R7 250 with i7-3770K 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K benchmarks at Ultra Quality

The R7 250 is more suitable for budget PC builds and less demanding games. With current 1024 MB RAM, the R7 250 can have serious memory-related bottlenecks in more modern games. The R7 250 's power requirements are reasonable and it is very efficient compared to the competition. With regards to max load temperature, the R7 250 's cooling is excellent at keeping it cool and under control. This combination between R7 250 and Intel Core i7-3770K @ 3.50GHz has less than 8% bottleneck in many games and is perfect match to avoid FPS loss. This combination between R7 250 and Intel Core i7-3770K @ 3.50GHz is a perfect match to avoid FPS loss.

R7 250 with i7-3770K 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K benchmarks at Ultra Quality
AMD Radeon R7 250
Price $ 95.0
Year 2013
Maximum Recorded Temperature 65C
Max Fan Noise 46.9dB
Recommended Power Supply 415W
Benchmark CPU Intel Core i7-3770K @ 3.50GHz ($248.98)
CPU Impact on FPS + 0.0 FPS
CPU Impact on FPS % 0.0%
Benchmark Quality Settings Ultra Quality Settings
Average 1080p Performance 15.4 FPS
Average 1440p Performance 8.5 FPS
(Ultrawide) Average 1440p Performance 7.3 FPS
Average 4K Performance 5.1 FPS
Memory 1 GB
1080p Cost Per Frame $ 5.8
1440p Cost Per Frame $ 10.5
(Ultrawide) 1440p Cost Per Frame $ 12.2
4K Cost Per Frame $ 17.5
Series R7 250
Variant AMD Radeon R7 250
Overall Combination Score 57/100 Acceptable

AMD ’s xx50 cards have always been defined by budget prices with performance that knocks on the door of entry-level graphics cards – especially when overclocked. After taking the time to fully test the GCN 1.0 graphics card inside the R7 250, we can say without a doubt that it continues the trend.

Game Performance at Ultra Quality settings

Change Quality Settings

Resolution 1920x1080

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
Year Game Frames Per Second
2019 Apex Legends
8
9.0
2019 Anthem
5
5.8
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
7
8.5
2019 Resident Evil 2
13
14.6
2019 Metro Exodus
5
6.5
2019 World War Z
10
12.0
2019 Gears of War 5
8
9.5
2019 F1 2019
10
11.9
2019 GreedFall
9
10.7
2019 Borderlands 3
6
7.5
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
13
14.5
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
5
5.6
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
7
8.8
2018 Just Cause 4
8
9.4
2018 Monster Hunter: World
9
10.2
2018 Strange Brigade
13
15.3
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
11
13.1
2017 For Honor
15
17.4
2017 Project CARS 2
11
12.3
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
13
14.9
2016 Dishonored 2
8
9.0
2015 Rocket League
45
50.8
2015 Need For Speed
12
14.1
2015 Project CARS
12
13.5
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
22
24.6
2013 Bioshock Infinite
28
31.3
2013 GRID 2
45
50.4
2013 Total War: Rome 2
37
41.2
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
31
34.8
2009 League of Legends
58
65.2
2008 Crysis: Warhead
25
28.6

Resolution 2560x1440

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
Year Game Frames Per Second
2019 Apex Legends
5
6.7
2019 Anthem
3
4.6
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
5
6.6
2019 Resident Evil 2
7
9.9
2019 Metro Exodus
4
5.1
2019 World War Z
7
8.8
2019 Gears of War 5
5
6.9
2019 F1 2019
6
8.4
2019 GreedFall
6
7.8
2019 Borderlands 3
4
5.3
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
8
10.4
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
3
4.6
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
5
6.9
2018 Just Cause 4
5
7.0
2018 Monster Hunter: World
5
7.1
2018 Strange Brigade
8
10.7
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
7
9.4
2017 For Honor
8
10.2
2017 Project CARS 2
6
8.7
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
10
13.5
2016 Dishonored 2
6
7.7
2015 Rocket League
17
21.8
2015 Need For Speed
8
10.9
2015 Project CARS
8
10.3
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
12
16.0
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
23
29.0
2009 League of Legends
28
36.2

Resolution 3440x1440

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
Year Game Frames Per Second
2019 Apex Legends
4
5.7
2019 Anthem
2
3.8
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
4
5.4
2019 Resident Evil 2
6
7.9
2019 Metro Exodus
3
4.4
2019 World War Z
5
7.4
2019 Gears of War 5
4
6.0
2019 F1 2019
5
7.4
2019 GreedFall
4
5.9
2019 Borderlands 3
3
4.3
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
6
8.9
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
3
4.0
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
4
6.0
2018 Just Cause 4
4
5.7
2018 Monster Hunter: World
4
5.6
2018 Strange Brigade
6
8.8
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
6
8.5
2017 For Honor
6
8.2
2017 Project CARS 2
6
8.5
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
10
13.3
2016 Dishonored 2
5
7.4
2015 Rocket League
12
17.1
2015 Need For Speed
7
9.7
2015 Project CARS
7
9.4
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
9
12.5
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
22
29.5
2009 League of Legends
20
27.2

Resolution 3840x2160

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
Year Game Frames Per Second
2019 Apex Legends
2
4.0
2019 Anthem
1
2.5
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
2
3.5
2019 Resident Evil 2
3
4.9
2019 Metro Exodus
2
3.2
2019 World War Z
3
5.0
2019 Gears of War 5
3
4.3
2019 F1 2019
3
5.4
2019 GreedFall
2
3.2
2019 Borderlands 3
1
2.8
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
4
6.2
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
2
2.9
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
3
4.3
2018 Just Cause 4
2
3.6
2018 Monster Hunter: World
2
3.4
2018 Strange Brigade
4
5.8
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
4
6.5
2017 For Honor
3
5.1
2017 Project CARS 2
5
7.2
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
7
11.3
2016 Dishonored 2
4
6.1
2015 Rocket League
7
10.2
2015 Need For Speed
5
7.2
2015 Project CARS
5
7.2
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
5
7.4
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
18
26.1
2009 League of Legends
10
14.5
R7 250 with i7-3770K at 1080p and Ultra Quality settings

R7 250 Specifications

R7 250

Critics Reviews

Radeon-based stock video cards are usually some variation on AMD's red-and-black theme, and PowerColor's version of the Radeon R7 250X we're looking at here doesn't stray too far from that tradition.
The Radeon R7 250 was an entry-level graphics card by AMD, launched in October 2013. Built on the 28 nm process, and based on the Oland graphics processor, in its Oland XT variant, the card supports DirectX 12.0.

Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments