GTX 650 Ti Boost with Core i7-3770K @ 3.50GHz benchmarks at Ultra Quality settings

With current 2048 MB RAM, the GTX 650 Ti Boost can have serious memory-related bottlenecks in more modern games. This combination between GTX 650 Ti Boost and Intel Core i7-3770K @ 3.50GHz has less than 8% bottleneck in many games and is perfect match to avoid FPS loss. This combination between GTX 650 Ti Boost and Intel Core i7-3770K @ 3.50GHz is a perfect match to avoid FPS loss. With current 2048 MB RAM, the GTX 650 Ti Boost can have very few memory-related bottlenecks in more modern games.

 GTX 650 Ti Boost with Core i7-3770K @ 3.50GHz benchmarks at Ultra Quality settings
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
Price $ 169.0
Year 2013
Maximum Recorded Temperature 77C
Max Fan Noise 47.4dB
Recommended Power Supply 484W
Benchmark CPU Intel Core i7-3770K @ 3.50GHz ($248.98)
CPU Impact on FPS + 0.0 FPS
CPU Impact on FPS % 0.0%
Benchmark Quality Settings Ultra Quality Settings
Average 1080p Performance 35.7 FPS
Average 1440p Performance 19.8 FPS
Average 4K Performance 13.5 FPS
Memory 2 GB
1080p Cost Per Frame $ 4.7
1440p Cost Per Frame $ 8.5
4K Cost Per Frame $ 12.5
Series GTX 650 Ti Boost
Overall Combination Score 57/100 Acceptable

Game Performance at Ultra Quality settings

Change Quality Settings

Resolution 1920x1080

Year Game Frames Per Second
2018 Just Cause 4
19.8 FPS
2018 Monster Hunter: World
21.3 FPS
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
27.5 FPS
2017 For Honor
36.6 FPS
2017 Project CARS 2
25.9 FPS
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
31.4 FPS
2016 Dishonored 2
18.9 FPS
2015 Rocket League
106.8 FPS
2015 Need For Speed
29.6 FPS
2015 Project CARS
28.4 FPS
2013 Bioshock Infinite
50.7 FPS
2013 Company of Heroes 2
21.2 FPS
2013 Crysis 3
41.6 FPS
2013 GRID 2
47.5 FPS
2013 Metro: Last Light
31.0 FPS
2013 Total War: Rome 2
27.2 FPS
2013 Battlefield 4
47.7 FPS
2012 DiRT: Showdown
38.5 FPS
2012 Far Cry 3
38.6 FPS
2012 Hitman: Absolution
50.2 FPS
2012 Sleeping Dogs
49.0 FPS
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
73.2 FPS
2011 Total War: Shogun 2
33.9 FPS
2011 Battlefield 3
47.4 FPS
2010 Civilization V
56.3 FPS
2009 League of Legends
137.3 FPS
2008 Crysis: Warhead
36.3 FPS

Resolution 2560x1440

Year Game Frames Per Second
2018 Just Cause 4
14.6 FPS
2018 Monster Hunter: World
14.9 FPS
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
19.8 FPS
2017 For Honor
21.3 FPS
2017 Project CARS 2
18.3 FPS
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
28.4 FPS
2016 Dishonored 2
16.2 FPS
2015 Rocket League
45.8 FPS
2015 Need For Speed
22.9 FPS
2015 Project CARS
21.7 FPS
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
61.0 FPS
2009 League of Legends
76.2 FPS

Resolution 3840x2160

Year Game Frames Per Second
2018 Just Cause 4
7.6 FPS
2018 Monster Hunter: World
7.2 FPS
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
13.7 FPS
2017 For Honor
10.7 FPS
2017 Project CARS 2
15.3 FPS
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
23.8 FPS
2016 Dishonored 2
12.8 FPS
2015 Rocket League
21.3 FPS
2015 Need For Speed
15.3 FPS
2015 Project CARS
15.3 FPS
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
54.9 FPS
2009 League of Legends
30.5 FPS

Compare Against Competitors

GTX 650 Ti Boost Specifications

GTX 650 Ti Boost Board Design

Board NumberP2030
Length9.5 inches 241 mm
Outputs2x DVI1x HDMI1x DisplayPort
Power Connectors1x 6-pin
Slot WidthDual-slot
TDP134 W

GTX 650 Ti Boost Clock Speeds

Boost Clock1032 MHz
GPU Clock980 MHz
Memory Clock1502 MHz 6008 MHz effective

GTX 650 Ti Boost Graphics Card

Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16
GenerationGeForce 600
Launch Price169 USD
ProductionEnd-of-life
Release DateMar 26th, 2013

GTX 650 Ti Boost Graphics Features

CUDA3
DirectX12.0 (11_0)
OpenCL1.2
OpenGL4.6
Shader Model5.1
Vulkan1.1.82

GTX 650 Ti Boost Graphics Processor

ArchitectureKepler
Die Size221 mm²
GPU NameGK106
GPU VariantGK106-240-A1
Process Size28 nm
Transistors2,540 million

GTX 650 Ti Boost Memory

Bandwidth144.2 GB/s
Memory Bus192 bit
Memory Size2048 MB
Memory TypeGDDR5

GTX 650 Ti Boost Render Config

ROPs24
SMX Count4
Shading Units768
TMUs64

GTX 650 Ti Boost Theoretical Performance

FP32 (float) performance1,585 GFLOPS
FP64 (double) performance66.05 GFLOPS (1:24)
Pixel Rate16.51 GPixel/s
Texture Rate66.05 GTexel/s

Critics Reviews


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments