RX Vega 56 med Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4200+ benchmarks på Ultra kvalitet kvalitetsindstillinger

Det er klart, at RX Vega 56 det er en betydeligt mere i stand high-end kort, der kan spille AAA titler på 1080p/1440p med 50-60 frames per sekund. Det er værd at bemærke, at RX Vega 56 det er en meget strømslugende kort og kræver en anstændig strømforsyning. Med hensyn til hukommelse, RX Vega 56 8192 er MB RAM mere end nok til moderne spil og bør ikke forårsage nogen flaskehalse. Denne kombination mellem RX Vega 56 og AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4200+ vil forårsage alvorlige flaskehalse i mange spil og forårsage alvorlige fps tab. Kort sagt forestillingen er usædvanlig, er der ingen tvivl om, at dette er en af de mest magtfulde enkelt 2017 GPU derude i.

 RX Vega 56 med Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4200+ benchmarks på Ultra kvalitet kvalitetsindstillinger
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
Pris kr 1,767.3
År 2017
Maksimal indspillet temperatur 75C
Max blæserstøj 55.2dB
Anbefalet strømforsyning 560W
Benchmark CPU AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4200+ ($129.95)
CPU indvirkning på FPS -56.8 FPS
CPU indvirkning på FPS% -60.0%
Indstillinger for benchmark-kvalitet Ultra Quality Settings
Gennemsnitlig 1080p-ydeevne 44.6 FPS
Gennemsnitlig 1440p ydeevne 33.2 FPS
Gennemsnitlig 4K-ydeevne 19.5 FPS
Hukommelse 8 GB
1080p Pris pr. Ramme kr 58.8
1440p Pris pr. Ramme kr 79.0
4K pris pr. Ramme kr 134.4
Serie RX Vega 56
Samlet kombinations score 59/100 Acceptabelt

RX Vega 64 muligvis flagskibet high-end i det nyeste GCN 5.0 sæt grafikkort, men deres priser holder dem uden for rækkevidde for de fleste mid-range pc-spillere. På den anden side er RX Vega 56 tættere på at være rimelig overkommelig til en pris på . AMD 's xx56 -kort er altid blevet defineret af mid-range priser med ydeevne, der banker på døren til high-end grafikkort - især når de er overklokket. Efter at have taget os tid til fuldt ud at teste GCN 5.0 grafikkortet inde i RX Vega 56 , kan vi uden tvivl sige, at det fortsætter trenden.

Til 1080p Full HD kunne vi spille Anthem, Final Fantasy XV, Just Cause 4, Hitman 2, Monster Hunter: World på 68 fps til 82 fps og holdt billedhastighederne svævende rundt på 76 fps. Til 1440p Quad HD kunne vi spille Forza Horizon 4, Far Cry New Dawn, Resident Evil 2, Call of Duty: Black Ops 4, Fallout 76 på 75 fps til 87 fps og holdt billedhastighederne svævende rundt på 80 fps.

Spillets ydeevne Ultra kvalitet under indstillinger

Ændre kvalitetsindstillinger

Opløsning 1920x1080

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
År Spil Billeder pr. sekund
2019 Apex Legends
10
35.0
2019 Anthem
6
20.3
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
8
29.7
2019 Resident Evil 2
10
35.5
2019 Metro Exodus
4
15.8
2019 World War Z
11
37.2
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
11
38.8
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
5
16.9
2018 Final Fantasy XV
6
22.9
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
7
25.7
2018 Forza Horizon 4
8
26.7
2018 Fallout 76
9
30.5
2018 Hitman 2
7
23.8
2018 Just Cause 4
6
22.9
2018 Monster Hunter: World
7
24.6
2018 Battlefield V
11
36.9
2017 Dawn of War III
9
30.3
2017 Ghost Recon Wildlands
6
20.5
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
5
17.2
2017 Destiny 2
11
37.9
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
6
21.3
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
8
26.7
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
9
31.6
2017 For Honor
12
42.2
2017 Project CARS 2
8
29.9
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
10
36.2
2016 Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
6
23.2
2016 Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
7
23.4
2016 Doom
16
54.1
2016 F1 2016
9
31.8
2016 Total War: Warhammer
8
29.4
2016 Battlefield 1
11
40.0
2016 Overwatch
12
41.4
2016 Dishonored 2
6
21.8
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
7
25.1
2015 Rocket League
36
123.2
2015 Need For Speed
10
34.2
2015 Project CARS
9
32.7
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
18
61.4
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
25
84.5
2009 League of Legends
47
158.4

Opløsning 2560x1440

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
År Spil Billeder pr. sekund
2019 Apex Legends
7
26.1
2019 Anthem
4
16.1
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
6
23.1
2019 Resident Evil 2
7
24.0
2019 Metro Exodus
3
12.3
2019 World War Z
8
27.1
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
7
24.4
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
3
10.8
2018 Final Fantasy XV
4
16.3
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
5
17.2
2018 Forza Horizon 4
6
22.5
2018 Fallout 76
7
26.1
2018 Hitman 2
4
15.6
2018 Just Cause 4
5
16.9
2018 Monster Hunter: World
5
17.2
2018 Battlefield V
8
27.3
2017 Dawn of War III
8
26.8
2017 Ghost Recon Wildlands
5
18.3
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
4
15.6
2017 Destiny 2
9
32.4
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
4
16.3
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
5
17.3
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
6
22.9
2017 For Honor
7
24.6
2017 Project CARS 2
6
21.1
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
9
32.7
2016 Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
4
15.7
2016 Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
5
19.3
2016 Doom
11
37.5
2016 F1 2016
8
28.6
2016 Total War: Warhammer
6
21.8
2016 Battlefield 1
9
30.1
2016 Overwatch
8
28.5
2016 Dishonored 2
5
18.6
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
5
17.4
2015 Rocket League
15
52.8
2015 Need For Speed
7
26.4
2015 Project CARS
7
25.0
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
11
39.8
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
21
70.4
2009 League of Legends
26
88.0

Opløsning 3840x2160

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
År Spil Billeder pr. sekund
2019 Apex Legends
4
14.0
2019 Anthem
2
8.8
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
3
12.2
2019 Resident Evil 2
3
11.8
2019 Metro Exodus
2
7.8
2019 World War Z
4
15.6
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
3
10.5
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
2
7.6
2018 Final Fantasy XV
2
9.5
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
2
8.9
2018 Forza Horizon 4
4
14.9
2018 Fallout 76
4
14.3
2018 Hitman 2
2
9.2
2018 Just Cause 4
2
8.8
2018 Monster Hunter: World
2
8.2
2018 Battlefield V
4
14.9
2017 Dawn of War III
4
13.7
2017 Ghost Recon Wildlands
3
11.0
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
3
10.2
2017 Destiny 2
4
16.3
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
2
9.2
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
2
9.4
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
4
15.8
2017 For Honor
3
12.3
2017 Project CARS 2
5
17.6
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
8
27.4
2016 Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
2
8.2
2016 Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
4
16.5
2016 Doom
5
19.7
2016 F1 2016
5
18.0
2016 Total War: Warhammer
3
12.4
2016 Battlefield 1
5
17.0
2016 Overwatch
4
14.7
2016 Dishonored 2
4
14.8
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
2
9.1
2015 Rocket League
7
24.6
2015 Need For Speed
5
17.6
2015 Project CARS
5
17.6
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
5
18.4
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
19
63.4
2009 League of Legends
10
35.2
RX Vega 56 with Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4200+ at 1080p and Ultra kvalitet settings
RX Vega 56 with Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4200+ at 1440p and Ultra kvalitet settings
RX Vega 56 with Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4200+ at 4K and Ultra kvalitet settings

RX Vega 56 Specifikationer

RX Vega 56 Board Design

Board NumberD050-03
Length10.5 inches 267 mm
Outputs1x HDMI3x DisplayPort
Power Connectors2x 8-pin
Slot WidthDual-slot
TDP210 W

RX Vega 56 Clock Speeds

Boost Clock1474 MHz
GPU Clock1138 MHz
Memory Clock800 MHz 1600 MHz effective

RX Vega 56 Graphics Card

Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16
GenerationVega (RX Vega)
Launch Price399 USD
ProductionActive
Release DateAug 14th, 2017

RX Vega 56 Graphics Features

DirectX12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL2
OpenGL4.6
Shader Model6.1
Vulkan1.1.82

RX Vega 56 Graphics Processor

ArchitectureGCN 5.0
Die Size510 mm²
GPU NameVega 10
GPU VariantVega 10 XL (215-0894216)
Process Size14 nm
Transistors12,500 million

RX Vega 56 Memory

Bandwidth409.6 GB/s
Memory Bus2048 bit
Memory Size8192 MB
Memory TypeHBM2

RX Vega 56 Render Config

Compute Units56
ROPs64
Shading Units3584
TMUs224

RX Vega 56 Theoretical Performance

FP16 (half) performance21,131 GFLOPS (2:1)
FP32 (float) performance10,566 GFLOPS
FP64 (double) performance660.4 GFLOPS (1:16)
Pixel Rate94.34 GPixel/s
Texture Rate330.2 GTexel/s

Critics Reviews

• See the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 at Best Buy The Verdict If this were two separate reviews the Vega 56 would get a higher score than the Vega 64, but since it's one review I'm labeling both of ...
Conclusion. Radeon RX Vega 56 is a close derivative of Vega 64, so its behaviors largely carry over from AMD’s flagship. The company does cut this card’s board power rating by almost 30% ...
Years in development, the new Radeon RX Vega line is finally arriving - AMD's return to the higher-end of GPU performance after concentrating its efforts more on the mainstream and budget sectors ...
Similar to AMD's Radeon RX Vega 64, the Vega 56 offers two BIOSes with corresponding power profiles that can be selected using a switch on the card. If you don't change the driver-based profiles ...
Perhaps the most telling comparison, however, is that despite the 20 percent price reduction compared to the RX Vega 64, the RX Vega 56 is slower by less than 10 percent on average.
Radeon RX Vega 56 is the second AMD Vega card launched today. It comes at an affordable 9 price point, with a slightly reduced shader count that actually improves things greatly. For example, power efficiency now trades blows with some Pascal cards, which means less heat and noise, too.
On the AMD side of things, it is the AMD Radeon RX 480, or that card's successors, the Radeon RX 580 and Radeon RX 570. Therefore, the Vega 56 should be more than adequate for today's VR ...
Conclusion (RX Vega 56) The Radeon RX Vega 56 is easily the best card of this launch. It is cooler, quieter, and more efficient than the Radeon RX Vega 64 and delivers only 10 percent less ...
The AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 is the little sister of Vega 64. It comes in at a 20% lower price than the RX Vega 64, but only has 12.5% fewer stream processors, and runs lower operating frequencies.
Meet Radeon RX Vega 56 and RX Vega 64 Brad Chacos/IDG AMD sent PCWorld every version of Vega for testing, including both the air-cooled and liquid-cooled versions of the Radeon RX Vega 64.
The AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 is an upper mid-range graphics card, intended to beat Nvidia's GeForce GTX 1070 - a job it performs admirably as the benchmarks on this page demonstrate.
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 - the Digital Foundry verdict. If you're looking for an alternative to the GTX 1070, the bottom line is that you're generally getting around 10 to 12 per cent of additional ...
The Radeon RX Vega 56 is a high-end graphics card by AMD, launched in August 2017. Built on the 14 nm process, and based on the Vega 10 graphics processor, in its Vega 10 XL variant, the card supports DirectX 12.0.
Launching today is the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64, or just Vega 64 for short. Based on a fully enabled Vega 10 GPU, the Vega 64 will come in two physical variants: air cooled and liquid cooled.
Radeon RX Vega 56 utilizes the same Vega 10 processor found in Vega 64. It’s a 486 mm² behemoth sporting 12.5 billion transistors manufactured on GlobalFoundries’ 14LPP platform.
Vega 56 vs GTX 1070, Vega goes 6-2-2 = Winner Vega! Good job AMD, hopefully next gen you can make more headway in power efficiency. But this is a good card, even beats the factory OC 1070.
The AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 and Vega 64 preview. ... so thanks AMD! RX Vega vs. the World: a 15-round heavyweight battle ... The RX Vega 56 is the more compelling choice, given the lower price and ...

Diskussion og kommentarer

Del dine kommentarer
P
periodiccholly 8 months ago
Rx580 or vega 56 or gtx 1070
I will buy a new gaming pc in march with a ryzen 7 2700, but i dont know which graphics card should i buy. In my country i can get the rx 580 around 120k ft, the vega 56 around 185k ft, and a gtx 1070 about 150-160k ft. Which should I buy? I already have my monitor, it supports freesync. (75hz, 1080x2560 resolution)
0 0
R
rubbishlibrary 8 months ago


If you want to use freesync you would have to go for either of the amd cards. you could get a vega 56 but its a pricey and can draw quite a lot of power than a 1070, which give almost similar performance which run much cooler with a third party cooler.

So you would be good with the gtx 1070 and save some bucks for some of performance and there are cases where the gtx 1070 outperforms the vega 56,and you could overclock it to get vega like performance but or if that isn't the case you don't mind the extra power draw and heat, and want to make use of the free sync you can surely go for the vega 56. The rx 580 doesn't come anywhere these two so it is out if the question.

Check this link out for comparison of two cards at stock and overclocked- http://blog.logicalincrements.com/2017/08/rx-vega-56-vs-gtx-1070-gtx-1080/
1 0
C
crazeduncanny 8 months ago
Should I buy the RX Vega 56 over the GTX 1070?
I'll be building a new rig in a few weeks. For a few days, I've been having trouble deciding on which graphics card I want to get. For a while, I was decided that I'd go with the 1070, but then I realized that Vega 56 performs just as well or better while offering Freesync, which my monitor does offer. For some reason, I still can't decide whether or not I should go for the Vega 56. Should I?
0 0
A
appraisersquash 8 months ago
On much smaller case blower type cooler is better due to heat being dump outside the case directly. But on much bigger case "open air" cooler usually end up being better. Also noise. Those blower type cooler can be very loud when the fan speed start ramping up.
0 0