R9 Nano with i7-4790K 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K benchmarks at Ultra Quality

At 1440p, R9 Nano can hit 50-60 fps on pretty much everything at ultra, just without antialiasing, less ambient occlusion and turned down shadows. Deciding whether to invest so much money in a high-end GPU like R9 Nano requires careful thought. With current 4096 MB RAM, the R9 Nano can have very few memory-related bottlenecks in more modern games.

View Current Price List

R9 Nano Summary R9 Nano Competitors R9 Nano Review and Analysis R9 Nano Specifications
R9 Nano 1080p Benchmarks R9 Nano 1440p Benchmarks R9 Nano Ultrawide 1440p Benchmarks R9 Nano 4K Benchmarks
R9 Nano Prices R9 Nano Variants
R9 Nano with i7-4790K 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K benchmarks at Ultra Quality
Share Your Comments 1
AMD Radeon R9 Nano
Price $ 1,529.0
Year 2015
Maximum Recorded Temperature 73C
Max Fan Noise 45.8dB
Recommended Power Supply 525W
Benchmark CPU Intel Core i7-4790K @ 4.00GHz ($306.99)
CPU Impact on FPS + 0.0 FPS
CPU Impact on FPS % 0.0%
Benchmark Quality Settings Ultra Quality Settings
Average 1080p Performance 73.1 FPS
Average 1440p Performance 54.7 FPS
(Ultrawide) Average 1440p Performance 46.8 FPS
Average 4K Performance 32.7 FPS
Memory 4 GB
1080p Cost Per Frame $ 8.9
1440p Cost Per Frame $ 11.9
(Ultrawide) 1440p Cost Per Frame $ 13.9
4K Cost Per Frame $ 19.9
Series R9 Nano
Variant AMD Radeon R9 Nano
Overall Combination Score 49/100 Acceptable

The R9 Nano is much more expensive than the R9 390 as it costs a whopping $ 649. Compare this to the R9 390, AMD Radeon R9 390X, which came originally at a price of $ 329, $ 429. Meanwhile, the NVIDIA closest equivalent card is the GTX 980 which costs $ 549. Unfortunately, gaming performance was not quite as impressive. Even if the R9 Nano consistently delivers frame rate increases over the R9 390, AMD Radeon R9 390X, the gain is not much to justify an upgrade.

Whether it is a justifiable upgrade depends on what graphics card you are upgrading from. Users with a R9 390, AMD Radeon R9 390X will not see a remarkable increase in frame rates after paying more for this R9 Nano. Similarly, those holding onto GTX 980 's GTX 780 graphics cards will not have a reason to jump teams yet. For 1080p Full HD, we were able to play Monster Hunter: World, Final Fantasy XV, Forza Horizon 4, GreedFall, Battlefield V at 61 fps to 65 fps and kept frame rates hovering around 63 fps.

For 1440p Quad HD, we were able to play Call of Duty Modern Warfare, World War Z, Strange Brigade, Fallout 76 at 63 fps to 70 fps and kept frame rates hovering around 65 fps.

Compare R9 Nano Variants Performance in Ultra Quality

Assassin's Creed Odyssey (2018)

Ultra Quality

Resolution 1920x1080

Year Graphics Card Price Frames Per Second
2018 AMD Radeon RX 590 $ 279
43.5 FPS
2015 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti $ 649
40.0 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 580 $ 229
39.3 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 FURY X $ 649
39.0 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 FURY $ 549
38.0 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 Nano $ 649
37.0 FPS
2014 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 $ 549
35.0 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 390X $ 429
34.0 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB $ 254
34.0 FPS
2016 AMD Radeon RX 480 $ 400
33.0 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB $ 170
32.3 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti $ 699
28.5 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 570 $ 169
27.2 FPS
2014 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 $ 329
26.7 FPS
2016 AMD Radeon RX 470 $ 179
26.0 FPS

The R9 Nano sits between the R9 FURY and the GTX 980, falling slower than R9 FURY by 2.7% and faster than GTX 980 by 5.7%. It has an average relative performance against every graphics card here. Its results are actually indistinguishable from those of the R9 FURY. It is a close call between the R9 Nano and its rival GTX 980 by a small margin.

Forza Horizon 4 (2018)

Ultra Quality

Resolution 1920x1080

Year Graphics Card Price Frames Per Second
2015 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti $ 649
94.0 FPS
2018 AMD Radeon RX 590 $ 279
75.5 FPS
2014 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 $ 549
73.0 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB $ 254
70.2 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 580 $ 229
68.2 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 FURY X $ 649
68.0 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB $ 170
66.6 FPS
2014 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 $ 329
63.4 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 Nano $ 649
63.0 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 390X $ 429
57.0 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN $ 999
54.0 FPS
2013 AMD Radeon R9 290 $ 399
53.0 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 390 $ 329
52.0 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 570 $ 169
52.0 FPS
2016 AMD Radeon RX 470 $ 179
45.0 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti $ 699
42.6 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 $ 649
41.0 FPS
2013 AMD Radeon R9 290X $ 549
37.0 FPS
2012 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 $ 499
37.0 FPS

The R9 Nano sits between the GTX 970 and the R9 390X, falling slower than GTX 970 by 0.6% and faster than R9 390X by 10.5%. It has an average relative performance against every graphics card here. The R9 Nano's performance in this game hovers around the 60fps mark. Its results are actually indistinguishable from those of the GTX 970. In addition, the R9 Nano was also faster than the R9 390 by a good margin.

Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018)

Ultra Quality

Resolution 1920x1080

Year Graphics Card Price Frames Per Second
2018 AMD Radeon RX 590 $ 279
71.9 FPS
2015 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti $ 649
66.0 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 580 $ 229
64.9 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 390X $ 429
56.0 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 FURY X $ 649
56.0 FPS
2016 AMD Radeon RX 480 $ 400
54.0 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 570 $ 169
52.0 FPS
2014 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 $ 549
52.0 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 FURY $ 549
51.0 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 Nano $ 649
50.0 FPS
2016 AMD Radeon RX 470 $ 179
48.0 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB $ 254
46.8 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB $ 170
44.4 FPS
2014 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 $ 329
43.6 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti $ 699
37.9 FPS

The R9 Nano sits between the R9 FURY and the RX 470, falling slower than R9 FURY by 2% and faster than RX 470 by 4.2%. It has below average relative performance against every graphics card here. Its results are actually indistinguishable from those of the R9 FURY.

PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (2017)

Ultra Quality

Resolution 1920x1080

Year Graphics Card Price Frames Per Second
2015 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti $ 649
68.0 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 FURY X $ 649
60.0 FPS
2014 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 $ 549
58.0 FPS
2018 AMD Radeon RX 590 $ 279
56.0 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 Nano $ 649
53.0 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB $ 254
52.2 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 580 $ 229
50.6 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB $ 170
49.6 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 390X $ 429
49.0 FPS
2014 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 $ 329
47.5 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 390 $ 329
47.0 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN $ 999
44.0 FPS
2013 AMD Radeon R9 290 $ 399
43.0 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 570 $ 169
43.0 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 $ 649
43.0 FPS
2013 AMD Radeon R9 290X $ 549
41.0 FPS
2016 AMD Radeon RX 470 $ 179
41.0 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti $ 699
37.0 FPS
2012 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 $ 499
32.0 FPS

The R9 Nano sits between the RX 590 and the GTX 1060 6GB, falling slower than RX 590 by 5.7% and faster than GTX 1060 6GB by 1.5%. It has a strong relative performance against every graphics card here. In addition, the R9 Nano was also faster than the R9 390 by a good margin.

Battlefield V (2018)

Ultra Quality

Resolution 1920x1080

Year Graphics Card Price Frames Per Second
2018 AMD Radeon RX 590 $ 279
103.5 FPS
2015 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti $ 649
94.0 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 580 $ 229
93.5 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 FURY X $ 649
86.0 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 FURY $ 549
83.0 FPS
2014 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 $ 549
73.0 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 390X $ 429
71.0 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 570 $ 169
71.0 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB $ 254
68.4 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 Nano $ 649
65.0 FPS
2016 AMD Radeon RX 480 $ 400
65.0 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB $ 170
64.9 FPS
2016 AMD Radeon RX 470 $ 179
62.0 FPS
2014 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 $ 329
60.4 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti $ 699
50.4 FPS

The R9 Nano sits between the GTX 1060 6GB and the RX 480, falling slower than GTX 1060 6GB by 5.2% and faster than RX 480 by 0%. It has below average relative performance against every graphics card here.

Game Performance at Ultra Quality settings

Change Quality Settings
Ultra Quality High Quality Medium Quality Low Quality

Resolution 1920x1080

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
Year Game Frames Per Second
2019 Apex Legends
64
72.0
2019 Anthem
41
46.4
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
61
68.0
2019 Resident Evil 2
79
87.9
2019 Metro Exodus
35
39.1
2019 World War Z
78
87.0
2019 Gears of War 5
51
57.0
2019 F1 2019
64
71.5
2019 GreedFall
57
64.4
2019 Borderlands 3
40
45.2
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
78
87.0
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
30
33.5
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
47
52.6
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
71
79.0
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
33
37.0
2018 Final Fantasy XV
56
63.0
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
45
50.0
2018 Forza Horizon 4
56
63.0
2018 Fallout 76
61
68.0
2018 Hitman 2
47
53.0
2018 Just Cause 4
50
56.5
2018 Monster Hunter: World
54
60.9
2018 Strange Brigade
82
91.8
2018 Battlefield V
58
65.0
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
47
53.0
2017 Destiny 2
91
102.0
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
47
53.0
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
57
63.7
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
70
78.3
2017 For Honor
93
104.4
2017 Project CARS 2
66
73.9
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
80
89.6
2016 Ashes of the Singularity
49
55.2
2016 Hitman
75
83.8
2016 Rise of the Tomb Raider
64
71.2
2016 The Division
58
64.6
2016 Overwatch
88
98.7
2016 Dishonored 2
48
53.9
2015 DiRT Rally
102
114.2
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
55
62.1
2015 The Witcher 3
53
59.2
2015 Total War: Attila
50
55.9
2015 Rocket League
274
304.5
2015 Need For Speed
75
84.4
2015 Project CARS
72
80.9
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
133
147.9
2014 Civilization: Beyond Earth
101
113.2
2014 Dragon Age: Inquisition
71
79.6
2014 Far Cry 4
67
75.0
2014 GRID Autosport
72
80.1
2014 Shadow of Mordor
92
103.0
2014 The Talos Principle
102
113.9
2013 Crysis 3
63
70.2
2013 Battlefield 4
79
88.8
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
187
208.8
2009 League of Legends
352
391.5

Resolution 2560x1440

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
Year Game Frames Per Second
2019 Apex Legends
42
53.6
2019 Anthem
29
36.8
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
42
52.8
2019 Resident Evil 2
47
59.2
2019 Metro Exodus
24
30.4
2019 World War Z
50
63.5
2019 Gears of War 5
33
41.3
2019 F1 2019
40
50.6
2019 GreedFall
37
46.5
2019 Borderlands 3
25
31.8
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
50
62.6
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
21
27.4
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
33
41.3
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
37
47.0
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
23
29.0
2018 Final Fantasy XV
36
45.0
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
28
35.0
2018 Forza Horizon 4
43
54.0
2018 Fallout 76
56
70.0
2018 Hitman 2
28
35.0
2018 Just Cause 4
33
41.8
2018 Monster Hunter: World
34
42.6
2018 Strange Brigade
51
63.9
2018 Battlefield V
40
51.0
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
33
42.0
2017 Destiny 2
70
88.0
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
32
40.0
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
33
41.3
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
45
56.5
2017 For Honor
48
60.9
2017 Project CARS 2
41
52.2
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
64
80.9
2016 Ashes of the Singularity
39
49.0
2016 Hitman
51
64.4
2016 Rise of the Tomb Raider
40
50.7
2016 The Division
38
48.5
2016 Overwatch
54
67.9
2016 Dishonored 2
36
46.1
2015 DiRT Rally
65
82.3
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
35
44.6
2015 The Witcher 3
36
45.9
2015 Total War: Attila
31
39.8
2015 Rocket League
104
130.5
2015 Need For Speed
52
65.2
2015 Project CARS
49
61.8
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
76
95.7
2014 Civilization: Beyond Earth
72
90.2
2014 Dragon Age: Inquisition
45
56.8
2014 Far Cry 4
55
68.8
2014 GRID Autosport
65
81.3
2014 Shadow of Mordor
60
75.0
2014 The Talos Principle
67
84.6
2013 Crysis 3
37
46.8
2013 Battlefield 4
48
60.6
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
139
174.0
2009 League of Legends
174
217.5

Resolution 3440x1440

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
Year Game Frames Per Second
2019 Apex Legends
34
45.8
2019 Anthem
23
30.4
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
32
43.2
2019 Resident Evil 2
35
47.2
2019 Metro Exodus
20
26.5
2019 World War Z
40
53.5
2019 Gears of War 5
27
36.1
2019 F1 2019
33
44.3
2019 GreedFall
26
35.1
2019 Borderlands 3
19
25.8
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
40
53.5
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
18
24.0
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
27
36.1
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
32
42.8
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
19
26.2
2018 Final Fantasy XV
28
38.0
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
21
28.4
2018 Forza Horizon 4
36
47.6
2018 Fallout 76
44
58.3
2018 Hitman 2
22
29.4
2018 Just Cause 4
25
34.0
2018 Monster Hunter: World
25
33.7
2018 Strange Brigade
40
52.8
2018 Battlefield V
30
40.1
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
28
36.9
2017 Destiny 2
53
70.6
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
25
33.7
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
25
34.1
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
38
51.1
2017 For Honor
37
48.8
2017 Project CARS 2
38
51.2
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
60
79.6
2016 Ashes of the Singularity
35
46.5
2016 Hitman
41
54.4
2016 Rise of the Tomb Raider
31
41.9
2016 The Division
31
40.8
2016 Overwatch
41
55.1
2016 Dishonored 2
33
44.2
2015 DiRT Rally
52
69.0
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
27
35.7
2015 The Witcher 3
30
39.5
2015 Total War: Attila
30
40.3
2015 Rocket League
77
102.4
2015 Need For Speed
44
58.2
2015 Project CARS
42
56.3
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
57
75.0
2014 Civilization: Beyond Earth
60
79.1
2014 Dragon Age: Inquisition
35
46.9
2014 Far Cry 4
43
56.9
2014 GRID Autosport
55
72.5
2014 Shadow of Mordor
47
62.6
2014 The Talos Principle
54
71.2
2013 Crysis 3
28
37.5
2013 Battlefield 4
42
56.4
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
134
176.9
2009 League of Legends
123
162.9

Resolution 3840x2160

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
Year Game Frames Per Second
2019 Apex Legends
22
32.0
2019 Anthem
14
20.0
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
19
28.0
2019 Resident Evil 2
20
29.1
2019 Metro Exodus
13
19.1
2019 World War Z
25
36.5
2019 Gears of War 5
18
26.1
2019 F1 2019
22
32.2
2019 GreedFall
13
19.1
2019 Borderlands 3
11
16.5
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
26
37.4
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
12
17.4
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
18
26.1
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
23
33.0
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
14
20.0
2018 Final Fantasy XV
18
26.0
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
12
18.0
2018 Forza Horizon 4
24
35.0
2018 Fallout 76
27
39.0
2018 Hitman 2
14
20.0
2018 Just Cause 4
15
21.8
2018 Monster Hunter: World
14
20.4
2018 Strange Brigade
24
34.8
2018 Battlefield V
16
24.0
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
18
27.0
2017 Destiny 2
30
44.0
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
16
23.0
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
15
22.4
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
27
39.1
2017 For Honor
21
30.4
2017 Project CARS 2
30
43.5
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
47
67.9
2016 Ashes of the Singularity
26
38.0
2016 Hitman
26
37.2
2016 Rise of the Tomb Raider
19
27.6
2016 The Division
19
27.7
2016 Overwatch
24
35.0
2016 Dishonored 2
25
36.5
2015 DiRT Rally
32
46.6
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
15
22.1
2015 The Witcher 3
19
28.0
2015 Total War: Attila
24
35.5
2015 Rocket League
42
60.9
2015 Need For Speed
30
43.5
2015 Project CARS
30
43.5
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
31
44.4
2014 Civilization: Beyond Earth
40
57.7
2014 Dragon Age: Inquisition
21
30.8
2014 Far Cry 4
26
37.6
2014 GRID Autosport
37
54.2
2014 Shadow of Mordor
29
42.0
2014 The Talos Principle
33
48.4
2013 Crysis 3
16
23.3
2013 Battlefield 4
31
44.9
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
109
156.6
2009 League of Legends
60
87.0
R9 Nano with i7-4790K at 1080p and Ultra Quality settings

