GTX 480 avec i7-975 des benchmarks Qualité ultra à des paramètres de qualité

Il est intéressant de noter que le GTX 480 est une carte très avide de puissance et nécessite une unité d'alimentation décent. Avec la 1536 RAM MB actuelle, GTX 480 le peut avoir de graves goulots d'étranglement liés à la mémoire dans les jeux plus modernes. Il est important de savoir que GTX 480 la température de charge maximale est très élevée et peut nécessiter des solutions de refroidissement personnalisées. Cette combinaison entre GTX 480 et Intel Core i7-975 @ 3.33GHz a moins de 15% de goulot d'étranglement dans de nombreux jeux et peut causer des pertes fps mineures. Cette combinaison entre GTX 480 et Intel Core i7-975 @ 3.33GHz a moins de 8% goulot d'étranglement dans de nombreux jeux et est parfait match pour éviter la perte fps.

 GTX 480 avec i7-975 des benchmarks Qualité ultra à des paramètres de qualité
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480
Prix € 439.1
Année 2010
Température maximale enregistrée 94C
Bruit maximum de ventilateur dB
Alimentation recommandée 600W
CPU Benchmark Intel Core i7-975 @ 3.33GHz ($179.99)
Impact CPU sur FPS + 0.0 FPS
Impact CPU sur FPS% 0.0%
Paramètres de qualité de référence Ultra Quality Settings
Rendement moyen en 1080p 30.7 FPS
Rendement 1440p moyen 19.3 FPS
Rendement moyen de 4K 11.6 FPS
Mémoire 1 GB
Coût 1080p par image € 14.3
1440p Coût Par Image € 22.7
Coût 4K par image € 37.9
Série GTX 480
Variant NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480
Score global combiné 42/100 Acceptable

NVIDIA cartes xx80 ont toujours été définies par des prix high-end avec des performances qui frappent à la porte des cartes graphiques extreme, en particulier lorsqu'elles sont overclockées. Après avoir pris le temps de tester complètement la carte graphique Fermi à l'intérieur du GTX 480, nous pouvons affirmer sans l'ombre d'un doute qu'elle poursuit la tendance.

Performances du jeu Qualité ultra aux réglages

Modifier les paramètres de qualité

Résolution 1920x1080

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
Année Jeu Images par seconde
2019 Apex Legends
24
27.0
2019 Anthem
15
17.4
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
22
25.5
2019 Resident Evil 2
28
31.5
2019 Metro Exodus
12
14.0
2019 World War Z
23
25.9
2019 Gears of War 5
18
20.4
2019 F1 2019
23
25.6
2019 GreedFall
20
23.1
2019 Borderlands 3
14
16.2
2018 Just Cause 4
18
20.3
2018 Monster Hunter: World
19
21.8
2018 Strange Brigade
29
32.9
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
25
28.1
2017 For Honor
33
37.4
2017 Project CARS 2
23
26.5
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
28
32.1
2016 Dishonored 2
17
19.3
2015 Rocket League
98
109.2
2015 Need For Speed
27
30.3
2015 Project CARS
26
29.0
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
47
53.0
2013 Bioshock Infinite
50
56.5
2013 Company of Heroes 2
34
38.8
2013 GRID 2
38
43.2
2013 Metro: Last Light
37
41.5
2013 Total War: Rome 2
49
55.4
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
67
74.9
2009 League of Legends
126
140.4
2008 Crysis: Warhead
33
37.2

Résolution 2560x1440

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
Année Jeu Images par seconde
2019 Apex Legends
16
20.1
2019 Anthem
11
13.8
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
15
19.8
2019 Resident Evil 2
16
21.2
2019 Metro Exodus
8
10.9
2019 World War Z
15
18.9
2019 Gears of War 5
11
14.8
2019 F1 2019
14
18.2
2019 GreedFall
13
16.7
2019 Borderlands 3
9
11.4
2018 Just Cause 4
12
15.0
2018 Monster Hunter: World
12
15.3
2018 Strange Brigade
18
22.9
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
16
20.3
2017 For Honor
17
21.8
2017 Project CARS 2
14
18.7
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
23
29.0
2016 Dishonored 2
13
16.5
2015 Rocket League
37
46.8
2015 Need For Speed
18
23.4
2015 Project CARS
17
22.2
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
27
34.3
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
49
62.4
2009 League of Legends
62
78.0

Résolution 3840x2160

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
Année Jeu Images par seconde
2019 Apex Legends
8
12.0
2019 Anthem
5
7.5
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
7
10.5
2019 Resident Evil 2
7
10.5
2019 Metro Exodus
4
6.9
2019 World War Z
7
10.9
2019 Gears of War 5
6
9.4
2019 F1 2019
8
11.5
2019 GreedFall
4
6.9
2019 Borderlands 3
4
5.9
2018 Just Cause 4
5
7.8
2018 Monster Hunter: World
5
7.3
2018 Strange Brigade
8
12.5
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
9
14.0
2017 For Honor
7
10.9
2017 Project CARS 2
10
15.6
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
17
24.3
2016 Dishonored 2
9
13.1
2015 Rocket League
15
21.8
2015 Need For Speed
10
15.6
2015 Project CARS
10
15.6
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
11
15.9
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
39
56.2
2009 League of Legends
21
31.2
GTX 480 with i7-975 at 1080p and Qualité ultra settings

Comparer avec les concurrents

GTX 480 Spécifications

GTX 480 Board Design

Board NumberP1022
Length10.5 inches 267 mm
Outputs2x DVI1x mini-HDMI
Power Connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Slot WidthDual-slot
TDP250 W

GTX 480 Clock Speeds

GPU Clock701 MHz
Memory Clock924 MHz 3696 MHz effective
Shader Clock1401 MHz

GTX 480 Graphics Card

Bus InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16
GenerationGeForce 400
Launch Price499 USD
ProductionEnd-of-life
Release DateMar 26th, 2010

GTX 480 Graphics Features

CUDA2
DirectX12.0 (11_0)
OpenCL1.1
OpenGL4.6
Shader Model5.1
VulkanN/A

GTX 480 Graphics Processor

ArchitectureFermi
Die Size529 mm²
GPU NameGF100
GPU VariantGF100-375-A3
Process Size40 nm
Transistors3,100 million

GTX 480 Memory

Bandwidth177.4 GB/s
Memory Bus384 bit
Memory Size1536 MB
Memory TypeGDDR5

GTX 480 Render Config

ROPs48
SM Count15
Shading Units480
TMUs60

GTX 480 Theoretical Performance

FP32 (float) performance1,345 GFLOPS
FP64 (double) performance168.1 GFLOPS (1:8)
Pixel Rate21.03 GPixel/s
Texture Rate42.06 GTexel/s

Critics Reviews

Nvidia GeForce GTX 480: Verdict So, in essence, the GTX 480 isn't actually competing directly with any other card on the market, sitting as it does slap-bang in between the two top AMD cards in ...
The GTX 480 is 20-30% ahead of the Radeon 5870, and the GTX 470 is 12-25% ahead of the 5850. Not surprisingly, the GTX 480SLI is also in a solid lead over the 5870CF.
NVIDIA is announcing two DirectX-11 class cards today based on the GF100 GPU, the GeForce GTX 480 and the GeForce GTX 470. Each card's respective specifications and features are listed in the ...
According to NVIDIA the suggested retail price of the GeForce GTX 480 is USD 499. Whether this will hold up in the market we will see and depends on supply and demand. The first comparable thing to the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 that comes to the mind are the powerful yet gas-guzzling SUVs that are used ...
Performance Summary: NVIDIA has created a powerful GPU in the GF100, as our performance data of the new GeForce GTX 480 has shown. Generally speaking, versus the single-GPU powered Radeon HD 5870 ...
The wait is finally over - Nvidia's new graphics cards based around the Fermi architecture are here! We take a look at the flagship card, the Nvidia GeForce GTX 480 1,536MB. Read on to find out if ...
Is the GeForce GTX 480 fashionably late, or just plain late? ATI has been tooting the DirectX 11 horn for quite some time now, while their competitors labored on a rebuttal. At long last, Nvidia's ...
GeForce 400-series There will be others along very soon, most noticeably the cheaper GTX 470, but this graphical behemoth represents the top-end of Nvidia's Fermi launch.
Introduction Finally! Today NVIDIA releases their highly anticipated GeForce GTX 480 and GeForce GTX 470 cards. While the initial announcement of the Fermi architecture was back in 2009, the actual cards are being released just now.
Nvidia GeForce GTX 970 v AMD Radeon RX 480 – Specs and technology. AMD has made the unusual decision to debut its Polaris architecture with this mid-range card. There’s a lot to like about the ...
The GeForce 400 series, particularly the GeForce GTX 480, is a serious piece of hardware that at least on paper should leave the Radeon HD 5870 dead in the water.
Today NVIDIA is launching two cards: the GeForce GTX 480, and the GeForce GTX 470. Both of them are based on GF100, the first and largest member of the Fermi family.

Discussion et commentaires

Partagez vos commentaires