RX Vega 56 med i7-7700K benchmarks ved Ultra kvalitet kvalitetsinnstillinger

Det er klart at RX Vega 56 er et betydelig bedre standby-kort som kan spille AAA-titler på 1080p / 1440p med 50-60 bilder per sekund. Det er verdt å merke seg at RX Vega 56 er et veldig kraftig sulten kort og krever en anstendig strømforsyningsenhet. Når det gjelder minne, er RX Vega 56 8192 MB RAM mer enn nok for moderne spill og bør ikke forårsake noen flaskehalser. Kort sagt, ytelsen er eksepsjonell, det er ingen tvil om at dette er en av de kraftigste single GPUene der ute i 2017 .

 RX Vega 56 med i7-7700K benchmarks ved Ultra kvalitet kvalitetsinnstillinger
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
Pris kr 2,356.4
År 2017
Maksimal opptakstemperatur 75C
Max Fan Noise 55.2dB
Anbefalt strømforsyning 560W
Benchmark CPU Intel Core i7-7700K @ 4.20GHz ($354.99)
CPU-innvirkning på FPS + 0.0 FPS
CPU-innvirkning på FPS% 0.0%
Benchmark Quality Settings Ultra Quality Settings
Gjennomsnittlig 1080p ytelse 98.9 FPS
Gjennomsnittlig 1440p ytelse 73.3 FPS
(Ultrawide) Gjennomsnittlig 1440p ytelse 62.2 FPS
Gjennomsnittlig 4K ytelse 42.9 FPS
Hukommelse 8 GB
1080p kostnad per ramme kr 35.3
1440p pris per ramme kr 47.7
(Ultrawide) 1440p pris per ramme kr 56.2
4K pris per ramme kr 81.5
Serie RX Vega 56
Variant AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
Samlet kombinasjonspoeng 81/100 Utmerket

RX Vega 64 kanskje high-end flaggskipet til det siste GCN 5.0 settet med grafikkort, men prisene holder dem utenfor rekkevidden for de fleste mid-range PC-spillere. På den annen side er RX Vega 56 nærmere å være rimelig til en prislapp på kr 3495.2. AMD 's xx56 -kort har alltid blitt definert av mid-range priser med ytelse som banker på døren til high-end grafikkort - spesielt når de er overklokket. Etter å ha tatt oss tid til å teste GCN 5.0 grafikkortet inne i RX Vega 56, kan vi uten tvil si at det fortsetter trenden.

For 1080p Full HD kunne vi spille Borderlands 3, Anthem, Need For Speed: Heat, Final Fantasy XV, Just Cause 4 på 63 fps til 76 fps og holdt bildefrekvensene svevet rundt 71 fps. For 1440p Quad HD kunne vi spille GreedFall, F1 2019, Forza Horizon 4, Far Cry New Dawn, Resident Evil 2 på 65 fps til 80 fps og holdt bildefrekvensene svevet rundt 73 fps.

Assassin's Creed Odyssey (2018)

Ultra kvalitet

Vedtak 1920x1080

År Grafikkort Pris Bilder per sekund
2018 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 kr 4,371
83.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER kr 4,371
71.0 FPS
2019 AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT kr 3,495
68.8 FPS
2019 AMD Radeon RX 5700 kr 3,057
63.0 FPS
2020 AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT kr 2,444
60.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER kr 3,504
60.0 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 kr 4,371
59.8 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 kr 4,371
57.0 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 kr 3,495
56.2 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 kr 3,066
54.4 FPS
2017 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti kr 3,583
53.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti kr 2,444
50.3 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 kr 3,495
47.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER kr 2,006
47.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 kr 1,927
44.3 FPS
2018 AMD Radeon RX 590 kr 2,444
43.5 FPS
2019 AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 8GB kr 1,743
39.6 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 580 kr 2,006
39.3 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER kr 1,402
38.8 FPS
2019 AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 4GB kr 1,480
35.7 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 390X kr 3,758
34.0 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB kr 2,225
34.0 FPS
2016 AMD Radeon RX 480 kr 3,504
33.0 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB kr 1,489
32.3 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 kr 1,305
29.0 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 570 kr 1,480
27.2 FPS
2014 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 kr 2,882
26.7 FPS
2016 AMD Radeon RX 470 kr 1,568
26.0 FPS

RX Vega 56 sitter mellom RX Vega 64 og RTX 2060 og faller langsommere enn RX Vega 64 med 1.4 % og raskere enn RTX 2060 med 3.3 %. Det har en gjennomsnittlig relativ ytelse mot hvert grafikkort her. RX Vega 56 's ytelse i dette spillet svømmer rundt 60fps-merket. Resultatene kan faktisk ikke skilles fra RX Vega 64 . Det er en nær samtale mellom RX Vega 56 og dens rival GTX 1070 Ti med liten margin.

Forza Horizon 4 (2018)

Ultra kvalitet

Vedtak 1920x1080

År Grafikkort Pris Bilder per sekund
2018 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 kr 4,371
154.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER kr 4,371
135.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER kr 3,504
121.0 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 kr 4,371
117.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 kr 3,066
111.1 FPS
2019 AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT kr 3,495
109.7 FPS
2017 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti kr 3,583
105.0 FPS
2019 AMD Radeon RX 5700 kr 3,057
100.8 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti kr 2,444
99.8 FPS
2020 AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT kr 2,444
99.0 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 kr 3,495
96.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER kr 2,006
94.0 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 kr 4,371
91.0 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 kr 3,495
89.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 kr 1,927
87.8 FPS
2018 AMD Radeon RX 590 kr 2,444
75.5 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER kr 1,402
74.5 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB kr 2,225
70.2 FPS
2019 AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 8GB kr 1,743
69.7 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 580 kr 2,006
68.2 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB kr 1,489
66.6 FPS
2014 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 kr 2,882
63.4 FPS
2019 AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 4GB kr 1,480
62.2 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 390X kr 3,758
57.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 kr 1,305
54.5 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 390 kr 2,882
52.0 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 570 kr 1,480
52.0 FPS
2016 AMD Radeon RX 470 kr 1,568
45.0 FPS

RX Vega 56 sitter mellom RX Vega 64 og GTX 1660 og faller langsommere enn RX Vega 64 med 2.2 % og raskere enn GTX 1660 med 1.4 %. Det har en gjennomsnittlig relativ ytelse mot hvert grafikkort her. Resultatene kan faktisk ikke skilles fra RX Vega 64 . Mot sin rival - GTX 1070 Ti , er RX Vega 56 mye tregere.

Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018)

Ultra kvalitet

Vedtak 1920x1080

År Grafikkort Pris Bilder per sekund
2018 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 kr 4,371
139.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER kr 4,371
110.0 FPS
2019 AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT kr 3,495
108.8 FPS
2019 AMD Radeon RX 5700 kr 3,057
99.8 FPS
2020 AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT kr 2,444
96.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER kr 3,504
94.0 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 kr 4,371
91.0 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 kr 4,371
90.0 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 kr 3,495
85.7 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 kr 3,066
85.7 FPS
2017 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti kr 3,583
84.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti kr 2,444
79.8 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER kr 2,006
75.0 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 kr 3,495
74.0 FPS
2018 AMD Radeon RX 590 kr 2,444
71.9 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 kr 1,927
70.2 FPS
2019 AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 8GB kr 1,743
66.4 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 580 kr 2,006
64.9 FPS
2019 AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 4GB kr 1,480
60.2 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER kr 1,402
59.9 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 390X kr 3,758
56.0 FPS
2016 AMD Radeon RX 480 kr 3,504
54.0 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 570 kr 1,480
52.0 FPS
2016 AMD Radeon RX 470 kr 1,568
48.0 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB kr 2,225
46.8 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB kr 1,489
44.4 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 kr 1,305
43.6 FPS
2014 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 kr 2,882
43.6 FPS

RX Vega 56 sitter mellom RX Vega 64 og RTX 2060 og faller langsommere enn RX Vega 64 med 5 % og raskere enn RTX 2060 med 0 %. Det har en gjennomsnittlig relativ ytelse mot hvert grafikkort her. Det er en nær samtale mellom RX Vega 56 og dens rival GTX 1070 Ti med liten margin.

PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (2017)

Ultra kvalitet

Vedtak 1920x1080

År Grafikkort Pris Bilder per sekund
2018 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 kr 4,371
124.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER kr 4,371
110.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER kr 3,504
100.0 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 kr 4,371
95.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 kr 3,066
92.6 FPS
2019 AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT kr 3,495
88.7 FPS
2017 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti kr 3,583
85.0 FPS
2019 AMD Radeon RX 5700 kr 3,057
80.8 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti kr 2,444
80.8 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 kr 3,495
80.0 FPS
2020 AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT kr 2,444
77.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER kr 2,006
76.0 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 kr 4,371
73.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 kr 1,927
71.1 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 kr 3,495
71.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER kr 1,402
58.8 FPS
2018 AMD Radeon RX 590 kr 2,444
56.0 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB kr 2,225
52.2 FPS
2019 AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 8GB kr 1,743
51.4 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 580 kr 2,006
50.6 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB kr 1,489
49.6 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 390X kr 3,758
49.0 FPS
2014 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 kr 2,882
47.5 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 390 kr 2,882
47.0 FPS
2019 AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 4GB kr 1,480
45.9 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 570 kr 1,480
43.0 FPS
2016 AMD Radeon RX 470 kr 1,568
41.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 kr 1,305
39.9 FPS

RX Vega 56 sitter mellom GTX 1660 og GTX 1650 SUPER og faller langsommere enn GTX 1660 med 0.1 % og raskere enn GTX 1650 SUPER med 20.7 %. Det har en gjennomsnittlig relativ ytelse mot hvert grafikkort her. Resultatene kan faktisk ikke skilles fra GTX 1660 . Mot sin rival - GTX 1070 Ti , er RX Vega 56 mye tregere.

Battlefield V (2018)

Ultra kvalitet

Vedtak 1920x1080

År Grafikkort Pris Bilder per sekund
2018 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 kr 4,371
188.0 FPS
2019 AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT kr 3,495
150.7 FPS
2019 AMD Radeon RX 5700 kr 3,057
137.6 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER kr 4,371
137.0 FPS
2020 AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT kr 2,444
135.0 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 kr 4,371
125.0 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 kr 3,495
123.1 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 kr 4,371
121.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER kr 3,504
120.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 kr 3,066
114.6 FPS
2017 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti kr 3,583
111.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti kr 2,444
105.4 FPS
2018 AMD Radeon RX 590 kr 2,444
103.5 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 kr 3,495
99.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER kr 2,006
99.0 FPS
2019 AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 8GB kr 1,743
95.3 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 580 kr 2,006
93.5 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 kr 1,927
92.8 FPS
2019 AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 4GB kr 1,480
85.7 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER kr 1,402
83.0 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 390X kr 3,758
71.0 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 570 kr 1,480
71.0 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB kr 2,225
68.4 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 kr 1,305
65.3 FPS
2016 AMD Radeon RX 480 kr 3,504
65.0 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB kr 1,489
64.9 FPS
2016 AMD Radeon RX 470 kr 1,568
62.0 FPS
2014 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 kr 2,882
60.4 FPS

RX Vega 56 sitter mellom RX Vega 64 og GTX 1080 og faller langsommere enn RX Vega 64 med 1.5 % og raskere enn GTX 1080 med 1.7 %. Det har en sterk relativ ytelse mot hvert grafikkort her. Resultatene kan faktisk ikke skilles fra RX Vega 64 . De som har en høy oppdateringsfrekvensmonitor vil glede seg over hva RX Vega 56 har å tilby når det gjennomsnitt 123.1 fps. RX Vega 56 gjennomsnitt 123.1 fps i , og toppet GTX 1070 Ti med god margin.

Spillytelse ved Ultra kvalitet innstillinger

Endre kvalitetsinnstillinger

Vedtak 1920x1080

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
År Spill Bilder per sekund
2019 Apex Legends
104
116.6
2019 Anthem
60
67.6
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
89
99.1
2019 Resident Evil 2
106
118.5
2019 Metro Exodus
47
52.8
2019 World War Z
111
124.0
2019 Gears of War 5
71
78.9
2019 F1 2019
89
99.1
2019 GreedFall
80
89.2
2019 Borderlands 3
56
62.7
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
108
120.5
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
41
46.4
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
65
72.9
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
116
129.2
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
50
56.2
2018 Final Fantasy XV
68
76.3
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
77
85.7
2018 Forza Horizon 4
80
89.0
2018 Fallout 76
91
101.7
2018 Hitman 2
71
79.5
2018 Just Cause 4
68
76.3
2018 Monster Hunter: World
73
82.1
2018 Strange Brigade
114
127.1
2018 Battlefield V
110
123.1
2017 Dawn of War III
90
100.9
2017 Ghost Recon Wildlands
61
68.4
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
51
57.2
2017 Destiny 2
113
126.2
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
63
71.0
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
80
89.0
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
94
105.5
2017 For Honor
126
140.7
2017 Project CARS 2
89
99.7
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
108
120.8
2016 Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
69
77.5
2016 Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
70
77.9
2016 Doom
162
180.3
2016 F1 2016
95
106.0
2016 Total War: Warhammer
88
97.9
2016 Battlefield 1
120
133.5
2016 Overwatch
124
138.0
2016 Dishonored 2
65
72.7
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
75
83.6
2015 Rocket League
369
410.6
2015 Need For Speed
102
113.9
2015 Project CARS
98
109.1
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
184
204.8
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
253
281.7
2009 League of Legends
475
528.0

Vedtak 2560x1440

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
År Spill Bilder per sekund
2019 Apex Legends
69
86.9
2019 Anthem
42
53.6
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
61
76.9
2019 Resident Evil 2
63
79.9
2019 Metro Exodus
32
41.0
2019 World War Z
72
90.5
2019 Gears of War 5
45
57.2
2019 F1 2019
56
70.1
2019 GreedFall
51
64.5
2019 Borderlands 3
35
44.0
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
69
86.8
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
30
38.0
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
45
57.2
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
65
81.5
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
28
36.1
2018 Final Fantasy XV
43
54.2
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
45
57.2
2018 Forza Horizon 4
60
75.1
2018 Fallout 76
69
86.9
2018 Hitman 2
41
51.9
2018 Just Cause 4
45
56.3
2018 Monster Hunter: World
45
57.4
2018 Strange Brigade
70
88.6
2018 Battlefield V
72
91.1
2017 Dawn of War III
71
89.4
2017 Ghost Recon Wildlands
48
61.0
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
41
51.9
2017 Destiny 2
86
108.1
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
43
54.2
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
46
57.8
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
61
76.3
2017 For Honor
65
82.1
2017 Project CARS 2
56
70.3
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
87
109.1
2016 Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
42
52.5
2016 Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
51
64.3
2016 Doom
99
124.9
2016 F1 2016
76
95.2
2016 Total War: Warhammer
58
72.6
2016 Battlefield 1
80
100.3
2016 Overwatch
75
94.9
2016 Dishonored 2
49
62.1
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
46
58.0
2015 Rocket League
140
176.0
2015 Need For Speed
70
88.0
2015 Project CARS
66
83.3
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
106
132.6
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
187
234.7
2009 League of Legends
234
293.3

Vedtak 3440x1440

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
År Spill Bilder per sekund
2019 Apex Legends
54
71.4
2019 Anthem
33
44.3
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
47
63.0
2019 Resident Evil 2
48
63.8
2019 Metro Exodus
27
35.8
2019 World War Z
57
76.3
2019 Gears of War 5
37
49.9
2019 F1 2019
46
61.4
2019 GreedFall
37
48.7
2019 Borderlands 3
27
35.8
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
56
74.2
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
25
33.2
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
37
49.9
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
47
62.3
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
25
33.0
2018 Final Fantasy XV
34
46.0
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
35
46.5
2018 Forza Horizon 4
50
66.8
2018 Fallout 76
54
72.0
2018 Hitman 2
33
44.2
2018 Just Cause 4
34
45.8
2018 Monster Hunter: World
34
45.4
2018 Strange Brigade
55
73.2
2018 Battlefield V
57
75.4
2017 Dawn of War III
54
72.2
2017 Ghost Recon Wildlands
39
52.3
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
34
45.9
2017 Destiny 2
65
86.8
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
34
45.5
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
36
47.6
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
52
69.1
2017 For Honor
50
65.9
2017 Project CARS 2
52
69.0
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
81
107.3
2016 Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
32
42.8
2016 Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
48
63.9
2016 Doom
77
102.0
2016 F1 2016
63
83.0
2016 Total War: Warhammer
46
61.0
2016 Battlefield 1
63
83.9
2016 Overwatch
58
77.0
2016 Dishonored 2
45
59.6
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
35
47.2
2015 Rocket League
104
138.1
2015 Need For Speed
59
78.5
2015 Project CARS
57
76.0
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
78
103.8
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
181
238.6
2009 League of Legends
166
219.7

Vedtak 3840x2160

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
År Spill Bilder per sekund
2019 Apex Legends
32
46.6
2019 Anthem
20
29.2
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
28
40.8
2019 Resident Evil 2
27
39.4
2019 Metro Exodus
18
25.9
2019 World War Z
36
52.1
2019 Gears of War 5
25
36.1
2019 F1 2019
31
44.6
2019 GreedFall
18
26.5
2019 Borderlands 3
16
22.9
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
36
51.8
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
16
24.1
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
25
36.1
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
24
34.9
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
17
25.5
2018 Final Fantasy XV
22
31.7
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
20
29.7
2018 Forza Horizon 4
34
49.8
2018 Fallout 76
33
47.6
2018 Hitman 2
21
30.8
2018 Just Cause 4
20
29.4
2018 Monster Hunter: World
19
27.5
2018 Strange Brigade
33
48.2
2018 Battlefield V
34
49.8
2017 Dawn of War III
31
45.6
2017 Ghost Recon Wildlands
25
36.7
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
23
33.9
2017 Destiny 2
37
54.2
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
21
30.8
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
21
31.2
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
36
52.8
2017 For Honor
28
41.0
2017 Project CARS 2
41
58.7
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
63
91.4
2016 Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
19
27.5
2016 Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
38
55.1
2016 Doom
45
65.7
2016 F1 2016
42
60.0
2016 Total War: Warhammer
28
41.4
2016 Battlefield 1
39
56.6
2016 Overwatch
34
49.0
2016 Dishonored 2
34
49.3
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
21
30.3
2015 Rocket League
57
82.1
2015 Need For Speed
41
58.7
2015 Project CARS
41
58.7
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
43
61.5
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
147
211.2
2009 League of Legends
82
117.3
RX Vega 56 with i7-7700K at 1080p and Ultra kvalitet settings

Sammenlign mot konkurrenter

RX Vega 56 Spesifikasjoner

RX Vega 56 Board Design

Board NumberD050-03
Length10.5 inches 267 mm
Outputs1x HDMI3x DisplayPort
Power Connectors2x 8-pin
Slot WidthDual-slot
TDP210 W

RX Vega 56 Clock Speeds

Boost Clock1474 MHz
GPU Clock1138 MHz
Memory Clock800 MHz 1600 MHz effective

RX Vega 56 Graphics Card

Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16
GenerationVega (RX Vega)
Launch Price399 USD
ProductionActive
Release DateAug 14th, 2017

RX Vega 56 Graphics Features

DirectX12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL2
OpenGL4.6
Shader Model6.1
Vulkan1.1.82

RX Vega 56 Graphics Processor

ArchitectureGCN 5.0
Die Size510 mm²
GPU NameVega 10
GPU VariantVega 10 XL (215-0894216)
Process Size14 nm
Transistors12,500 million

RX Vega 56 Memory

Bandwidth409.6 GB/s
Memory Bus2048 bit
Memory Size8192 MB
Memory TypeHBM2

RX Vega 56 Render Config

Compute Units56
ROPs64
Shading Units3584
TMUs224

RX Vega 56 Theoretical Performance

FP16 (half) performance21,131 GFLOPS (2:1)
FP32 (float) performance10,566 GFLOPS
FP64 (double) performance660.4 GFLOPS (1:16)
Pixel Rate94.34 GPixel/s
Texture Rate330.2 GTexel/s

