R9 285 avec Athlon 5200 des benchmarks Qualité ultra à des paramètres de qualité

Avec la 2048 RAM MB actuelle, R9 285 le peut avoir de graves goulots d'étranglement liés à la mémoire dans les jeux plus modernes. Cette combinaison entre R9 285 et AMD Athlon 5200 Dual-Core va causer des goulots d'étranglement graves dans de nombreux jeux et causer des pertes fps graves. Avec la 2048 RAM MB actuelle, R9 285 le peut avoir très peu de goulots d'étranglement liés à la mémoire dans les jeux plus modernes.

 R9 285 avec Athlon 5200 des benchmarks Qualité ultra à des paramètres de qualité
AMD Radeon R9 285
Prix € 334.4
Année 2014
Température maximale enregistrée 70C
Bruit maximum de ventilateur 48.3dB
Alimentation recommandée 540W
CPU Benchmark AMD Athlon 5200 Dual-Core ($29.99)
Impact CPU sur FPS -19.0 FPS
Impact CPU sur FPS% -50.0%
Paramètres de qualité de référence Ultra Quality Settings
Rendement moyen en 1080p 22.3 FPS
Rendement 1440p moyen 16.1 FPS
(Ultrawide) Rendement 1440p moyen 13.5 FPS
Rendement moyen de 4K 9.1 FPS
Mémoire 2 GB
Coût 1080p par image € 9.8
1440p Coût Par Image € 13.6
(Ultrawide) 1440p Coût Par Image € 16.2
Coût 4K par image € 24.1
Série R9 285
Variant AMD Radeon R9 285
Score global combiné 55/100 Acceptable

Le R9 295X2 pourrait être le extreme phare de extreme du dernier jeu de cartes GCN 3.0 dernier extreme, mais leur prix les maintient hors de la portée de la plupart des joueurs sur high-end PC high-end. D'autre part, le R9 285 est plus proche d'être raisonnablement abordable à un prix de € 219.1. AMD cartes xx85 ont toujours été définies par des prix high-end avec des performances qui frappent à la porte des cartes graphiques extreme, en particulier lorsqu'elles sont overclockées. Après avoir pris le temps de tester complètement la carte graphique GCN 3.0 à l'intérieur du R9 285, nous pouvons affirmer sans l'ombre d'un doute qu'elle poursuit la tendance.

Forza Horizon 4 (2018)

Qualité ultra

Résolution 1920x1080

Année Carte graphique Prix Images par seconde
2013 AMD Radeon R9 290 € 351
53.0 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 570 € 149
52.0 FPS
2016 AMD Radeon RX 470 € 158
45.0 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 € 571
41.0 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 380X € 202
40.0 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 380 € 175
38.0 FPS
2015 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 € 175
38.0 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti € 149
37.2 FPS
2012 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 € 439
37.0 FPS
2012 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 € 351
35.0 FPS
2014 AMD Radeon R9 285 € 219
12.9 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 € 219
31.5 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 € 351
30.4 FPS
2014 AMD Radeon R9 280 € 246
29.0 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 560 € 87
29.0 FPS
2015 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 € 140
28.4 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R7 370 € 131
25.0 FPS
2012 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 € 202
23.4 FPS
2016 AMD Radeon RX 460 € 123
23.0 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 550 € 70
17.0 FPS

Le R9 285 situe entre le GTX 670 et le GTX 760 , tombant plus lentement que GTX 670 de 9.4 % et plus rapide que GTX 760 de 1.6 %. Il a une performance relative moyenne contre chaque carte graphique ici. Contre son rival - le GTX 960 , le R9 285 est beaucoup plus lent.

PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (2017)

Qualité ultra

Résolution 1920x1080

Année Carte graphique Prix Images par seconde
2014 AMD Radeon R9 285 € 219
19.3 FPS
2013 AMD Radeon R9 290 € 351
43.0 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 570 € 149
43.0 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 € 571
43.0 FPS
2016 AMD Radeon RX 470 € 158
41.0 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 € 219
39.6 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R7 370 € 131
37.0 FPS
2015 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 € 140
34.0 FPS
2011 AMD Radeon HD 7970 € 483
32.0 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 380 € 175
32.0 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 380X € 202
32.0 FPS
2012 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 € 439
32.0 FPS
2012 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 € 351
31.0 FPS
2015 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 € 175
31.0 FPS
2014 AMD Radeon R9 280 € 246
30.0 FPS
2014 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti € 131
30.0 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti € 149
27.6 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 € 351
26.4 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 560 € 87
23.0 FPS
2012 AMD Radeon HD 7850 € 219
21.0 FPS
2016 AMD Radeon RX 460 € 123
20.0 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 550 € 70
16.1 FPS
2012 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 € 202
13.5 FPS

Performances du jeu Qualité ultra aux réglages

Modifier les paramètres de qualité

Résolution 1920x1080

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
Année Jeu Images par seconde
2019 Apex Legends
5
14.5
2019 Anthem
3
9.3
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
5
13.7
2019 Resident Evil 2
7
19.0
2019 Metro Exodus
3
8.5
2019 World War Z
7
19.3
2019 Gears of War 5
4
12.3
2019 F1 2019
6
15.4
2019 GreedFall
5
13.9
2019 Borderlands 3
3
9.7
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
7
18.8
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
2
7.2
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
4
11.4
2018 Forza Horizon 4
5
12.9
2018 Fallout 76
5
14.5
2018 Hitman 2
4
11.3
2018 Just Cause 4
4
12.2
2018 Monster Hunter: World
5
13.1
2018 Strange Brigade
7
19.8
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
7
19.3
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
5
12.7
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
6
16.9
2017 For Honor
9
22.5
2017 Project CARS 2
6
15.9
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
7
19.3
2016 Overwatch
7
19.7
2016 Dishonored 2
4
11.6
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
5
14.4
2015 Total War: Attila
5
12.9
2015 Rocket League
26
65.7
2015 Need For Speed
7
18.2
2015 Project CARS
7
17.4
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
12
31.9
2014 Civilization: Beyond Earth
12
29.9
2014 Dragon Age: Inquisition
8
21.0
2014 Far Cry 4
7
19.5
2014 GRID Autosport
11
27.8
2014 Shadow of Mordor
7
18.8
2014 The Talos Principle
9
24.3
2013 Crysis 3
6
16.4
2013 Battlefield 4
7
18.4
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
18
45.0
2009 League of Legends
33
84.4

Résolution 2560x1440

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
Année Jeu Images par seconde
2019 Apex Legends
4
10.8
2019 Anthem
2
7.4
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
4
10.6
2019 Resident Evil 2
5
12.8
2019 Metro Exodus
2
6.6
2019 World War Z
5
14.1
2019 Gears of War 5
3
8.9
2019 F1 2019
4
10.9
2019 GreedFall
4
10.0
2019 Borderlands 3
2
6.8
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
5
13.5
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
2
5.9
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
3
8.9
2018 Forza Horizon 4
4
10.9
2018 Hitman 2
2
7.2
2018 Just Cause 4
3
9.0
2018 Monster Hunter: World
3
9.2
2018 Strange Brigade
5
13.8
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
5
14.9
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
3
8.2
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
4
12.2
2017 For Honor
5
13.1
2017 Project CARS 2
4
11.3
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
7
17.4
2016 Overwatch
5
13.5
2016 Dishonored 2
3
9.9
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
3
8.6
2015 Total War: Attila
3
8.6
2015 Rocket League
11
28.1
2015 Need For Speed
5
14.1
2015 Project CARS
5
13.3
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
8
20.7
2014 Civilization: Beyond Earth
9
22.4
2014 Dragon Age: Inquisition
5
13.8
2014 Far Cry 4
5
13.9
2014 GRID Autosport
8
20.3
2014 Shadow of Mordor
5
12.9
2014 The Talos Principle
6
17.3
2013 Crysis 3
5
14.0
2013 Battlefield 4
4
11.9
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
15
37.5
2009 League of Legends
18
46.9

Résolution 3440x1440

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
Année Jeu Images par seconde
2019 Apex Legends
3
9.2
2019 Anthem
2
6.1
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
3
8.7
2019 Resident Evil 2
4
10.2
2019 Metro Exodus
2
5.7
2019 World War Z
4
11.9
2019 Gears of War 5
3
7.8
2019 F1 2019
3
9.5
2019 GreedFall
3
7.6
2019 Borderlands 3
2
5.6
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
4
11.6
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
2
5.2
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
3
7.8
2018 Forza Horizon 4
3
9.7
2018 Hitman 2
2
6.2
2018 Just Cause 4
2
7.3
2018 Monster Hunter: World
2
7.3
2018 Strange Brigade
4
11.4
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
5
12.5
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
2
6.8
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
4
11.0
2017 For Honor
4
10.5
2017 Project CARS 2
4
11.0
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
6
17.2
2016 Overwatch
4
11.0
2016 Dishonored 2
3
9.5
2015 Rocket League
8
22.1
2015 Need For Speed
5
12.6
2015 Project CARS
4
12.2
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
6
16.2
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
15
38.1
2009 League of Legends
14
35.1

