R9 285 con i7-4770K parametri di riferimento Qualità ultra a impostazioni di qualità

Con la 2048 RAM corrente MB, R9 285 il può avere seri colli di bottiglia relativi alla memoria nei giochi più moderni. Questa combinazione tra R9 285 e Intel Core i7-4770K @ 3.50GHz ha meno di 8% di collo di bottiglia in molti giochi ed è perfetta corrispondenza per evitare la perdita di fps. Questa combinazione tra R9 285 ed Intel Core i7-4770K @ 3.50GHz è una partita perfetta per evitare la perdita di fps. Con la 2048 RAM corrente MB, R9 285 il può avere pochissimi colli di bottiglia relativi alla memoria nei giochi più moderni.

 R9 285 con i7-4770K parametri di riferimento Qualità ultra a impostazioni di qualità
AMD Radeon R9 285
Prezzo € 334.4
Anno 2014
Temperatura massima registrata 70C
Massimo rumore del ventilatore 48.3dB
Alimentatore raccomandato 540W
Benchmark CPU Intel Core i7-4770K @ 3.50GHz ($284.99)
Impatto della CPU su FPS + 0.0 FPS
Impatto della CPU sull'FPS% 0.0%
Impostazioni di qualità benchmark Ultra Quality Settings
Prestazioni medie 1080p 42.3 FPS
Prestazioni 1440p medie 30.5 FPS
Prestazioni medie 4K 17.2 FPS
Memoria 2 GB
Costo 1080p per fotogramma € 5.2
Costo 1440 per frame € 7.2
Costo 4K per frame € 12.7
Serie R9 285
Variant AMD Radeon R9 285
Punteggio complessivo combinazione 57/100 Accettabile

Il R9 295X2 potrebbe essere il extreme fiore all'occhiello dell'ultimo set di schede grafiche GCN 3.0, ma i loro prezzi li tengono fuori dalla portata della maggior parte dei gamer di high-end PC. D'altra parte, il R9 285 è più vicino ad essere ragionevolmente conveniente ad un prezzo di € 219.1. AMD carte xx85 sono sempre state definite dai prezzi di high-end con prestazioni che extreme alla porta delle schede grafiche extreme, specialmente se overcloccate. Dopo aver dedicato del tempo a testare completamente la GCN 3.0 scheda grafica all'interno del R9 285, possiamo dire senza dubbio che continua la tendenza.

Forza Horizon 4 (2018)

Qualità ultra

Risoluzione 1920x1080

Anno Scheda grafica Prezzo FotoGrammi al secondo
2013 AMD Radeon R9 290 € 351
53.0 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 570 € 149
52.0 FPS
2016 AMD Radeon RX 470 € 158
45.0 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 € 571
41.0 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 380X € 202
40.0 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 380 € 175
38.0 FPS
2015 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 € 175
38.0 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti € 149
37.2 FPS
2012 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 € 439
37.0 FPS
2012 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 € 351
35.0 FPS
2014 AMD Radeon R9 285 € 219
32.0 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 € 219
31.5 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 € 351
30.4 FPS
2014 AMD Radeon R9 280 € 246
29.0 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 560 € 87
29.0 FPS
2015 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 € 140
28.4 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R7 370 € 131
25.0 FPS
2012 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 € 202
23.4 FPS
2016 AMD Radeon RX 460 € 123
23.0 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 550 € 70
17.0 FPS

Il R9 285 si trova tra il GTX 670 e il GTX 760 , cadendo più lento di GTX 670 da 9.4 % e più veloce di GTX 760 da 1.6 %. Ha una prestazione relativa media rispetto a tutte le schede grafiche qui. Contro il suo rivale - il GTX 960 , il R9 285 è molto più lento.

PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (2017)

Qualità ultra

Risoluzione 1920x1080

Anno Scheda grafica Prezzo FotoGrammi al secondo
2014 AMD Radeon R9 285 € 219
48.0 FPS
2013 AMD Radeon R9 290 € 351
43.0 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 570 € 149
43.0 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 € 571
43.0 FPS
2016 AMD Radeon RX 470 € 158
41.0 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 € 219
39.6 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R7 370 € 131
37.0 FPS
2015 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 € 140
34.0 FPS
2011 AMD Radeon HD 7970 € 483
32.0 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 380 € 175
32.0 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 380X € 202
32.0 FPS
2012 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 € 439
32.0 FPS
2012 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 € 351
31.0 FPS
2015 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 € 175
31.0 FPS
2014 AMD Radeon R9 280 € 246
30.0 FPS
2014 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti € 131
30.0 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti € 149
27.6 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 € 351
26.4 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 560 € 87
23.0 FPS
2012 AMD Radeon HD 7850 € 219
21.0 FPS
2016 AMD Radeon RX 460 € 123
20.0 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 550 € 70
16.1 FPS
2012 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 € 202
13.5 FPS

Prestazioni del gioco Qualità ultra alle impostazioni

Modificare le impostazioni di qualità

Risoluzione 1920x1080

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
Anno Gioco FotoGrammi al secondo
2019 Apex Legends
32
36.0
2019 Anthem
20
23.2
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
30
34.0
2019 Resident Evil 2
42
47.1
2019 Metro Exodus
18
21.0
2019 World War Z
43
48.0
2019 Gears of War 5
27
30.5
2019 F1 2019
34
38.3
2019 GreedFall
31
34.5
2019 Borderlands 3
21
24.2
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
41
46.6
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
16
17.9
2018 Forza Horizon 4
28
32.0
2018 Fallout 76
32
36.0
2018 Hitman 2
25
28.0
2018 Just Cause 4
27
30.3
2018 Monster Hunter: World
29
32.6
2018 Strange Brigade
44
49.2
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
43
48.0
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
28
31.5
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
37
41.9
2017 For Honor
50
55.9
2017 Project CARS 2
35
39.6
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
43
48.0
2016 Overwatch
44
49.0
2016 Dishonored 2
26
28.9
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
32
35.7
2015 Total War: Attila
28
32.1
2015 Rocket League
146
163.1
2015 Need For Speed
40
45.2
2015 Project CARS
38
43.3
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
71
79.2
2014 Civilization: Beyond Earth
66
74.2
2014 Dragon Age: Inquisition
46
52.0
2014 Far Cry 4
43
48.5
2014 GRID Autosport
62
69.2
2014 Shadow of Mordor
42
46.8
2014 The Talos Principle
54
60.3
2013 Crysis 3
36
40.6
2013 Battlefield 4
41
45.8
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
100
111.8
2009 League of Legends
188
209.7

Risoluzione 2560x1440

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
Anno Gioco FotoGrammi al secondo
2019 Apex Legends
21
26.8
2019 Anthem
14
18.4
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
21
26.4
2019 Resident Evil 2
25
31.7
2019 Metro Exodus
13
16.3
2019 World War Z
28
35.0
2019 Gears of War 5
17
22.1
2019 F1 2019
21
27.1
2019 GreedFall
19
24.9
2019 Borderlands 3
13
17.0
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
26
33.6
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
11
14.7
2018 Forza Horizon 4
21
27.0
2018 Hitman 2
14
18.0
2018 Just Cause 4
17
22.4
2018 Monster Hunter: World
18
22.8
2018 Strange Brigade
27
34.3
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
29
37.0
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
16
20.3
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
24
30.3
2017 For Honor
26
32.6
2017 Project CARS 2
22
28.0
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
34
43.3
2016 Overwatch
26
33.6
2016 Dishonored 2
19
24.7
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
17
21.3
2015 Total War: Attila
17
21.3
2015 Rocket League
55
69.9
2015 Need For Speed
28
35.0
2015 Project CARS
26
33.1
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
41
51.3
2014 Civilization: Beyond Earth
44
55.7
2014 Dragon Age: Inquisition
27
34.3
2014 Far Cry 4
27
34.6
2014 GRID Autosport
40
50.4
2014 Shadow of Mordor
25
32.0
2014 The Talos Principle
34
42.9
2013 Crysis 3
27
34.7
2013 Battlefield 4
23
29.5
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
74
93.2
2009 League of Legends
93
116.5

Risoluzione 3840x2160

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
Anno Gioco FotoGrammi al secondo
2019 Apex Legends
11
16.0
2019 Anthem
7
10.0
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
9
14.0
2019 Resident Evil 2
10
15.6
2019 Metro Exodus
7
10.3
2019 World War Z
14
20.2
2019 Gears of War 5
9
14.0
2019 F1 2019
12
17.2
2019 GreedFall
7
10.3
2019 Borderlands 3
6
8.9
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
14
20.0
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
6
9.3
2018 Forza Horizon 4
12
18.0
2018 Hitman 2
7
11.0
2018 Just Cause 4
8
11.7
2018 Monster Hunter: World
7
11.0
2018 Strange Brigade
13
18.6
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
14
21.0
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
7
11.2
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
14
21.0
2017 For Honor
11
16.3
2017 Project CARS 2
16
23.3
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
25
36.3
2016 Overwatch
12
17.5
2016 Dishonored 2
13
19.6
2015 Rocket League
22
32.6
2015 Need For Speed
16
23.3
2015 Project CARS
16
23.3
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
16
23.8
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
58
83.9
2009 League of Legends
32
46.6
R9 285 with i7-4770K at 1080p and Qualità ultra settings

