RX Vega 56 med i5-4460 benchmarks på Ultra kvalitet kvalitetsindstillinger

Det er klart, at RX Vega 56 det er en betydeligt mere i stand high-end kort, der kan spille AAA titler på 1080p/1440p med 50-60 frames per sekund. Det er værd at bemærke, at RX Vega 56 det er en meget strømslugende kort og kræver en anstændig strømforsyning. Med hensyn til hukommelse, RX Vega 56 8192 er MB RAM mere end nok til moderne spil og bør ikke forårsage nogen flaskehalse. Denne kombination mellem RX Vega 56 og Intel Core i5-4460 @ 3.20GHz har mindre end 15% flaskehals i mange spil og kan forårsage mindre fps tab. Kort sagt forestillingen er usædvanlig, er der ingen tvivl om, at dette er en af de mest magtfulde enkelt 2017 GPU derude i.

 RX Vega 56 med i5-4460 benchmarks på Ultra kvalitet kvalitetsindstillinger
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
Pris kr 1,767.3
År 2017
Maksimal indspillet temperatur 75C
Max blæserstøj 55.2dB
Anbefalet strømforsyning 560W
Benchmark CPU Intel Core i5-4460 @ 3.20GHz ($169.99)
CPU indvirkning på FPS -19.8 FPS
CPU indvirkning på FPS% -20.0%
Indstillinger for benchmark-kvalitet Ultra Quality Settings
Gennemsnitlig 1080p-ydeevne 79.1 FPS
Gennemsnitlig 1440p ydeevne 58.6 FPS
(Ultrawide) Gennemsnitlig 1440p ydeevne 49.7 FPS
Gennemsnitlig 4K-ydeevne 34.3 FPS
Hukommelse 8 GB
1080p Pris pr. Ramme kr 33.1
1440p Pris pr. Ramme kr 44.7
(Ultrawide) 1440p Pris pr. Ramme kr 52.8
4K pris pr. Ramme kr 76.4
Serie RX Vega 56
Variant AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
Samlet kombinations score 76/100 Meget god

RX Vega 64 muligvis flagskibet high-end i det nyeste GCN 5.0 sæt grafikkort, men deres priser holder dem uden for rækkevidde for de fleste mid-range pc-spillere. På den anden side er RX Vega 56 tættere på at være rimelig overkommelig til en pris på kr 2621.4. AMD 's xx56 -kort er altid blevet defineret af mid-range priser med ydeevne, der banker på døren til high-end grafikkort - især når de er overklokket. Efter at have taget os tid til fuldt ud at teste GCN 5.0 grafikkortet inde i RX Vega 56, kan vi uden tvivl sige, at det fortsætter trenden.

Til 1080p Full HD kunne vi spille Borderlands 3, Anthem, Need For Speed: Heat, Final Fantasy XV, Just Cause 4 på 63 fps til 76 fps og holdt billedhastighederne svævende rundt på 71 fps. Til 1440p Quad HD kunne vi spille GreedFall, F1 2019, Forza Horizon 4, Far Cry New Dawn, Resident Evil 2 på 65 fps til 80 fps og holdt billedhastighederne svævende rundt på 73 fps.

Assassin's Creed Odyssey (2018)

Ultra kvalitet

Opløsning 1920x1080

År Grafikkort Pris Billeder pr. sekund
2018 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 kr 3,278
83.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER kr 3,278
71.0 FPS
2019 AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT kr 2,621
68.8 FPS
2019 AMD Radeon RX 5700 kr 2,293
63.0 FPS
2020 AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT kr 1,833
60.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER kr 2,628
60.0 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 kr 3,278
59.8 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 kr 3,278
57.0 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 kr 2,621
44.7 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 kr 2,300
54.4 FPS
2017 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti kr 2,687
53.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti kr 1,833
50.3 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 kr 2,621
47.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER kr 1,505
47.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 kr 1,445
44.3 FPS
2018 AMD Radeon RX 590 kr 1,833
43.5 FPS
2019 AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 8GB kr 1,307
39.6 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 580 kr 1,505
39.3 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER kr 1,051
38.8 FPS
2019 AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 4GB kr 1,110
35.7 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 390X kr 2,819
34.0 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB kr 1,669
34.0 FPS
2016 AMD Radeon RX 480 kr 2,628
33.0 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB kr 1,117
32.3 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 kr 979
29.0 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 570 kr 1,110
27.2 FPS
2014 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 kr 2,162
26.7 FPS
2016 AMD Radeon RX 470 kr 1,176
26.0 FPS

RX Vega 56 sidder mellem RX Vega 64 og RTX 2060 og falder langsommere end RX Vega 64 med 1.4 % og hurtigere end RTX 2060 med 3.3 %. Det har en gennemsnitlig relativ ydelse mod hvert grafikkort her. Dets resultater kan faktisk ikke skelnes fra RX Vega 64 . Mod sin rival - GTX 1070 Ti , er RX Vega 56 meget langsommere. Sammenlignet med dets højere søskende var RX Vega 56 meget langsommere end RX Vega 64 med mere end 20%.

Forza Horizon 4 (2018)

Ultra kvalitet

Opløsning 1920x1080

År Grafikkort Pris Billeder pr. sekund
2018 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 kr 3,278
154.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER kr 3,278
135.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER kr 2,628
121.0 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 kr 3,278
117.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 kr 2,300
111.1 FPS
2019 AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT kr 2,621
109.7 FPS
2017 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti kr 2,687
105.0 FPS
2019 AMD Radeon RX 5700 kr 2,293
100.8 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti kr 1,833
99.8 FPS
2020 AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT kr 1,833
99.0 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 kr 2,621
96.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER kr 1,505
94.0 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 kr 3,278
91.0 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 kr 2,621
70.8 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 kr 1,445
87.8 FPS
2018 AMD Radeon RX 590 kr 1,833
75.5 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER kr 1,051
74.5 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB kr 1,669
70.2 FPS
2019 AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 8GB kr 1,307
69.7 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 580 kr 1,505
68.2 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB kr 1,117
66.6 FPS
2014 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 kr 2,162
63.4 FPS
2019 AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 4GB kr 1,110
62.2 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 390X kr 2,819
57.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 kr 979
54.5 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 390 kr 2,162
52.0 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 570 kr 1,110
52.0 FPS
2016 AMD Radeon RX 470 kr 1,176
45.0 FPS

RX Vega 56 sidder mellem RX Vega 64 og GTX 1660 og falder langsommere end RX Vega 64 med 2.2 % og hurtigere end GTX 1660 med 1.4 %. Det har en gennemsnitlig relativ ydelse mod hvert grafikkort her. Dets resultater kan faktisk ikke skelnes fra RX Vega 64 . Mod sin rival - GTX 1070 Ti , er RX Vega 56 meget langsommere. Sammenlignet med dets højere søskende var RX Vega 56 meget langsommere end RX Vega 64 med mere end 20%.

Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018)

Ultra kvalitet

Opløsning 1920x1080

År Grafikkort Pris Billeder pr. sekund
2018 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 kr 3,278
139.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER kr 3,278
110.0 FPS
2019 AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT kr 2,621
108.8 FPS
2019 AMD Radeon RX 5700 kr 2,293
99.8 FPS
2020 AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT kr 1,833
96.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER kr 2,628
94.0 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 kr 3,278
91.0 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 kr 3,278
90.0 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 kr 2,621
68.2 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 kr 2,300
85.7 FPS
2017 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti kr 2,687
84.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti kr 1,833
79.8 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER kr 1,505
75.0 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 kr 2,621
74.0 FPS
2018 AMD Radeon RX 590 kr 1,833
71.9 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 kr 1,445
70.2 FPS
2019 AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 8GB kr 1,307
66.4 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 580 kr 1,505
64.9 FPS
2019 AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 4GB kr 1,110
60.2 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER kr 1,051
59.9 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 390X kr 2,819
56.0 FPS
2016 AMD Radeon RX 480 kr 2,628
54.0 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 570 kr 1,110
52.0 FPS
2016 AMD Radeon RX 470 kr 1,176
48.0 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB kr 1,669
46.8 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB kr 1,117
44.4 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 kr 979
43.6 FPS
2014 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 kr 2,162
43.6 FPS

RX Vega 56 sidder mellem RX Vega 64 og RTX 2060 og falder langsommere end RX Vega 64 med 5 % og hurtigere end RTX 2060 med 0 %. Det har en gennemsnitlig relativ ydelse mod hvert grafikkort her. Mod sin rival - GTX 1070 Ti , er RX Vega 56 meget langsommere. Sammenlignet med dets højere søskende var RX Vega 56 meget langsommere end RX Vega 64 med mere end 20%.

PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (2017)

Ultra kvalitet

Opløsning 1920x1080

År Grafikkort Pris Billeder pr. sekund
2018 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 kr 3,278
124.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER kr 3,278
110.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER kr 2,628
100.0 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 kr 3,278
95.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 kr 2,300
92.6 FPS
2019 AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT kr 2,621
88.7 FPS
2017 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti kr 2,687
85.0 FPS
2019 AMD Radeon RX 5700 kr 2,293
80.8 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti kr 1,833
80.8 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 kr 2,621
80.0 FPS
2020 AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT kr 1,833
77.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER kr 1,505
76.0 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 kr 3,278
73.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 kr 1,445
71.1 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 kr 2,621
56.5 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER kr 1,051
58.8 FPS
2018 AMD Radeon RX 590 kr 1,833
56.0 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB kr 1,669
52.2 FPS
2019 AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 8GB kr 1,307
51.4 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 580 kr 1,505
50.6 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB kr 1,117
49.6 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 390X kr 2,819
49.0 FPS
2014 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 kr 2,162
47.5 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 390 kr 2,162
47.0 FPS
2019 AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 4GB kr 1,110
45.9 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 570 kr 1,110
43.0 FPS
2016 AMD Radeon RX 470 kr 1,176
41.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 kr 979
39.9 FPS

RX Vega 56 sidder mellem GTX 1660 og GTX 1650 SUPER og falder langsommere end GTX 1660 med 0.1 % og hurtigere end GTX 1650 SUPER med 20.7 %. Det har en gennemsnitlig relativ ydelse mod hvert grafikkort her. RX Vega 56 's præstation i dette spil svæver omkring 60fps mærket. Dets resultater kan faktisk ikke skelnes fra GTX 1660 . Mod sin rival - GTX 1070 Ti , er RX Vega 56 meget langsommere. Sammenlignet med dets højere søskende var RX Vega 56 meget langsommere end RX Vega 64 med mere end 20%.

Battlefield V (2018)

Ultra kvalitet

Opløsning 1920x1080

År Grafikkort Pris Billeder pr. sekund
2018 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 kr 3,278
188.0 FPS
2019 AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT kr 2,621
150.7 FPS
2019 AMD Radeon RX 5700 kr 2,293
137.6 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER kr 3,278
137.0 FPS
2020 AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT kr 1,833
135.0 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 kr 3,278
125.0 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 kr 2,621
98.0 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 kr 3,278
121.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER kr 2,628
120.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 kr 2,300
114.6 FPS
2017 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti kr 2,687
111.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti kr 1,833
105.4 FPS
2018 AMD Radeon RX 590 kr 1,833
103.5 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 kr 2,621
99.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER kr 1,505
99.0 FPS
2019 AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 8GB kr 1,307
95.3 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 580 kr 1,505
93.5 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 kr 1,445
92.8 FPS
2019 AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 4GB kr 1,110
85.7 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER kr 1,051
83.0 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 390X kr 2,819
71.0 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 570 kr 1,110
71.0 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB kr 1,669
68.4 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 kr 979
65.3 FPS
2016 AMD Radeon RX 480 kr 2,628
65.0 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB kr 1,117
64.9 FPS
2016 AMD Radeon RX 470 kr 1,176
62.0 FPS
2014 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 kr 2,162
60.4 FPS

RX Vega 56 sidder mellem RX Vega 64 og GTX 1080 og falder langsommere end RX Vega 64 med 1.5 % og hurtigere end GTX 1080 med 1.7 %. Det har en stærk relativ ydelse mod hvert grafikkort her. Dets resultater kan faktisk ikke skelnes fra RX Vega 64 . Sammenlignet med dets højere søskende var RX Vega 56 meget langsommere end RX Vega 64 med mere end 20%.

Spillets ydeevne Ultra kvalitet under indstillinger

Ændre kvalitetsindstillinger

Opløsning 1920x1080

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
År Spil Billeder pr. sekund
2019 Apex Legends
73
92.8
2019 Anthem
42
53.8
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
62
78.9
2019 Resident Evil 2
75
94.3
2019 Metro Exodus
33
42.0
2019 World War Z
78
98.7
2019 Gears of War 5
49
62.8
2019 F1 2019
62
78.9
2019 GreedFall
56
71.0
2019 Borderlands 3
39
49.9
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
76
95.9
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
29
36.9
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
46
58.0
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
81
102.8
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
35
44.7
2018 Final Fantasy XV
48
60.7
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
54
68.2
2018 Forza Horizon 4
56
70.8
2018 Fallout 76
64
80.9
2018 Hitman 2
50
63.3
2018 Just Cause 4
48
60.7
2018 Monster Hunter: World
51
65.3
2018 Strange Brigade
80
101.2
2018 Battlefield V
78
98.0
2017 Dawn of War III
63
80.3
2017 Ghost Recon Wildlands
43
54.4
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
36
45.5
2017 Destiny 2
79
100.4
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
44
56.5
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
56
70.8
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
66
84.0
2017 For Honor
89
112.0
2017 Project CARS 2
63
79.4
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
76
96.1
2016 Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
49
61.7
2016 Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
49
62.0
2016 Doom
114
143.5
2016 F1 2016
67
84.4
2016 Total War: Warhammer
62
77.9
2016 Battlefield 1
84
106.3
2016 Overwatch
87
109.8
2016 Dishonored 2
46
57.9
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
52
66.5
2015 Rocket League
260
326.8
2015 Need For Speed
72
90.7
2015 Project CARS
69
86.8
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
129
163.0
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
178
224.2
2009 League of Legends
334
420.2

Opløsning 2560x1440

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
År Spil Billeder pr. sekund
2019 Apex Legends
55
69.2
2019 Anthem
33
42.7
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
48
61.2
2019 Resident Evil 2
50
63.6
2019 Metro Exodus
25
32.6
2019 World War Z
57
72.0
2019 Gears of War 5
36
45.5
2019 F1 2019
44
55.8
2019 GreedFall
40
51.3
2019 Borderlands 3
27
35.0
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
54
69.1
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
24
30.2
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
36
45.5
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
51
64.9
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
22
28.7
2018 Final Fantasy XV
34
43.1
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
36
45.5
2018 Forza Horizon 4
47
59.8
2018 Fallout 76
55
69.2
2018 Hitman 2
32
41.3
2018 Just Cause 4
35
44.8
2018 Monster Hunter: World
36
45.7
2018 Strange Brigade
56
70.5
2018 Battlefield V
57
72.5
2017 Dawn of War III
56
71.2
2017 Ghost Recon Wildlands
38
48.6
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
32
41.3
2017 Destiny 2
68
86.0
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
34
43.1
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
36
46.0
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
48
60.7
2017 For Honor
51
65.3
2017 Project CARS 2
44
56.0
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
69
86.8
2016 Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
33
41.8
2016 Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
40
51.2
2016 Doom
79
99.4
2016 F1 2016
60
75.8
2016 Total War: Warhammer
46
57.8
2016 Battlefield 1
63
79.8
2016 Overwatch
60
75.5
2016 Dishonored 2
39
49.4
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
36
46.2
2015 Rocket League
111
140.1
2015 Need For Speed
55
70.0
2015 Project CARS
52
66.3
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
83
105.5
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
148
186.8
2009 League of Legends
185
233.4

Opløsning 3440x1440

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
År Spil Billeder pr. sekund
2019 Apex Legends
43
56.8
2019 Anthem
26
35.3
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
38
50.1
2019 Resident Evil 2
38
50.8
2019 Metro Exodus
21
28.5
2019 World War Z
46
60.7
2019 Gears of War 5
30
39.7
2019 F1 2019
37
48.9
2019 GreedFall
29
38.8
2019 Borderlands 3
21
28.5
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
44
59.1
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
20
26.4
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
30
39.7
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
37
49.6
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
19
26.3
2018 Final Fantasy XV
27
36.6
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
28
37.0
2018 Forza Horizon 4
40
53.2
2018 Fallout 76
43
57.3
2018 Hitman 2
26
35.2
2018 Just Cause 4
27
36.5
2018 Monster Hunter: World
27
36.1
2018 Strange Brigade
44
58.3
2018 Battlefield V
45
60.0
2017 Dawn of War III
43
57.5
2017 Ghost Recon Wildlands
31
41.6
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
27
36.5
2017 Destiny 2
52
69.1
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
27
36.2
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
28
37.9
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
41
55.0
2017 For Honor
39
52.5
2017 Project CARS 2
41
54.9
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
64
85.4
2016 Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
25
34.1
2016 Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
38
50.9
2016 Doom
61
81.2
2016 F1 2016
50
66.1
2016 Total War: Warhammer
36
48.6
2016 Battlefield 1
50
66.8
2016 Overwatch
46
61.3
2016 Dishonored 2
36
47.4
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
28
37.6
2015 Rocket League
83
109.9
2015 Need For Speed
47
62.5
2015 Project CARS
45
60.5
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
62
82.6
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
144
189.9
2009 League of Legends
132
174.9

Opløsning 3840x2160

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
År Spil Billeder pr. sekund
2019 Apex Legends
25
37.1
2019 Anthem
16
23.2
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
22
32.5
2019 Resident Evil 2
21
31.4
2019 Metro Exodus
14
20.6
2019 World War Z
29
41.5
2019 Gears of War 5
20
28.7
2019 F1 2019
24
35.5
2019 GreedFall
14
21.1
2019 Borderlands 3
12
18.2
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
28
41.2
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
13
19.2
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
20
28.7
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
19
27.8
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
14
20.3
2018 Final Fantasy XV
17
25.2
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
16
23.6
2018 Forza Horizon 4
27
39.6
2018 Fallout 76
26
37.9
2018 Hitman 2
17
24.5
2018 Just Cause 4
16
23.4
2018 Monster Hunter: World
15
21.9
2018 Strange Brigade
26
38.4
2018 Battlefield V
27
39.6
2017 Dawn of War III
25
36.3
2017 Ghost Recon Wildlands
20
29.2
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
18
27.0
2017 Destiny 2
30
43.1
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
17
24.5
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
17
24.8
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
29
42.0
2017 For Honor
22
32.6
2017 Project CARS 2
32
46.7
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
50
72.7
2016 Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
15
21.9
2016 Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
30
43.9
2016 Doom
36
52.3
2016 F1 2016
33
47.8
2016 Total War: Warhammer
23
33.0
2016 Battlefield 1
31
45.0
2016 Overwatch
27
39.0
2016 Dishonored 2
27
39.2
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
16
24.1
2015 Rocket League
45
65.3
2015 Need For Speed
32
46.7
2015 Project CARS
32
46.7
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
34
48.9
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
117
168.1
2009 League of Legends
65
93.4
RX Vega 56 with i5-4460 at 1080p and Ultra kvalitet settings

Sammenlign mod konkurrenter

RX Vega 56 Specifikationer

RX Vega 56 Board Design

Board NumberD050-03
Length10.5 inches 267 mm
Outputs1x HDMI3x DisplayPort
Power Connectors2x 8-pin
Slot WidthDual-slot
TDP210 W

RX Vega 56 Clock Speeds

Boost Clock1474 MHz
GPU Clock1138 MHz
Memory Clock800 MHz 1600 MHz effective

RX Vega 56 Graphics Card

Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16
GenerationVega (RX Vega)
Launch Price399 USD
ProductionActive
Release DateAug 14th, 2017

RX Vega 56 Graphics Features

DirectX12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL2
OpenGL4.6
Shader Model6.1
Vulkan1.1.82

RX Vega 56 Graphics Processor

ArchitectureGCN 5.0
Die Size510 mm²
GPU NameVega 10
GPU VariantVega 10 XL (215-0894216)
Process Size14 nm
Transistors12,500 million

RX Vega 56 Memory

Bandwidth409.6 GB/s
Memory Bus2048 bit
Memory Size8192 MB
Memory TypeHBM2

RX Vega 56 Render Config

Compute Units56
ROPs64
Shading Units3584
TMUs224

RX Vega 56 Theoretical Performance

FP16 (half) performance21,131 GFLOPS (2:1)
FP32 (float) performance10,566 GFLOPS
FP64 (double) performance660.4 GFLOPS (1:16)
Pixel Rate94.34 GPixel/s
Texture Rate330.2 GTexel/s

Critics Reviews

• See the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 at Best Buy The Verdict If this were two separate reviews the Vega 56 would get a higher score than the Vega 64, but since it's one review I'm labeling both of ...
Conclusion. Radeon RX Vega 56 is a close derivative of Vega 64, so its behaviors largely carry over from AMD’s flagship. The company does cut this card’s board power rating by almost 30% ...
Years in development, the new Radeon RX Vega line is finally arriving - AMD's return to the higher-end of GPU performance after concentrating its efforts more on the mainstream and budget sectors ...
Similar to AMD's Radeon RX Vega 64, the Vega 56 offers two BIOSes with corresponding power profiles that can be selected using a switch on the card. If you don't change the driver-based profiles ...
Perhaps the most telling comparison, however, is that despite the 20 percent price reduction compared to the RX Vega 64, the RX Vega 56 is slower by less than 10 percent on average.
Radeon RX Vega 56 is the second AMD Vega card launched today. It comes at an affordable 9 price point, with a slightly reduced shader count that actually improves things greatly. For example, power efficiency now trades blows with some Pascal cards, which means less heat and noise, too.
On the AMD side of things, it is the AMD Radeon RX 480, or that card's successors, the Radeon RX 580 and Radeon RX 570. Therefore, the Vega 56 should be more than adequate for today's VR ...
Conclusion (RX Vega 56) The Radeon RX Vega 56 is easily the best card of this launch. It is cooler, quieter, and more efficient than the Radeon RX Vega 64 and delivers only 10 percent less ...
The AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 is the little sister of Vega 64. It comes in at a 20% lower price than the RX Vega 64, but only has 12.5% fewer stream processors, and runs lower operating frequencies.
Meet Radeon RX Vega 56 and RX Vega 64 Brad Chacos/IDG AMD sent PCWorld every version of Vega for testing, including both the air-cooled and liquid-cooled versions of the Radeon RX Vega 64.
The AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 is an upper mid-range graphics card, intended to beat Nvidia's GeForce GTX 1070 - a job it performs admirably as the benchmarks on this page demonstrate.
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 - the Digital Foundry verdict. If you're looking for an alternative to the GTX 1070, the bottom line is that you're generally getting around 10 to 12 per cent of additional ...
The Radeon RX Vega 56 is a high-end graphics card by AMD, launched in August 2017. Built on the 14 nm process, and based on the Vega 10 graphics processor, in its Vega 10 XL variant, the card supports DirectX 12.0.
Launching today is the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64, or just Vega 64 for short. Based on a fully enabled Vega 10 GPU, the Vega 64 will come in two physical variants: air cooled and liquid cooled.
Radeon RX Vega 56 utilizes the same Vega 10 processor found in Vega 64. It’s a 486 mm² behemoth sporting 12.5 billion transistors manufactured on GlobalFoundries’ 14LPP platform.
Vega 56 vs GTX 1070, Vega goes 6-2-2 = Winner Vega! Good job AMD, hopefully next gen you can make more headway in power efficiency. But this is a good card, even beats the factory OC 1070.
The AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 and Vega 64 preview. ... so thanks AMD! RX Vega vs. the World: a 15-round heavyweight battle ... The RX Vega 56 is the more compelling choice, given the lower price and ...

Diskussion og kommentarer

Del dine kommentarer
S
seventeeninternet 1 year ago
Rx580 or vega 56 or gtx 1070I will buy a new gaming pc in march with a ryzen 7 2700, but i dont know which graphics card should i buy. In my country i can get the rx 580 around 120k ft, the vega 56 around 185k ft, and a gtx 1070 about 150-160k ft. Which should I buy? I already have my monitor, it supports freesync. (75hz, 1080x2560 resolution)
0 0
G
grublunchbox 1 year ago
If you want to use freesync you would have to go for either of the amd cards. you could get a vega 56 but its a pricey and can draw quite a lot of power than a 1070, which give almost similar performance which run much cooler with a third party cooler. So you would be good with the gtx 1070 and save some bucks for some of performance and there are cases where the gtx 1070 outperforms the vega 56,and you could overclock it to get vega like performance but or if that isn't the case you don't mind the extra power draw and heat, and want to make use of the free sync you can surely go for the vega 56. The rx 580 doesn't come anywhere these two so it is out if the question.Check this link out for comparison of two cards at stock and overclocked- http://blog.logicalincrements.com/2017/08/rx-vega-56-vs-gtx-1070-gtx-1080/
1 0
H
hankessay 1 year ago
Should I buy the RX Vega 56 over the GTX 1070?I'll be building a new rig in a few weeks. For a few days, I've been having trouble deciding on which graphics card I want to get. For a while, I was decided that I'd go with the 1070, but then I realized that Vega 56 performs just as well or better while offering Freesync, which my monitor does offer. For some reason, I still can't decide whether or not I should go for the Vega 56. Should I?
0 0
I
immatureminds 1 year ago
On much smaller case blower type cooler is better due to heat being dump outside the case directly. But on much bigger case "open air" cooler usually end up being better. Also noise. Those blower type cooler can be very loud when the fan speed start ramping up.
0 0