RX Vega 56 avec Phenom II X4 925 des benchmarks Qualité ultra à des paramètres de qualité

Il est clair que le RX Vega 56 est une carte haut de gamme sensiblement plus capable qui peut jouer des titres AAA à 1080p/1440p avec 50-60 images par seconde. Il est intéressant de noter que le RX Vega 56 est une carte très avide de puissance et nécessite une unité d'alimentation décent. En termes de mémoire, le RX Vega 56 Mo 8192 de RAM est plus que suffisant pour les jeux modernes et ne devrait pas causer de goulots d'étranglement. Cette combinaison entre RX Vega 56 et AMD Phenom II X4 925 va causer des goulots d'étranglement graves dans de nombreux jeux et causer des pertes fps graves. En bref, la performance est exceptionnelle, il ne fait aucun doute que c'est l'un des plus puissants GPU unique là 2017 -bas po

 RX Vega 56 avec Phenom II X4 925 des benchmarks Qualité ultra à des paramètres de qualité
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
Prix € 236.7
Année 2017
Température maximale enregistrée 75C
Bruit maximum de ventilateur 55.2dB
Alimentation recommandée 560W
CPU Benchmark AMD Phenom II X4 925 ($159.99)
Impact CPU sur FPS -45.6 FPS
Impact CPU sur FPS% -40.0%
Paramètres de qualité de référence Ultra Quality Settings
Rendement moyen en 1080p 55.8 FPS
Rendement 1440p moyen 41.5 FPS
Rendement moyen de 4K 24.3 FPS
Mémoire 8 GB
Coût 1080p par image € 6.3
1440p Coût Par Image € 8.5
Coût 4K par image € 14.4
Série RX Vega 56
Score global combiné 67/100 Bon

Performances du jeu Qualité ultra aux réglages

Modifier les paramètres de qualité

Résolution 1920x1080

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
Année Jeu Images par seconde
2019 Apex Legends
26
55.2
2019 Anthem
15
32.0
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
22
46.9
2019 Resident Evil 2
26
56.1
2019 Metro Exodus
11
25.0
2019 World War Z
27
58.7
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
28
61.2
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
12
26.6
2018 Final Fantasy XV
17
36.1
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
19
40.6
2018 Forza Horizon 4
19
42.2
2018 Fallout 76
22
48.2
2018 Hitman 2
17
37.7
2018 Just Cause 4
17
36.1
2018 Monster Hunter: World
18
38.9
2018 Battlefield V
27
58.3
2017 Dawn of War III
22
47.8
2017 Ghost Recon Wildlands
15
32.4
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
12
27.1
2017 Destiny 2
28
59.8
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
15
33.6
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
19
42.2
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
23
50.0
2017 For Honor
31
66.6
2017 Project CARS 2
22
47.2
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
27
57.2
2016 Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
17
36.7
2016 Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
17
36.9
2016 Doom
40
85.4
2016 F1 2016
23
50.2
2016 Total War: Warhammer
21
46.4
2016 Battlefield 1
29
63.2
2016 Overwatch
30
65.4
2016 Dishonored 2
16
34.4
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
18
39.6
2015 Rocket League
92
194.5
2015 Need For Speed
25
54.0
2015 Project CARS
24
51.7
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
45
97.0
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
63
133.4
2009 League of Legends
118
250.1

Résolution 2560x1440

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
Année Jeu Images par seconde
2019 Apex Legends
19
41.2
2019 Anthem
12
25.4
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
17
36.4
2019 Resident Evil 2
17
37.8
2019 Metro Exodus
9
19.4
2019 World War Z
20
42.9
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
18
38.6
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
8
17.1
2018 Final Fantasy XV
12
25.7
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
12
27.1
2018 Forza Horizon 4
16
35.6
2018 Fallout 76
19
41.2
2018 Hitman 2
11
24.6
2018 Just Cause 4
12
26.7
2018 Monster Hunter: World
12
27.2
2018 Battlefield V
20
43.2
2017 Dawn of War III
20
42.3
2017 Ghost Recon Wildlands
13
28.9
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
11
24.6
2017 Destiny 2
24
51.2
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
12
25.7
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
12
27.4
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
17
36.1
2017 For Honor
18
38.9
2017 Project CARS 2
15
33.3
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
24
51.7
2016 Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
11
24.9
2016 Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
14
30.5
2016 Doom
28
59.2
2016 F1 2016
21
45.1
2016 Total War: Warhammer
16
34.4
2016 Battlefield 1
22
47.5
2016 Overwatch
21
45.0
2016 Dishonored 2
13
29.4
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
13
27.5
2015 Rocket League
39
83.4
2015 Need For Speed
19
41.7
2015 Project CARS
18
39.5
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
29
62.8
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
52
111.2
2009 League of Legends
65
138.9

