R9 FURY med Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4200+ benchmarks ved Ultra kvalitet kvalitetsinnstillinger

Ved 1440p kan R9 FURY slå 50-60 fps på stort sett alt på ultra, bare uten antialiasing, mindre omgivende okklusjon og skrudd ned skygger. Det er verdt å merke seg at R9 FURY er et veldig kraftig sulten kort og krever en anstendig strømforsyningsenhet. Denne kombinasjonen mellom R9 FURY og AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4200+ kommer til å forårsake alvorlige flaskehalser i mange spill og forårsake alvorlig FPS-tap. Med dagens 4096 MB RAM kan R9 FURY ha svært få minnerelaterte flaskehalser i mer moderne spill.

 R9 FURY med Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4200+ benchmarks ved Ultra kvalitet kvalitetsinnstillinger
AMD Radeon R9 FURY
Pris kr 4,809.2
År 2015
Maksimal opptakstemperatur C
Max Fan Noise dB
Anbefalt strømforsyning 625W
Benchmark CPU AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4200+ ($129.95)
CPU-innvirkning på FPS -38.9 FPS
CPU-innvirkning på FPS% -50.0%
Benchmark Quality Settings Ultra Quality Settings
Gjennomsnittlig 1080p ytelse 31.8 FPS
Gjennomsnittlig 1440p ytelse 23.6 FPS
Gjennomsnittlig 4K ytelse 13.9 FPS
Hukommelse 4 GB
1080p kostnad per ramme kr 151.2
1440p pris per ramme kr 203.8
4K pris per ramme kr 346.0
Serie R9 FURY
Variant AMD Radeon R9 FURY
Samlet kombinasjonspoeng 52/100 Akseptabel

Den gode nyheten er, med utgivelsen av R9 FURY X, får R9 FURY R9 FURY X mer rabatt. R9 FURY er mye dyrere enn R9 390 ettersom den koster en enorm kr 4809.2. Sammenlign dette med R9 390, AMD Radeon R9 390X, som opprinnelig kom til en pris av kr 2882, kr 3758. I mellomtiden er NVIDIA nærmeste ekvivalente kort GTX 980 som koster kr 4809.2.

Dessverre var ikke spillytelsen like imponerende. Selv om R9 FURY konsekvent leverer bildefrekvensøkning over R9 390, AMD Radeon R9 390X, er gevinsten ikke mye som rettferdiggjør en oppgradering. Om det er en forsvarlig oppgradering avhenger av hvilket grafikkort du oppgraderer fra. Brukere med R9 390, AMD Radeon R9 390X vil ikke se en bemerkelsesverdig økning i bildefrekvensen etter å ha betalt mer for denne R9 FURY. Tilsvarende vil de som holder på GTX 980 's GTX 780 grafikkort ikke ha en grunn til å hoppe lag ennå.

For 1080p Full HD kunne vi spille GreedFall, Final Fantasy XV, F1 2019, Far Cry New Dawn, Apex Legends på 61 fps til 72 fps og holdt bildefrekvensene svevet rundt 67 fps. For 1440p Quad HD kunne vi spille Strange Brigade, World War Z, Battlefield V, Fallout 76 på 61 fps til 72 fps og holdt bildefrekvensene svevet rundt 67 fps.

Assassin's Creed Odyssey (2018)

Ultra kvalitet

Vedtak 1920x1080

År Grafikkort Pris Bilder per sekund
2018 AMD Radeon RX 590 kr 2,444
43.5 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 580 kr 2,006
39.3 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 FURY X kr 5,685
39.0 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 FURY kr 4,809
11.7 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 Nano kr 5,685
37.0 FPS
2014 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 kr 4,809
35.0 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 390X kr 3,758
34.0 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB kr 2,225
34.0 FPS
2016 AMD Radeon RX 480 kr 3,504
33.0 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB kr 1,489
32.3 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti kr 6,123
28.5 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 570 kr 1,480
27.2 FPS
2014 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 kr 2,882
26.7 FPS
2016 AMD Radeon RX 470 kr 1,568
26.0 FPS

R9 FURY sitter mellom R9 FURY X og R9 Nano og faller langsommere enn R9 FURY X med 2.6 % og raskere enn R9 Nano med 2.7 %. Det har en sterk relativ ytelse mot hvert grafikkort her. Resultatene kan faktisk ikke skilles fra R9 FURY X . Mot sin rival - GTX 980 , er R9 FURY mye tregere. Det er en stor margin i ytelsen når du sammenligner R9 FURY mot R9 FURY X .

Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018)

Ultra kvalitet

Vedtak 1920x1080

År Grafikkort Pris Bilder per sekund
2018 AMD Radeon RX 590 kr 2,444
71.9 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 580 kr 2,006
64.9 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 390X kr 3,758
56.0 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 FURY X kr 5,685
56.0 FPS
2016 AMD Radeon RX 480 kr 3,504
54.0 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 570 kr 1,480
52.0 FPS
2014 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 kr 4,809
52.0 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 FURY kr 4,809
15.7 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 Nano kr 5,685
50.0 FPS
2016 AMD Radeon RX 470 kr 1,568
48.0 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB kr 2,225
46.8 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB kr 1,489
44.4 FPS
2014 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 kr 2,882
43.6 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti kr 6,123
37.9 FPS

R9 FURY sitter mellom GTX 980 og R9 Nano og faller langsommere enn GTX 980 med 2 % og raskere enn R9 Nano med 2 %. Det har en gjennomsnittlig relativ ytelse mot hvert grafikkort her. Resultatene kan faktisk ikke skilles fra GTX 980 . Mot sin rival - GTX 980 , er R9 FURY mye tregere. Det er en stor margin i ytelsen når du sammenligner R9 FURY mot R9 FURY X .

Battlefield V (2018)

Ultra kvalitet

Vedtak 1920x1080

År Grafikkort Pris Bilder per sekund
2018 AMD Radeon RX 590 kr 2,444
103.5 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 580 kr 2,006
93.5 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 FURY X kr 5,685
86.0 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 FURY kr 4,809
25.6 FPS
2014 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 kr 4,809
73.0 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 390X kr 3,758
71.0 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 570 kr 1,480
71.0 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB kr 2,225
68.4 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 Nano kr 5,685
65.0 FPS
2016 AMD Radeon RX 480 kr 3,504
65.0 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB kr 1,489
64.9 FPS
2016 AMD Radeon RX 470 kr 1,568
62.0 FPS
2014 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 kr 2,882
60.4 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti kr 6,123
50.4 FPS

R9 FURY sitter mellom R9 FURY X og GTX 980 og faller langsommere enn R9 FURY X med 3.6 % og raskere enn GTX 980 med 13.7 %. Det har en sterk relativ ytelse mot hvert grafikkort her. Mot sin rival - GTX 980 , er R9 FURY mye tregere. Det er en stor margin i ytelsen når du sammenligner R9 FURY mot R9 FURY X .

Spillytelse ved Ultra kvalitet innstillinger

Endre kvalitetsinnstillinger

Vedtak 1920x1080

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
År Spill Bilder per sekund
2019 Apex Legends
6
22.2
2019 Anthem
4
14.3
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
6
21.0
2019 Resident Evil 2
7
25.6
2019 Metro Exodus
3
11.4
2019 World War Z
8
28.0
2019 Gears of War 5
5
16.6
2019 F1 2019
6
20.9
2019 GreedFall
5
18.8
2019 Borderlands 3
4
13.2
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
8
26.2
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
3
11.7
2018 Final Fantasy XV
6
20.0
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
4
15.7
2018 Just Cause 4
5
16.5
2018 Monster Hunter: World
5
17.8
2018 Strange Brigade
8
26.8
2018 Battlefield V
7
25.6
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
5
16.9
2017 Destiny 2
9
32.4
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
7
22.9
2017 For Honor
9
30.5
2017 Project CARS 2
6
21.6
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
8
26.2
2016 Dishonored 2
4
15.7
2015 Rocket League
27
88.9
2015 Need For Speed
7
24.6
2015 Project CARS
7
23.6
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
13
43.2
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
18
60.9
2009 League of Legends
35
114.3

