R7 265 Mit Athlon 64 X2 Dual 4400+ Benchmarks bei Ultra-Qualität Qualitätseinstellungen

Die R7 265 eignet sich eher für Budget-PC-Builds und weniger anspruchsvolle Spiele. Das Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis ist für R7 265 gegenüber der Konkurrenz in den preiswerten Grafikkarten hervorragend. Mit aktuellem 2048 MB RAM kann der R7 265 in moderneren Spielen gravierende Gedächtnisengpässe aufweisen. In Bezug auf die maximale Belastungstemperatur ist die Kühlung des R7 265 hervorragend, um sie kühl und unter Kontrolle zu halten. Diese Kombination zwischen R7 265 und AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4400+ hat in vielen Spielen weniger als 15% Engpass und kann zu einem geringen FPS-Verlust führen. Mit aktuellem 2048 MB RAM kann der R7 265 in moderneren Spielen nur sehr wenige speicherbedingte Engpässe aufweisen.

 R7 265 Mit Athlon 64 X2 Dual 4400+ Benchmarks bei Ultra-Qualität Qualitätseinstellungen
AMD Radeon R7 265
Preis € 131.1
Jahr 2014
Maximale Rekordtemperatur 61C
Max Fan Lärm 43.6dB
Empfohlene Stromversorgung 500W
Benchmark CPU AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4400+ ($60)
CPU-Effekt auf FPS -14.6 FPS
CPU-Effekt auf FPS% -50.0%
Benchmark Quality Settings Ultra Quality Settings
Durchschnittliche 1080p-Leistung 15.8 FPS
Durchschnittliche 1440p Performance 10.5 FPS
(Ultrawide) Durchschnittliche 1440p Performance 9.0 FPS
Durchschnittliche 4K-Performance 6.3 FPS
Speicher 2 GB
1080p Kosten pro Frame € 8.3
1440p Kosten pro Frame € 12.5
(Ultrawide) 1440p Kosten pro Frame € 14.6
4K Kosten pro Frame € 20.8
Serie R7 265
Variant AMD Radeon R7 265
Gesamtkombination-Score 60/100 Gute

AMD xx65 -Karten von xx65 wurden immer durch entry-level mid-range mit einer Leistung definiert, die bei mid-range an die Tür klopft - besonders beim Übertakten. Nachdem wir uns die Zeit genommen haben, die GCN 1.0 -Grafikkarte im R7 265 vollständig zu testen, können wir ohne Zweifel sagen, dass sie den Trend fortsetzt.

Spielperformance bei Ultra-Qualität Einstellungen

Qualitätseinstellungen ändern

Auflösung 1920x1080

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
Jahr Spiel Frames Per Second
2019 Apex Legends
3
9.9
2019 Anthem
2
6.4
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
3
9.4
2019 Resident Evil 2
4
12.4
2019 Metro Exodus
2
5.5
2019 World War Z
4
11.4
2019 Gears of War 5
2
8.0
2019 F1 2019
3
10.1
2019 GreedFall
3
9.1
2019 Borderlands 3
2
6.4
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
4
12.3
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
1
4.7
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
2
7.4
2018 Just Cause 4
2
8.0
2018 Monster Hunter: World
3
8.6
2018 Strange Brigade
4
12.9
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
4
11.1
2017 For Honor
5
14.7
2017 Project CARS 2
3
10.4
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
4
12.6
2016 Dishonored 2
2
7.6
2015 Rocket League
15
42.9
2015 Need For Speed
4
11.9
2015 Project CARS
4
11.4
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
7
20.9
2013 Bioshock Infinite
6
17.2
2013 Company of Heroes 2
4
10.9
2013 Crysis 3
5
15.0
2013 GRID 2
7
20.0
2013 Metro: Last Light
4
12.3
2013 Total War: Rome 2
4
11.2
2013 Battlefield 4
4
13.0
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
10
29.4
2009 League of Legends
20
55.2
2008 Crysis: Warhead
5
15.9

Auflösung 2560x1440

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
Jahr Spiel Frames Per Second
2019 Apex Legends
2
7.4
2019 Anthem
1
5.1
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
2
7.3
2019 Resident Evil 2
3
8.3
2019 Metro Exodus
1
4.3
2019 World War Z
3
8.3
2019 Gears of War 5
2
5.8
2019 F1 2019
2
7.1
2019 GreedFall
2
6.6
2019 Borderlands 3
1
4.5
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
3
8.8
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
1
3.9
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
2
5.8
2018 Just Cause 4
2
5.9
2018 Monster Hunter: World
2
6.0
2018 Strange Brigade
3
9.0
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
2
8.0
2017 For Honor
3
8.6
2017 Project CARS 2
2
7.4
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
4
11.4
2016 Dishonored 2
2
6.5
2015 Rocket League
6
18.4
2015 Need For Speed
3
9.2
2015 Project CARS
3
8.7
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
4
13.5
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
9
24.5
2009 League of Legends
11
30.7

Auflösung 3440x1440

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
Jahr Spiel Frames Per Second
2019 Apex Legends
2
6.3
2019 Anthem
1
4.2
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
2
6.0
2019 Resident Evil 2
2
6.7
2019 Metro Exodus
1
3.8
2019 World War Z
2
7.0
2019 Gears of War 5
1
5.1
2019 F1 2019
2
6.3
2019 GreedFall
1
4.9
2019 Borderlands 3
1
3.6
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
2
7.6
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
1
3.4
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
1
5.1
2018 Just Cause 4
1
4.8
2018 Monster Hunter: World
1
4.8
2018 Strange Brigade
2
7.4
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
2
7.2
2017 For Honor
2
6.9
2017 Project CARS 2
2
7.2
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
4
11.2
2016 Dishonored 2
2
6.2
2015 Rocket League
5
14.4
2015 Need For Speed
3
8.2
2015 Project CARS
2
7.9
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
3
10.6
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
9
24.9
2009 League of Legends
8
23.0

Auflösung 3840x2160

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
Jahr Spiel Frames Per Second
2019 Apex Legends
1
4.4
2019 Anthem
1
2.8
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
1
3.9
2019 Resident Evil 2
1
4.1
2019 Metro Exodus
0
2.7
2019 World War Z
1
4.8
2019 Gears of War 5
1
3.7
2019 F1 2019
1
4.5
2019 GreedFall
0
2.7
2019 Borderlands 3
0
2.3
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
1
5.3
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
0
2.5
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
1
3.7
2018 Just Cause 4
1
3.1
2018 Monster Hunter: World
1
2.9
2018 Strange Brigade
1
4.9
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
2
5.5
2017 For Honor
1
4.3
2017 Project CARS 2
2
6.1
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
3
9.6
2016 Dishonored 2
1
5.2
2015 Rocket League
3
8.6
2015 Need For Speed
2
6.1
2015 Project CARS
2
6.1
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
2
6.3
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
8
22.1
2009 League of Legends
4
12.3
R7 265 with Athlon 64 X2 Dual 4400+ at 1080p and Ultra-Qualität settings

Vergleich gegen Konkurrenten

R7 265 Spezifikationen

R7 265 Board Design

Board NumberC630
Length8.28 inches 210 mm
Outputs2x DVI1x HDMI1x DisplayPort
Power Connectors1x 6-pin
Slot WidthDual-slot
TDP150 W

R7 265 Clock Speeds

Boost Clock925 MHz
GPU Clock900 MHz
Memory Clock1400 MHz 5600 MHz effective

R7 265 Graphics Card

Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16
GenerationVolcanic Islands (R7 200)
Launch Price149 USD
ProductionEnd-of-life
Release DateFeb 13th, 2014

R7 265 Graphics Features

DirectX12.0 (11_1)
OpenCL1.2
OpenGL4.5
Shader Model5.1
Vulkan1.1.77

R7 265 Graphics Processor

ArchitectureGCN 1.0
Die Size212 mm²
GPU NamePitcairn
GPU VariantPitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
Process Size28 nm
Transistors2,800 million

R7 265 Memory

Bandwidth179.2 GB/s
Memory Bus256 bit
Memory Size2048 MB
Memory TypeGDDR5

R7 265 Render Config

Compute Units16
ROPs32
Shading Units1024
TMUs64

R7 265 Theoretical Performance

FP32 (float) performance1,894 GFLOPS
FP64 (double) performance118.4 GFLOPS (1:16)
Pixel Rate29.60 GPixel/s
Texture Rate59.20 GTexel/s

Critics Reviews

AMD's Radeon R7 265 was launched a few months ago with little fanfare – after all, it's essentially just a rebadged and moderately overclocked version of the HD 7850.
HotHardware takes a detailed look at the brand new AMD Radeon R7 265, mainstream graphics card. - Page 2
AMD Radeon R7 265 - Overclocking Using MSI Afterburner, we ramped up the card's power limit by 20 percent, the maximum allowed. Voltage increases were not an option, but even so we were quickly ...
The Radeon R7 265 fits into AMD's line-up between the R7 260X and R9 270. The R7 265 uses a cut-down 'Curacao' GPU which we've seen used for the R9 270 and R9 270X.
Crysis 3, which is powered by Crytek’s proprietary CryENGINE 3 technology, is the third installment in this popular franchise. Crysis 3 is the sequel to 2011’s Crysis 2 and follows Prophet as ...
AMD said that the Radeon R7 265 will offer 2GB of GDDR-5 memory on a 256-bit memory bus, “crowning the AMD R7 series,” according to the company.
Based on AMD’s venerable Pitcairn GPU, R7 265 will be filling this gap by bringing a variant of the Radeon HD 7850 back to the market, creating a 3 rd tier Pitcairn product for the 200 series.
The Radeon R7 265 was a mid-range graphics card by AMD, launched in February 2014. Built on the 28 nm process, and based on the Pitcairn graphics processor, in its Pitcairn PRO variant, the card supports DirectX 12.0.
Neither the R7 260 nor the R7 265 are remarkable as far as voltages are concerned. Both of these are right in the range of common voltages for lower clocked Pitcairn and Bonaire products respectively.
We take a look at the £115 R7 265 2GB, essentially a rebadged and overclocked HD 7850 2GB
AMD is shaking up its mid-range graphics line-up today, by slashing the price of the Radeon R7 260X and introducing the more powerful Radeon R7 265. Though their model numbers are quite similar ...
The overclocked R7 265 saw a 13% boost in frame rates in Metro: Last Light hitting 35fps compared to the GTX 750 Ti's 31fps, which was an 11% increase over the standard frequency.
Marking the introduction of its Maxwell architecture, Nvidia has targeted AMD's 0 Radeon R7 265 with the new GeForce GTX 750 Ti, a card that promises to be more than another rebadge. The GTX ...
The Radeon R7 A265 was a graphics card by AMD, launched in January 2014. Built on the 28 nm process, and based on the Opal graphics processor, in its Opal XT variant, the card supports DirectX 12.0.

Diskussion und Kommentare

Teilen Sie Ihre Kommentare