R9 Nano Specifications

R9 Nano

Critics Reviews

The AMD Radeon R9 Nano shows that you don’t always have to be the fastest to win the race. Some races are more of a marathon, and it’s more important to pace yourself well. MORE: Best Graphics ...
The Radeon R9 Nano is the fruition of AMD's gamble of integrating stacked high-bandwidth memory (HBM) and a 4,096 SP pixel-grinder into a compact multi-chip module that eliminates the need for external memory chips, freeing up large swathes of PCB area.
The new Radeon R9 Nano is the little brother to the existing AMD Radeon R9 Fury cards – in water-cooled 'X' and air-cooled standard models – and deserves that distinction in more ways than one.
AMD seems to have hit all the cues it set out to with the Radeon R9 Nano. This card is ridiculously tiny in light of other high-end GPUs, its power consumption characteristics are significantly ...
AMD's R9 Nano is a graphics card that serves its (very) niche high-end small form factor market well but its premium pricing makes it unaffordable to many small form factor system builders, and ...
AMD's R9 Nano is a hell of a little graphics card, delivering near-R9 Fury X performance in a compact mini-ITX form-factor. It's also expensive—very expensive—at 0, matching the price of ...
The AMD Radeon R9 Fury Nano is one of the most exciting graphics cards I’ve seen for years and, at only 6in long, it’s also one of the smallest. ... Verdict. AMD’s latest card is one of its ...
While AMD is pegging the Radeon R9 Nano as a luxury card, a component that isn't meant to be about value for money, rather it's all about getting the maximum performance for a small form factor PC ...
With the Radeon R9 Nano at the heart of our test rig, it consumed over 90 fewer watts than the Fury X--AMD's specified power ratings are in-line with our testing.
AMD Radeon R9 Nano Overclocking Results Extra performance with the R9 Nano comes in two distinct areas, overclocking and power management. Interestingly, AMD lets users unlock the power management ...
The R9 Nano is stunningly powerful given its Mini-ITX-friendly form factor, and a true leap ahead for AMD. Just know that this is a specialized component meant for very tight, compact PCs, and ...
As it turns out, AMD's Radeon R9 Nano is a great piece of hardware; there's really nothing like it out there. That’s probably why AMD is setting its price at an eye-popping 9. A lack of ...
The Radeon R9 Nano is AMD's solution for all small-form-factor system builders that want to create a 4K-capable gaming PC in a tiny volume. Thanks to a new approach to power management, the card stays below 200 W at all times, while still delivering excellent framerates.
AMD Radeon R9 Nano - the Digital Foundry verdict The R9 Nano packs an unprecedented amount of rendering power into an absolutely tiny product, and possesses superb build quality.
AMD deserves some serious props for even creating the Radeon R9 Nano in the first place. This pint-sized powerhouse is the latest in a long line of AMD technical innovations that skate to where ...
We’ll have a full suite of Radeon R9 Nano benchmarks recorded in our ultra-high-end graphics test-bed, along with comparison numbers from an array of other high-end GPUs, a little later.
AMD’s itty-bitty Radeon R9 Nano isn’t due to launch until September 10, but a review unit landed on my doorstep today. Sadly, I can’t talk about its performance until then, but an AMD ...
The Radeon R9 Nano is a high-end graphics card by AMD, launched in August 2015. Built on the 28 nm process, and based on the Fiji graphics processor, in its Fiji XT CA variant, the card supports DirectX 12.0.
The AMD Radeon R9 Nano finished just behind the Radeon R9 Fury here, but well ahead of the R9 390 or similarly-sized GeForce GTX 970 mini (the Asus GeForce GTX 970 Direct-CU mini to be exact).
As it turns out, AMD's Radeon R9 Nano is a great piece of hardware; there's really nothing like it out there. That’s probably why AMD is setting its price at an eye-popping 9.
Meanwhile at the other end of the spectrum is the Radeon R9 Nano, which sees AMD push the limits on miniaturization and pack Fiji into a card just 6 inches long.
What to Consider Before Buying a Graphics Card

What to Consider Before Buying a Graphics Card

If you have been planning to upgrade your system by purchasing a new graphics card. Then there are some important factors to consider.
Resolution VS Quality: Impact on Game Performance

Resolution VS Quality: Impact on Game Performance

What affects game performance? Clarity or Details?

Ultra VS High Quality Settings in PC Games

Ultra VS High Quality Settings in PC Games

Every player has a different notion about the ideal setting for PC games. But in most cases, opting for a High quality graphics configuration is the way to go.

What are CPU or GPU Bottlenecks?

What are CPU or GPU Bottlenecks?

Are you getting sudden frame drops? you might have a bottleneck.
What is the acceptable FPS speed for me?

What is the acceptable FPS speed for me?

For some games, you can still enjoy great garphics at lower frame rates.
GPU Hierarchy
GPU Hierarchy
GPU Compare
GPU Compare
CPU Hierarchy
CPU Compare
Laptop Hierarchy
Gaming Laptops
Monitor Hierarchy
Gaming Monitors
Headset Hierarchy
Gaming Headsets

Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments
S
Stan 1 year ago
649 $ NOT 1529$ lmao
1 0