R7 370 with i7-4790K benchmarks at Ultra Quality settings

The R7 370 is more suitable for budget PC builds and less demanding games. The price/performance ratio is excellent for R7 370 against the competition in budget graphics cards. With current 2048 MB RAM, the R7 370 can have serious memory-related bottlenecks in more modern games. With current 2048 MB RAM, the R7 370 can have very few memory-related bottlenecks in more modern games.

 R7 370 with i7-4790K benchmarks at Ultra Quality settings
AMD Radeon R7 370
Price $ 202.0
Year 2015
Maximum Recorded Temperature 69C
Max Fan Noise 56.3dB
Recommended Power Supply 460W
Benchmark CPU Intel Core i7-4790K @ 4.00GHz ($306.99)
CPU Impact on FPS + 0.0 FPS
CPU Impact on FPS % 0.0%
Benchmark Quality Settings Ultra Quality Settings
Average 1080p Performance 31.2 FPS
Average 1440p Performance 21.2 FPS
Average 4K Performance 12.7 FPS
Memory 2 GB
1080p Cost Per Frame $ 4.8
1440p Cost Per Frame $ 7.0
4K Cost Per Frame $ 11.7
Series R7 370
Variant AMD Radeon R7 370
Overall Combination Score 62/100 Good

The R9 380 might be the high-end flagship of the latest GCN 1.0 set of graphics cards, but their prices keep them out of the reach of most mid-range PC gamers. On the other hand, the R7 370 is closer to being reasonably affordable at a price tag of $ 149. AMD ’s xx70 cards have always been defined by mid-range prices with performance that knocks on the door of high-end graphics cards – especially when overclocked. After taking the time to fully test the GCN 1.0 graphics card inside the R7 370, we can say without a doubt that it continues the trend.

The R7 370 is much more cheaper than the R9 270 as it costs $ 149. Compare this to the R9 270, which came originally at a price of $ 179. Meanwhile, the NVIDIA closest equivalent card is the GTX 760 which costs $ 249.

Forza Horizon 4 (2018)

Ultra Quality

Resolution 1920x1080

Year Graphics Card Price Frames Per Second
2015 AMD Radeon R9 380X $ 229
40.0 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 380 $ 199
38.0 FPS
2015 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 $ 199
38.0 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti $ 169
37.2 FPS
2018 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 $ 169
33.4 FPS
2014 AMD Radeon R9 285 $ 249
32.0 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 $ 249
31.5 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 $ 399
30.4 FPS
2014 AMD Radeon R9 280 $ 279
29.0 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 560 $ 99
29.0 FPS
2015 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 $ 159
28.4 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R7 370 $ 149
25.0 FPS
2012 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 $ 229
23.4 FPS
2016 AMD Radeon RX 460 $ 140
23.0 FPS
2017 NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 $ 79
22.0 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 550 $ 79
17.0 FPS

The R7 370 sits between the GTX 950 and the GTX 660, falling slower than GTX 950 by 13.6% and faster than GTX 660 by 6.8%. It has below average relative performance against every graphics card here. Against its rival - the GTX 760, the R7 370 is much slower. Compared to its higher sibling, the R7 370 was much slower than the R9 380 by more than 20%.

PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (2017)

Ultra Quality

Resolution 1920x1080

Year Graphics Card Price Frames Per Second
2014 AMD Radeon R9 285 $ 249
48.0 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 $ 249
39.6 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R7 370 $ 149
37.0 FPS
2015 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 $ 159
34.0 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 380 $ 199
32.0 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 380X $ 229
32.0 FPS
2015 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 $ 199
31.0 FPS
2014 AMD Radeon R9 280 $ 279
30.0 FPS
2014 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti $ 149
30.0 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti $ 169
27.6 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 $ 399
26.4 FPS
2018 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 $ 169
24.9 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 560 $ 99
23.0 FPS
2012 AMD Radeon HD 7850 $ 249
21.0 FPS
2016 AMD Radeon RX 460 $ 140
20.0 FPS
2017 NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 $ 79
17.7 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 550 $ 79
16.1 FPS
2012 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 $ 229
13.5 FPS

The R7 370 sits between the GTX 760 and the GTX 950, falling slower than GTX 760 by 7% and faster than GTX 950 by 8.8%. It has a strong relative performance against every graphics card here.

Game Performance at Ultra Quality settings

Change Quality Settings

Resolution 1920x1080

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
Year Game Frames Per Second
2019 Apex Legends
24
27.0
2019 Anthem
15
17.4
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
22
25.5
2019 Resident Evil 2
30
34.2
2019 Metro Exodus
13
15.3
2019 World War Z
36
40.0
2019 Gears of War 5
19
22.2
2019 F1 2019
25
27.9
2019 GreedFall
22
25.1
2019 Borderlands 3
15
17.6
2018 Forza Horizon 4
22
25.0
2018 Fallout 76
26
29.0
2018 Hitman 2
20
23.0
2018 Just Cause 4
19
22.0
2018 Monster Hunter: World
21
23.7
2018 Strange Brigade
32
35.8
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
33
37.0
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
22
25.2
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
27
30.5
2017 For Honor
36
40.7
2017 Project CARS 2
25
28.8
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
31
34.9
2016 Ashes of the Singularity
18
20.1
2016 Hitman
26
29.1
2016 Rise of the Tomb Raider
26
29.9
2016 The Division
24
27.6
2016 Overwatch
35
39.2
2016 Dishonored 2
18
21.0
2015 DiRT Rally
47
52.5
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
25
28.4
2015 The Witcher 3
21
23.9
2015 Total War: Attila
19
21.5
2015 Rocket League
106
118.7
2015 Need For Speed
29
32.9
2015 Project CARS
28
31.5
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
51
57.6
2014 Dragon Age: Inquisition
34
38.2
2014 Far Cry 4
37
42.2
2014 GRID Autosport
47
53.2
2014 Shadow of Mordor
34
38.3
2014 The Talos Principle
42
47.2
2013 Crysis 3
26
29.0
2013 Battlefield 4
36
40.4
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
73
81.4
2009 League of Legends
137
152.6

