RX 5700 with i7-8700K benchmarks at Low Quality settings

With some tuning, the RX 5700 makes the most sense for gamers with 4K monitors. Though serious gamers hardly play at 4k. It is worth noting that the RX 5700 is a very power hungry card and requires a decent power supply unit. In terms of memory, the RX 5700 's 8192 MB RAM is more than enough for modern games and should not cause any bottlenecks. In short the performance is exceptional, there's no question that this is one of the most powerful single GPU out there in 2019 .

 RX 5700 with i7-8700K benchmarks at Low Quality settings
AMD Radeon RX 5700
Price $ 349.0
Year 2019
Maximum Recorded Temperature 75C
Max Fan Noise 54.5dB
Recommended Power Supply 560W
Benchmark CPU Intel Core i7-8700K @ 3.70GHz ($369.89)
CPU Impact on FPS -3.6 FPS
CPU Impact on FPS % 0.0%
Benchmark Quality Settings Low Quality Settings
Average 1080p Performance 218.0 FPS
Average 1440p Performance 191.4 FPS
Average 4K Performance 121.8 FPS
Memory 8 GB
1080p Cost Per Frame $ 3.0
1440p Cost Per Frame $ 4.0
4K Cost Per Frame $ 6.9
Series RX 5700
Overall Combination Score 90/100 Excellent

The good news is, with the release of the RX 5700 XT , the RX 5700 's price is getting more discount. AMD ’s xx00 cards have always been defined by mid-range prices with performance that knocks on the door of high-end graphics cards – especially when overclocked. After taking the time to fully test the RDNA 1.0 graphics card inside the RX 5700 , we can say without a doubt that it continues the trend.

In our synthetic benchmarks, the RX 5700 blows past the RX Vega 56 and, amazingly, even the RX Vega 64 as well. Unfortunately, gaming performance was not quite as impressive. Even if the RX 5700 consistently delivers frame rate increases over the RX Vega 56 , the gain is not much to justify an upgrade.

For 1080p Full HD , we were able to play Metro Exodus, Assassin's Creed Odyssey, Anthem, Final Fantasy XV, Just Cause 4 at 62 fps to 89 fps and kept frame rates hovering around 75 fps. For 1440p Quad HD , we were able to play Anthem, Final Fantasy XV, Just Cause 4, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Monster Hunter: World at 61 fps to 67 fps and kept frame rates hovering around 65 fps.

For 2160p 4K , we were able to play World War Z, F1 2018 at 65 fps to 67 fps and kept frame rates hovering around 66 fps.

Game Performance at Low Quality settings

Change Quality Settings

Resolution 1920x1080

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
Year Game Frames Per Second
2019 Apex Legends
207
230.0
2019 Anthem
159
176.7
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
190
211.6
2019 Resident Evil 2
213
237.1
2019 Metro Exodus
146
162.4
2019 World War Z
228
253.5
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
222
247.3
2018 F1 2018
218
242.3
2018 Far Cry 5
194
215.6
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
147
163.4
2018 Final Fantasy XV
166
184.8
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
179
199.3
2018 Forza Horizon 4
180
200.2
2018 Fallout 76
222
247.3
2018 Hitman 2
193
214.6
2018 Just Cause 4
170
188.9
2018 Monster Hunter: World
175
195.1
2018 Battlefield V
212
236.1
2017 Dawn of War III
198
220.7
2017 Ghost Recon Wildlands
155
172.7
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
145
161.4
2017 Shadow of War
192
213.6
2017 Total War: Warhammer II
166
184.8
2017 Wolfenstein II
256
285.2
2017 Destiny 2
216
240.2
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
162
180.8
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
180
200.2
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
200
222.8
2017 For Honor
236
262.7
2017 Project CARS 2
194
215.6
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
216
240.2
2016 Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
171
191.1
2016 Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
174
194.1
2016 Doom
274
304.6
2016 F1 2016
194
215.6
2016 Total War: Warhammer
190
211.6
2016 Battlefield 1
228
253.5
2016 Overwatch
229
254.5
2016 Dishonored 2
166
184.8
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
172
192.1
2015 Rocket League
513
570.7
2015 Need For Speed
208
232.0
2015 Project CARS
204
226.9
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
296
329.2
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
381
423.4
2009 League of Legends
633
703.8

Resolution 2560x1440

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
Year Game Frames Per Second
2019 Apex Legends
161
202.3
2019 Anthem
131
164.4
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
152
190.0
2019 Resident Evil 2
156
196.0
2019 Metro Exodus
121
152.1
2019 World War Z
172
215.5
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
159
199.2
2018 F1 2018
170
213.5
2018 Far Cry 5
156
195.1
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
120
151.0
2018 Final Fantasy XV
132
165.4
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
136
170.5
2018 Forza Horizon 4
150
187.8
2018 Fallout 76
167
209.4
2018 Hitman 2
142
178.7
2018 Just Cause 4
135
169.5
2018 Monster Hunter: World
136
170.5
2018 Battlefield V
165
207.3
2017 Dawn of War III
162
203.2
2017 Ghost Recon Wildlands
134
168.5
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
129
162.3
2017 Shadow of War
144
180.7
2017 Total War: Warhammer II
133
166.4
2017 Wolfenstein II
185
231.9
2017 Destiny 2
178
223.7
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
132
165.4
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
134
168.5
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
153
191.9
2017 For Honor
158
198.1
2017 Project CARS 2
147
184.8
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
183
229.9
2016 Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
132
165.4
2016 Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
145
181.7
2016 Doom
203
254.4
2016 F1 2016
168
210.5
2016 Total War: Warhammer
151
188.9
2016 Battlefield 1
176
220.7
2016 Overwatch
168
210.5
2016 Dishonored 2
140
175.7
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
134
168.5
2015 Rocket League
244
305.6
2015 Need For Speed
164
205.3
2015 Project CARS
160
200.1
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
201
252.4
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
297
372.2
2009 League of Legends
351
439.7

Resolution 3840x2160

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
Year Game Frames Per Second
2019 Apex Legends
85
122.2
2019 Anthem
72
103.7
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
81
116.0
2019 Resident Evil 2
81
116.0
2019 Metro Exodus
70
100.7
2019 World War Z
94
134.5
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
78
111.9
2018 F1 2018
95
136.5
2018 Far Cry 5
83
119.1
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
72
103.7
2018 Final Fantasy XV
73
104.7
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
73
104.7
2018 Forza Horizon 4
88
126.3
2018 Fallout 76
89
128.3
2018 Hitman 2
79
114.0
2018 Just Cause 4
73
104.7
2018 Monster Hunter: World
71
102.8
2018 Battlefield V
89
128.3
2017 Dawn of War III
87
125.3
2017 Ghost Recon Wildlands
79
113.0
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
75
107.8
2017 Shadow of War
81
116.0
2017 Total War: Warhammer II
71
102.8
2017 Wolfenstein II
101
145.7
2017 Destiny 2
91
130.4
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
74
105.8
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
74
105.8
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
91
131.4
2017 For Honor
82
118.1
2017 Project CARS 2
96
137.6
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
122
175.4
2016 Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
72
103.7
2016 Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
94
134.5
2016 Doom
104
149.8
2016 F1 2016
98
140.6
2016 Total War: Warhammer
84
120.1
2016 Battlefield 1
94
134.5
2016 Overwatch
87
125.3
2016 Dishonored 2
89
127.2
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
73
104.7
2015 Rocket League
115
165.2
2015 Need For Speed
96
137.6
2015 Project CARS
96
137.6
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
97
139.6
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
218
311.5
2009 League of Legends
143
205.1
RX 5700 with i7-8700K at 1080p and Low Quality settings
RX 5700 with i7-8700K at 1440p and Low Quality settings
RX 5700 with i7-8700K at 4K and Low Quality settings

RX 5700 Specifications

RX 5700 Board Design

Board Number-
Length12 inches 305 mm
Outputs1x HDMI 3x DisplayPort
Power Connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Slot WidthDual-slot
TDP180 W

RX 5700 Clock Speeds

Boost Clock1625 MHz
GPU Clock1465 MHz
Memory Clock 1750 MHz

RX 5700 Graphics Card

Bus InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16
GenerationNavi
Launch Price349 USD
ProductionUnreleased
Release DateJul 7th, 2019

RX 5700 Graphics Features

DirectX12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL2
OpenGL4.6
Shader Model6.4
Vulkan1.1.108

RX 5700 Graphics Processor

ArchitectureRDNA 1.0
Die Size251 mm²
GPU NameNavi 10
GPU VariantNavi 10 PRO
Process Size7 nm
Transistors10,300 million

RX 5700 Memory

Bandwidth448.0 GB/s
Memory Bus256 bit
Memory Size8192 MB
Memory TypeGDDR6

RX 5700 Render Config

Compute Units36
ROPs64
Shading Units2304
TMUs144

RX 5700 Theoretical Performance

FP16 (half) performance14,980 GFLOPS (2:1)
FP32 (float) performance7,488 GFLOPS
FP64 (double) performance468.0 GFLOPS (1:16)
Pixel Rate104.0 GPixel/s
Texture Rate234.0 GTexel/s

Critics Reviews


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments