R9 285 avec i7-4770K des benchmarks Qualité ultra à des paramètres de qualité

Avec la 2048 RAM MB actuelle, R9 285 le peut avoir de graves goulots d'étranglement liés à la mémoire dans les jeux plus modernes. Cette combinaison entre R9 285 et Intel Core i7-4770K @ 3.50GHz a moins de 8% goulot d'étranglement dans de nombreux jeux et est parfait match pour éviter la perte fps. Cette combinaison entre R9 285 et Intel Core i7-4770K @ 3.50GHz est un match parfait pour éviter la perte de fps. Avec la 2048 RAM MB actuelle, R9 285 le peut avoir très peu de goulots d'étranglement liés à la mémoire dans les jeux plus modernes.

 R9 285 avec i7-4770K des benchmarks Qualité ultra à des paramètres de qualité
AMD Radeon R9 285
Prix € 334.4
Année 2014
Température maximale enregistrée 70C
Bruit maximum de ventilateur 48.3dB
Alimentation recommandée 540W
CPU Benchmark Intel Core i7-4770K @ 3.50GHz ($284.99)
Impact CPU sur FPS + 0.0 FPS
Impact CPU sur FPS% 0.0%
Paramètres de qualité de référence Ultra Quality Settings
Rendement moyen en 1080p 43.2 FPS
Rendement 1440p moyen 31.3 FPS
Rendement moyen de 4K 17.8 FPS
Mémoire 2 GB
Coût 1080p par image € 5.1
1440p Coût Par Image € 7.0
Coût 4K par image € 12.3
Série R9 285
Score global combiné 57/100 Acceptable

Le R9 295X2 pourrait être le extreme phare de extreme du dernier jeu de cartes GCN 3.0 dernier extreme , mais leur prix les maintient hors de la portée de la plupart des joueurs sur high-end PC high-end . D'autre part, le R9 285 est plus proche d'être raisonnablement abordable à un prix de . AMD cartes xx85 ont toujours été définies par des prix high-end avec des performances qui frappent à la porte des cartes graphiques extreme , en particulier lorsqu'elles sont overclockées. Après avoir pris le temps de tester complètement la carte graphique GCN 3.0 à l'intérieur du R9 285 , nous pouvons affirmer sans l'ombre d'un doute qu'elle poursuit la tendance.

Performances du jeu Qualité ultra aux réglages

Modifier les paramètres de qualité

Résolution 1920x1080

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
Année Jeu Images par seconde
2019 Apex Legends
32
36.0
2019 Anthem
20
23.2
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
30
34.0
2019 Resident Evil 2
42
47.1
2019 Metro Exodus
18
21.0
2019 World War Z
43
48.0
2018 Forza Horizon 4
28
32.0
2018 Fallout 76
32
36.0
2018 Hitman 2
25
28.0
2018 Just Cause 4
27
30.3
2018 Monster Hunter: World
29
32.6
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
43
48.0
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
28
31.5
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
37
41.9
2017 For Honor
50
55.9
2017 Project CARS 2
35
39.6
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
43
48.0
2016 Overwatch
44
49.0
2016 Dishonored 2
26
28.9
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
32
35.7
2015 Total War: Attila
28
32.1
2015 Rocket League
146
163.1
2015 Need For Speed
40
45.2
2015 Project CARS
38
43.3
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
71
79.2
2014 Civilization: Beyond Earth
66
74.2
2014 Dragon Age: Inquisition
46
52.0
2014 Far Cry 4
43
48.5
2014 GRID Autosport
62
69.2
2014 Shadow of Mordor
42
46.8
2014 The Talos Principle
54
60.3
2013 Crysis 3
36
40.6
2013 Battlefield 4
41
45.8
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
100
111.8
2009 League of Legends
188
209.7

Résolution 2560x1440

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
Année Jeu Images par seconde
2019 Apex Legends
21
26.8
2019 Anthem
14
18.4
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
21
26.4
2019 Resident Evil 2
25
31.7
2019 Metro Exodus
13
16.3
2019 World War Z
28
35.0
2018 Forza Horizon 4
21
27.0
2018 Hitman 2
14
18.0
2018 Just Cause 4
17
22.4
2018 Monster Hunter: World
18
22.8
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
29
37.0
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
16
20.3
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
24
30.3
2017 For Honor
26
32.6
2017 Project CARS 2
22
28.0
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
34
43.3
2016 Overwatch
26
33.6
2016 Dishonored 2
19
24.7
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
17
21.3
2015 Total War: Attila
17
21.3
2015 Rocket League
55
69.9
2015 Need For Speed
28
35.0
2015 Project CARS
26
33.1
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
41
51.3
2014 Civilization: Beyond Earth
44
55.7
2014 Dragon Age: Inquisition
27
34.3
2014 Far Cry 4
27
34.6
2014 GRID Autosport
40
50.4
2014 Shadow of Mordor
25
32.0
2014 The Talos Principle
34
42.9
2013 Crysis 3
27
34.7
2013 Battlefield 4
23
29.5
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
74
93.2
2009 League of Legends
93
116.5

Résolution 3840x2160

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
Année Jeu Images par seconde
2019 Apex Legends
11
16.0
2019 Anthem
7
10.0
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
9
14.0
2019 Resident Evil 2
10
15.6
2019 Metro Exodus
7
10.3
2019 World War Z
14
20.2
2018 Forza Horizon 4
12
18.0
2018 Hitman 2
7
11.0
2018 Just Cause 4
8
11.7
2018 Monster Hunter: World
7
11.0
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
14
21.0
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
7
11.2
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
14
21.0
2017 For Honor
11
16.3
2017 Project CARS 2
16
23.3
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
25
36.3
2016 Overwatch
12
17.5
2016 Dishonored 2
13
19.6
2015 Rocket League
22
32.6
2015 Need For Speed
16
23.3
2015 Project CARS
16
23.3
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
16
23.8
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
58
83.9
2009 League of Legends
32
46.6
R9 285 with i7-4770K at 1080p and Qualité ultra settings
R9 285 with i7-4770K at 1440p and Qualité ultra settings
R9 285 with i7-4770K at 4K and Qualité ultra settings

Comparer avec les concurrents

R9 285 Spécifications

R9 285 Board Design

Board NumberC766
Length8.7 inches 221 mm
Outputs2x DVI1x HDMI1x DisplayPort
Power Connectors2x 6-pin
Slot WidthDual-slot
TDP190 W

R9 285 Clock Speeds

GPU Clock918 MHz
Memory Clock1375 MHz 5500 MHz effective

R9 285 Graphics Card

Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16
GenerationVolcanic Islands (R9 200)
Launch Price249 USD
ProductionEnd-of-life
Release DateSep 2nd, 2014

R9 285 Graphics Features

DirectX12.0 (12_0)
OpenCL2
OpenGL4.5
Shader Model6
Vulkan1.1.82

R9 285 Graphics Processor

ArchitectureGCN 3.0
Die Size366 mm²
GPU NameTonga
GPU VariantTonga PRO (215-0851128)
Process Size28 nm
Transistors5,000 million

R9 285 Memory

Bandwidth176.0 GB/s
Memory Bus256 bit
Memory Size2048 MB
Memory TypeGDDR5

R9 285 Render Config

Compute Units28
ROPs32
Shading Units1792
TMUs112

R9 285 Theoretical Performance

FP16 (half) performance3,290 GFLOPS (1:1)
FP32 (float) performance3,290 GFLOPS
FP64 (double) performance205.6 GFLOPS (1:16)
Pixel Rate29.38 GPixel/s
Texture Rate102.8 GTexel/s

Critics Reviews

AMD's 9 Radeon R9 285 delivers modern features (such as support for TrueAudio and FreeSync) found on other AMD cards, and performance that edges out Nvidia's GeForce GTX 760.
AMD's 9 Radeon R9 285 delivers modern features (such as support for TrueAudio and FreeSync) found on other AMD cards, and performance that edges out Nvidia's GeForce GTX 760.
Having said that, the Radeon R9 285 is a wonderful option at 0 and probably represents the best product a gamer can buy for that price, just as the Radeon R9 280 did.
AMD’s reference specifications call for up to a 918MHz engine clock for the Radeon R9 285 with 1375MHz memory (5.5 Gbps effective). The specifications list 2GB of on-board memory, but 4GB ...
The R9 285 starts slightly behind the GTX 760 in Battlefield 4 and the R9 280 is also ahead by a few fps. The new card also only manages to be 1fps faster than the R9 270X at both resolutions tested.
AMD Radeon R9 285: Other Benchmarks Fire Strike is 3D Mark’s toughest graphics benchmark, and in this test the R9 285 scored 6,744 points. That’s better than the 5,905 scored by the R9 280 ...
The Radeon R9 285 is indeed a new piece of silicon, code-named "Tonga." What's newest about it: It brings with it the features of other recent AMD cards, such as TrueAudio and support for multi ...
Last month AMD held their 30 years of graphics celebration, during which they announced their next Radeon video card, the Radeon R9 285. Designed to be AMD’s new 9 midrange enthusiast card ...
The R9 280 debuted with an MSRP of 9 and this is the exact price point that the R9 285 is arriving at, placing it directly between the R9 270X (0) and R9 280X (0). Given their similar ...
On paper, the new Tonga-based R9 285 looks to be slightly slower than the R9 280 it is intended to replace, but there's more than meets the eye. When we first heard about the new Radeon R9 285 ...
AMD Radeon R9 285 Review: Feat. Sapphire R9 285 Dual-X OC ... Power, Temperature, & Noise. As always, last but not least is our look at power, temperature, and noise. Next to price and performance ...
AMD Radeon R9 285: Under the Hood. The R9 285 is the only card to currently use the Tonga core. It’s a mid-range core, but it shares a crucial part of its architecture with AMD’s high-end 290 ...

Discussion et commentaires

Partagez vos commentaires