
The AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 is the little sister of Vega 64. It comes in at a 20% lower price than the RX Vega 64, but only has 12.5% fewer stream processors, and runs lower operating frequencies.
Meet Radeon RX Vega 56 and RX Vega 64 Brad Chacos/IDG AMD sent PCWorld every version of Vega for testing, including both the air-cooled and liquid-cooled versions of the Radeon RX Vega 64.
The AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 is an upper mid-range graphics card, intended to beat Nvidia's GeForce GTX 1070 - a job it performs admirably as the benchmarks on this page demonstrate.
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 - the Digital Foundry verdict. If you're looking for an alternative to the GTX 1070, the bottom line is that you're generally getting around 10 to 12 per cent of additional ...
The Radeon RX Vega 56 is a high-end graphics card by AMD, launched in August 2017. Built on the 14 nm process, and based on the Vega 10 graphics processor, in its Vega 10 XL variant, the card supports DirectX 12.0.
Launching today is the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64, or just Vega 64 for short. Based on a fully enabled Vega 10 GPU, the Vega 64 will come in two physical variants: air cooled and liquid cooled.
Radeon RX Vega 56 utilizes the same Vega 10 processor found in Vega 64. It’s a 486 mm² behemoth sporting 12.5 billion transistors manufactured on GlobalFoundries’ 14LPP platform.
Vega 56 vs GTX 1070, Vega goes 6-2-2 = Winner Vega! Good job AMD, hopefully next gen you can make more headway in power efficiency. But this is a good card, even beats the factory OC 1070.
The AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 and Vega 64 preview. ... so thanks AMD! RX Vega vs. the World: a 15-round heavyweight battle ... The RX Vega 56 is the more compelling choice, given the lower price and ...

Discuții și comentarii

Distribuiți comentariile dvs.
K
kosherfinnegan 9 months ago
Rx580 or vega 56 or gtx 1070
I will buy a new gaming pc in march with a ryzen 7 2700, but i dont know which graphics card should i buy. In my country i can get the rx 580 around 120k ft, the vega 56 around 185k ft, and a gtx 1070 about 150-160k ft. Which should I buy? I already have my monitor, it supports freesync. (75hz, 1080x2560 resolution)
0 0
S
stararticle 9 months ago
Should I buy the RX Vega 56 over the GTX 1070?
I'll be building a new rig in a few weeks. For a few days, I've been having trouble deciding on which graphics card I want to get. For a while, I was decided that I'd go with the 1070, but then I realized that Vega 56 performs just as well or better while offering Freesync, which my monitor does offer. For some reason, I still can't decide whether or not I should go for the Vega 56. Should I?
0 0
H
hankessay 9 months ago
On much smaller case blower type cooler is better due to heat being dump outside the case directly. But on much bigger case "open air" cooler usually end up being better. Also noise. Those blower type cooler can be very loud when the fan speed start ramping up.
0 0