Résolution 3840x2160

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
Année Jeu Images par seconde
2019 Apex Legends
2
6.4
2019 Anthem
1
4.0
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
2
5.6
2019 Resident Evil 2
2
6.3
2019 Metro Exodus
1
4.1
2019 World War Z
3
8.1
2019 Gears of War 5
2
5.6
2019 F1 2019
2
6.9
2019 GreedFall
1
4.1
2019 Borderlands 3
1
3.6
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
3
8.1
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
1
3.7
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
2
5.6
2018 Forza Horizon 4
2
7.2
2018 Hitman 2
1
4.4
2018 Just Cause 4
1
4.7
2018 Monster Hunter: World
1
4.4
2018 Strange Brigade
3
7.5
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
3
8.5
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
1
4.5
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
3
8.5
2017 For Honor
2
6.6
2017 Project CARS 2
3
9.4
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
5
14.6
2016 Overwatch
2
7.0
2016 Dishonored 2
3
7.9
2015 Rocket League
5
13.1
2015 Need For Speed
3
9.4
2015 Project CARS
3
9.4
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
3
9.6
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
13
33.8
2009 League of Legends
7
18.8
R9 285 with Athlon 5200 at 1080p and Qualité ultra settings

Comparer avec les concurrents

R9 285 Spécifications

R9 285 Board Design

Board NumberC766
Length8.7 inches 221 mm
Outputs2x DVI1x HDMI1x DisplayPort
Power Connectors2x 6-pin
Slot WidthDual-slot
TDP190 W

R9 285 Clock Speeds

GPU Clock918 MHz
Memory Clock1375 MHz 5500 MHz effective

R9 285 Graphics Card

Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16
GenerationVolcanic Islands (R9 200)
Launch Price249 USD
ProductionEnd-of-life
Release DateSep 2nd, 2014

R9 285 Graphics Features

DirectX12.0 (12_0)
OpenCL2
OpenGL4.5
Shader Model6
Vulkan1.1.82

R9 285 Graphics Processor

ArchitectureGCN 3.0
Die Size366 mm²
GPU NameTonga
GPU VariantTonga PRO (215-0851128)
Process Size28 nm
Transistors5,000 million

R9 285 Memory

Bandwidth176.0 GB/s
Memory Bus256 bit
Memory Size2048 MB
Memory TypeGDDR5

R9 285 Render Config

Compute Units28
ROPs32
Shading Units1792
TMUs112

R9 285 Theoretical Performance

FP16 (half) performance3,290 GFLOPS (1:1)
FP32 (float) performance3,290 GFLOPS
FP64 (double) performance205.6 GFLOPS (1:16)
Pixel Rate29.38 GPixel/s
Texture Rate102.8 GTexel/s

Critics Reviews

AMD's 9 Radeon R9 285 delivers modern features (such as support for TrueAudio and FreeSync) found on other AMD cards, and performance that edges out Nvidia's GeForce GTX 760.
AMD's 9 Radeon R9 285 delivers modern features (such as support for TrueAudio and FreeSync) found on other AMD cards, and performance that edges out Nvidia's GeForce GTX 760.
Having said that, the Radeon R9 285 is a wonderful option at 0 and probably represents the best product a gamer can buy for that price, just as the Radeon R9 280 did.
AMD’s reference specifications call for up to a 918MHz engine clock for the Radeon R9 285 with 1375MHz memory (5.5 Gbps effective). The specifications list 2GB of on-board memory, but 4GB ...
The R9 285 starts slightly behind the GTX 760 in Battlefield 4 and the R9 280 is also ahead by a few fps. The new card also only manages to be 1fps faster than the R9 270X at both resolutions tested.
AMD Radeon R9 285: Other Benchmarks Fire Strike is 3D Mark’s toughest graphics benchmark, and in this test the R9 285 scored 6,744 points. That’s better than the 5,905 scored by the R9 280 ...
The Radeon R9 285 is indeed a new piece of silicon, code-named "Tonga." What's newest about it: It brings with it the features of other recent AMD cards, such as TrueAudio and support for multi ...
Last month AMD held their 30 years of graphics celebration, during which they announced their next Radeon video card, the Radeon R9 285. Designed to be AMD’s new 9 midrange enthusiast card ...
The R9 280 debuted with an MSRP of 9 and this is the exact price point that the R9 285 is arriving at, placing it directly between the R9 270X (0) and R9 280X (0). Given their similar ...
On paper, the new Tonga-based R9 285 looks to be slightly slower than the R9 280 it is intended to replace, but there's more than meets the eye. When we first heard about the new Radeon R9 285 ...
AMD Radeon R9 285 Review: Feat. Sapphire R9 285 Dual-X OC ... Power, Temperature, & Noise. As always, last but not least is our look at power, temperature, and noise. Next to price and performance ...
AMD Radeon R9 285: Under the Hood. The R9 285 is the only card to currently use the Tonga core. It’s a mid-range core, but it shares a crucial part of its architecture with AMD’s high-end 290 ...

Discussion et commentaires

Partagez vos commentaires