RX Vega 64 with i7-7700K benchmarks at High Quality settings

It is worth noting that the RX Vega 64 is a very power hungry card and requires a decent power supply unit. In terms of memory, the RX Vega 64 's 8192 MB RAM is more than enough for modern games and should not cause any bottlenecks. It is important to know that RX Vega 64 's max load temperature is very high and might require custom cooling solutions. In short the performance is exceptional, there's no question that this is one of the most powerful single GPU out there in 2017 .

 RX Vega 64 with i7-7700K benchmarks at High Quality settings
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Price $ 419.0
Year 2017
Maximum Recorded Temperature 86C
Max Fan Noise 56.3dB
Recommended Power Supply 645W
Benchmark CPU Intel Core i7-7700K @ 4.20GHz ($354.99)
CPU Impact on FPS + 0.0 FPS
CPU Impact on FPS % 0.0%
Benchmark Quality Settings High Quality Settings
Average 1080p Performance 142.6 FPS
Average 1440p Performance 99.2 FPS
Average 4K Performance 56.1 FPS
Memory 8 GB
1080p Cost Per Frame $ 4.6
1440p Cost Per Frame $ 6.2
4K Cost Per Frame $ 10.6
Series RX Vega 64
Overall Combination Score 82/100 Excellent

Game Performance at High Quality settings

Change Quality Settings

Resolution 1920x1080

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
Year Game Frames Per Second
2019 Apex Legends
138
154.0
2019 Anthem
94
104.6
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
123
137.0
2019 Resident Evil 2
144
160.7
2019 Metro Exodus
81
91.0
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
153
170.0
2018 F1 2018
148
165.2
2018 Far Cry 5
126
141.0
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
82
92.0
2018 Final Fantasy XV
101
112.4
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
112
125.0
2018 Forza Horizon 4
113
126.0
2018 Fallout 76
152
169.8
2018 Hitman 2
126
140.0
2018 Just Cause 4
104
115.9
2018 Monster Hunter: World
109
122.1
2018 Battlefield V
144
160.0
2017 Dawn of War III
130
145.3
2017 Ghost Recon Wildlands
90
100.3
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
81
90.0
2017 Shadow of War
125
139.0
2017 Total War: Warhammer II
101
112.3
2017 Wolfenstein II
184
205.2
2017 Destiny 2
147
164.0
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
97
108.0
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
114
126.7
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
132
147.0
2017 For Honor
165
184.4
2017 Project CARS 2
126
140.8
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
146
163.2
2016 Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
105
117.7
2016 Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
108
120.7
2016 Doom
201
223.5
2016 F1 2016
126
140.4
2016 Total War: Warhammer
122
136.6
2016 Battlefield 1
158
175.9
2016 Overwatch
159
177.1
2016 Dishonored 2
100
112.2
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
106
118.7
2015 Rocket League
423
470.8
2015 Need For Speed
140
155.8
2015 Project CARS
135
150.8
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
221
246.6
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
300
333.8
2009 League of Legends
535
595.2

Resolution 2560x1440

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
Year Game Frames Per Second
2019 Apex Legends
87
109.0
2019 Anthem
59
74.2
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
78
98.2
2019 Resident Evil 2
82
103.7
2019 Metro Exodus
50
62.6
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
85
107.0
2018 F1 2018
96
120.1
2018 Far Cry 5
82
103.0
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
49
62.0
2018 Final Fantasy XV
59
74.8
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
64
80.0
2018 Forza Horizon 4
76
96.0
2018 Fallout 76
92
116.0
2018 Hitman 2
70
88.0
2018 Just Cause 4
63
78.8
2018 Monster Hunter: World
64
80.0
2018 Battlefield V
91
114.0
2017 Dawn of War III
88
110.2
2017 Ghost Recon Wildlands
62
78.2
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
57
72.0
2017 Shadow of War
71
89.9
2017 Total War: Warhammer II
61
76.3
2017 Wolfenstein II
109
136.7
2017 Destiny 2
103
129.0
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
60
75.0
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
62
78.5
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
79
99.9
2017 For Honor
84
106.1
2017 Project CARS 2
74
93.7
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
107
134.8
2016 Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
60
75.4
2016 Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
72
90.6
2016 Doom
126
158.1
2016 F1 2016
93
117.0
2016 Total War: Warhammer
77
96.7
2016 Battlefield 1
101
126.7
2016 Overwatch
93
117.0
2016 Dishonored 2
68
85.0
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
62
78.4
2015 Rocket League
164
205.8
2015 Need For Speed
89
112.4
2015 Project CARS
85
107.4
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
124
156.0
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
214
268.0
2009 League of Legends
264
330.2

Resolution 3840x2160

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
Year Game Frames Per Second
2019 Apex Legends
39
57.0
2019 Anthem
27
39.0
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
35
51.0
2019 Resident Evil 2
35
50.7
2019 Metro Exodus
25
36.4
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
32
47.0
2018 F1 2018
49
70.0
2018 Far Cry 5
37
54.0
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
27
39.0
2018 Final Fantasy XV
28
40.1
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
28
40.0
2018 Forza Horizon 4
42
60.0
2018 Fallout 76
43
62.0
2018 Hitman 2
34
49.0
2018 Just Cause 4
28
40.1
2018 Monster Hunter: World
26
38.3
2018 Battlefield V
43
62.0
2017 Dawn of War III
41
59.5
2017 Ghost Recon Wildlands
33
47.6
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
30
43.0
2017 Shadow of War
35
51.1
2017 Total War: Warhammer II
26
38.2
2017 Wolfenstein II
54
78.4
2017 Destiny 2
44
64.0
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
28
41.0
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
28
41.2
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
45
65.0
2017 For Honor
36
52.6
2017 Project CARS 2
49
71.2
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
74
106.1
2016 Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
27
39.4
2016 Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
47
68.2
2016 Doom
57
82.4
2016 F1 2016
51
73.6
2016 Total War: Warhammer
38
54.3
2016 Battlefield 1
47
68.0
2016 Overwatch
41
59.4
2016 Dishonored 2
42
61.3
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
28
40.1
2015 Rocket League
67
96.1
2015 Need For Speed
49
71.2
2015 Project CARS
49
71.2
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
50
72.5
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
163
233.1
2009 League of Legends
93
133.5

RX Vega 64 Specifications

RX Vega 64 Board Design

Board NumberD05001
Length11 inches 279 mm
Outputs1x HDMI3x DisplayPort
Power Connectors2x 8-pin
Slot WidthDual-slot
TDP295 W

RX Vega 64 Clock Speeds

Boost Clock1536 MHz
GPU Clock1200 MHz
Memory Clock945 MHz 1890 MHz effective

RX Vega 64 Graphics Card

Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16
GenerationVega (RX Vega)
Launch Price499 USD
ProductionActive
Release DateAug 7th, 2017

RX Vega 64 Graphics Features

DirectX12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL2
OpenGL4.6
Shader Model6.1
Vulkan1.1.82

RX Vega 64 Graphics Processor

ArchitectureGCN 5.0
Die Size510 mm²
GPU NameVega 10
GPU VariantVega 10 XT (215-0894200)
Process Size14 nm
Transistors12,500 million

RX Vega 64 Memory

Bandwidth483.8 GB/s
Memory Bus2048 bit
Memory Size8192 MB
Memory TypeHBM2

RX Vega 64 Render Config

Compute Units64
ROPs64
Shading Units4096
TMUs256

RX Vega 64 Theoretical Performance

FP16 (half) performance25,166 GFLOPS (2:1)
FP32 (float) performance12,583 GFLOPS
FP64 (double) performance786.4 GFLOPS (1:16)
Pixel Rate98.30 GPixel/s
Texture Rate393.2 GTexel/s

Critics Reviews

• See the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 at Best Buy The Verdict If this were two separate reviews the Vega 56 would get a higher score than the Vega 64, but since it's one review I'm labeling both of ...
Conclusion. On the one hand, AMD's Radeon RX Vega cards get the company back into the ring against Nvidia, fighting in a higher GPU weight class. ... both the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 and the Nvidia ...
Our AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 review confirms that the company achieved major performance improvements over their last-generation Polaris and Fiji cards: Vega is faster than the GTX 1080. We tested six different performance configurations of the Vega 64, with surprising results.
Conclusion (RX Vega 56) The Radeon RX Vega 56 is easily the best card of this launch. It is cooler, quieter, and more efficient than the Radeon RX Vega 64 and delivers only 10 percent less ...
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64: the Digital Foundry verdict The numbers don't lie. There's an RX Vega out there that offers great performance for the money and brings the fight to the competition, but it's ...
A better comparison for purchasing decisions would have been to use the RX Vega 64 Air Cooled, or to have compared the RX Vega 64 LC to the GTX 1080ti as the pricing is more in line.
Our Verdict. The Radeon RX Vega 64 is an excellent first showing of AMD’s newest graphics cards with Nvidia GTX 1080-equivalent performance and the potential of so much more.
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 review AMD's top GPU is a fast but power-hungry beast.
Conclusion (RX Vega 64) The RX Vega 64 is an answer to the GTX 1080, but currently it's not a whole lot more than that, and it's not an especially great answer either.
After months of teases and delays, the wait for Vega is finally over. First, AMD launched its flagship Radeon RX 64 lineup: the 9 Radeon RX Vega 64 and the 9 liquid-cooled Radeon RX Vega 64 ...
The AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 and Vega 64 preview. ... so thanks AMD! RX Vega vs. the World: a 15-round heavyweight battle ... The RX Vega 64 is available starting today. As discussed previously ...
Radeon RX Vega 64: At a Glance (Again) Speeds and feeds are always good to recap, so borrowing from our earlier coverage: Like the Radeon R9 Fury X's Fiji processor, Radeon RX Vega 64 employs four ...
AMD's Radeon RX Vega 64 requires a pair of eight-pin power connectors, and AMD's packaging says you'll need a 750-watt power supply, at minimum. Even if you don't care much about extra power ...
The Radeon RX Vega 64 is an excellent first showing of AMD’s newest graphics cards with Nvidia GTX 1080-equivalent performance and the potential of so much more. AMD Vega has been on the tip of ...
AMD’s current suggested retail price for its RX Vega 64 is 9 (£549, about AU0), but third party manufacturers, like Gigabyte and Asus, are still selling the card for far more than that on ...
The Radeon RX Vega 64 is a high-end graphics card by AMD, launched in August 2017. Built on the 14 nm process, and based on the Vega 10 graphics processor, in its Vega 10 XT variant, the card supports DirectX 12.0.

Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments
D
dimmerhamilton 4 months ago
Should I buy RX VEGA 64 or GTX 1070???
Should I buy RX VEGA 64 or GTX 1070 if I have a chance to buy RX VEGA 64 for 350 euro (used, 3 months, only for gaming) and I can buy the GTX 1070 for 400 euro (used, 2 years, gaming).

Which one should I buy? I know that gtx 1070 is better at power usage, but it's used for already 2 years...

So please help me decide!!!
0 0
S
silverhelpless 4 months ago
Providing you have a sufficient power supply to care for the RX Vega AND it hasn’t been used for mining, then I wouldn’t personally say go for the 64. It is a much more powerful card and currently by your prices cheaper than a 1070.

Especially with the Vega card been much newer and only been used for 3 months it is a much better option in my opinion.
0 0