Vedtak 2560x1440

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
År Spill Bilder per sekund
2019 Apex Legends
5
16.5
2019 Anthem
3
11.3
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
5
16.3
2019 Resident Evil 2
5
17.3
2019 Metro Exodus
2
8.9
2019 World War Z
6
20.5
2019 Gears of War 5
3
12.0
2019 F1 2019
4
14.8
2019 GreedFall
4
13.6
2019 Borderlands 3
2
9.3
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
4
15.4
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
2
9.2
2018 Final Fantasy XV
4
14.2
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
3
11.1
2018 Fallout 76
6
22.2
2018 Just Cause 4
3
12.2
2018 Monster Hunter: World
3
12.5
2018 Strange Brigade
5
18.7
2018 Battlefield V
6
20.6
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
4
13.6
2017 Destiny 2
8
27.7
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
5
16.5
2017 For Honor
5
17.8
2017 Project CARS 2
4
15.2
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
7
23.6
2016 Dishonored 2
4
13.5
2015 Rocket League
11
38.1
2015 Need For Speed
5
19.0
2015 Project CARS
5
18.0
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
8
27.9
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
15
50.8
2009 League of Legends
19
63.5

Vedtak 3840x2160

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
År Spill Bilder per sekund
2019 Apex Legends
3
9.9
2019 Anthem
1
6.2
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
2
8.6
2019 Resident Evil 2
2
8.5
2019 Metro Exodus
1
5.6
2019 World War Z
3
11.8
2019 Gears of War 5
2
7.6
2019 F1 2019
2
9.4
2019 GreedFall
1
5.6
2019 Borderlands 3
1
4.8
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
3
10.5
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
2
6.5
2018 Final Fantasy XV
2
8.3
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
1
5.5
2018 Fallout 76
3
12.3
2018 Just Cause 4
1
6.3
2018 Monster Hunter: World
1
6.0
2018 Strange Brigade
3
10.2
2018 Battlefield V
2
8.0
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
2
8.6
2017 Destiny 2
4
13.9
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
3
11.4
2017 For Honor
2
8.9
2017 Project CARS 2
3
12.7
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
6
19.8
2016 Dishonored 2
3
10.7
2015 Rocket League
5
17.8
2015 Need For Speed
3
12.7
2015 Project CARS
3
12.7
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
3
12.9
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
14
45.7
2009 League of Legends
7
25.4
R9 FURY with Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4200+ at 1080p and Ultra kvalitet settings

Sammenlign mot konkurrenter

R9 FURY Spesifikasjoner

R9 FURY Board Design

Board NumberC88003
Outputs1x HDMI3x DisplayPort
Power Connectors2x 8-pin
Slot WidthDual-slot
TDP275 W

R9 FURY Clock Speeds

GPU Clock1000 MHz
Memory Clock500 MHz 1000 MHz effective

R9 FURY Graphics Card

Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16
GenerationPirate Islands (R9 300)
Launch Price549 USD
ProductionActive
Release DateJul 10th, 2015

R9 FURY Graphics Features

DirectX12.0 (12_0)
OpenCL2
OpenGL4.5
Shader Model6
Vulkan1.1.82

R9 FURY Graphics Processor

ArchitectureGCN 3.0
Die Size596 mm²
GPU NameFiji
GPU VariantFiji PRO CB (215-0862046)
Process Size28 nm
Transistors8,900 million

R9 FURY Memory

Bandwidth512.0 GB/s
Memory Bus4096 bit
Memory Size4096 MB
Memory TypeHBM

R9 FURY Render Config

Compute Units56
ROPs64
Shading Units3584
TMUs224

R9 FURY Theoretical Performance

FP16 (half) performance7,168 GFLOPS (1:1)
FP32 (float) performance7,168 GFLOPS
FP64 (double) performance448.0 GFLOPS (1:16)
Pixel Rate64.00 GPixel/s
Texture Rate224.0 GTexel/s

Critics Reviews

Conclusion. AMD is putting reviewers in a tough spot with Fury. On one hand, the Fiji GPU with HBM is a remarkable feat of engineering. HBM is only in its infancy, but the technology already shows ...
The AMD Radeon R9 Fury Nano is one of the most exciting graphics cards I’ve seen for years and, at only 6in long, it’s also one of the smallest. ... Verdict. AMD’s latest card is one of its ...
Conclusion: Fiji delivers, but also faces formidable competition. Unfortunately we are bringing you our Radeon R9 Fury X review a week late. AMD had limited samples ready for the release and only ...
Verdict. If AMD and Nvidia’s flagship cards are too expensive then the AMD Radeon R9 Fury is a good option for high-end gameplay. Be warned, though – its power consumption is high. ...
AMD Radeon R9 Fury: the Digital Foundry verdict If you're looking for the cheapest single-chip GPU that can run a good proportion of games well at 4K resolution, the Radeon R9 Fury is a quality ...
Last week, AMD lifted the veil in its Radeon R7 and R9 300 series of products and publicly demoed its latest flagship, the Radeon R9 Fury X, at a small venue adjacent to E3. While the Radeon R7 ...
The R9 Fury X's power consumption is a real achievement by AMD. Given what we had seen in the past by the Radeon R9 290X and R9 390X, we had just naturally assumed that the Fury X would use a lot ...
The AMD Radeon R9 Fury X also supports the Asynchronous Shader technology AMD talked about recently. Asynchronous Shaders are a feature of new or next-gen APIs like DirectX 12, Vulkan, and AMD’s ...
AMD's Radeon R9 Fury X is released today, introducing HBM memory for graphics cards. The new card is built around a watercooled Fiji GPU, which enabled AMD to design a very compact card that will fit into many small-form-factor cases. Gaming performance at 4K is good and roughly matches the GTX 980 Ti.
In our review of AMD’s Radeon R9 Fury, we discovered that the Fury X’s air-cooled sibling packs a performance punch that justifies its competitive price tag. In fact, it punishes Nvidia’s ...
Radeon R9 Fury X specs. The Fiji processor in the R9 Fury X is based on AMD's third generation GCN architecture, previously found in the R9 295/380, and codenamed Tonga.
While AMD introduced its highly anticipated Radeon R9 Fury X in June, we’re taking a deeper look at its power consumption and pump noise. Since we were able to procure our own retail board, we ...
The Fury X uses an all-new chunk of silicon dubbed Fiji, as opposed to the die in the Radeon R9 290X, which was called Hawaii. Fiji is the beefiest GPU AMD has ever crafted, and it sports a ...
AMD says the Fury X is a reference design only, though the air-cooled Radeon R9 Fury scheduled for a July 14 release will have vendor-customized designs available.
Catching up to the present, this month marks an important occasion for AMD with the launch of their new flagship GPU, Fiji, and the flagship video card based on it, the Radeon R9 Fury X.
AMD's Radeon R9 Fury X is released today, introducing HBM memory for graphics cards. The new card is built around a watercooled Fiji GPU, which enabled AMD to design a very compact card that will fit into many small-form-factor cases. Gaming performance at 4K is good and roughly matches the GTX 980 Ti.
A bit over two weeks ago AMD launched their new flagship video card, the Radeon R9 Fury X.Based on the company’s new Fiji GPU, the R9 Fury X brought with it significant performance improvements ...
AMD does find itself in a somewhat strange position, what with arming Radeon R9 390X and 390 with 8GB and all. Still, we just don’t think the flagship’s halved capacity is much of a handicap.
Reference AMD Radeon R9 Fury specs. ... Of course, as Fiji is AMD’s latest and greatest GPU, the Nitro R9 Fury also supports AMD’s latest and greatest software features, like FreeSync, Virtual ...

Diskusjon og kommentarer

Del dine kommentarer