Resolution 2560x1440

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
Year Game Frames Per Second
2019 Apex Legends
16
20.1
2019 Anthem
11
13.8
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
15
19.8
2019 Resident Evil 2
18
23.1
2019 Metro Exodus
9
11.9
2019 World War Z
23
29.2
2019 Gears of War 5
12
16.1
2019 F1 2019
15
19.7
2019 GreedFall
14
18.1
2019 Borderlands 3
9
12.4
2018 Forza Horizon 4
16
21.0
2018 Hitman 2
12
15.0
2018 Just Cause 4
13
16.3
2018 Monster Hunter: World
13
16.6
2018 Strange Brigade
19
24.9
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
22
28.0
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
12
16.1
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
17
22.0
2017 For Honor
18
23.7
2017 Project CARS 2
16
20.3
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
25
31.5
2016 Overwatch
21
27.3
2016 Dishonored 2
14
18.0
2015 Rocket League
40
50.8
2015 Need For Speed
20
25.4
2015 Project CARS
19
24.1
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
29
37.3
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
54
67.8
2009 League of Legends
67
84.8

Resolution 3840x2160

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
Year Game Frames Per Second
2019 Apex Legends
8
12.0
2019 Anthem
5
7.5
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
7
10.5
2019 Resident Evil 2
7
11.4
2019 Metro Exodus
5
7.5
2019 World War Z
11
16.8
2019 Gears of War 5
7
10.2
2019 F1 2019
8
12.5
2019 GreedFall
5
7.5
2019 Borderlands 3
4
6.4
2018 Forza Horizon 4
9
14.0
2018 Hitman 2
6
9.0
2018 Just Cause 4
5
8.5
2018 Monster Hunter: World
5
8.0
2018 Strange Brigade
9
13.6
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
11
16.0
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
6
9.1
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
10
15.3
2017 For Honor
8
11.9
2017 Project CARS 2
11
17.0
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
18
26.4
2016 Overwatch
9
14.0
2016 Dishonored 2
9
14.2
2015 Rocket League
16
23.7
2015 Need For Speed
11
17.0
2015 Project CARS
11
17.0
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
12
17.3
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
42
61.0
2009 League of Legends
23
33.9
R7 370 with i7-4790K at 1080p and Ultra Quality settings

Compare Against Competitors

R7 370 Specifications

R7 370 Board Design

Board NumberC631, C634
Length6 inches 152 mm
Outputs2x DVI1x HDMI1x DisplayPort
Power Connectors1x 6-pin
Slot WidthDual-slot
TDP110 W

R7 370 Clock Speeds

Boost Clock975 MHz
GPU Clock925 MHz
Memory Clock1400 MHz 5600 MHz effective

R7 370 Graphics Card

Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16
GenerationPirate Islands (R7 300)
Launch Price149 USD
ProductionActive
Release DateJun 18th, 2015

R7 370 Graphics Features

DirectX12.0 (11_1)
OpenCL1.2
OpenGL4.5
Shader Model5.1
Vulkan1.1.77

R7 370 Graphics Processor

ArchitectureGCN 1.0
Die Size212 mm²
GPU NameTrinidad
GPU VariantTrinidad PRO (215-0870020)
Process Size28 nm
Transistors2,800 million

R7 370 Memory

Bandwidth179.2 GB/s
Memory Bus256 bit
Memory Size2048 MB
Memory TypeGDDR5

R7 370 Render Config

Compute Units16
ROPs32
Shading Units1024
TMUs64

R7 370 Theoretical Performance

FP32 (float) performance1,997 GFLOPS
FP64 (double) performance124.8 GFLOPS (1:16)
Pixel Rate31.20 GPixel/s
Texture Rate62.40 GTexel/s

Critics Reviews

AMD Radeon R7 370 – Results Analysis The affordable R7 370 is designed as a 1080p card, so that’s where I started my benchmarks. Thankfully, it proved playable in every game at this resolution.
In the end, drawing a sweeping conclusion is difficult when there’s no actual reference graphics card. The next best approach is evaluating cards from AMD’s partners. ... AMD’s Radeon R7 370 ...
AMD Radeon R7 370: Pitcairn Returns (Again and Again and Again) In March of 2012, more than three years ago, Pitcairn first saw the light of day. It was in a card called the Radeon HD 7850 back ...
The Radeon R7 370 is a mid-range graphics card by AMD, launched in June 2015. Built on the 28 nm process, and based on the Trinidad graphics processor, in its Trinidad PRO variant, the card supports DirectX 12.0.
Radeon R7 360, R7 370, & R9 380. Launching today is the bulk of the Radeon 300 series, the so-called “numbered” parts like 390, which are categorically distinct from the Fury products.

Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments