GTX 1650 with i3-9100F benchmarks at Ultra Quality settings

For the most part, the GTX 1650 is still capable of playing modern games, but you would have to reduce settings to sustain those higher framerates. If keeping graphics quality settings closer to ultra or high is important, there are a few options for upgrades. The price/performance ratio is excellent for GTX 1650 against the competition in budget graphics cards. The price/performance ratio is excellent for GTX 1650 against the competition in budget mid-range cards. The GTX 1650 's power requirements are reasonable and it is very efficient compared to the competition. With regards to max load temperature, the GTX 1650 's cooling is excellent at keeping it cool and under control. With current 4096 MB RAM, the GTX 1650 can have very few memory-related bottlenecks in more modern games.

 GTX 1650 with i3-9100F benchmarks at Ultra Quality settings
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
Price $ 149.0
Year 2019
Maximum Recorded Temperature 65C
Max Fan Noise 45dB
Recommended Power Supply 425W
Benchmark CPU Intel Core i3-9100F @ 3.60GHz ($104.99)
CPU Impact on FPS -9.0 FPS
CPU Impact on FPS % -10.0%
Benchmark Quality Settings Ultra Quality Settings
Average 1080p Performance 51.0 FPS
Average 1440p Performance 36.9 FPS
Average 4K Performance 21.8 FPS
Memory 4 GB
1080p Cost Per Frame $ 2.9
1440p Cost Per Frame $ 4.0
4K Cost Per Frame $ 6.8
Series GTX 1650
Overall Combination Score 74/100 Very Good

The GTX 1660 might be the entry-level flagship of the latest Turing set of graphics cards, but their prices keep them out of the reach of most budget PC gamers. On the other hand, the GTX 1650 is closer to being reasonably affordable at a price tag of . NVIDIA ’s xx50 cards have always been defined by budget prices with performance that knocks on the door of entry-level graphics cards – especially when overclocked. After taking the time to fully test the Turing graphics card inside the GTX 1650 , we can say without a doubt that it continues the trend.

Spec for spec, this GTX 1650 leapfrogs its direct predecessor, the GTX 1050 , by boasting 2 % more fps. The GTX 1650 has 4 GB RAM compared to the GTX 1050 's 3 GB video memory.

Fortunately, gaming performance was quite impressive. The GTX 1650 consistently delivers great frame rate increases over the GTX 1050, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti and it really justifies an upgrade. For 1080p Full HD , we were able to play Fallout 76, Battlefield V, Resident Evil 2 at 63 fps to 71 fps and kept frame rates hovering around 67 fps.

Game Performance at Ultra Quality settings

Change Quality Settings

Resolution 1920x1080

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
Year Game Frames Per Second
2019 Apex Legends
39
45.1
2019 Anthem
25
29.4
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
37
43.0
2019 Resident Evil 2
53
61.9
2019 Metro Exodus
23
27.3
2019 World War Z
43
50.4
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
39
45.1
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
21
25.1
2018 Final Fantasy XV
39
45.1
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
32
37.8
2018 Forza Horizon 4
40
47.2
2018 Fallout 76
47
54.5
2018 Hitman 2
37
43.0
2018 Just Cause 4
34
39.9
2018 Monster Hunter: World
37
43.0
2018 Battlefield V
49
56.6
2017 Dawn of War III
59
68.2
2017 Ghost Recon Wildlands
38
44.0
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
38
44.0
2017 Destiny 2
59
69.2
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
29
34.6
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
40
47.2
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
48
55.6
2017 For Honor
63
73.4
2017 Project CARS 2
45
52.4
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
54
62.9
2016 Ashes of the Singularity
31
36.7
2016 Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
32
37.8
2016 Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
32
37.8
2016 Doom
79
92.3
2016 F1 2016
53
61.9
2016 Hitman
56
65.0
2016 Rise of the Tomb Raider
49
56.6
2016 The Division
41
48.3
2016 Total War: Warhammer
45
52.4
2016 Battlefield 1
57
66.0
2016 Overwatch
63
73.4
2016 Dishonored 2
32
37.8
2015 DiRT Rally
65
75.5
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
35
40.9
2015 The Witcher 3
36
41.9
2015 Rocket League
186
215.0
2015 Need For Speed
51
59.8
2015 Project CARS
49
56.6
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
89
103.1
2013 Crysis 3
40
47.2
2013 Battlefield 4
48
55.6
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
127
146.8
2009 League of Legends
239
275.8

Resolution 2560x1440

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
Year Game Frames Per Second
2019 Apex Legends
26
33.5
2019 Anthem
18
23.1
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
26
33.5
2019 Resident Evil 2
33
41.9
2019 Metro Exodus
16
21.0
2019 World War Z
29
36.7
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
20
25.1
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
15
19.9
2018 Final Fantasy XV
26
33.5
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
19
24.1
2018 Forza Horizon 4
31
38.8
2018 Fallout 76
38
48.3
2018 Hitman 2
21
27.3
2018 Just Cause 4
23
29.4
2018 Monster Hunter: World
24
30.4
2018 Battlefield V
33
41.9
2017 Dawn of War III
34
43.0
2017 Ghost Recon Wildlands
26
32.5
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
25
31.5
2017 Destiny 2
47
58.8
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
21
26.3
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
24
30.4
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
31
39.9
2017 For Honor
34
43.0
2017 Project CARS 2
29
36.7
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
45
56.6
2016 Ashes of the Singularity
26
33.5
2016 Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
20
25.1
2016 Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
27
34.6
2016 Doom
50
62.9
2016 F1 2016
38
48.3
2016 Hitman
36
46.1
2016 Rise of the Tomb Raider
31
38.8
2016 The Division
27
34.6
2016 Total War: Warhammer
29
36.7
2016 Battlefield 1
38
48.3
2016 Overwatch
40
50.4
2016 Dishonored 2
26
32.5
2015 DiRT Rally
41
52.4
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
22
28.3
2015 The Witcher 3
24
30.4
2015 Rocket League
73
92.3
2015 Need For Speed
36
46.1
2015 Project CARS
35
44.0
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
53
66.7
2013 Crysis 3
22
28.3
2013 Battlefield 4
29
36.7
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
98
122.7
2009 League of Legends
122
153.1

Resolution 3840x2160

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
Year Game Frames Per Second
2019 Apex Legends
13
19.9
2019 Anthem
8
12.6
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
12
17.9
2019 Resident Evil 2
14
21.0
2019 Metro Exodus
9
13.6
2019 World War Z
14
21.1
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
16
23.1
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
9
13.6
2018 Final Fantasy XV
14
21.0
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
9
13.6
2018 Forza Horizon 4
18
26.3
2018 Fallout 76
18
26.3
2018 Hitman 2
11
16.8
2018 Just Cause 4
11
15.8
2018 Monster Hunter: World
10
14.6
2018 Battlefield V
13
19.9
2017 Dawn of War III
14
21.0
2017 Ghost Recon Wildlands
13
18.9
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
11
16.8
2017 Destiny 2
20
29.4
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
10
14.6
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
11
16.8
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
19
27.3
2017 For Honor
14
21.0
2017 Project CARS 2
21
30.4
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
33
48.3
2016 Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
8
12.6
2016 Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
17
25.1
2016 Doom
22
31.5
2016 F1 2016
19
28.3
2016 Total War: Warhammer
13
19.9
2016 Battlefield 1
18
26.3
2016 Overwatch
18
26.3
2016 Dishonored 2
18
26.3
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
9
13.6
2015 Rocket League
30
43.0
2015 Need For Speed
21
30.4
2015 Project CARS
21
30.4
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
21
30.9
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
77
110.2
2009 League of Legends
42
60.8
GTX 1650 with i3-9100F at 1080p and Ultra Quality settings
GTX 1650 with i3-9100F at 1440p and Ultra Quality settings
GTX 1650 with i3-9100F at 4K and Ultra Quality settings

GTX 1650 Specifications

GTX 1650 Board Design

Outputs1x DVI1x HDMI1x DisplayPort
Power ConnectorsNone
Slot WidthDual-slot
TDP75 W

GTX 1650 Clock Speeds

Boost Clock1665 MHz
GPU Clock1485 MHz
Memory Clock2000 MHz 8000 MHz effective

GTX 1650 Graphics Card

Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16
GenerationGeForce 16
Launch Price149 USD
ProductionUnreleased
Release DateApr 23rd, 2019

GTX 1650 Graphics Features

CUDA7.5
DirectX12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL1.2
OpenGL4.6
Shader Model6.3
Vulkan1.1.103

GTX 1650 Graphics Processor

ArchitectureTuring
Die Sizeunknown
FoundryTSMC
GPU NameTU117
Process Size12 nm
Transistorsunknown

GTX 1650 Memory

Bandwidth128.0 GB/s
Memory Bus128 bit
Memory Size4 GB
Memory TypeGDDR5

GTX 1650 Render Config

ROPs32
SM Count14
Shading Units896
TMUs56

GTX 1650 Theoretical Performance

FP16 (half) performance5.967 TFLOPS (2:1)
FP32 (float) performance2.984 TFLOPS
FP64 (double) performance93.24 GFLOPS (1:32)
Pixel Rate53.28 GPixel/s
Texture Rate93.24 GTexel/s

Critics Reviews


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments