RX Vega 56 with i7-7700K benchmarks at Low Quality settings

It is clear that the RX Vega 56 is a significantly more capable high-end card that can play AAA titles at 1080p/1440p with 50-60 frames per second. It is worth noting that the RX Vega 56 is a very power hungry card and requires a decent power supply unit. In terms of memory, the RX Vega 56 's 8192 MB RAM is more than enough for modern games and should not cause any bottlenecks. In short the performance is exceptional, there's no question that this is one of the most powerful single GPU out there in 2017 .

 RX Vega 56 with i7-7700K  benchmarks at Low Quality settings
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
Price $ 351.0
Year 2017
Maximum Recorded Temperature 75C
Max Fan Noise 55.2dB
Recommended Power Supply 560W
Benchmark CPU Intel Core i7-7700K @ 4.20GHz ($354.99)
CPU Impact on FPS + 0.0 FPS
CPU Impact on FPS % 0.0%
Benchmark Quality Settings Low Quality Settings
Average 1080p Performance 199.9 FPS
Average 1440p Performance 178.4 FPS
Average 4K Performance 114.5 FPS
Memory 8 GB
1080p Cost Per Frame $ 4.1
1440p Cost Per Frame $ 5.4
4K Cost Per Frame $ 9.2
Series RX Vega 56
Overall Combination Score 90/100 Excellent

Game Performance at Low Quality settings

Change Quality Settings

Resolution 1920x1080

Year Game Frames Per Second
2019 Apex Legends
218.6 FPS
2019 Anthem
169.6 FPS
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
201.1 FPS
2019 Resident Evil 2
220.5 FPS
2019 Metro Exodus
154.8 FPS
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
231.2 FPS
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
158.2 FPS
2018 Final Fantasy XV
178.3 FPS
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
187.7 FPS
2018 Forza Horizon 4
191.0 FPS
2018 Fallout 76
203.7 FPS
2018 Hitman 2
181.5 FPS
2018 Just Cause 4
178.3 FPS
2018 Monster Hunter: World
184.1 FPS
2018 Battlefield V
225.1 FPS
2017 Dawn of War III
202.9 FPS
2017 Ghost Recon Wildlands
170.4 FPS
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
159.2 FPS
2017 Destiny 2
228.2 FPS
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
173.0 FPS
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
191.0 FPS
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
207.5 FPS
2017 For Honor
242.7 FPS
2017 Project CARS 2
201.7 FPS
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
222.8 FPS
2016 Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
179.5 FPS
2016 Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
179.9 FPS
2016 Doom
282.3 FPS
2016 F1 2016
208.0 FPS
2016 Total War: Warhammer
199.9 FPS
2016 Battlefield 1
235.5 FPS
2016 Overwatch
240.0 FPS
2016 Dishonored 2
174.7 FPS
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
185.6 FPS
2015 Rocket League
512.6 FPS
2015 Need For Speed
215.9 FPS
2015 Project CARS
211.1 FPS
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
383.7 FPS
2009 League of Legends
630.0 FPS

Resolution 2560x1440

Year Game Frames Per Second
2019 Apex Legends
191.9 FPS
2019 Anthem
158.6 FPS
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
181.9 FPS
2019 Resident Evil 2
184.9 FPS
2019 Metro Exodus
146.0 FPS
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
186.5 FPS
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
141.1 FPS
2018 Final Fantasy XV
159.2 FPS
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
162.2 FPS
2018 Forza Horizon 4
180.1 FPS
2018 Fallout 76
191.9 FPS
2018 Hitman 2
156.9 FPS
2018 Just Cause 4
161.3 FPS
2018 Monster Hunter: World
162.4 FPS
2018 Battlefield V
196.1 FPS
2017 Dawn of War III
194.4 FPS
2017 Ghost Recon Wildlands
166.0 FPS
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
156.9 FPS
2017 Destiny 2
213.1 FPS
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
159.2 FPS
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
162.8 FPS
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
181.3 FPS
2017 For Honor
187.1 FPS
2017 Project CARS 2
175.3 FPS
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
214.1 FPS
2016 Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
157.5 FPS
2016 Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
169.3 FPS
2016 Doom
229.9 FPS
2016 F1 2016
200.2 FPS
2016 Total War: Warhammer
177.6 FPS
2016 Battlefield 1
205.3 FPS
2016 Overwatch
199.9 FPS
2016 Dishonored 2
167.1 FPS
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
163.0 FPS
2015 Rocket League
281.0 FPS
2015 Need For Speed
193.0 FPS
2015 Project CARS
188.3 FPS
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
339.7 FPS
2009 League of Legends
398.3 FPS

Resolution 3840x2160

Year Game Frames Per Second
2019 Apex Legends
117.6 FPS
2019 Anthem
100.2 FPS
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
111.8 FPS
2019 Resident Evil 2
110.4 FPS
2019 Metro Exodus
96.9 FPS
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
105.9 FPS
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
96.5 FPS
2018 Final Fantasy XV
102.7 FPS
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
100.7 FPS
2018 Forza Horizon 4
120.8 FPS
2018 Fallout 76
118.6 FPS
2018 Hitman 2
101.8 FPS
2018 Just Cause 4
100.4 FPS
2018 Monster Hunter: World
98.5 FPS
2018 Battlefield V
120.8 FPS
2017 Dawn of War III
116.6 FPS
2017 Ghost Recon Wildlands
107.7 FPS
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
104.9 FPS
2017 Destiny 2
125.2 FPS
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
101.8 FPS
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
102.2 FPS
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
123.8 FPS
2017 For Honor
112.0 FPS
2017 Project CARS 2
129.7 FPS
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
162.4 FPS
2016 Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
98.5 FPS
2016 Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
126.1 FPS
2016 Doom
136.7 FPS
2016 F1 2016
131.0 FPS
2016 Total War: Warhammer
112.4 FPS
2016 Battlefield 1
127.6 FPS
2016 Overwatch
120.0 FPS
2016 Dishonored 2
120.3 FPS
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
101.3 FPS
2015 Rocket League
153.1 FPS
2015 Need For Speed
129.7 FPS
2015 Project CARS
129.7 FPS
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
282.2 FPS
2009 League of Legends
188.3 FPS

RX Vega 56 Specifications

RX Vega 56 Board Design

Board NumberD050-03
Length10.5 inches 267 mm
Outputs1x HDMI3x DisplayPort
Power Connectors2x 8-pin
Slot WidthDual-slot
TDP210 W

RX Vega 56 Clock Speeds

Boost Clock1474 MHz
GPU Clock1138 MHz
Memory Clock800 MHz 1600 MHz effective

RX Vega 56 Graphics Card

Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16
GenerationVega (RX Vega)
Launch Price399 USD
ProductionActive
Release DateAug 14th, 2017

RX Vega 56 Graphics Features

DirectX12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL2
OpenGL4.6
Shader Model6.1
Vulkan1.1.82

RX Vega 56 Graphics Processor

ArchitectureGCN 5.0
Die Size510 mm²
GPU NameVega 10
GPU VariantVega 10 XL (215-0894216)
Process Size14 nm
Transistors12,500 million

RX Vega 56 Memory

Bandwidth409.6 GB/s
Memory Bus2048 bit
Memory Size8192 MB
Memory TypeHBM2

RX Vega 56 Render Config

Compute Units56
ROPs64
Shading Units3584
TMUs224

RX Vega 56 Theoretical Performance

FP16 (half) performance21,131 GFLOPS (2:1)
FP32 (float) performance10,566 GFLOPS
FP64 (double) performance660.4 GFLOPS (1:16)
Pixel Rate94.34 GPixel/s
Texture Rate330.2 GTexel/s

Critics Reviews

• See the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 at Best Buy The Verdict If this were two separate reviews the Vega 56 would get a higher score than the Vega 64, but since it's one review I'm labeling both of ...
Conclusion. Radeon RX Vega 56 is a close derivative of Vega 64, so its behaviors largely carry over from AMD’s flagship. The company does cut this card’s board power rating by almost 30% ...
Years in development, the new Radeon RX Vega line is finally arriving - AMD's return to the higher-end of GPU performance after concentrating its efforts more on the mainstream and budget sectors ...
Similar to AMD's Radeon RX Vega 64, the Vega 56 offers two BIOSes with corresponding power profiles that can be selected using a switch on the card. If you don't change the driver-based profiles ...
Perhaps the most telling comparison, however, is that despite the 20 percent price reduction compared to the RX Vega 64, the RX Vega 56 is slower by less than 10 percent on average.
Radeon RX Vega 56 is the second AMD Vega card launched today. It comes at an affordable 9 price point, with a slightly reduced shader count that actually improves things greatly. For example, power efficiency now trades blows with some Pascal cards, which means less heat and noise, too.
On the AMD side of things, it is the AMD Radeon RX 480, or that card's successors, the Radeon RX 580 and Radeon RX 570. Therefore, the Vega 56 should be more than adequate for today's VR ...
Conclusion (RX Vega 56) The Radeon RX Vega 56 is easily the best card of this launch. It is cooler, quieter, and more efficient than the Radeon RX Vega 64 and delivers only 10 percent less ...
The AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 is the little sister of Vega 64. It comes in at a 20% lower price than the RX Vega 64, but only has 12.5% fewer stream processors, and runs lower operating frequencies.
Meet Radeon RX Vega 56 and RX Vega 64 Brad Chacos/IDG AMD sent PCWorld every version of Vega for testing, including both the air-cooled and liquid-cooled versions of the Radeon RX Vega 64.
The AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 is an upper mid-range graphics card, intended to beat Nvidia's GeForce GTX 1070 - a job it performs admirably as the benchmarks on this page demonstrate.
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 - the Digital Foundry verdict. If you're looking for an alternative to the GTX 1070, the bottom line is that you're generally getting around 10 to 12 per cent of additional ...
The Radeon RX Vega 56 is a high-end graphics card by AMD, launched in August 2017. Built on the 14 nm process, and based on the Vega 10 graphics processor, in its Vega 10 XL variant, the card supports DirectX 12.0.
Launching today is the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64, or just Vega 64 for short. Based on a fully enabled Vega 10 GPU, the Vega 64 will come in two physical variants: air cooled and liquid cooled.
Radeon RX Vega 56 utilizes the same Vega 10 processor found in Vega 64. It’s a 486 mm² behemoth sporting 12.5 billion transistors manufactured on GlobalFoundries’ 14LPP platform.
Vega 56 vs GTX 1070, Vega goes 6-2-2 = Winner Vega! Good job AMD, hopefully next gen you can make more headway in power efficiency. But this is a good card, even beats the factory OC 1070.
The AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 and Vega 64 preview. ... so thanks AMD! RX Vega vs. the World: a 15-round heavyweight battle ... The RX Vega 56 is the more compelling choice, given the lower price and ...

Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments
P
packagerooted 3 months ago
Rx580 or vega 56 or gtx 1070
I will buy a new gaming pc in march with a ryzen 7 2700, but i dont know which graphics card should i buy. In my country i can get the rx 580 around 120k ft, the vega 56 around 185k ft, and a gtx 1070 about 150-160k ft. Which should I buy? I already have my monitor, it supports freesync. (75hz, 1080x2560 resolution)
0 0
H
hinnisdalteith 3 months ago


If you want to use freesync you would have to go for either of the amd cards. you could get a vega 56 but its a pricey and can draw quite a lot of power than a 1070, which give almost similar performance which run much cooler with a third party cooler.

So you would be good with the gtx 1070 and save some bucks for some of performance and there are cases where the gtx 1070 outperforms the vega 56,and you could overclock it to get vega like performance but or if that isn't the case you don't mind the extra power draw and heat, and want to make use of the free sync you can surely go for the vega 56. The rx 580 doesn't come anywhere these two so it is out if the question.

Check this link out for comparison of two cards at stock and overclocked- http://blog.logicalincrements.com/2017/08/rx-vega-56-vs-gtx-1070-gtx-1080/
0 0
S
sunnycomma 3 months ago
Should I buy the RX Vega 56 over the GTX 1070?
I'll be building a new rig in a few weeks. For a few days, I've been having trouble deciding on which graphics card I want to get. For a while, I was decided that I'd go with the 1070, but then I realized that Vega 56 performs just as well or better while offering Freesync, which my monitor does offer. For some reason, I still can't decide whether or not I should go for the Vega 56. Should I?
0 0
D
dillsonore 3 months ago
On much smaller case blower type cooler is better due to heat being dump outside the case directly. But on much bigger case "open air" cooler usually end up being better. Also noise. Those blower type cooler can be very loud when the fan speed start ramping up.
0 0