RX Vega 56 dengan i7-7700K benchmark di Kualitas ultra pengaturan kualitas

Jelas bahwa RX Vega 56 secara signifikan lebih mampu high-end kartu yang dapat bermain AAA judul di 1080 p/1440 p dengan 50-60 frame per detik. It's worth dicatat bahwa RX Vega 56 adalah kartu sangat kuasa lapar dan membutuhkan kabel listrik layak. Dalam memori, RX Vega 56 's 8192 MB RAM lebih dari cukup untuk modern permainan dan tidak akan menyebabkan kemacetan yang ada. Singkatnya kinerja luar biasa, tidak ada pertanyaan bahwa ini adalah salah satu paling kuat satu GPU luar sana di 2017 .

 RX Vega 56 dengan i7-7700K benchmark di Kualitas ultra pengaturan kualitas
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
Harga ₨ 3,922,114.2
Tahun 2017
Maksimum tercatat suhu 75C
Suara kipas Max 55.2dB
Direkomendasikan Power Supply 560W
Patokan CPU Intel Core i7-7700K @ 4.20GHz ($354.99)
CPU dampak pada FPS + 0.0 FPS
CPU dampak pada FPS % 0.0%
Pengaturan kualitas patokan Ultra Quality Settings
Rata-rata 1080p kinerja 100.2 FPS
Rata-rata 1440p kinerja 74.2 FPS
Rata-rata 4K kinerja 43.2 FPS
Memori 8 GB
Biaya 1080p Per Bingkai ₨ 58,029.8
Biaya 1440p Per Bingkai ₨ 78,442.3
Biaya 4K Per Bingkai ₨ 134,722.4
Seri RX Vega 56
Variant AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
Keseluruhan kombinasi Skor 81/100 Sangat baik

RX Vega 64 mungkin menjadi flagship high-end dari set GCN 5.0 kartu grafis terbaru, tetapi harganya membuat mereka jauh dari jangkauan sebagian besar mid-range gamer PC. Di sisi lain, RX Vega 56 lebih dekat untuk terjangkau dengan label ₨ 5817559.7. AMD 's xx56 kartu selalu ditentukan oleh harga mid-range dengan kinerja yang mengetuk pintu high-end kartu grafis - terutama ketika overclock. Setelah meluangkan waktu untuk menguji sepenuhnya kartu grafis GCN 5.0 di dalam RX Vega 56, kita dapat mengatakan tanpa ragu bahwa itu melanjutkan tren.

Untuk 1080p Full HD, kami dapat memainkan Borderlands 3, Anthem, Final Fantasy XV, Just Cause 4, Gears of War 5 di 63 fps hingga 79 fps dan menjaga frame rate tetap di sekitar 72 fps. Untuk 1440p Quad HD, kami dapat memainkan GreedFall, F1 2019, Forza Horizon 4, Far Cry New Dawn, Resident Evil 2 di 65 fps hingga 80 fps dan menjaga frame rate tetap di sekitar 73 fps.

Assassin's Creed Odyssey (2018)

Kualitas ultra

Resolusi 1920x1080

Tahun Kartu grafis Harga Frame Per detik
2019 AMD Radeon RX 5700 ₨ 5,088,542
63.0 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 ₨ 7,275,595
59.8 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 ₨ 7,275,595
57.0 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 ₨ 5,817,560
56.2 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 ₨ 5,103,123
54.4 FPS
2017 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti ₨ 5,963,363
53.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti ₨ 4,067,918
50.3 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 ₨ 5,817,560
47.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 ₨ 3,207,677
44.3 FPS
2018 AMD Radeon RX 590 ₨ 4,067,918
43.5 FPS

RX Vega 56 berada di antara RX Vega 64 dan RTX 2060 , jatuh lebih lambat dari RX Vega 64 oleh 1.4 % dan lebih cepat dari RTX 2060 oleh 3.3 %. Ini memiliki kinerja relatif rata-rata terhadap setiap kartu grafis di sini. Kinerja RX Vega 56 dalam game ini berkisar sekitar 60fps. Hasilnya sebenarnya tidak bisa dibedakan dengan hasil dari RX Vega 64 . Ini adalah panggilan dekat antara RX Vega 56 dan rivalnya GTX 1070 Ti dengan selisih kecil.

Forza Horizon 4 (2018)

Kualitas ultra

Resolusi 1920x1080

Tahun Kartu grafis Harga Frame Per detik
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 ₨ 7,275,595
117.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 ₨ 5,103,123
111.1 FPS
2017 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti ₨ 5,963,363
105.0 FPS
2019 AMD Radeon RX 5700 ₨ 5,088,542
100.8 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti ₨ 4,067,918
99.8 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 ₨ 5,817,560
96.0 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 ₨ 7,275,595
91.0 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 ₨ 5,817,560
89.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 ₨ 3,207,677
87.8 FPS
2018 AMD Radeon RX 590 ₨ 4,067,918
75.5 FPS

RX Vega 56 berada di antara RX Vega 64 dan GTX 1660 , jatuh lebih lambat dari RX Vega 64 oleh 2.2 % dan lebih cepat dari GTX 1660 oleh 1.4 %. Ini memiliki kinerja relatif di bawah rata-rata terhadap setiap kartu grafis di sini. Hasilnya sebenarnya tidak bisa dibedakan dengan hasil dari RX Vega 64 . Terhadap saingannya - GTX 1070 Ti , RX Vega 56 jauh lebih lambat.

Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018)

Kualitas ultra

Resolusi 1920x1080

Tahun Kartu grafis Harga Frame Per detik
2019 AMD Radeon RX 5700 ₨ 5,088,542
99.8 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 ₨ 7,275,595
91.0 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 ₨ 7,275,595
90.0 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 ₨ 5,817,560
85.7 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 ₨ 5,103,123
85.7 FPS
2017 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti ₨ 5,963,363
84.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti ₨ 4,067,918
79.8 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 ₨ 5,817,560
74.0 FPS
2018 AMD Radeon RX 590 ₨ 4,067,918
71.9 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 ₨ 3,207,677
70.2 FPS

RX Vega 56 berada di antara RX Vega 64 dan RTX 2060 , jatuh lebih lambat dari RX Vega 64 oleh 5 % dan lebih cepat dari RTX 2060 oleh 0 %. Ini memiliki kinerja relatif rata-rata terhadap setiap kartu grafis di sini. Ini adalah panggilan dekat antara RX Vega 56 dan rivalnya GTX 1070 Ti dengan selisih kecil.

PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (2017)

Kualitas ultra

Resolusi 1920x1080

Tahun Kartu grafis Harga Frame Per detik
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 ₨ 7,275,595
95.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 ₨ 5,103,123
92.6 FPS
2017 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti ₨ 5,963,363
85.0 FPS
2019 AMD Radeon RX 5700 ₨ 5,088,542
80.8 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti ₨ 4,067,918
80.8 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 ₨ 5,817,560
80.0 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 ₨ 7,275,595
73.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 ₨ 3,207,677
71.1 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 ₨ 5,817,560
71.0 FPS
2018 AMD Radeon RX 590 ₨ 4,067,918
56.0 FPS

RX Vega 56 berada di antara GTX 1660 dan RX 590 , jatuh lebih lambat dari GTX 1660 oleh 0.1 % dan lebih cepat dari RX 590 oleh 26.8 %. Performanya relatif kurang baik dibandingkan sebagian besar kartu grafis di sini. Hasilnya sebenarnya tidak bisa dibedakan dengan hasil dari GTX 1660 . Terhadap saingannya - GTX 1070 Ti , RX Vega 56 jauh lebih lambat.

