R9 290 avec i7-3770K des benchmarks Qualité ultra à des paramètres de qualité

À 1440p, R9 290 peut frapper 50-60 fps sur à peu près tout à ultra, juste sans anticrénelage, moins d'occlusion ambiante et tourné vers le bas des ombres. Il est clair que le R9 290 est une carte haut de gamme sensiblement plus capable qui peut jouer des titres AAA à 1080p/1440p avec 50-60 images par seconde. Il est intéressant de noter que le R9 290 est une carte très avide de puissance et nécessite une unité d'alimentation décent. Il est important de savoir que R9 290 la température de charge maximale est très élevée et peut nécessiter des solutions de refroidissement personnalisées. Cette combinaison entre R9 290 et Intel Core i7-3770K @ 3.50GHz a moins de 8% goulot d'étranglement dans de nombreux jeux et est parfait match pour éviter la perte fps. Cette combinaison entre R9 290 et Intel Core i7-3770K @ 3.50GHz est un match parfait pour éviter la perte de fps. Avec la 4096 RAM MB actuelle, R9 290 le peut avoir très peu de goulots d'étranglement liés à la mémoire dans les jeux plus modernes.

 R9 290 avec i7-3770K des benchmarks Qualité ultra à des paramètres de qualité
AMD Radeon R9 290
Prix € 272.8
Année 2013
Température maximale enregistrée 94C
Bruit maximum de ventilateur 60.1dB
Alimentation recommandée 625W
CPU Benchmark Intel Core i7-3770K @ 3.50GHz ($248.98)
Impact CPU sur FPS + 0.0 FPS
Impact CPU sur FPS% 0.0%
Paramètres de qualité de référence Ultra Quality Settings
Rendement moyen en 1080p 62.8 FPS
Rendement 1440p moyen 45.2 FPS
Rendement moyen de 4K 29.1 FPS
Mémoire 4 GB
Coût 1080p par image € 5.6
1440p Coût Par Image € 7.8
Coût 4K par image € 12.1
Série R9 290
Score global combiné 64/100 Bon

La bonne nouvelle est que, avec la sortie de la R9 290X , le prix de R9 290 bénéficie d’une réduction supplémentaire. AMD cartes xx90 ont toujours été définies par des prix high-end avec des performances qui frappent à la porte des cartes graphiques extreme , en particulier lorsqu'elles sont overclockées. Après avoir pris le temps de tester complètement la carte graphique GCN 2.0 à l'intérieur du R9 290 , nous pouvons affirmer sans l'ombre d'un doute qu'elle poursuit la tendance.

Pour 1080p Full HD , nous avons pu jouer Fallout 76, World War Z, Resident Evil 2 à 61 fps en 66 fps et conservant des fréquences d'images 64 fps.

Performances du jeu Qualité ultra aux réglages

Modifier les paramètres de qualité

Résolution 1920x1080

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
Année Jeu Images par seconde
2019 Apex Legends
48
54.0
2019 Anthem
31
34.8
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
45
51.0
2019 Resident Evil 2
59
66.4
2019 Metro Exodus
26
29.6
2019 World War Z
59
66.0
2018 Forza Horizon 4
47
53.0
2018 Fallout 76
54
61.0
2018 Hitman 2
43
48.0
2018 Just Cause 4
38
42.7
2018 Monster Hunter: World
41
46.0
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
38
43.0
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
47
53.2
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
53
59.1
2017 For Honor
70
78.8
2017 Project CARS 2
50
55.8
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
60
67.7
2016 Ashes of the Singularity
40
44.8
2016 Hitman
59
66.6
2016 Rise of the Tomb Raider
52
58.5
2016 The Division
43
48.2
2016 Overwatch
74
82.6
2016 Dishonored 2
36
40.7
2015 DiRT Rally
89
99.0
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
45
50.7
2015 The Witcher 3
42
47.0
2015 Rocket League
207
230.0
2015 Need For Speed
57
63.7
2015 Project CARS
54
61.1
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
100
111.7
2014 Thief
58
64.9
2013 Bioshock Infinite
82
91.5
2013 Company of Heroes 2
52
58.8
2013 Crysis 3
50
56.5
2013 GRID 2
99
110.8
2013 Metro: Last Light
64
71.6
2013 Total War: Rome 2
62
69.3
2013 Battlefield 4
66
73.7
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
141
157.7
2011 Battlefield 3
79
87.9
2009 League of Legends
266
295.7
2008 Crysis: Warhead
72
80.0

Résolution 2560x1440

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
Année Jeu Images par seconde
2019 Apex Legends
32
40.2
2019 Anthem
22
27.6
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
31
39.6
2019 Resident Evil 2
35
44.7
2019 Metro Exodus
18
23.0
2019 World War Z
38
48.2
2018 Forza Horizon 4
36
45.0
2018 Hitman 2
24
31.0
2018 Just Cause 4
25
31.5
2018 Monster Hunter: World
25
32.2
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
26
33.0
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
27
34.3
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
34
42.7
2017 For Honor
36
46.0
2017 Project CARS 2
31
39.4
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
48
61.1
2016 Ashes of the Singularity
33
41.3
2016 Hitman
40
50.6
2016 Rise of the Tomb Raider
33
41.8
2016 The Division
29
37.1
2016 Overwatch
45
56.7
2016 Dishonored 2
27
34.8
2015 DiRT Rally
55
69.9
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
28
35.9
2015 The Witcher 3
29
36.3
2015 Rocket League
78
98.6
2015 Need For Speed
39
49.3
2015 Project CARS
37
46.6
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
57
72.3
2014 Thief
36
45.4
2013 Bioshock Infinite
47
59.1
2013 Company of Heroes 2
32
40.1
2013 Crysis 3
29
36.7
2013 GRID 2
64
80.2
2013 Metro: Last Light
45
56.8
2013 Total War: Rome 2
35
44.2
2013 Battlefield 4
39
49.6
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
105
131.4
2011 Battlefield 3
48
60.4
2009 League of Legends
131
164.2
2008 Crysis: Warhead
42
53.0

Résolution 3840x2160

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
Année Jeu Images par seconde
2019 Apex Legends
16
24.0
2019 Anthem
10
15.0
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
14
21.0
2019 Resident Evil 2
15
22.0
2019 Metro Exodus
10
14.5
2019 World War Z
19
27.7
2018 Forza Horizon 4
21
30.0
2018 Hitman 2
12
18.0
2018 Just Cause 4
11
16.4
2018 Monster Hunter: World
10
15.4
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
13
19.0
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
13
18.9
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
20
29.6
2017 For Honor
16
23.0
2017 Project CARS 2
23
32.9
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
35
51.2
2016 Overwatch
20
29.4
2016 Dishonored 2
19
27.6
2015 Rocket League
32
46.0
2015 Need For Speed
23
32.9
2015 Project CARS
23
32.9
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
23
33.5
2014 Thief
27
38.9
2013 Bioshock Infinite
33
47.9
2013 GRID 2
32
46.5
2013 Total War: Rome 2
29
41.7
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
82
118.3
2009 League of Legends
45
65.7
2008 Crysis: Warhead
33
47.3
R9 290 with i7-3770K at 1080p and Qualité ultra settings
R9 290 with i7-3770K at 1440p and Qualité ultra settings
R9 290 with i7-3770K at 4K and Qualité ultra settings

Comparer avec les concurrents

R9 290 Spécifications

R9 290 Board Design

Board NumberC671
Length10.83 inches 275 mm
Outputs2x DVI1x HDMI1x DisplayPort
Power Connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Slot WidthDual-slot
TDP275 W

R9 290 Clock Speeds

GPU Clock947 MHz
Memory Clock1250 MHz 5000 MHz effective

R9 290 Graphics Card

Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16
GenerationVolcanic Islands (R9 200)
Launch Price399 USD
ProductionEnd-of-life
Release DateNov 5th, 2013

R9 290 Graphics Features

DirectX12.0 (12_0)
OpenCL2
OpenGL4.6
Shader Model6
Vulkan1.1.82

R9 290 Graphics Processor

ArchitectureGCN 2.0
Die Size438 mm²
GPU NameHawaii
GPU VariantHawaii PRO (215-0852020)
Process Size28 nm
Transistors6,200 million

R9 290 Memory

Bandwidth320.0 GB/s
Memory Bus512 bit
Memory Size4096 MB
Memory TypeGDDR5

R9 290 Render Config

Compute Units40
ROPs64
Shading Units2560
TMUs160

R9 290 Theoretical Performance

FP32 (float) performance4,849 GFLOPS
FP64 (double) performance606.1 GFLOPS (1:8)
Pixel Rate60.61 GPixel/s
Texture Rate151.5 GTexel/s

