GTX TITAN Mit i7-3770K Benchmarks bei Ultra-Qualität Qualitätseinstellungen

Was die Kosten angeht, so ist die Preisgestaltung hier eindeutig ein echtes Thema, und der Preis von GTX TITAN ist einfach lächerlich. Bei 1440p kann GTX TITAN auf so ziemlich alles bei Ultra 50-60 fps treffen, nur ohne Antialiasing, weniger ambient Okklusion und abgedrehte Schatten. Es ist erwähnenswert, dass die GTX TITAN eine sehr stromhungrige Karte ist und eine anständige Stromversorgung benötigt. In Bezug auf den Speicher ist der GTX TITAN es 6144 MB RAM mehr als genug für moderne Spiele und sollte keine Engpässe verursachen. Diese Kombination zwischen GTX TITAN und Intel Core i7-3770K @ 3.50GHz hat in vielen Spielen weniger als 8% Engpass und passt perfekt zu FPS-Verlusten. Diese Kombination zwischen GTX TITAN und Intel Core i7-3770K @ 3.50GHz ist ein perfektes Spiel, um FPS-Verlust zu vermeiden.

 GTX TITAN Mit i7-3770K Benchmarks bei Ultra-Qualität Qualitätseinstellungen
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN
Preis € 572.0
Jahr 2013
Maximale Rekordtemperatur 82C
Max Fan Lärm 53.1dB
Empfohlene Stromversorgung 600W
Benchmark CPU Intel Core i7-3770K @ 3.50GHz ($248.98)
CPU-Effekt auf FPS + 0.0 FPS
CPU-Effekt auf FPS% 0.0%
Benchmark Quality Settings Ultra Quality Settings
Durchschnittliche 1080p-Leistung 70.2 FPS
Durchschnittliche 1440p Performance 50.3 FPS
(Ultrawide) Durchschnittliche 1440p Performance 41.6 FPS
Durchschnittliche 4K-Performance 27.4 FPS
Speicher 6 GB
1080p Kosten pro Frame € 12.5
1440p Kosten pro Frame € 17.5
(Ultrawide) 1440p Kosten pro Frame € 21.1
4K Kosten pro Frame € 32.1
Serie GTX TITAN
Variant NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN
Gesamtkombination-Score 39/100 Schwach

Für 1080p Full HD konnten wir Fallout 76, Apex Legends, Call of Duty Modern Warfare, Resident Evil 2, Strange Brigade mit 62 fps bis 76 fps spielen und die 69 fps halten.

Forza Horizon 4 (2018)

Ultra-Qualität

Auflösung 1920x1080

Jahr Grafikkarte Preis Frames Per Second
2015 NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X € 879
100.0 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 € 351
96.0 FPS
2015 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti € 571
94.0 FPS
2014 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 € 483
73.0 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB € 224
70.2 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 FURY X € 571
68.0 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB € 150
66.6 FPS
2014 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 € 290
63.4 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 Nano € 571
63.0 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 390X € 378
57.0 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN € 879
54.0 FPS
2013 AMD Radeon R9 290 € 351
53.0 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 390 € 290
52.0 FPS
2016 AMD Radeon RX 470 € 158
45.0 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti € 615
42.6 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 € 571
41.0 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 380X € 202
40.0 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 380 € 175
38.0 FPS
2015 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 € 175
38.0 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti € 149
37.2 FPS
2013 AMD Radeon R9 290X € 483
37.0 FPS
2012 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 € 439
37.0 FPS
2010 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 € 439
35.0 FPS
2012 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 € 351
35.0 FPS
2014 AMD Radeon R9 285 € 219
32.0 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 € 219
31.5 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 € 351
30.4 FPS
2014 AMD Radeon R9 280 € 246
29.0 FPS
2012 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 € 202
23.4 FPS

Das GTX TITAN befindet sich zwischen dem R9 390X und dem R9 290 und fällt um 5.6 % langsamer als R9 390X und um 1.9 % schneller als R9 290 . Es hat eine durchschnittliche relative Leistung gegenüber jeder Grafikkarte hier. Die GTX TITAN 54 FPS in und lag damit deutlich über der R9 290X .

PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (2017)

Ultra-Qualität

Auflösung 1920x1080

Jahr Grafikkarte Preis Frames Per Second
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 € 351
80.0 FPS
2015 NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X € 879
70.0 FPS
2015 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti € 571
68.0 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 FURY X € 571
60.0 FPS
2014 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 € 483
58.0 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 Nano € 571
53.0 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB € 224
52.2 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB € 150
49.6 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 390X € 378
49.0 FPS
2014 AMD Radeon R9 285 € 219
48.0 FPS
2014 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 € 290
47.5 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 390 € 290
47.0 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN € 879
44.0 FPS
2013 AMD Radeon R9 290 € 351
43.0 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 € 571
43.0 FPS
2013 AMD Radeon R9 290X € 483
41.0 FPS
2016 AMD Radeon RX 470 € 158
41.0 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 € 219
39.6 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti € 615
37.0 FPS
2011 AMD Radeon HD 7970 € 483
32.0 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 380 € 175
32.0 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 380X € 202
32.0 FPS
2012 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 € 439
32.0 FPS
2012 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 € 351
31.0 FPS
2015 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 € 175
31.0 FPS
2014 AMD Radeon R9 280 € 246
30.0 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti € 149
27.6 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 € 351
26.4 FPS
2010 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 € 439
22.0 FPS
2012 AMD Radeon HD 7850 € 219
21.0 FPS
2012 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 € 202
13.5 FPS

Das GTX TITAN befindet sich zwischen dem R9 390 und dem R9 290 und fällt um 6.8 % langsamer als R9 390 und um 2.3 % schneller als R9 290 . Es hat eine durchschnittliche relative Leistung gegenüber jeder Grafikkarte hier. Es ist eine enge Verbindung zwischen dem GTX TITAN und seinem Rivalen R9 290X .

Spielperformance bei Ultra-Qualität Einstellungen

Qualitätseinstellungen ändern

Auflösung 1920x1080

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
Jahr Spiel Frames Per Second
2019 Apex Legends
56
63.0
2019 Anthem
36
40.6
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
53
59.5
2019 Resident Evil 2
65
73.0
2019 Metro Exodus
29
32.5
2019 World War Z
54
60.0
2019 Gears of War 5
42
47.4
2019 F1 2019
53
59.4
2019 GreedFall
48
53.5
2019 Borderlands 3
33
37.6
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
65
72.3
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
25
27.8
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
39
43.7
2018 Forza Horizon 4
48
54.0
2018 Fallout 76
55
62.0
2018 Hitman 2
43
48.0
2018 Just Cause 4
42
47.0
2018 Monster Hunter: World
45
50.6
2018 Strange Brigade
68
76.3
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
39
44.0
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
49
54.6
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
58
65.1
2017 For Honor
78
86.8
2017 Project CARS 2
55
61.5
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
67
74.5
2016 Overwatch
76
84.7
2016 Dishonored 2
40
44.8
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
46
51.7
2015 Total War: Attila
37
41.6
2015 Rocket League
227
253.1
2015 Need For Speed
63
70.1
2015 Project CARS
60
67.2
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
110
122.9
2014 Civilization: Beyond Earth
94
104.5
2014 Dragon Age: Inquisition
59
66.5
2014 Far Cry 4
57
63.8
2014 GRID Autosport
95
105.8
2014 Shadow of Mordor
70
78.3
2014 The Talos Principle
82
91.5
2014 Thief
59
66.6
2013 Bioshock Infinite
101
113.1
2013 Company of Heroes 2
51
56.7
2013 Crysis 3
84
93.9
2013 GRID 2
100
111.6
2013 Metro: Last Light
63
70.8
2013 Total War: Rome 2
60
67.6
2013 Battlefield 4
69
77.2
2012 DiRT: Showdown
82
91.7
2012 Far Cry 3
57
64.0
2012 Hitman: Absolution
58
65.2
2012 Sleeping Dogs
98
109.6
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
156
173.5
2011 Total War: Shogun 2
83
93.0
2011 Battlefield 3
98
108.9
2010 Civilization V
124
138.1
2009 League of Legends
292
325.4
2008 Crysis: Warhead
69
76.9

Auflösung 2560x1440

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
Jahr Spiel Frames Per Second
2019 Apex Legends
37
46.9
2019 Anthem
25
32.2
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
36
46.2
2019 Resident Evil 2
39
49.2
2019 Metro Exodus
20
25.3
2019 World War Z
35
43.8
2019 Gears of War 5
27
34.3
2019 F1 2019
33
42.1
2019 GreedFall
30
38.7
2019 Borderlands 3
21
26.4
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
41
52.1
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
18
22.8
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
27
34.3
2018 Forza Horizon 4
36
46.0
2018 Hitman 2
25
32.0
2018 Just Cause 4
27
34.7
2018 Monster Hunter: World
28
35.4
2018 Strange Brigade
42
53.1
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
27
34.0
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
28
35.7
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
37
47.0
2017 For Honor
40
50.6
2017 Project CARS 2
34
43.4
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
53
67.2
2016 Overwatch
46
58.1
2016 Dishonored 2
30
38.3
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
28
36.1
2015 Total War: Attila
22
28.2
2015 Rocket League
86
108.4
2015 Need For Speed
43
54.2
2015 Project CARS
41
51.3
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
63
79.5
2014 Civilization: Beyond Earth
62
78.1
2014 Dragon Age: Inquisition
38
47.6
2014 Far Cry 4
35
43.8
2014 GRID Autosport
62
77.9
2014 Shadow of Mordor
43
54.4
2014 The Talos Principle
53
66.5
2014 Thief
37
46.3
2013 Bioshock Infinite
60
75.8
2013 Company of Heroes 2
29
36.6
2013 Crysis 3
47
59.0
2013 GRID 2
65
81.7
2013 Metro: Last Light
47
59.4
2013 Total War: Rome 2
35
44.4
2013 Battlefield 4
39
49.9
2012 DiRT: Showdown
53
67.0
2012 Far Cry 3
48
61.2
2012 Hitman: Absolution
56
70.6
2012 Sleeping Dogs
29
37.1
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
115
144.6
2011 Total War: Shogun 2
46
57.8
2011 Battlefield 3
57
72.1
2010 Civilization V
90
112.5
2009 League of Legends
144
180.8
2008 Crysis: Warhead
39
49.3

Auflösung 3440x1440

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
Jahr Spiel Frames Per Second
2019 Apex Legends
30
40.1
2019 Anthem
20
26.6
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
28
37.8
2019 Resident Evil 2
29
39.3
2019 Metro Exodus
16
22.0
2019 World War Z
28
36.9
2019 Gears of War 5
22
30.0
2019 F1 2019
28
36.9
2019 GreedFall
22
29.2
2019 Borderlands 3
16
21.5
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
33
44.5
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
15
20.0
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
22
30.0
2018 Forza Horizon 4
30
40.7
2018 Hitman 2
20
27.3
2018 Just Cause 4
21
28.2
2018 Monster Hunter: World
21
28.0
2018 Strange Brigade
33
43.9
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
21
28.4
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
22
29.2
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
32
42.5
2017 For Honor
30
40.6
2017 Project CARS 2
32
42.6
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
50
66.1
2016 Overwatch
35
47.2
2016 Dishonored 2
27
36.8
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
21
28.8
2015 Total War: Attila
17
22.9
2015 Rocket League
64
85.1
2015 Need For Speed
36
48.4
2015 Project CARS
35
46.8
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
47
62.3
2014 Civilization: Beyond Earth
49
65.6
2014 Dragon Age: Inquisition
29
38.6
2014 Far Cry 4
27
36.0
2014 GRID Autosport
49
65.4
2014 Shadow of Mordor
34
45.3
2014 The Talos Principle
41
55.1
2013 Bioshock Infinite
45
59.9
2013 Crysis 3
35
46.4
2013 GRID 2
50
66.6
2013 Metro: Last Light
36
48.4
2013 Total War: Rome 2
34
44.8
2013 Battlefield 4
34
45.6
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
111
147.0
2011 Battlefield 3
44
58.2
2009 League of Legends
102
135.4
2008 Crysis: Warhead
38
50.2

Auflösung 3840x2160

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
Jahr Spiel Frames Per Second
2019 Apex Legends
19
28.0
2019 Anthem
12
17.5
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
17
24.5
2019 Resident Evil 2
16
24.2
2019 Metro Exodus
11
15.9
2019 World War Z
17
25.2
2019 Gears of War 5
15
21.7
2019 F1 2019
18
26.8
2019 GreedFall
11
15.9
2019 Borderlands 3
9
13.7
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
21
31.1
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
10
14.5
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
15
21.7
2018 Forza Horizon 4
21
30.0
2018 Hitman 2
13
19.0
2018 Just Cause 4
12
18.1
2018 Monster Hunter: World
11
17.0
2018 Strange Brigade
20
28.9
2017 Ghost Recon Wildlands
13
19.8
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
13
19.0
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
13
18.9
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
22
32.5
2017 For Honor
17
25.3
2017 Project CARS 2
25
36.2
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
39
56.4
2016 Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
8
12.3
2016 Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
18
25.8
2016 Doom
17
24.6
2016 Total War: Warhammer
17
24.5
2016 Battlefield 1
19
27.8
2016 Overwatch
21
30.1
2016 Dishonored 2
21
30.4
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
12
17.8
2015 Total War: Attila
10
14.6
2015 Rocket League
35
50.6
2015 Need For Speed
25
36.2
2015 Project CARS
25
36.2
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
25
36.9
2014 Civilization: Beyond Earth
31
44.5
2014 Dragon Age: Inquisition
17
24.5
2014 Far Cry 4
16
23.4
2014 GRID Autosport
31
44.3
2014 Shadow of Mordor
21
30.3
2014 The Talos Principle
25
36.4
2013 Bioshock Infinite
25
36.1
2013 Crysis 3
19
27.8
2013 GRID 2
29
42.8
2013 Metro: Last Light
21
31.0
2013 Total War: Rome 2
27
39.3
2013 Battlefield 4
24
35.4
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
91
130.1
2011 Battlefield 3
25
36.6
2009 League of Legends
50
72.3
2008 Crysis: Warhead
31
44.6
2008 Crysis: Warhead (DX10)
5
7.2
GTX TITAN with i7-3770K at 1080p and Ultra-Qualität settings
GTX TITAN with i7-3770K at 1440p and Ultra-Qualität settings
GTX TITAN with i7-3770K at 4K and Ultra-Qualität settings

Vergleich gegen Konkurrenten

GTX TITAN Spezifikationen

GTX TITAN Board Design

Board NumberP2083 SKU 10
Length10.5 inches 267 mm
Outputs2x DVI1x HDMI1x DisplayPort
Power Connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Slot WidthDual-slot
TDP250 W

GTX TITAN Clock Speeds

Boost Clock876 MHz
GPU Clock836 MHz
Memory Clock1502 MHz 6008 MHz effective

GTX TITAN Graphics Card

Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16
GenerationGeForce 700
Launch Price999 USD
ProductionEnd-of-life
Release DateFeb 19th, 2013

GTX TITAN Graphics Features

CUDA3.5
DirectX12.0 (11_0)
OpenCL1.2
OpenGL4.6
Shader Model5.1
Vulkan1.1.82

GTX TITAN Graphics Processor

ArchitectureKepler
Die Size561 mm²
GPU NameGK110
GPU VariantGK110-400-A1
Process Size28 nm
Transistors7,080 million

GTX TITAN Memory

Bandwidth288.4 GB/s
Memory Bus384 bit
Memory Size6144 MB
Memory TypeGDDR5

GTX TITAN Render Config

ROPs48
SMX Count14
Shading Units2688
TMUs224

GTX TITAN Theoretical Performance

FP32 (float) performance4,709 GFLOPS
FP64 (double) performance1,570 GFLOPS (1:3)
Pixel Rate49.06 GPixel/s
Texture Rate196.2 GTexel/s

Critics Reviews

Conclusion. In many ways, the GeForce GTX Titan X conclusion writes itself. Priced at 00, Nvidia’s new single-GPU flagship assumes a position previously occupied by the original Titan.
Nvidia's GeForce GTX Titan X is hands-down the fastest single-GPU graphics card in the world, and the first capable of gaming at 4K without having to resort to a multiple-card setup.
Earlier this week NVIDIA announced their new top-end single-GPU consumer card, the GeForce GTX Titan. Built on NVIDIA’s GK110 and named after the same supercomputer that GK110 first powered, the ...
What followed was a frantic attempt by NVIDIA to re-package the GK104 into a high-end product, the GeForce GTX 680, while shelving its best but expensive chip, the GK110 (which drives the GTX Titan we're reviewing today).
So no, the Nvidia GeForce GTX Titan X can't call itself the fastest gaming graphics card available right now. That's because of the continued impressive performance of AMD's top-end R9 295X2 card.
Conclusion Every sensible part of our reviewer-brains says the GeForce GTX Titan 6GB shouldn't work. Despite being beautifully engineered and far more powerful than any other single GPU card, on ...
The GTX Titan X also leaves Nvidia in a very good position when it comes to competition from AMD. There is a massive gap between GTX 980 and GTX Titan X, in terms of both performance and price.
Nvidia’s GeForce GTX Titan X is a card designed for those who won’t baulk at spending a silly amount of money on a GPU, but it does back up its price with stonking performance.
Announced earlier this week, NVIDIA's 00 GeForce GTX TITAN set out to claim the single-GPU performance throne. The new card offers not only performance improvements but also comes with a new GPU Boost 2.0 algorithm that helps keep temperature and noise levels down.
The GeForce GTX Titan’s specifications portend to the card’s immense horsepower. Not only is the GK110 at the heart of the GTX Titan twice the size of the GK104 used in the GeForce GTX 600 ...
Our Verdict. With no single-GPU AMD competition, Nvidia's GTX Titan X is simply the most efficient and most elegant 4K gaming card around.
The GeForce GTX Titan is the new kid on the block. With a single GK110 (Kepler) GPU, the GTX Titan has the potential to give high-end gamers similar performance to the GTX 690 with more efficient ...
The GeForce GTX TITAN X is a enthusiast-class graphics card by NVIDIA, launched in March 2015. Built on the 28 nm process, and based on the GM200 graphics processor, in its GM200-400-A1 variant, the card supports DirectX 12.0.
With the GTX 980 already performing well here, the GTX Titan X takes it home, improving on the GTX 980 by 31%. Whereas GTX 980 could only hold even with the Radeon R9 290X, the GTX Titan X takes a ...
Never one to shy away from high-end video cards, in 2013 NVIDIA took the next step towards establishing a definitive brand for high-end cards with the launch of the GeForce GTX Titan.Proudly named ...
Today Nvidia has yanked the wraps off its all-new flagship GPU, the GeForce GTX Titan X. With 12GB of RAM and 3,072 cuda cores, it’s the company’s "we’re not messing around" GPU, and ...

Diskussion und Kommentare

Teilen Sie Ihre Kommentare