RX Vega 64 med Athlon 5200 benchmarks på Ultra kvalitet kvalitetsindstillinger

Det er værd at bemærke, at RX Vega 64 det er en meget strømslugende kort og kræver en anstændig strømforsyning. Med hensyn til hukommelse, RX Vega 64 8192 er MB RAM mere end nok til moderne spil og bør ikke forårsage nogen flaskehalse. Det er vigtigt at vide, RX Vega 64 thats max belastning temperatur er meget høj og kan kræve brugerdefinerede køleløsninger. Denne kombination mellem RX Vega 64 og AMD Athlon 5200 Dual-Core vil forårsage alvorlige flaskehalse i mange spil og forårsage alvorlige fps tab. Kort sagt forestillingen er usædvanlig, er der ingen tvivl om, at dette er en af de mest magtfulde enkelt 2017 GPU derude i.

 RX Vega 64 med Athlon 5200 benchmarks på Ultra kvalitet kvalitetsindstillinger
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Pris kr 2,752.8
År 2017
Maksimal indspillet temperatur 86C
Max blæserstøj 56.3dB
Anbefalet strømforsyning 645W
Benchmark CPU AMD Athlon 5200 Dual-Core ($29.99)
CPU indvirkning på FPS -57.0 FPS
CPU indvirkning på FPS% -50.0%
Indstillinger for benchmark-kvalitet Ultra Quality Settings
Gennemsnitlig 1080p-ydeevne 48.5 FPS
Gennemsnitlig 1440p ydeevne 36.1 FPS
(Ultrawide) Gennemsnitlig 1440p ydeevne 30.6 FPS
Gennemsnitlig 4K-ydeevne 21.1 FPS
Hukommelse 8 GB
1080p Pris pr. Ramme kr 67.6
1440p Pris pr. Ramme kr 90.8
(Ultrawide) 1440p Pris pr. Ramme kr 107.2
4K pris pr. Ramme kr 155.4
Serie RX Vega 64
Variant AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Samlet kombinations score 60/100 God

AMD 's xx64 -kort er altid blevet defineret af high-end priser med ydeevne, der banker på døren til extreme grafikkort - især når de er overklokket. Efter at have taget os tid til fuldt ud at teste GCN 5.0 grafikkortet inde i RX Vega 64, kan vi uden tvivl sige, at det fortsætter trenden. Til 1080p Full HD kunne vi spille Borderlands 3, Anthem, Need For Speed: Heat, Final Fantasy XV, Just Cause 4 på 65 fps til 81 fps og holdt billedhastighederne svævende rundt på 74 fps.

Til 1440p Quad HD kunne vi spille Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Monster Hunter: World, GreedFall, Hitman 2, F1 2019 på 61 fps til 73 fps og holdt billedhastighederne svævende rundt på 66 fps. Til 2160p 4K kunne vi spille F1 2018 på 61 fps til 61 fps og holdt billedhastighederne svævende rundt på 61 fps.

Assassin's Creed Odyssey (2018)

Ultra kvalitet

Opløsning 1920x1080

År Grafikkort Pris Billeder pr. sekund
2018 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 kr 3,278
65.0 FPS
2019 AMD Radeon RX 5700 kr 2,293
63.0 FPS
2020 AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT kr 1,833
60.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER kr 2,628
60.0 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 kr 3,278
59.8 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 kr 3,278
19.0 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 kr 2,621
56.2 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 kr 2,300
54.4 FPS
2017 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti kr 2,687
53.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti kr 1,833
50.3 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 kr 2,621
47.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER kr 1,505
47.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 kr 1,445
44.3 FPS
2015 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti kr 4,264
40.0 FPS

RX Vega 64 sidder mellem GTX 1080 og RX Vega 56 og falder langsommere end GTX 1080 med 4.9 % og hurtigere end RX Vega 56 med 1.4 %. Det har en gennemsnitlig relativ ydelse mod hvert grafikkort her. Mod sin rival - GTX 1080 , er RX Vega 64 meget langsommere.

Forza Horizon 4 (2018)

Ultra kvalitet

Opløsning 1920x1080

År Grafikkort Pris Billeder pr. sekund
2018 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 kr 3,278
131.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER kr 2,628
121.0 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 kr 3,278
117.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 kr 2,300
111.1 FPS
2017 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti kr 2,687
105.0 FPS
2019 AMD Radeon RX 5700 kr 2,293
100.8 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti kr 1,833
99.8 FPS
2020 AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT kr 1,833
99.0 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 kr 2,621
96.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER kr 1,505
94.0 FPS
2015 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti kr 4,264
94.0 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 kr 3,278
30.3 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 kr 2,621
89.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 kr 1,445
87.8 FPS

RX Vega 64 sidder mellem GTX 980 Ti og RX Vega 56 og falder langsommere end GTX 980 Ti med 3.3 % og hurtigere end RX Vega 56 med 2.2 %. Det har under gennemsnittet relativ ydelse mod hvert grafikkort her. Mod sin rival - GTX 1080 , er RX Vega 64 meget langsommere.

Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018)

Ultra kvalitet

Opløsning 1920x1080

År Grafikkort Pris Billeder pr. sekund
2018 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 kr 3,278
101.9 FPS
2019 AMD Radeon RX 5700 kr 2,293
99.8 FPS
2020 AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT kr 1,833
96.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER kr 2,628
94.0 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 kr 3,278
91.0 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 kr 3,278
30.0 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 kr 2,621
85.7 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 kr 2,300
85.7 FPS
2017 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti kr 2,687
84.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti kr 1,833
79.8 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER kr 1,505
75.0 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 kr 2,621
74.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 kr 1,445
70.2 FPS
2015 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti kr 4,264
66.0 FPS

RX Vega 64 sidder mellem GTX 1080 og RX Vega 56 og falder langsommere end GTX 1080 med 1.1 % og hurtigere end RX Vega 56 med 5 %. Det har en gennemsnitlig relativ ydelse mod hvert grafikkort her. Dets resultater kan faktisk ikke skelnes fra GTX 1080 . Mod sin rival - GTX 1080 , er RX Vega 64 meget langsommere.

PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (2017)

Ultra kvalitet

Opløsning 1920x1080

År Grafikkort Pris Billeder pr. sekund
2018 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 kr 3,278
106.4 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER kr 2,628
100.0 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 kr 3,278
95.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 kr 2,300
92.6 FPS
2017 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti kr 2,687
85.0 FPS
2019 AMD Radeon RX 5700 kr 2,293
80.8 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti kr 1,833
80.8 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 kr 2,621
80.0 FPS
2020 AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT kr 1,833
77.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER kr 1,505
76.0 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 kr 3,278
24.3 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 kr 1,445
71.1 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 kr 2,621
71.0 FPS
2015 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti kr 4,264
68.0 FPS

RX Vega 64 sidder mellem GTX 1660 SUPER og GTX 1660 og falder langsommere end GTX 1660 SUPER med 4.1 % og hurtigere end GTX 1660 med 2.7 %. Det har under gennemsnittet relativ ydelse mod hvert grafikkort her. Mod sin rival - GTX 1080 , er RX Vega 64 meget langsommere.

Battlefield V (2018)

Ultra kvalitet

Opløsning 1920x1080

År Grafikkort Pris Billeder pr. sekund
2019 AMD Radeon RX 5700 kr 2,293
137.6 FPS
2020 AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT kr 1,833
135.0 FPS
2018 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 kr 3,278
126.0 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 kr 3,278
41.7 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 kr 2,621
123.1 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 kr 3,278
121.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER kr 2,628
120.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 kr 2,300
114.6 FPS
2017 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti kr 2,687
111.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti kr 1,833
105.4 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 kr 2,621
99.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER kr 1,505
99.0 FPS
2015 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti kr 4,264
94.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 kr 1,445
92.8 FPS

RX Vega 64 sidder mellem RTX 2070 og RX Vega 56 og falder langsommere end RTX 2070 med 0.8 % og hurtigere end RX Vega 56 med 1.5 %. Det har en stærk relativ ydelse mod hvert grafikkort her. Dets resultater kan faktisk ikke skelnes fra RTX 2070 . Mod sin rival - GTX 1080 , er RX Vega 64 meget langsommere.

Spillets ydeevne Ultra kvalitet under indstillinger

Ændre kvalitetsindstillinger

Opløsning 1920x1080

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
År Spil Billeder pr. sekund
2019 Apex Legends
13
39.7
2019 Anthem
7
23.2
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
11
34.0
2019 Resident Evil 2
13
41.9
2019 Metro Exodus
6
18.7
2019 World War Z
15
47.0
2019 Gears of War 5
9
27.2
2019 F1 2019
11
34.1
2019 GreedFall
10
30.7
2019 Borderlands 3
7
21.6
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
13
41.5
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
5
16.0
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
8
25.1
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
15
45.0
2018 F1 2018
14
43.4
2018 Far Cry 5
11
35.3
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
6
19.0
2018 Final Fantasy XV
8
25.8
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
10
30.0
2018 Forza Horizon 4
10
30.3
2018 Fallout 76
14
44.9
2018 Hitman 2
11
35.0
2018 Just Cause 4
9
27.0
2018 Monster Hunter: World
9
29.0
2018 Strange Brigade
14
43.8
2018 Battlefield V
13
41.7
2017 Dawn of War III
12
36.8
2017 Ghost Recon Wildlands
7
21.8
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
6
18.3
2017 Shadow of War
11
34.7
2017 Total War: Warhammer II
8
25.8
2017 Wolfenstein II
18
56.7
2017 Destiny 2
14
43.0
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
8
24.3
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
10
30.6
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
12
37.3
2017 For Honor
16
49.8
2017 Project CARS 2
11
35.3
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
14
42.7
2016 Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
9
27.6
2016 Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
9
28.6
2016 Doom
20
62.8
2016 F1 2016
11
35.1
2016 Total War: Warhammer
11
33.9
2016 Battlefield 1
15
47.0
2016 Overwatch
15
47.4
2016 Dishonored 2
8
25.7
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
9
27.9
2015 Rocket League
48
145.3
2015 Need For Speed
13
40.3
2015 Project CARS
12
38.6
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
23
70.5
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
33
99.6
2009 League of Legends
62
186.8

Opløsning 2560x1440

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
År Spil Billeder pr. sekund
2019 Apex Legends
10
30.0
2019 Anthem
6
18.4
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
8
26.4
2019 Resident Evil 2
9
28.2
2019 Metro Exodus
4
14.5
2019 World War Z
11
34.3
2019 Gears of War 5
6
19.7
2019 F1 2019
8
24.2
2019 GreedFall
7
22.2
2019 Borderlands 3
5
15.1
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
9
29.9
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
4
13.1
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
6
19.7
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
9
29.3
2018 F1 2018
11
33.7
2018 Far Cry 5
9
28.0
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
4
14.3
2018 Final Fantasy XV
6
18.6
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
6
20.3
2018 Forza Horizon 4
8
25.7
2018 Fallout 76
10
32.3
2018 Hitman 2
7
23.0
2018 Just Cause 4
6
19.9
2018 Monster Hunter: World
6
20.3
2018 Strange Brigade
10
30.5
2018 Battlefield V
10
31.7
2017 Dawn of War III
10
30.4
2017 Ghost Recon Wildlands
6
19.7
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
5
17.7
2017 Shadow of War
7
23.6
2017 Total War: Warhammer II
6
19.1
2017 Wolfenstein II
13
39.2
2017 Destiny 2
12
36.7
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
6
18.7
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
6
19.8
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
9
27.0
2017 For Honor
9
29.0
2017 Project CARS 2
8
24.9
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
12
38.6
2016 Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
6
18.8
2016 Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
7
23.9
2016 Doom
15
46.4
2016 F1 2016
10
32.7
2016 Total War: Warhammer
8
25.9
2016 Battlefield 1
11
35.9
2016 Overwatch
10
32.7
2016 Dishonored 2
7
22.0
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
6
19.8
2015 Rocket League
20
62.3
2015 Need For Speed
10
31.1
2015 Project CARS
9
29.5
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
15
45.7
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
27
83.0
2009 League of Legends
34
103.8

Opløsning 3440x1440

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
År Spil Billeder pr. sekund
2019 Apex Legends
8
24.6
2019 Anthem
5
15.2
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
7
21.6
2019 Resident Evil 2
7
22.5
2019 Metro Exodus
4
12.7
2019 World War Z
9
28.9
2019 Gears of War 5
5
17.2
2019 F1 2019
7
21.2
2019 GreedFall
5
16.8
2019 Borderlands 3
4
12.3
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
8
25.5
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
3
11.4
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
5
17.2
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
7
22.5
2018 F1 2018
9
28.9
2018 Far Cry 5
7
23.0
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
4
13.0
2018 Final Fantasy XV
5
15.5
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
5
16.4
2018 Forza Horizon 4
7
22.8
2018 Fallout 76
8
26.7
2018 Hitman 2
6
19.4
2018 Just Cause 4
5
16.2
2018 Monster Hunter: World
5
16.1
2018 Strange Brigade
8
25.2
2018 Battlefield V
8
26.4
2017 Dawn of War III
8
25.3
2017 Ghost Recon Wildlands
5
17.4
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
5
15.5
2017 Shadow of War
6
20.2
2017 Total War: Warhammer II
5
15.4
2017 Wolfenstein II
11
33.4
2017 Destiny 2
9
29.4
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
5
15.7
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
5
16.4
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
8
24.4
2017 For Honor
7
23.3
2017 Project CARS 2
8
24.4
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
12
38.0
2016 Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
5
15.5
2016 Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
7
23.3
2016 Doom
12
37.9
2016 F1 2016
9
29.0
2016 Total War: Warhammer
7
21.9
2016 Battlefield 1
9
29.7
2016 Overwatch
8
26.5
2016 Dishonored 2
7
21.1
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
5
16.1
2015 Rocket League
16
48.8
2015 Need For Speed
9
27.7
2015 Project CARS
8
26.9
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
11
35.8
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
28
84.4
2009 League of Legends
25
77.7

Opløsning 3840x2160

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
År Spil Billeder pr. sekund
2019 Apex Legends
5
16.0
2019 Anthem
3
10.0
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
4
14.0
2019 Resident Evil 2
4
13.9
2019 Metro Exodus
3
9.1
2019 World War Z
6
19.7
2019 Gears of War 5
4
12.4
2019 F1 2019
5
15.4
2019 GreedFall
3
9.1
2019 Borderlands 3
2
7.9
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
5
17.8
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
2
8.3
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
4
12.4
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
4
12.7
2018 F1 2018
6
20.3
2018 Far Cry 5
5
15.0
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
3
10.0
2018 Final Fantasy XV
3
10.4
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
3
10.3
2018 Forza Horizon 4
5
17.0
2018 Fallout 76
5
17.7
2018 Hitman 2
4
13.3
2018 Just Cause 4
3
10.4
2018 Monster Hunter: World
3
9.8
2018 Strange Brigade
5
16.6
2018 Battlefield V
5
17.7
2017 Dawn of War III
5
16.8
2017 Ghost Recon Wildlands
4
12.9
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
3
11.3
2017 Shadow of War
4
14.0
2017 Total War: Warhammer II
3
9.7
2017 Wolfenstein II
7
23.1
2017 Destiny 2
6
18.3
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
3
10.7
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
3
10.7
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
6
18.7
2017 For Honor
4
14.5
2017 Project CARS 2
6
20.7
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
10
32.4
2016 Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
3
10.1
2016 Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
6
19.7
2016 Doom
8
24.5
2016 F1 2016
7
21.5
2016 Total War: Warhammer
5
15.1
2016 Battlefield 1
6
19.7
2016 Overwatch
5
16.8
2016 Dishonored 2
5
17.4
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
3
10.4
2015 Rocket League
9
29.1
2015 Need For Speed
6
20.7
2015 Project CARS
6
20.7
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
7
21.2
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
24
74.7
2009 League of Legends
13
41.5
RX Vega 64 with Athlon 5200 at 1080p and Ultra kvalitet settings

RX Vega 64 Specifikationer

RX Vega 64

Critics Reviews

• See the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 at Best Buy The Verdict If this were two separate reviews the Vega 56 would get a higher score than the Vega 64, but since it's one review I'm labeling both of ...
Conclusion. On the one hand, AMD's Radeon RX Vega cards get the company back into the ring against Nvidia, fighting in a higher GPU weight class. ... both the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 and the Nvidia ...
Our AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 review confirms that the company achieved major performance improvements over their last-generation Polaris and Fiji cards: Vega is faster than the GTX 1080. We tested six different performance configurations of the Vega 64, with surprising results.
Conclusion (RX Vega 56) The Radeon RX Vega 56 is easily the best card of this launch. It is cooler, quieter, and more efficient than the Radeon RX Vega 64 and delivers only 10 percent less ...
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64: the Digital Foundry verdict The numbers don't lie. There's an RX Vega out there that offers great performance for the money and brings the fight to the competition, but it's ...
A better comparison for purchasing decisions would have been to use the RX Vega 64 Air Cooled, or to have compared the RX Vega 64 LC to the GTX 1080ti as the pricing is more in line.
Our Verdict. The Radeon RX Vega 64 is an excellent first showing of AMD’s newest graphics cards with Nvidia GTX 1080-equivalent performance and the potential of so much more.
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 review AMD's top GPU is a fast but power-hungry beast.
Conclusion (RX Vega 64) The RX Vega 64 is an answer to the GTX 1080, but currently it's not a whole lot more than that, and it's not an especially great answer either.
After months of teases and delays, the wait for Vega is finally over. First, AMD launched its flagship Radeon RX 64 lineup: the 9 Radeon RX Vega 64 and the 9 liquid-cooled Radeon RX Vega 64 ...
The AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 and Vega 64 preview. ... so thanks AMD! RX Vega vs. the World: a 15-round heavyweight battle ... The RX Vega 64 is available starting today. As discussed previously ...
Radeon RX Vega 64: At a Glance (Again) Speeds and feeds are always good to recap, so borrowing from our earlier coverage: Like the Radeon R9 Fury X's Fiji processor, Radeon RX Vega 64 employs four ...
AMD's Radeon RX Vega 64 requires a pair of eight-pin power connectors, and AMD's packaging says you'll need a 750-watt power supply, at minimum. Even if you don't care much about extra power ...
The Radeon RX Vega 64 is an excellent first showing of AMD’s newest graphics cards with Nvidia GTX 1080-equivalent performance and the potential of so much more. AMD Vega has been on the tip of ...
AMD’s current suggested retail price for its RX Vega 64 is 9 (£549, about AU0), but third party manufacturers, like Gigabyte and Asus, are still selling the card for far more than that on ...
The Radeon RX Vega 64 is a high-end graphics card by AMD, launched in August 2017. Built on the 14 nm process, and based on the Vega 10 graphics processor, in its Vega 10 XT variant, the card supports DirectX 12.0.

Diskussion og kommentarer

Del dine kommentarer
C
Chris 89 1 year ago
Ich weiß nicht wie ihr auf solche fps kommt mittlere Einstellungen rainbow six siege 222 bis....
Ihr habt wohl einen rostigen Nagel im Kopf
Maximal 177 fps werden erreicht und das sogar OC und UV
0 0
D
dillsonore 1 year ago
Should I buy RX VEGA 64 or GTX 1070???Should I buy RX VEGA 64 or GTX 1070 if I have a chance to buy RX VEGA 64 for 350 euro (used, 3 months, only for gaming) and I can buy the GTX 1070 for 400 euro (used, 2 years, gaming).Which one should I buy? I know that gtx 1070 is better at power usage, but it's used for already 2 years...So please help me decide!!!
0 0
E
effortcreamy 1 year ago
Providing you have a sufficient power supply to care for the RX Vega AND it hasn’t been used for mining, then I wouldn’t personally say go for the 64. It is a much more powerful card and currently by your prices cheaper than a 1070. Especially with the Vega card been much newer and only been used for 3 months it is a much better option in my opinion.
0 0