Critics Reviews

In essence then the Radeon R9 290 is an absolute blazing graphics card. £320 / 0 is about right for a top-end, performance graphics card. Unless you really need the double precision ...
Performance Summary: The AMD Radeon R9 290 is an excellent performer. As you probably surmised when the card was first announced, its performance is better than the Radeon R9 280X, but not quite ...
The AMD Radeon R9 290 (9 list) graphics card is a slightly slower, significantly cheaper version of the AMD Radeon R9 290X, with virtually all of that GPU's features and performance, but for ...
Using the same Hawaii GPU it just unveiled, AMD is introducing a Radeon R9 290. Hawaii Gets A Haircut The R9 290 is a derivative product, which means its specifications don’t fall far from the 290X.
We take a look at the second AMD card based on the Hawaii GPU, the R9 290 4GB AMD Radeon R9 290 boards hit by last-minute delay Non-X model launch shifted by a week.
AMD Radeon R9 290 Forget the 290X, this is the real star in AMD's Radeon stable ... So here it is, the Radeon R9 290, another new graphics card based on the Hawaii silicon. ... Verdict. This all ...
The R9 290’s good 1,920 x 1,080 minimum framerates continued in Battlefield 4, where the AMD card’s 57fps result was one frame ahead of the GTX 970.
AMD's new Radeon R9 290 delivers quite impressive performance numbers. Averaged over all our games and resolutions, the card exactly matches the performance of the Radeon R9 290X in "Quiet" mode, and the difference is just - 6%, very little, compared to the R9 290X in "Uber" mode.
Conclusion The most important thing to say about the new Radeon R9 290X 4GB is that on the price performance scale it's a clear winner against Nvidia's GTX 780 3GB, at the time of writing.
Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 v AMD Radeon R9 290X: Other Things to Consider . These high-end cards are both available with huge variations in price. Most of the GTX 980 cards available range between £ ...
Diving right into the hardware specifications, Radeon R9 290 is a bit more powerful than usual for a lower-tier part. AMD has cut the number of CUs from 44 to 40 – disabling 1 CU per SE ...
The AMD Radeon R9 290X Review ... The 290X is not only the fastest card in AMD’s 200 series lineup, but the 290 series in particular also contains the only new GPU in AMD’s latest generation ...
Nvidia’s GeForce GTX 970 is the newer and more expensive GPU, with prices that run from £260 to £316. It’s a reply to AMD’s Radeon R9 290, which has been cut in price and now looks like a ...
R9 290 vs. GTX 780: Fight!. Before Nvidia can strike back, it'll have to eat another blow in the form of the new Radeon R9 290. At 0, the R9 290 offers fantastic value when you consider it will ...
AMD Radeon R9 290 Forget the 290X, this is the real star in AMD's Radeon stable. ... So here it is, the Radeon R9 290, another new graphics card based on the Hawaii silicon. And it's a bit of a doozy.
AMD Radeon R9 290 review: AMD's second-tier graphics card is a solid performer for 1080p and 1440p gaming but is power hungry. AMD Radeon R9 290 review: AMD's second-tier graphics card is a solid ...
The problem is, the AMD R9 290 offers 96 percent of the R9 290X's performance for 0 instead of 0, which is why the former is our Editors' Choice for high-end graphics cards.
The Radeon R9 290 was a high-end graphics card by AMD, launched in November 2013. Built on the 28 nm process, and based on the Hawaii graphics processor, in its Hawaii PRO variant, the card supports DirectX 12.0.
AMD mentions that the new CrossFire technology for AMD Radeon R9 290X and Radeon R9n 290 is designed for AMD Eyefinity and UltraHD (4K) resolution setups. The new technology, as mentioned before ...
AMD's reference Radeon R9 290 and 290X cooler earned our disdain once we figured out that it was causing the otherwise-impressive Hawaii GPU to operate at performance levels below the company's ...
As you probably deduced from its model number, the Radeon R9 290 drops in between the more affordable Radeon R9 280X and AMD's flagship, single-GPU powered card, the Radeon R9 290X.

Discussion et commentaires

Partagez vos commentaires