Critics Reviews

• See the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 at Best Buy The Verdict If this were two separate reviews the Vega 56 would get a higher score than the Vega 64, but since it's one review I'm labeling both of ...
Conclusion. Radeon RX Vega 56 is a close derivative of Vega 64, so its behaviors largely carry over from AMD’s flagship. The company does cut this card’s board power rating by almost 30% ...
Years in development, the new Radeon RX Vega line is finally arriving - AMD's return to the higher-end of GPU performance after concentrating its efforts more on the mainstream and budget sectors ...
Similar to AMD's Radeon RX Vega 64, the Vega 56 offers two BIOSes with corresponding power profiles that can be selected using a switch on the card. If you don't change the driver-based profiles ...
Perhaps the most telling comparison, however, is that despite the 20 percent price reduction compared to the RX Vega 64, the RX Vega 56 is slower by less than 10 percent on average.
Radeon RX Vega 56 is the second AMD Vega card launched today. It comes at an affordable 9 price point, with a slightly reduced shader count that actually improves things greatly. For example, power efficiency now trades blows with some Pascal cards, which means less heat and noise, too.
On the AMD side of things, it is the AMD Radeon RX 480, or that card's successors, the Radeon RX 580 and Radeon RX 570. Therefore, the Vega 56 should be more than adequate for today's VR ...
Conclusion (RX Vega 56) The Radeon RX Vega 56 is easily the best card of this launch. It is cooler, quieter, and more efficient than the Radeon RX Vega 64 and delivers only 10 percent less ...
The AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 is the little sister of Vega 64. It comes in at a 20% lower price than the RX Vega 64, but only has 12.5% fewer stream processors, and runs lower operating frequencies.
Meet Radeon RX Vega 56 and RX Vega 64 Brad Chacos/IDG AMD sent PCWorld every version of Vega for testing, including both the air-cooled and liquid-cooled versions of the Radeon RX Vega 64.
The AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 is an upper mid-range graphics card, intended to beat Nvidia's GeForce GTX 1070 - a job it performs admirably as the benchmarks on this page demonstrate.
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 - the Digital Foundry verdict. If you're looking for an alternative to the GTX 1070, the bottom line is that you're generally getting around 10 to 12 per cent of additional ...
The Radeon RX Vega 56 is a high-end graphics card by AMD, launched in August 2017. Built on the 14 nm process, and based on the Vega 10 graphics processor, in its Vega 10 XL variant, the card supports DirectX 12.0.
Launching today is the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64, or just Vega 64 for short. Based on a fully enabled Vega 10 GPU, the Vega 64 will come in two physical variants: air cooled and liquid cooled.
Radeon RX Vega 56 utilizes the same Vega 10 processor found in Vega 64. It’s a 486 mm² behemoth sporting 12.5 billion transistors manufactured on GlobalFoundries’ 14LPP platform.
Vega 56 vs GTX 1070, Vega goes 6-2-2 = Winner Vega! Good job AMD, hopefully next gen you can make more headway in power efficiency. But this is a good card, even beats the factory OC 1070.
The AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 and Vega 64 preview. ... so thanks AMD! RX Vega vs. the World: a 15-round heavyweight battle ... The RX Vega 56 is the more compelling choice, given the lower price and ...

Diskusjon og kommentarer

Del dine kommentarer
M
mercifultuesday 1 year ago
Rx580 or vega 56 or gtx 1070I will buy a new gaming pc in march with a ryzen 7 2700, but i dont know which graphics card should i buy. In my country i can get the rx 580 around 120k ft, the vega 56 around 185k ft, and a gtx 1070 about 150-160k ft. Which should I buy? I already have my monitor, it supports freesync. (75hz, 1080x2560 resolution)
0 0
A
astonishedtanning 1 year ago
If you want to use freesync you would have to go for either of the amd cards. you could get a vega 56 but its a pricey and can draw quite a lot of power than a 1070, which give almost similar performance which run much cooler with a third party cooler. So you would be good with the gtx 1070 and save some bucks for some of performance and there are cases where the gtx 1070 outperforms the vega 56,and you could overclock it to get vega like performance but or if that isn't the case you don't mind the extra power draw and heat, and want to make use of the free sync you can surely go for the vega 56. The rx 580 doesn't come anywhere these two so it is out if the question.Check this link out for comparison of two cards at stock and overclocked- http://blog.logicalincrements.com/2017/08/rx-vega-56-vs-gtx-1070-gtx-1080/
1 0
T
thankchase 1 year ago
Should I buy the RX Vega 56 over the GTX 1070?I'll be building a new rig in a few weeks. For a few days, I've been having trouble deciding on which graphics card I want to get. For a while, I was decided that I'd go with the 1070, but then I realized that Vega 56 performs just as well or better while offering Freesync, which my monitor does offer. For some reason, I still can't decide whether or not I should go for the Vega 56. Should I?
0 0
R
rowdyerring 1 year ago
On much smaller case blower type cooler is better due to heat being dump outside the case directly. But on much bigger case "open air" cooler usually end up being better. Also noise. Those blower type cooler can be very loud when the fan speed start ramping up.
0 0