GTX 1650 with i7-8700K benchmarks at Ultra Quality settings

For the most part, the GTX 1650 is still capable of playing modern games, but you would have to reduce settings to sustain those higher framerates. If keeping graphics quality settings closer to ultra or high is important, there are a few options for upgrades. The price/performance ratio is excellent for GTX 1650 against the competition in budget graphics cards. The price/performance ratio is excellent for GTX 1650 against the competition in budget mid-range cards. The GTX 1650 's power requirements are reasonable and it is very efficient compared to the competition. With regards to max load temperature, the GTX 1650 's cooling is excellent at keeping it cool and under control. With current 4096 MB RAM, the GTX 1650 can have very few memory-related bottlenecks in more modern games.

 GTX 1650 with i7-8700K benchmarks at Ultra Quality settings
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
Price $ 149.0
Year 2019
Maximum Recorded Temperature 65C
Max Fan Noise 45dB
Recommended Power Supply 425W
Benchmark CPU Intel Core i7-8700K @ 3.70GHz ($369.89)
CPU Impact on FPS -1.8 FPS
CPU Impact on FPS % 0.0%
Benchmark Quality Settings Ultra Quality Settings
Average 1080p Performance 58.2 FPS
Average 1440p Performance 42.1 FPS
Average 4K Performance 24.8 FPS
Memory 4 GB
1080p Cost Per Frame $ 2.6
1440p Cost Per Frame $ 3.5
4K Cost Per Frame $ 6.0
Series GTX 1650
Overall Combination Score 76/100 Very Good

The GTX 1660 might be the entry-level flagship of the latest Turing set of graphics cards, but their prices keep them out of the reach of most budget PC gamers. On the other hand, the GTX 1650 is closer to being reasonably affordable at a price tag of . NVIDIA ’s xx50 cards have always been defined by budget prices with performance that knocks on the door of entry-level graphics cards – especially when overclocked. After taking the time to fully test the Turing graphics card inside the GTX 1650 , we can say without a doubt that it continues the trend.

Spec for spec, this GTX 1650 leapfrogs its direct predecessor, the GTX 1050 , by boasting 2 % more fps. The GTX 1650 has 4 GB RAM compared to the GTX 1050 's 3 GB video memory.

Fortunately, gaming performance was quite impressive. The GTX 1650 consistently delivers great frame rate increases over the GTX 1050, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti and it really justifies an upgrade. For 1080p Full HD , we were able to play Fallout 76, Battlefield V, Resident Evil 2 at 63 fps to 71 fps and kept frame rates hovering around 67 fps.

Game Performance at Ultra Quality settings

Change Quality Settings

Resolution 1920x1080

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
Year Game Frames Per Second
2019 Apex Legends
45
50.6
2019 Anthem
29
33.0
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
43
48.3
2019 Resident Evil 2
62
69.5
2019 Metro Exodus
27
30.7
2019 World War Z
50
56.6
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
45
50.6
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
25
28.2
2018 Final Fantasy XV
45
50.6
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
38
42.5
2018 Forza Horizon 4
47
53.1
2018 Fallout 76
55
61.3
2018 Hitman 2
43
48.3
2018 Just Cause 4
40
44.8
2018 Monster Hunter: World
43
48.3
2018 Battlefield V
57
63.6
2017 Dawn of War III
69
76.7
2017 Ghost Recon Wildlands
44
49.5
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
44
49.5
2017 Destiny 2
70
77.8
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
35
38.9
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
47
53.1
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
56
62.4
2017 For Honor
74
82.5
2017 Project CARS 2
53
58.9
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
63
70.7
2016 Ashes of the Singularity
37
41.3
2016 Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
38
42.5
2016 Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
38
42.5
2016 Doom
93
103.7
2016 F1 2016
62
69.5
2016 Hitman
65
73.1
2016 Rise of the Tomb Raider
57
63.6
2016 The Division
48
54.3
2016 Total War: Warhammer
53
58.9
2016 Battlefield 1
66
74.2
2016 Overwatch
74
82.5
2016 Dishonored 2
38
42.5
2015 DiRT Rally
76
84.8
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
41
46.0
2015 The Witcher 3
42
47.1
2015 Rocket League
217
241.7
2015 Need For Speed
60
67.2
2015 Project CARS
57
63.6
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
104
115.9
2013 Crysis 3
47
53.1
2013 Battlefield 4
56
62.4
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
148
165.0
2009 League of Legends
278
309.9