Confronta contro i concorrenti

R9 285 Specifiche

R9 285 Board Design

Board NumberC766
Length8.7 inches 221 mm
Outputs2x DVI1x HDMI1x DisplayPort
Power Connectors2x 6-pin
Slot WidthDual-slot
TDP190 W

R9 285 Clock Speeds

GPU Clock918 MHz
Memory Clock1375 MHz 5500 MHz effective

R9 285 Graphics Card

Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16
GenerationVolcanic Islands (R9 200)
Launch Price249 USD
ProductionEnd-of-life
Release DateSep 2nd, 2014

R9 285 Graphics Features

DirectX12.0 (12_0)
OpenCL2
OpenGL4.5
Shader Model6
Vulkan1.1.82

R9 285 Graphics Processor

ArchitectureGCN 3.0
Die Size366 mm²
GPU NameTonga
GPU VariantTonga PRO (215-0851128)
Process Size28 nm
Transistors5,000 million

R9 285 Memory

Bandwidth176.0 GB/s
Memory Bus256 bit
Memory Size2048 MB
Memory TypeGDDR5

R9 285 Render Config

Compute Units28
ROPs32
Shading Units1792
TMUs112

R9 285 Theoretical Performance

FP16 (half) performance3,290 GFLOPS (1:1)
FP32 (float) performance3,290 GFLOPS
FP64 (double) performance205.6 GFLOPS (1:16)
Pixel Rate29.38 GPixel/s
Texture Rate102.8 GTexel/s

Critics Reviews

AMD's 9 Radeon R9 285 delivers modern features (such as support for TrueAudio and FreeSync) found on other AMD cards, and performance that edges out Nvidia's GeForce GTX 760.
AMD's 9 Radeon R9 285 delivers modern features (such as support for TrueAudio and FreeSync) found on other AMD cards, and performance that edges out Nvidia's GeForce GTX 760.
Having said that, the Radeon R9 285 is a wonderful option at 0 and probably represents the best product a gamer can buy for that price, just as the Radeon R9 280 did.
AMD’s reference specifications call for up to a 918MHz engine clock for the Radeon R9 285 with 1375MHz memory (5.5 Gbps effective). The specifications list 2GB of on-board memory, but 4GB ...
The R9 285 starts slightly behind the GTX 760 in Battlefield 4 and the R9 280 is also ahead by a few fps. The new card also only manages to be 1fps faster than the R9 270X at both resolutions tested.
AMD Radeon R9 285: Other Benchmarks Fire Strike is 3D Mark’s toughest graphics benchmark, and in this test the R9 285 scored 6,744 points. That’s better than the 5,905 scored by the R9 280 ...
The Radeon R9 285 is indeed a new piece of silicon, code-named "Tonga." What's newest about it: It brings with it the features of other recent AMD cards, such as TrueAudio and support for multi ...
Last month AMD held their 30 years of graphics celebration, during which they announced their next Radeon video card, the Radeon R9 285. Designed to be AMD’s new 9 midrange enthusiast card ...
The R9 280 debuted with an MSRP of 9 and this is the exact price point that the R9 285 is arriving at, placing it directly between the R9 270X (0) and R9 280X (0). Given their similar ...
On paper, the new Tonga-based R9 285 looks to be slightly slower than the R9 280 it is intended to replace, but there's more than meets the eye. When we first heard about the new Radeon R9 285 ...
AMD Radeon R9 285 Review: Feat. Sapphire R9 285 Dual-X OC ... Power, Temperature, & Noise. As always, last but not least is our look at power, temperature, and noise. Next to price and performance ...
AMD Radeon R9 285: Under the Hood. The R9 285 is the only card to currently use the Tonga core. It’s a mid-range core, but it shares a crucial part of its architecture with AMD’s high-end 290 ...

Discussione e commenti

Condividi i tuoi commenti