RX Vega 56 品質 i7-7700K 設定で 超品質 のベンチマーク

これは、 RX Vega 56 1 秒あたり50-60 フレームで 1080p/1440p で AAA タイトルを再生することができます大幅に多くの可能なハイエンドカードであることは明らかである。 それは、 RX Vega 56 非常にパワー空腹カードであり、まともな電源ユニットを必要とすることは注目に値する。 メモリ RX Vega 56 の面では、の 8192 MB の RAM は、現代のゲームのための十分以上であり、任意のボトルネックを引き起こすことはありません。 要するに、パフォーマンスは例外的ですが、これはそこに 2017 最も強力な単一の GPU の一つであることは問題ありません。

 RX Vega 56 品質 i7-7700K 設定で 超品質 のベンチマーク
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
価格 ¥ 39,677.0
2017
最高記録温度 75C
最大ファンノイズ 55.2dB
推奨電源 560W
ベンチマーク CPU Intel Core i7-7700K @ 4.20GHz ($354.99)
FPS に対する CPU の影響 + 0.0 FPS
FPS% の CPU への影響 0.0%
ベンチマークの品質設定 Ultra Quality Settings
平均1080p のパフォーマンス 97.9 FPS
平均1440p パフォーマンス 73.4 FPS
平均4k パフォーマンス 43.5 FPS
メモリ 8 GB
1フレームあたり1080 pのコスト ¥ 461.2
1フレームあたり1440pのコスト ¥ 614.9
1フレームあたり4Kの費用 ¥ 1,036.6
シリーズ RX Vega 56
全体の組み合わせのスコア 81/100 たいへん良い

設定時の 超品質 ゲームパフォーマンス

品質設定の変更

解像 度 1920x1080

ゲーム 1秒あたりのフレーム数
2019 Apex Legends
116.6 FPS
2019 Anthem
67.6 FPS
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
99.1 FPS
2019 Resident Evil 2
118.5 FPS
2019 Metro Exodus
52.8 FPS
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
129.2 FPS
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
56.2 FPS
2018 Final Fantasy XV
76.3 FPS
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
85.7 FPS
2018 Forza Horizon 4
89.0 FPS
2018 Fallout 76
101.7 FPS
2018 Hitman 2
79.5 FPS
2018 Just Cause 4
76.3 FPS
2018 Monster Hunter: World
82.1 FPS
2018 Battlefield V
123.1 FPS
2017 Dawn of War III
100.9 FPS
2017 Ghost Recon Wildlands
68.4 FPS
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
57.2 FPS
2017 Destiny 2
126.2 FPS
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
71.0 FPS
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
89.0 FPS
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
105.5 FPS
2017 For Honor
140.7 FPS
2017 Project CARS 2
99.7 FPS
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
120.8 FPS
2016 Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
77.5 FPS
2016 Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
77.9 FPS
2016 Doom
180.3 FPS
2016 F1 2016
106.0 FPS
2016 Total War: Warhammer
97.9 FPS
2016 Battlefield 1
133.5 FPS
2016 Overwatch
138.0 FPS
2016 Dishonored 2
72.7 FPS
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
83.6 FPS
2015 Rocket League
410.6 FPS
2015 Need For Speed
113.9 FPS
2015 Project CARS
109.1 FPS
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
281.7 FPS
2009 League of Legends
528.0 FPS

解像 度 2560x1440

ゲーム 1秒あたりのフレーム数
2019 Apex Legends
86.9 FPS
2019 Anthem
53.6 FPS
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
76.9 FPS
2019 Resident Evil 2
79.9 FPS
2019 Metro Exodus
41.0 FPS
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
81.5 FPS
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
36.1 FPS
2018 Final Fantasy XV
54.2 FPS
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
57.2 FPS
2018 Forza Horizon 4
75.1 FPS
2018 Fallout 76
86.9 FPS
2018 Hitman 2
51.9 FPS
2018 Just Cause 4
56.3 FPS
2018 Monster Hunter: World
57.4 FPS
2018 Battlefield V
91.1 FPS
2017 Dawn of War III
89.4 FPS
2017 Ghost Recon Wildlands
61.0 FPS
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
51.9 FPS
2017 Destiny 2
108.1 FPS
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
54.2 FPS
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
57.8 FPS
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
76.3 FPS
2017 For Honor
82.1 FPS
2017 Project CARS 2
70.3 FPS
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
109.1 FPS
2016 Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
52.5 FPS
2016 Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
64.3 FPS
2016 Doom
124.9 FPS
2016 F1 2016
95.2 FPS
2016 Total War: Warhammer
72.6 FPS
2016 Battlefield 1
100.3 FPS
2016 Overwatch
94.9 FPS
2016 Dishonored 2
62.1 FPS
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
58.0 FPS
2015 Rocket League
176.0 FPS
2015 Need For Speed
88.0 FPS
2015 Project CARS
83.3 FPS
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
234.7 FPS
2009 League of Legends
293.3 FPS

解像 度 3840x2160

ゲーム 1秒あたりのフレーム数
2019 Apex Legends
46.6 FPS
2019 Anthem
29.2 FPS
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
40.8 FPS
2019 Resident Evil 2
39.4 FPS
2019 Metro Exodus
25.9 FPS
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
34.9 FPS
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
25.5 FPS
2018 Final Fantasy XV
31.7 FPS
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
29.7 FPS
2018 Forza Horizon 4
49.8 FPS
2018 Fallout 76
47.6 FPS
2018 Hitman 2
30.8 FPS
2018 Just Cause 4
29.4 FPS
2018 Monster Hunter: World
27.5 FPS
2018 Battlefield V
49.8 FPS
2017 Dawn of War III
45.6 FPS
2017 Ghost Recon Wildlands
36.7 FPS
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
33.9 FPS
2017 Destiny 2
54.2 FPS
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
30.8 FPS
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
31.2 FPS
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
52.8 FPS
2017 For Honor
41.0 FPS
2017 Project CARS 2
58.7 FPS
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
91.4 FPS
2016 Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
27.5 FPS
2016 Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
55.1 FPS
2016 Doom
65.7 FPS
2016 F1 2016
60.0 FPS
2016 Total War: Warhammer
41.4 FPS
2016 Battlefield 1
56.6 FPS
2016 Overwatch
49.0 FPS
2016 Dishonored 2
49.3 FPS
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
30.3 FPS
2015 Rocket League
82.1 FPS
2015 Need For Speed
58.7 FPS
2015 Project CARS
58.7 FPS
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
211.2 FPS
2009 League of Legends
117.3 FPS

RX Vega 56 仕様

RX Vega 56 Board Design

Board NumberD050-03
Length10.5 inches 267 mm
Outputs1x HDMI3x DisplayPort
Power Connectors2x 8-pin
Slot WidthDual-slot
TDP210 W

RX Vega 56 Clock Speeds

Boost Clock1474 MHz
GPU Clock1138 MHz
Memory Clock800 MHz 1600 MHz effective

RX Vega 56 Graphics Card

Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16
GenerationVega (RX Vega)
Launch Price399 USD
ProductionActive
Release DateAug 14th, 2017

RX Vega 56 Graphics Features

DirectX12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL2
OpenGL4.6
Shader Model6.1
Vulkan1.1.82

RX Vega 56 Graphics Processor

ArchitectureGCN 5.0
Die Size510 mm²
GPU NameVega 10
GPU VariantVega 10 XL (215-0894216)
Process Size14 nm
Transistors12,500 million

RX Vega 56 Memory

Bandwidth409.6 GB/s
Memory Bus2048 bit
Memory Size8192 MB
Memory TypeHBM2

RX Vega 56 Render Config

Compute Units56
ROPs64
Shading Units3584
TMUs224

RX Vega 56 Theoretical Performance

FP16 (half) performance21,131 GFLOPS (2:1)
FP32 (float) performance10,566 GFLOPS
FP64 (double) performance660.4 GFLOPS (1:16)
Pixel Rate94.34 GPixel/s
Texture Rate330.2 GTexel/s

Critics Reviews

• See the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 at Best Buy The Verdict If this were two separate reviews the Vega 56 would get a higher score than the Vega 64, but since it's one review I'm labeling both of ...
Conclusion. Radeon RX Vega 56 is a close derivative of Vega 64, so its behaviors largely carry over from AMD’s flagship. The company does cut this card’s board power rating by almost 30% ...
Years in development, the new Radeon RX Vega line is finally arriving - AMD's return to the higher-end of GPU performance after concentrating its efforts more on the mainstream and budget sectors ...
Similar to AMD's Radeon RX Vega 64, the Vega 56 offers two BIOSes with corresponding power profiles that can be selected using a switch on the card. If you don't change the driver-based profiles ...
Perhaps the most telling comparison, however, is that despite the 20 percent price reduction compared to the RX Vega 64, the RX Vega 56 is slower by less than 10 percent on average.
Radeon RX Vega 56 is the second AMD Vega card launched today. It comes at an affordable 9 price point, with a slightly reduced shader count that actually improves things greatly. For example, power efficiency now trades blows with some Pascal cards, which means less heat and noise, too.
On the AMD side of things, it is the AMD Radeon RX 480, or that card's successors, the Radeon RX 580 and Radeon RX 570. Therefore, the Vega 56 should be more than adequate for today's VR ...
Conclusion (RX Vega 56) The Radeon RX Vega 56 is easily the best card of this launch. It is cooler, quieter, and more efficient than the Radeon RX Vega 64 and delivers only 10 percent less ...
The AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 is the little sister of Vega 64. It comes in at a 20% lower price than the RX Vega 64, but only has 12.5% fewer stream processors, and runs lower operating frequencies.
Meet Radeon RX Vega 56 and RX Vega 64 Brad Chacos/IDG AMD sent PCWorld every version of Vega for testing, including both the air-cooled and liquid-cooled versions of the Radeon RX Vega 64.
The AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 is an upper mid-range graphics card, intended to beat Nvidia's GeForce GTX 1070 - a job it performs admirably as the benchmarks on this page demonstrate.
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 - the Digital Foundry verdict. If you're looking for an alternative to the GTX 1070, the bottom line is that you're generally getting around 10 to 12 per cent of additional ...
The Radeon RX Vega 56 is a high-end graphics card by AMD, launched in August 2017. Built on the 14 nm process, and based on the Vega 10 graphics processor, in its Vega 10 XL variant, the card supports DirectX 12.0.
Launching today is the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64, or just Vega 64 for short. Based on a fully enabled Vega 10 GPU, the Vega 64 will come in two physical variants: air cooled and liquid cooled.
Radeon RX Vega 56 utilizes the same Vega 10 processor found in Vega 64. It’s a 486 mm² behemoth sporting 12.5 billion transistors manufactured on GlobalFoundries’ 14LPP platform.
Vega 56 vs GTX 1070, Vega goes 6-2-2 = Winner Vega! Good job AMD, hopefully next gen you can make more headway in power efficiency. But this is a good card, even beats the factory OC 1070.
The AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 and Vega 64 preview. ... so thanks AMD! RX Vega vs. the World: a 15-round heavyweight battle ... The RX Vega 56 is the more compelling choice, given the lower price and ...

議論とコメント

あなたのコメントを共有する
P
periodiccholly 3 months ago
Rx580 or vega 56 or gtx 1070
I will buy a new gaming pc in march with a ryzen 7 2700, but i dont know which graphics card should i buy. In my country i can get the rx 580 around 120k ft, the vega 56 around 185k ft, and a gtx 1070 about 150-160k ft. Which should I buy? I already have my monitor, it supports freesync. (75hz, 1080x2560 resolution)
0 0
H
hankessay 3 months ago


If you want to use freesync you would have to go for either of the amd cards. you could get a vega 56 but its a pricey and can draw quite a lot of power than a 1070, which give almost similar performance which run much cooler with a third party cooler.

So you would be good with the gtx 1070 and save some bucks for some of performance and there are cases where the gtx 1070 outperforms the vega 56,and you could overclock it to get vega like performance but or if that isn't the case you don't mind the extra power draw and heat, and want to make use of the free sync you can surely go for the vega 56. The rx 580 doesn't come anywhere these two so it is out if the question.

Check this link out for comparison of two cards at stock and overclocked- http://blog.logicalincrements.com/2017/08/rx-vega-56-vs-gtx-1070-gtx-1080/
0 0
H
hoodenfood 3 months ago
Should I buy the RX Vega 56 over the GTX 1070?
I'll be building a new rig in a few weeks. For a few days, I've been having trouble deciding on which graphics card I want to get. For a while, I was decided that I'd go with the 1070, but then I realized that Vega 56 performs just as well or better while offering Freesync, which my monitor does offer. For some reason, I still can't decide whether or not I should go for the Vega 56. Should I?
0 0
D
debugkenzi 3 months ago
On much smaller case blower type cooler is better due to heat being dump outside the case directly. But on much bigger case "open air" cooler usually end up being better. Also noise. Those blower type cooler can be very loud when the fan speed start ramping up.
0 0