R9 285 Mit Athlon 64 X2 Dual 6400+ Benchmarks bei Ultra-Qualität Qualitätseinstellungen

Mit aktuellem 2048 MB RAM kann der R9 285 in moderneren Spielen gravierende Gedächtnisengpässe aufweisen. Diese Kombination zwischen R9 285 und AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 6400+ wird in vielen Spielen zu ernsthaften Engpässen führen und zu einem schweren FPS-Verlust führen. Mit aktuellem 2048 MB RAM kann der R9 285 in moderneren Spielen nur sehr wenige speicherbedingte Engpässe aufweisen.

 R9 285 Mit Athlon 64 X2 Dual 6400+ Benchmarks bei Ultra-Qualität Qualitätseinstellungen
AMD Radeon R9 285
Preis € 334.4
Jahr 2014
Maximale Rekordtemperatur 70C
Max Fan Lärm 48.3dB
Empfohlene Stromversorgung 540W
Benchmark CPU AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 6400+ ($259.95)
CPU-Effekt auf FPS -16.1 FPS
CPU-Effekt auf FPS% -40.0%
Benchmark Quality Settings Ultra Quality Settings
Durchschnittliche 1080p-Leistung 25.2 FPS
Durchschnittliche 1440p Performance 18.2 FPS
(Ultrawide) Durchschnittliche 1440p Performance 15.2 FPS
Durchschnittliche 4K-Performance 10.2 FPS
Speicher 2 GB
1080p Kosten pro Frame € 8.7
1440p Kosten pro Frame € 12.0
(Ultrawide) 1440p Kosten pro Frame € 14.4
4K Kosten pro Frame € 21.5
Serie R9 285
Variant AMD Radeon R9 285
Gesamtkombination-Score 55/100 Annehmbar

Die R9 295X2 könnte das sein extreme Flaggschiff der neuesten GCN 3.0 Satz von Grafikkarten, aber die Preise halten sie außerhalb der Reichweite der meisten high-end PC - Spieler. Auf der anderen Seite ist R9 285 bei einem Preis von € 219.1 beinahe erschwinglich. AMD xx85 -Karten von xx85 wurden immer durch high-end extreme mit einer Leistung definiert, die bei extreme an die Tür klopft - besonders beim Übertakten. Nachdem wir uns die Zeit genommen haben, die GCN 3.0 -Grafikkarte im R9 285 vollständig zu testen, können wir ohne Zweifel sagen, dass sie den Trend fortsetzt.

Forza Horizon 4 (2018)

Ultra-Qualität

Auflösung 1920x1080

Jahr Grafikkarte Preis Frames Per Second
2013 AMD Radeon R9 290 € 351
53.0 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 570 € 149
52.0 FPS
2016 AMD Radeon RX 470 € 158
45.0 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 € 571
41.0 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 380X € 202
40.0 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 380 € 175
38.0 FPS
2015 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 € 175
38.0 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti € 149
37.2 FPS
2012 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 € 439
37.0 FPS
2012 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 € 351
35.0 FPS
2014 AMD Radeon R9 285 € 219
16.5 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 € 219
31.5 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 € 351
30.4 FPS
2014 AMD Radeon R9 280 € 246
29.0 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 560 € 87
29.0 FPS
2015 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 € 140
28.4 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R7 370 € 131
25.0 FPS
2012 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 € 202
23.4 FPS
2016 AMD Radeon RX 460 € 123
23.0 FPS
2017 NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 € 70
22.0 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 550 € 70
17.0 FPS

Das R9 285 befindet sich zwischen dem GTX 670 und dem GTX 760 und fällt um 9.4 % langsamer als GTX 670 und um 1.6 % schneller als GTX 760 . Es hat eine durchschnittliche relative Leistung gegenüber jeder Grafikkarte hier. Gegen seinen Rivalen, den GTX 960 , ist der R9 285 viel langsamer.

PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (2017)

Ultra-Qualität

Auflösung 1920x1080

Jahr Grafikkarte Preis Frames Per Second
2014 AMD Radeon R9 285 € 219
24.7 FPS
2013 AMD Radeon R9 290 € 351
43.0 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 570 € 149
43.0 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 € 571
43.0 FPS
2016 AMD Radeon RX 470 € 158
41.0 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 € 219
39.6 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R7 370 € 131
37.0 FPS
2015 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 € 140
34.0 FPS
2011 AMD Radeon HD 7970 € 483
32.0 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 380 € 175
32.0 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 380X € 202
32.0 FPS
2012 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 € 439
32.0 FPS
2012 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 € 351
31.0 FPS
2015 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 € 175
31.0 FPS
2014 AMD Radeon R9 280 € 246
30.0 FPS
2014 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti € 131
30.0 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti € 149
27.6 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 € 351
26.4 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 560 € 87
23.0 FPS
2012 AMD Radeon HD 7850 € 219
21.0 FPS
2016 AMD Radeon RX 460 € 123
20.0 FPS
2017 NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 € 70
17.7 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 550 € 70
16.1 FPS
2012 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 € 202
13.5 FPS

Spielperformance bei Ultra-Qualität Einstellungen

Qualitätseinstellungen ändern

Auflösung 1920x1080

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
Jahr Spiel Frames Per Second
2019 Apex Legends
9
18.6
2019 Anthem
6
12.0
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
9
17.5
2019 Resident Evil 2
12
24.3
2019 Metro Exodus
5
10.8
2019 World War Z
12
24.7
2019 Gears of War 5
8
15.7
2019 F1 2019
10
19.7
2019 GreedFall
9
17.8
2019 Borderlands 3
6
12.5
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
12
24.0
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
4
9.2
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
7
14.5
2018 Forza Horizon 4
8
16.5
2018 Fallout 76
9
18.6
2018 Hitman 2
7
14.4
2018 Just Cause 4
8
15.6
2018 Monster Hunter: World
8
16.8
2018 Strange Brigade
13
25.4
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
12
24.7
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
8
16.2
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
11
21.6
2017 For Honor
14
28.8
2017 Project CARS 2
10
20.4
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
12
24.7
2016 Overwatch
13
25.3
2016 Dishonored 2
7
14.9
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
9
18.4
2015 Total War: Attila
8
16.5
2015 Rocket League
43
84.1
2015 Need For Speed
12
23.3
2015 Project CARS
11
22.3
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
21
40.8
2014 Civilization: Beyond Earth
19
38.3
2014 Dragon Age: Inquisition
13
26.8
2014 Far Cry 4
12
25.0
2014 GRID Autosport
18
35.7
2014 Shadow of Mordor
12
24.1
2014 The Talos Principle
16
31.1
2013 Crysis 3
10
20.9
2013 Battlefield 4
12
23.6
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
29
57.7
2009 League of Legends
55
108.1

Auflösung 2560x1440

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
Jahr Spiel Frames Per Second
2019 Apex Legends
7
13.8
2019 Anthem
4
9.5
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
7
13.6
2019 Resident Evil 2
8
16.3
2019 Metro Exodus
4
8.4
2019 World War Z
9
18.0
2019 Gears of War 5
5
11.4
2019 F1 2019
7
14.0
2019 GreedFall
6
12.8
2019 Borderlands 3
4
8.8
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
8
17.3
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
3
7.6
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
5
11.4
2018 Forza Horizon 4
7
13.9
2018 Hitman 2
4
9.3
2018 Just Cause 4
5
11.5
2018 Monster Hunter: World
6
11.8
2018 Strange Brigade
9
17.7
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
9
19.1
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
5
10.5
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
8
15.6
2017 For Honor
8
16.8
2017 Project CARS 2
7
14.4
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
11
22.3
2016 Overwatch
8
17.3
2016 Dishonored 2
6
12.7
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
5
11.0
2015 Total War: Attila
5
11.0
2015 Rocket League
18
36.0
2015 Need For Speed
9
18.0
2015 Project CARS
8
17.1
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
13
26.4
2014 Civilization: Beyond Earth
14
28.7
2014 Dragon Age: Inquisition
9
17.7
2014 Far Cry 4
9
17.8
2014 GRID Autosport
13
26.0
2014 Shadow of Mordor
8
16.5
2014 The Talos Principle
11
22.1
2013 Crysis 3
9
17.9
2013 Battlefield 4
7
15.2
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
24
48.0
2009 League of Legends
30
60.1

Auflösung 3440x1440

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
Jahr Spiel Frames Per Second
2019 Apex Legends
6
11.8
2019 Anthem
4
7.8
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
5
11.1
2019 Resident Evil 2
6
13.0
2019 Metro Exodus
3
7.3
2019 World War Z
7
15.2
2019 Gears of War 5
5
9.9
2019 F1 2019
6
12.2
2019 GreedFall
5
9.7
2019 Borderlands 3
3
7.2
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
7
14.8
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
3
6.6
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
5
9.9
2018 Forza Horizon 4
6
12.4
2018 Hitman 2
4
8.0
2018 Just Cause 4
4
9.4
2018 Monster Hunter: World
4
9.3
2018 Strange Brigade
7
14.6
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
8
16.0
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
4
8.7
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
7
14.1
2017 For Honor
6
13.5
2017 Project CARS 2
7
14.1
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
11
22.0
2016 Overwatch
7
14.1
2016 Dishonored 2
6
12.2
2015 Rocket League
14
28.3
2015 Need For Speed
8
16.1
2015 Project CARS
8
15.6
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
10
20.7
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
25
48.8
2009 League of Legends
23
45.0

Auflösung 3840x2160

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
Jahr Spiel Frames Per Second
2019 Apex Legends
4
8.2
2019 Anthem
2
5.2
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
3
7.2
2019 Resident Evil 2
4
8.0
2019 Metro Exodus
2
5.3
2019 World War Z
5
10.4
2019 Gears of War 5
3
7.2
2019 F1 2019
4
8.9
2019 GreedFall
2
5.3
2019 Borderlands 3
2
4.6
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
5
10.3
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
2
4.8
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
3
7.2
2018 Forza Horizon 4
4
9.3
2018 Hitman 2
2
5.7
2018 Just Cause 4
3
6.0
2018 Monster Hunter: World
2
5.7
2018 Strange Brigade
4
9.6
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
5
10.8
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
2
5.8
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
5
10.8
2017 For Honor
4
8.4
2017 Project CARS 2
6
12.0
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
9
18.7
2016 Overwatch
4
9.0
2016 Dishonored 2
5
10.1
2015 Rocket League
8
16.8
2015 Need For Speed
6
12.0
2015 Project CARS
6
12.0
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
6
12.3
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
22
43.2
2009 League of Legends
12
24.0
R9 285 with Athlon 64 X2 Dual 6400+ at 1080p and Ultra-Qualität settings

Vergleich gegen Konkurrenten

R9 285 Spezifikationen

R9 285 Board Design

Board NumberC766
Length8.7 inches 221 mm
Outputs2x DVI1x HDMI1x DisplayPort
Power Connectors2x 6-pin
Slot WidthDual-slot
TDP190 W

R9 285 Clock Speeds

GPU Clock918 MHz
Memory Clock1375 MHz 5500 MHz effective

R9 285 Graphics Card

Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16
GenerationVolcanic Islands (R9 200)
Launch Price249 USD
ProductionEnd-of-life
Release DateSep 2nd, 2014

R9 285 Graphics Features

DirectX12.0 (12_0)
OpenCL2
OpenGL4.5
Shader Model6
Vulkan1.1.82

R9 285 Graphics Processor

ArchitectureGCN 3.0
Die Size366 mm²
GPU NameTonga
GPU VariantTonga PRO (215-0851128)
Process Size28 nm
Transistors5,000 million

R9 285 Memory

Bandwidth176.0 GB/s
Memory Bus256 bit
Memory Size2048 MB
Memory TypeGDDR5

R9 285 Render Config

Compute Units28
ROPs32
Shading Units1792
TMUs112

R9 285 Theoretical Performance

FP16 (half) performance3,290 GFLOPS (1:1)
FP32 (float) performance3,290 GFLOPS
FP64 (double) performance205.6 GFLOPS (1:16)
Pixel Rate29.38 GPixel/s
Texture Rate102.8 GTexel/s

Critics Reviews

AMD's 9 Radeon R9 285 delivers modern features (such as support for TrueAudio and FreeSync) found on other AMD cards, and performance that edges out Nvidia's GeForce GTX 760.
AMD's 9 Radeon R9 285 delivers modern features (such as support for TrueAudio and FreeSync) found on other AMD cards, and performance that edges out Nvidia's GeForce GTX 760.
Having said that, the Radeon R9 285 is a wonderful option at 0 and probably represents the best product a gamer can buy for that price, just as the Radeon R9 280 did.
AMD’s reference specifications call for up to a 918MHz engine clock for the Radeon R9 285 with 1375MHz memory (5.5 Gbps effective). The specifications list 2GB of on-board memory, but 4GB ...
The R9 285 starts slightly behind the GTX 760 in Battlefield 4 and the R9 280 is also ahead by a few fps. The new card also only manages to be 1fps faster than the R9 270X at both resolutions tested.
AMD Radeon R9 285: Other Benchmarks Fire Strike is 3D Mark’s toughest graphics benchmark, and in this test the R9 285 scored 6,744 points. That’s better than the 5,905 scored by the R9 280 ...
The Radeon R9 285 is indeed a new piece of silicon, code-named "Tonga." What's newest about it: It brings with it the features of other recent AMD cards, such as TrueAudio and support for multi ...
Last month AMD held their 30 years of graphics celebration, during which they announced their next Radeon video card, the Radeon R9 285. Designed to be AMD’s new 9 midrange enthusiast card ...
The R9 280 debuted with an MSRP of 9 and this is the exact price point that the R9 285 is arriving at, placing it directly between the R9 270X (0) and R9 280X (0). Given their similar ...
On paper, the new Tonga-based R9 285 looks to be slightly slower than the R9 280 it is intended to replace, but there's more than meets the eye. When we first heard about the new Radeon R9 285 ...
AMD Radeon R9 285 Review: Feat. Sapphire R9 285 Dual-X OC ... Power, Temperature, & Noise. As always, last but not least is our look at power, temperature, and noise. Next to price and performance ...
AMD Radeon R9 285: Under the Hood. The R9 285 is the only card to currently use the Tonga core. It’s a mid-range core, but it shares a crucial part of its architecture with AMD’s high-end 290 ...

Diskussion und Kommentare

Teilen Sie Ihre Kommentare