Battlefield V (2018)

Kualitas ultra

Resolusi 1920x1080

Tahun Kartu grafis Harga Frame Per detik
2019 AMD Radeon RX 5700 ₨ 5,088,542
137.6 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 ₨ 7,275,595
125.0 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 ₨ 5,817,560
123.1 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 ₨ 7,275,595
121.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 ₨ 5,103,123
114.6 FPS
2017 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti ₨ 5,963,363
111.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti ₨ 4,067,918
105.4 FPS
2018 AMD Radeon RX 590 ₨ 4,067,918
103.5 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 ₨ 5,817,560
99.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 ₨ 3,207,677
92.8 FPS

RX Vega 56 berada di antara RX Vega 64 dan GTX 1080 , jatuh lebih lambat dari RX Vega 64 oleh 1.5 % dan lebih cepat dari GTX 1080 oleh 1.7 %. Ini memiliki kinerja relatif yang kuat terhadap setiap kartu grafis di sini. Hasilnya sebenarnya tidak bisa dibedakan dengan hasil dari RX Vega 64 . Mereka yang memiliki monitor dengan kecepatan refresh tinggi akan menikmati apa yang ditawarkan RX Vega 56 karena rata 123.1 rata 123.1 fps. RX Vega 56 rata 123.1 rata 123.1 fps dalam , melampaui GTX 1070 Ti dengan selisih yang baik.

Permainan kinerja di Kualitas ultra pengaturan

Mengubah pengaturan kualitas

Resolusi 1920x1080

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
Tahun Permainan Frame Per detik
2019 Apex Legends
104
116.6
2019 Anthem
60
67.6
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
89
99.1
2019 Resident Evil 2
106
118.5
2019 Metro Exodus
47
52.8
2019 World War Z
111
124.0
2019 Gears of War 5
71
78.9
2019 F1 2019
89
99.1
2019 GreedFall
80
89.2
2019 Borderlands 3
56
62.7
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
116
129.2
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
50
56.2
2018 Final Fantasy XV
68
76.3
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
77
85.7
2018 Forza Horizon 4
80
89.0
2018 Fallout 76
91
101.7
2018 Hitman 2
71
79.5
2018 Just Cause 4
68
76.3
2018 Monster Hunter: World
73
82.1
2018 Strange Brigade
114
127.1
2018 Battlefield V
110
123.1
2017 Dawn of War III
90
100.9
2017 Ghost Recon Wildlands
61
68.4
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
51
57.2
2017 Destiny 2
113
126.2
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
63
71.0
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
80
89.0
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
94
105.5
2017 For Honor
126
140.7
2017 Project CARS 2
89
99.7
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
108
120.8
2016 Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
69
77.5
2016 Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
70
77.9
2016 Doom
162
180.3
2016 F1 2016
95
106.0
2016 Total War: Warhammer
88
97.9
2016 Battlefield 1
120
133.5
2016 Overwatch
124
138.0
2016 Dishonored 2
65
72.7
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
75
83.6
2015 Rocket League
369
410.6
2015 Need For Speed
102
113.9
2015 Project CARS
98
109.1
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
184
204.8
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
253
281.7
2009 League of Legends
475
528.0

Resolusi 2560x1440

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
Tahun Permainan Frame Per detik
2019 Apex Legends
69
86.9
2019 Anthem
42
53.6
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
61
76.9
2019 Resident Evil 2
63
79.9
2019 Metro Exodus
32
41.0
2019 World War Z
72
90.5
2019 Gears of War 5
45
57.2
2019 F1 2019
56
70.1
2019 GreedFall
51
64.5
2019 Borderlands 3
35
44.0
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
65
81.5
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
28
36.1
2018 Final Fantasy XV
43
54.2
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
45
57.2
2018 Forza Horizon 4
60
75.1
2018 Fallout 76
69
86.9
2018 Hitman 2
41
51.9
2018 Just Cause 4
45
56.3
2018 Monster Hunter: World
45
57.4
2018 Strange Brigade
70
88.6
2018 Battlefield V
72
91.1
2017 Dawn of War III
71
89.4
2017 Ghost Recon Wildlands
48
61.0
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
41
51.9
2017 Destiny 2
86
108.1
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
43
54.2
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
46
57.8
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
61
76.3
2017 For Honor
65
82.1
2017 Project CARS 2
56
70.3
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
87
109.1
2016 Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
42
52.5
2016 Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
51
64.3
2016 Doom
99
124.9
2016 F1 2016
76
95.2
2016 Total War: Warhammer
58
72.6
2016 Battlefield 1
80
100.3
2016 Overwatch
75
94.9
2016 Dishonored 2
49
62.1
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
46
58.0
2015 Rocket League
140
176.0
2015 Need For Speed
70
88.0
2015 Project CARS
66
83.3
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
106
132.6
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
187
234.7
2009 League of Legends
234
293.3

Resolusi 3840x2160

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
Tahun Permainan Frame Per detik
2019 Apex Legends
32
46.6
2019 Anthem
20
29.2
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
28
40.8
2019 Resident Evil 2
27
39.4
2019 Metro Exodus
18
25.9
2019 World War Z
36
52.1
2019 Gears of War 5
25
36.1
2019 F1 2019
31
44.6
2019 GreedFall
18
26.5
2019 Borderlands 3
16
22.9
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
24
34.9
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
17
25.5
2018 Final Fantasy XV
22
31.7
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
20
29.7
2018 Forza Horizon 4
34
49.8
2018 Fallout 76
33
47.6
2018 Hitman 2
21
30.8
2018 Just Cause 4
20
29.4
2018 Monster Hunter: World
19
27.5
2018 Strange Brigade
33
48.2
2018 Battlefield V
34
49.8
2017 Dawn of War III
31
45.6
2017 Ghost Recon Wildlands
25
36.7
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
23
33.9
2017 Destiny 2
37
54.2
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
21
30.8
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
21
31.2
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
36
52.8
2017 For Honor
28
41.0
2017 Project CARS 2
41
58.7
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
63
91.4
2016 Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
19
27.5
2016 Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
38
55.1
2016 Doom
45
65.7
2016 F1 2016
42
60.0
2016 Total War: Warhammer
28
41.4
2016 Battlefield 1
39
56.6
2016 Overwatch
34
49.0
2016 Dishonored 2
34
49.3
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
21
30.3
2015 Rocket League
57
82.1
2015 Need For Speed
41
58.7
2015 Project CARS
41
58.7
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
43
61.5
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
147
211.2
2009 League of Legends
82
117.3
RX Vega 56 with i7-7700K at 1080p and Kualitas ultra settings

RX Vega 56 Spesifikasi

RX Vega 56 Board Design

Board NumberD050-03
Length10.5 inches 267 mm
Outputs1x HDMI3x DisplayPort
Power Connectors2x 8-pin
Slot WidthDual-slot
TDP210 W

RX Vega 56 Clock Speeds

Boost Clock1474 MHz
GPU Clock1138 MHz
Memory Clock800 MHz 1600 MHz effective

RX Vega 56 Graphics Card

Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16
GenerationVega (RX Vega)
Launch Price399 USD
ProductionActive
Release DateAug 14th, 2017

RX Vega 56 Graphics Features

DirectX12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL2
OpenGL4.6
Shader Model6.1
Vulkan1.1.82

RX Vega 56 Graphics Processor

ArchitectureGCN 5.0
Die Size510 mm²
GPU NameVega 10
GPU VariantVega 10 XL (215-0894216)
Process Size14 nm
Transistors12,500 million

RX Vega 56 Memory

Bandwidth409.6 GB/s
Memory Bus2048 bit
Memory Size8192 MB
Memory TypeHBM2

RX Vega 56 Render Config

Compute Units56
ROPs64
Shading Units3584
TMUs224

RX Vega 56 Theoretical Performance

FP16 (half) performance21,131 GFLOPS (2:1)
FP32 (float) performance10,566 GFLOPS
FP64 (double) performance660.4 GFLOPS (1:16)
Pixel Rate94.34 GPixel/s
Texture Rate330.2 GTexel/s

Critics Reviews

• See the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 at Best Buy The Verdict If this were two separate reviews the Vega 56 would get a higher score than the Vega 64, but since it's one review I'm labeling both of ...
Conclusion. Radeon RX Vega 56 is a close derivative of Vega 64, so its behaviors largely carry over from AMD’s flagship. The company does cut this card’s board power rating by almost 30% ...
Years in development, the new Radeon RX Vega line is finally arriving - AMD's return to the higher-end of GPU performance after concentrating its efforts more on the mainstream and budget sectors ...
Similar to AMD's Radeon RX Vega 64, the Vega 56 offers two BIOSes with corresponding power profiles that can be selected using a switch on the card. If you don't change the driver-based profiles ...
Perhaps the most telling comparison, however, is that despite the 20 percent price reduction compared to the RX Vega 64, the RX Vega 56 is slower by less than 10 percent on average.
Radeon RX Vega 56 is the second AMD Vega card launched today. It comes at an affordable 9 price point, with a slightly reduced shader count that actually improves things greatly. For example, power efficiency now trades blows with some Pascal cards, which means less heat and noise, too.
On the AMD side of things, it is the AMD Radeon RX 480, or that card's successors, the Radeon RX 580 and Radeon RX 570. Therefore, the Vega 56 should be more than adequate for today's VR ...
Conclusion (RX Vega 56) The Radeon RX Vega 56 is easily the best card of this launch. It is cooler, quieter, and more efficient than the Radeon RX Vega 64 and delivers only 10 percent less ...
The AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 is the little sister of Vega 64. It comes in at a 20% lower price than the RX Vega 64, but only has 12.5% fewer stream processors, and runs lower operating frequencies.
Meet Radeon RX Vega 56 and RX Vega 64 Brad Chacos/IDG AMD sent PCWorld every version of Vega for testing, including both the air-cooled and liquid-cooled versions of the Radeon RX Vega 64.
The AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 is an upper mid-range graphics card, intended to beat Nvidia's GeForce GTX 1070 - a job it performs admirably as the benchmarks on this page demonstrate.
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 - the Digital Foundry verdict. If you're looking for an alternative to the GTX 1070, the bottom line is that you're generally getting around 10 to 12 per cent of additional ...
The Radeon RX Vega 56 is a high-end graphics card by AMD, launched in August 2017. Built on the 14 nm process, and based on the Vega 10 graphics processor, in its Vega 10 XL variant, the card supports DirectX 12.0.
Launching today is the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64, or just Vega 64 for short. Based on a fully enabled Vega 10 GPU, the Vega 64 will come in two physical variants: air cooled and liquid cooled.
Radeon RX Vega 56 utilizes the same Vega 10 processor found in Vega 64. It’s a 486 mm² behemoth sporting 12.5 billion transistors manufactured on GlobalFoundries’ 14LPP platform.
Vega 56 vs GTX 1070, Vega goes 6-2-2 = Winner Vega! Good job AMD, hopefully next gen you can make more headway in power efficiency. But this is a good card, even beats the factory OC 1070.
The AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 and Vega 64 preview. ... so thanks AMD! RX Vega vs. the World: a 15-round heavyweight battle ... The RX Vega 56 is the more compelling choice, given the lower price and ...

Diskusi dan Komentar

Bagikan Komentar Anda
R
radiatorspiffy 9 months ago
Rx580 or vega 56 or gtx 1070
I will buy a new gaming pc in march with a ryzen 7 2700, but i dont know which graphics card should i buy. In my country i can get the rx 580 around 120k ft, the vega 56 around 185k ft, and a gtx 1070 about 150-160k ft. Which should I buy? I already have my monitor, it supports freesync. (75hz, 1080x2560 resolution)
0 0
P
portbillet 9 months ago
Should I buy the RX Vega 56 over the GTX 1070?
I'll be building a new rig in a few weeks. For a few days, I've been having trouble deciding on which graphics card I want to get. For a while, I was decided that I'd go with the 1070, but then I realized that Vega 56 performs just as well or better while offering Freesync, which my monitor does offer. For some reason, I still can't decide whether or not I should go for the Vega 56. Should I?
0 0
D
dextrousribbit 9 months ago
On much smaller case blower type cooler is better due to heat being dump outside the case directly. But on much bigger case "open air" cooler usually end up being better. Also noise. Those blower type cooler can be very loud when the fan speed start ramping up.
0 0