Résolution 3840x2160

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
Année Jeu Images par seconde
2019 Apex Legends
10
22.1
2019 Anthem
6
13.8
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
9
19.3
2019 Resident Evil 2
8
18.7
2019 Metro Exodus
5
12.3
2019 World War Z
11
24.7
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
7
16.5
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
5
12.1
2018 Final Fantasy XV
7
15.0
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
6
14.1
2018 Forza Horizon 4
11
23.6
2018 Fallout 76
10
22.5
2018 Hitman 2
6
14.6
2018 Just Cause 4
6
13.9
2018 Monster Hunter: World
6
13.0
2018 Battlefield V
11
23.6
2017 Dawn of War III
10
21.6
2017 Ghost Recon Wildlands
8
17.4
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
7
16.1
2017 Destiny 2
12
25.7
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
6
14.6
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
7
14.8
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
11
25.0
2017 For Honor
9
19.4
2017 Project CARS 2
13
27.8
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
20
43.3
2016 Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
6
13.0
2016 Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
12
26.1
2016 Doom
14
31.1
2016 F1 2016
13
28.4
2016 Total War: Warhammer
9
19.6
2016 Battlefield 1
12
26.8
2016 Overwatch
10
23.2
2016 Dishonored 2
11
23.4
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
6
14.4
2015 Rocket League
18
38.9
2015 Need For Speed
13
27.8
2015 Project CARS
13
27.8
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
13
29.1
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
47
100.0
2009 League of Legends
26
55.6
RX Vega 56 with Phenom II X4 925 at 1080p and Qualité ultra settings
RX Vega 56 with Phenom II X4 925 at 1440p and Qualité ultra settings
RX Vega 56 with Phenom II X4 925 at 4K and Qualité ultra settings

RX Vega 56 Spécifications

RX Vega 56 Board Design

Board NumberD050-03
Length10.5 inches 267 mm
Outputs1x HDMI3x DisplayPort
Power Connectors2x 8-pin
Slot WidthDual-slot
TDP210 W

RX Vega 56 Clock Speeds

Boost Clock1474 MHz
GPU Clock1138 MHz
Memory Clock800 MHz 1600 MHz effective

RX Vega 56 Graphics Card

Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16
GenerationVega (RX Vega)
Launch Price399 USD
ProductionActive
Release DateAug 14th, 2017

RX Vega 56 Graphics Features

DirectX12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL2
OpenGL4.6
Shader Model6.1
Vulkan1.1.82

RX Vega 56 Graphics Processor

ArchitectureGCN 5.0
Die Size510 mm²
GPU NameVega 10
GPU VariantVega 10 XL (215-0894216)
Process Size14 nm
Transistors12,500 million

RX Vega 56 Memory

Bandwidth409.6 GB/s
Memory Bus2048 bit
Memory Size8192 MB
Memory TypeHBM2

RX Vega 56 Render Config

Compute Units56
ROPs64
Shading Units3584
TMUs224

RX Vega 56 Theoretical Performance

FP16 (half) performance21,131 GFLOPS (2:1)
FP32 (float) performance10,566 GFLOPS
FP64 (double) performance660.4 GFLOPS (1:16)
Pixel Rate94.34 GPixel/s
Texture Rate330.2 GTexel/s

Critics Reviews

• See the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 at Best Buy The Verdict If this were two separate reviews the Vega 56 would get a higher score than the Vega 64, but since it's one review I'm labeling both of ...
Conclusion. Radeon RX Vega 56 is a close derivative of Vega 64, so its behaviors largely carry over from AMD’s flagship. The company does cut this card’s board power rating by almost 30% ...
Years in development, the new Radeon RX Vega line is finally arriving - AMD's return to the higher-end of GPU performance after concentrating its efforts more on the mainstream and budget sectors ...
Similar to AMD's Radeon RX Vega 64, the Vega 56 offers two BIOSes with corresponding power profiles that can be selected using a switch on the card. If you don't change the driver-based profiles ...
Perhaps the most telling comparison, however, is that despite the 20 percent price reduction compared to the RX Vega 64, the RX Vega 56 is slower by less than 10 percent on average.
Radeon RX Vega 56 is the second AMD Vega card launched today. It comes at an affordable 9 price point, with a slightly reduced shader count that actually improves things greatly. For example, power efficiency now trades blows with some Pascal cards, which means less heat and noise, too.
On the AMD side of things, it is the AMD Radeon RX 480, or that card's successors, the Radeon RX 580 and Radeon RX 570. Therefore, the Vega 56 should be more than adequate for today's VR ...
Conclusion (RX Vega 56) The Radeon RX Vega 56 is easily the best card of this launch. It is cooler, quieter, and more efficient than the Radeon RX Vega 64 and delivers only 10 percent less ...
The AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 is the little sister of Vega 64. It comes in at a 20% lower price than the RX Vega 64, but only has 12.5% fewer stream processors, and runs lower operating frequencies.
Meet Radeon RX Vega 56 and RX Vega 64 Brad Chacos/IDG AMD sent PCWorld every version of Vega for testing, including both the air-cooled and liquid-cooled versions of the Radeon RX Vega 64.
The AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 is an upper mid-range graphics card, intended to beat Nvidia's GeForce GTX 1070 - a job it performs admirably as the benchmarks on this page demonstrate.
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 - the Digital Foundry verdict. If you're looking for an alternative to the GTX 1070, the bottom line is that you're generally getting around 10 to 12 per cent of additional ...
The Radeon RX Vega 56 is a high-end graphics card by AMD, launched in August 2017. Built on the 14 nm process, and based on the Vega 10 graphics processor, in its Vega 10 XL variant, the card supports DirectX 12.0.
Launching today is the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64, or just Vega 64 for short. Based on a fully enabled Vega 10 GPU, the Vega 64 will come in two physical variants: air cooled and liquid cooled.
Radeon RX Vega 56 utilizes the same Vega 10 processor found in Vega 64. It’s a 486 mm² behemoth sporting 12.5 billion transistors manufactured on GlobalFoundries’ 14LPP platform.
Vega 56 vs GTX 1070, Vega goes 6-2-2 = Winner Vega! Good job AMD, hopefully next gen you can make more headway in power efficiency. But this is a good card, even beats the factory OC 1070.
The AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 and Vega 64 preview. ... so thanks AMD! RX Vega vs. the World: a 15-round heavyweight battle ... The RX Vega 56 is the more compelling choice, given the lower price and ...

Discussion et commentaires

Partagez vos commentaires
E
egretpunctured 7 months ago
Rx580 or vega 56 or gtx 1070
I will buy a new gaming pc in march with a ryzen 7 2700, but i dont know which graphics card should i buy. In my country i can get the rx 580 around 120k ft, the vega 56 around 185k ft, and a gtx 1070 about 150-160k ft. Which should I buy? I already have my monitor, it supports freesync. (75hz, 1080x2560 resolution)
0 0
A
ancestorantarctic 7 months ago


If you want to use freesync you would have to go for either of the amd cards. you could get a vega 56 but its a pricey and can draw quite a lot of power than a 1070, which give almost similar performance which run much cooler with a third party cooler.

So you would be good with the gtx 1070 and save some bucks for some of performance and there are cases where the gtx 1070 outperforms the vega 56,and you could overclock it to get vega like performance but or if that isn't the case you don't mind the extra power draw and heat, and want to make use of the free sync you can surely go for the vega 56. The rx 580 doesn't come anywhere these two so it is out if the question.

Check this link out for comparison of two cards at stock and overclocked- http://blog.logicalincrements.com/2017/08/rx-vega-56-vs-gtx-1070-gtx-1080/
1 0
A
acutenesspace 7 months ago
Should I buy the RX Vega 56 over the GTX 1070?
I'll be building a new rig in a few weeks. For a few days, I've been having trouble deciding on which graphics card I want to get. For a while, I was decided that I'd go with the 1070, but then I realized that Vega 56 performs just as well or better while offering Freesync, which my monitor does offer. For some reason, I still can't decide whether or not I should go for the Vega 56. Should I?
0 0
P
preplanupswing 7 months ago
On much smaller case blower type cooler is better due to heat being dump outside the case directly. But on much bigger case "open air" cooler usually end up being better. Also noise. Those blower type cooler can be very loud when the fan speed start ramping up.
0 0