Resolution 2560x1440

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
Year Game Frames Per Second
2019 Apex Legends
30
37.7
2019 Anthem
20
25.9
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
30
37.7
2019 Resident Evil 2
37
47.1
2019 Metro Exodus
18
23.6
2019 World War Z
33
41.3
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
22
28.2
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
17
22.4
2018 Final Fantasy XV
30
37.7
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
21
27.1
2018 Forza Horizon 4
34
43.6
2018 Fallout 76
43
54.3
2018 Hitman 2
24
30.7
2018 Just Cause 4
26
33.0
2018 Monster Hunter: World
27
34.2
2018 Battlefield V
37
47.1
2017 Dawn of War III
38
48.3
2017 Ghost Recon Wildlands
29
36.5
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
28
35.4
2017 Destiny 2
52
66.0
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
23
29.5
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
27
34.2
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
35
44.8
2017 For Honor
38
48.3
2017 Project CARS 2
33
41.3
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
50
63.6
2016 Ashes of the Singularity
30
37.7
2016 Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
22
28.2
2016 Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
31
38.9
2016 Doom
56
70.7
2016 F1 2016
43
54.3
2016 Hitman
41
51.8
2016 Rise of the Tomb Raider
34
43.6
2016 The Division
31
38.9
2016 Total War: Warhammer
33
41.3
2016 Battlefield 1
43
54.3
2016 Overwatch
45
56.6
2016 Dishonored 2
29
36.5
2015 DiRT Rally
47
58.9
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
25
31.9
2015 The Witcher 3
27
34.2
2015 Rocket League
82
103.7
2015 Need For Speed
41
51.8
2015 Project CARS
39
49.5
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
60
75.0
2013 Crysis 3
25
31.9
2013 Battlefield 4
33
41.3
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
110
137.9
2009 League of Legends
137
172.1

Resolution 3840x2160

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
Year Game Frames Per Second
2019 Apex Legends
15
22.4
2019 Anthem
9
14.1
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
14
20.1
2019 Resident Evil 2
16
23.6
2019 Metro Exodus
10
15.3
2019 World War Z
16
23.8
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
18
25.9
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
10
15.3
2018 Final Fantasy XV
16
23.6
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
10
15.3
2018 Forza Horizon 4
20
29.5
2018 Fallout 76
20
29.5
2018 Hitman 2
13
18.9
2018 Just Cause 4
12
17.7
2018 Monster Hunter: World
11
16.5
2018 Battlefield V
15
22.4
2017 Dawn of War III
16
23.6
2017 Ghost Recon Wildlands
14
21.2
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
13
18.9
2017 Destiny 2
23
33.0
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
11
16.5
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
13
18.9
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
21
30.7
2017 For Honor
16
23.6
2017 Project CARS 2
23
34.2
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
38
54.3
2016 Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
9
14.1
2016 Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
19
28.2
2016 Doom
24
35.4
2016 F1 2016
22
31.9
2016 Total War: Warhammer
15
22.4
2016 Battlefield 1
20
29.5
2016 Overwatch
20
29.5
2016 Dishonored 2
20
29.5
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
10
15.3
2015 Rocket League
33
48.3
2015 Need For Speed
23
34.2
2015 Project CARS
23
34.2
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
24
34.8
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
86
123.8
2009 League of Legends
47
68.4
GTX 1650 with i7-8700K at 1080p and Ultra Quality settings
GTX 1650 with i7-8700K at 1440p and Ultra Quality settings
GTX 1650 with i7-8700K at 4K and Ultra Quality settings

GTX 1650 Specifications

GTX 1650 Board Design

Outputs1x DVI1x HDMI1x DisplayPort
Power ConnectorsNone
Slot WidthDual-slot
TDP75 W

GTX 1650 Clock Speeds

Boost Clock1665 MHz
GPU Clock1485 MHz
Memory Clock2000 MHz 8000 MHz effective

GTX 1650 Graphics Card

Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16
GenerationGeForce 16
Launch Price149 USD
ProductionUnreleased
Release DateApr 23rd, 2019

GTX 1650 Graphics Features

CUDA7.5
DirectX12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL1.2
OpenGL4.6
Shader Model6.3
Vulkan1.1.103

GTX 1650 Graphics Processor

ArchitectureTuring
Die Sizeunknown
FoundryTSMC
GPU NameTU117
Process Size12 nm
Transistorsunknown

GTX 1650 Memory

Bandwidth128.0 GB/s
Memory Bus128 bit
Memory Size4 GB
Memory TypeGDDR5

GTX 1650 Render Config

ROPs32
SM Count14
Shading Units896
TMUs56

GTX 1650 Theoretical Performance

FP16 (half) performance5.967 TFLOPS (2:1)
FP32 (float) performance2.984 TFLOPS
FP64 (double) performance93.24 GFLOPS (1:32)
Pixel Rate53.28 GPixel/s
Texture Rate93.24 GTexel/s

Critics Reviews


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments