RX Vega 56 med i7-7700K benchmarks på Ultra kvalitet kvalitetsindstillinger

Det er klart, at RX Vega 56 det er en betydeligt mere i stand high-end kort, der kan spille AAA titler på 1080p/1440p med 50-60 frames per sekund. Det er værd at bemærke, at RX Vega 56 det er en meget strømslugende kort og kræver en anstændig strømforsyning. Med hensyn til hukommelse, RX Vega 56 8192 er MB RAM mere end nok til moderne spil og bør ikke forårsage nogen flaskehalse. Kort sagt forestillingen er usædvanlig, er der ingen tvivl om, at dette er en af de mest magtfulde enkelt 2017 GPU derude i.

 RX Vega 56 med i7-7700K benchmarks på Ultra kvalitet kvalitetsindstillinger
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
Pris kr 1,767.3
År 2017
Maksimal indspillet temperatur 75C
Max blæserstøj 55.2dB
Anbefalet strømforsyning 560W
Benchmark CPU Intel Core i7-7700K @ 4.20GHz ($354.99)
CPU indvirkning på FPS + 0.0 FPS
CPU indvirkning på FPS% 0.0%
Indstillinger for benchmark-kvalitet Ultra Quality Settings
Gennemsnitlig 1080p-ydeevne 100.2 FPS
Gennemsnitlig 1440p ydeevne 74.2 FPS
Gennemsnitlig 4K-ydeevne 43.2 FPS
Hukommelse 8 GB
1080p Pris pr. Ramme kr 26.1
1440p Pris pr. Ramme kr 35.3
4K pris pr. Ramme kr 60.7
Serie RX Vega 56
Variant AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
Samlet kombinations score 81/100 Fremragende

RX Vega 64 muligvis flagskibet high-end i det nyeste GCN 5.0 sæt grafikkort, men deres priser holder dem uden for rækkevidde for de fleste mid-range pc-spillere. På den anden side er RX Vega 56 tættere på at være rimelig overkommelig til en pris på kr 2621.4. AMD 's xx56 -kort er altid blevet defineret af mid-range priser med ydeevne, der banker på døren til high-end grafikkort - især når de er overklokket. Efter at have taget os tid til fuldt ud at teste GCN 5.0 grafikkortet inde i RX Vega 56, kan vi uden tvivl sige, at det fortsætter trenden.

Til 1080p Full HD kunne vi spille Borderlands 3, Anthem, Final Fantasy XV, Just Cause 4, Gears of War 5 på 63 fps til 79 fps og holdt billedhastighederne svævende rundt på 72 fps. Til 1440p Quad HD kunne vi spille GreedFall, F1 2019, Forza Horizon 4, Far Cry New Dawn, Resident Evil 2 på 65 fps til 80 fps og holdt billedhastighederne svævende rundt på 73 fps.

Assassin's Creed Odyssey (2018)

Ultra kvalitet

Opløsning 1920x1080

År Grafikkort Pris Billeder pr. sekund
2019 AMD Radeon RX 5700 kr 2,293
63.0 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 kr 3,278
59.8 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 kr 3,278
57.0 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 kr 2,621
56.2 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 kr 2,300
54.4 FPS
2017 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti kr 2,687
53.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti kr 1,833
50.3 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 kr 2,621
47.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 kr 1,445
44.3 FPS
2018 AMD Radeon RX 590 kr 1,833
43.5 FPS

RX Vega 56 sidder mellem RX Vega 64 og RTX 2060 og falder langsommere end RX Vega 64 med 1.4 % og hurtigere end RTX 2060 med 3.3 %. Det har en gennemsnitlig relativ ydelse mod hvert grafikkort her. RX Vega 56 's præstation i dette spil svæver omkring 60fps mærket. Dets resultater kan faktisk ikke skelnes fra RX Vega 64 . Det er et tæt opkald mellem RX Vega 56 og dens rival GTX 1070 Ti med en lille margin.

Forza Horizon 4 (2018)

Ultra kvalitet

Opløsning 1920x1080

År Grafikkort Pris Billeder pr. sekund
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 kr 3,278
117.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 kr 2,300
111.1 FPS
2017 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti kr 2,687
105.0 FPS
2019 AMD Radeon RX 5700 kr 2,293
100.8 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti kr 1,833
99.8 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 kr 2,621
96.0 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 kr 3,278
91.0 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 kr 2,621
89.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 kr 1,445
87.8 FPS
2018 AMD Radeon RX 590 kr 1,833
75.5 FPS

RX Vega 56 sidder mellem RX Vega 64 og GTX 1660 og falder langsommere end RX Vega 64 med 2.2 % og hurtigere end GTX 1660 med 1.4 %. Det har under gennemsnittet relativ ydelse mod hvert grafikkort her. Dets resultater kan faktisk ikke skelnes fra RX Vega 64 . Mod sin rival - GTX 1070 Ti , er RX Vega 56 meget langsommere.

Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018)

Ultra kvalitet

Opløsning 1920x1080

År Grafikkort Pris Billeder pr. sekund
2019 AMD Radeon RX 5700 kr 2,293
99.8 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 kr 3,278
91.0 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 kr 3,278
90.0 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 kr 2,621
85.7 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 kr 2,300
85.7 FPS
2017 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti kr 2,687
84.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti kr 1,833
79.8 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 kr 2,621
74.0 FPS
2018 AMD Radeon RX 590 kr 1,833
71.9 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 kr 1,445
70.2 FPS

RX Vega 56 sidder mellem RX Vega 64 og RTX 2060 og falder langsommere end RX Vega 64 med 5 % og hurtigere end RTX 2060 med 0 %. Det har en gennemsnitlig relativ ydelse mod hvert grafikkort her. Det er et tæt opkald mellem RX Vega 56 og dens rival GTX 1070 Ti med en lille margin.

PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (2017)

Ultra kvalitet

Opløsning 1920x1080

År Grafikkort Pris Billeder pr. sekund
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 kr 3,278
95.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 kr 2,300
92.6 FPS
2017 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti kr 2,687
85.0 FPS
2019 AMD Radeon RX 5700 kr 2,293
80.8 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti kr 1,833
80.8 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 kr 2,621
80.0 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 kr 3,278
73.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 kr 1,445
71.1 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 kr 2,621
71.0 FPS
2018 AMD Radeon RX 590 kr 1,833
56.0 FPS

RX Vega 56 sidder mellem GTX 1660 og RX 590 og falder langsommere end GTX 1660 med 0.1 % og hurtigere end RX 590 med 26.8 %. Det kommer til kort i relativ ydeevne mod det meste af grafikkortet her. Dets resultater kan faktisk ikke skelnes fra GTX 1660 . Mod sin rival - GTX 1070 Ti , er RX Vega 56 meget langsommere.

Battlefield V (2018)

Ultra kvalitet

Opløsning 1920x1080

År Grafikkort Pris Billeder pr. sekund
2019 AMD Radeon RX 5700 kr 2,293
137.6 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 kr 3,278
125.0 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 kr 2,621
123.1 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 kr 3,278
121.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 kr 2,300
114.6 FPS
2017 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti kr 2,687
111.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti kr 1,833
105.4 FPS
2018 AMD Radeon RX 590 kr 1,833
103.5 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 kr 2,621
99.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 kr 1,445
92.8 FPS

RX Vega 56 sidder mellem RX Vega 64 og GTX 1080 og falder langsommere end RX Vega 64 med 1.5 % og hurtigere end GTX 1080 med 1.7 %. Det har en stærk relativ ydelse mod hvert grafikkort her. Dets resultater kan faktisk ikke skelnes fra RX Vega 64 . De, der har en skærm med høj opdateringsfrekvens, vil nyde, hvad RX Vega 56 har at tilbyde, da den gennemsnitligt 123.1 fps. RX Vega 56 gennemsnit 123.1 fps i og toppede GTX 1070 Ti med en god margin.

Spillets ydeevne Ultra kvalitet under indstillinger

Ændre kvalitetsindstillinger

Opløsning 1920x1080

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
År Spil Billeder pr. sekund
2019 Apex Legends
104
116.6
2019 Anthem
60
67.6
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
89
99.1
2019 Resident Evil 2
106
118.5
2019 Metro Exodus
47
52.8
2019 World War Z
111
124.0
2019 Gears of War 5
71
78.9
2019 F1 2019
89
99.1
2019 GreedFall
80
89.2
2019 Borderlands 3
56
62.7
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
116
129.2
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
50
56.2
2018 Final Fantasy XV
68
76.3
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
77
85.7
2018 Forza Horizon 4
80
89.0
2018 Fallout 76
91
101.7
2018 Hitman 2
71
79.5
2018 Just Cause 4
68
76.3
2018 Monster Hunter: World
73
82.1
2018 Strange Brigade
114
127.1
2018 Battlefield V
110
123.1
2017 Dawn of War III
90
100.9
2017 Ghost Recon Wildlands
61
68.4
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
51
57.2
2017 Destiny 2
113
126.2
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
63
71.0
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
80
89.0
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
94
105.5
2017 For Honor
126
140.7
2017 Project CARS 2
89
99.7
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
108
120.8
2016 Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
69
77.5
2016 Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
70
77.9
2016 Doom
162
180.3
2016 F1 2016
95
106.0
2016 Total War: Warhammer
88
97.9
2016 Battlefield 1
120
133.5
2016 Overwatch
124
138.0
2016 Dishonored 2
65
72.7
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
75
83.6
2015 Rocket League
369
410.6
2015 Need For Speed
102
113.9
2015 Project CARS
98
109.1
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
184
204.8
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
253
281.7
2009 League of Legends
475
528.0

Opløsning 2560x1440

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
År Spil Billeder pr. sekund
2019 Apex Legends
69
86.9
2019 Anthem
42
53.6
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
61
76.9
2019 Resident Evil 2
63
79.9
2019 Metro Exodus
32
41.0
2019 World War Z
72
90.5
2019 Gears of War 5
45
57.2
2019 F1 2019
56
70.1
2019 GreedFall
51
64.5
2019 Borderlands 3
35
44.0
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
65
81.5
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
28
36.1
2018 Final Fantasy XV
43
54.2
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
45
57.2
2018 Forza Horizon 4
60
75.1
2018 Fallout 76
69
86.9
2018 Hitman 2
41
51.9
2018 Just Cause 4
45
56.3
2018 Monster Hunter: World
45
57.4
2018 Strange Brigade
70
88.6
2018 Battlefield V
72
91.1
2017 Dawn of War III
71
89.4
2017 Ghost Recon Wildlands
48
61.0
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
41
51.9
2017 Destiny 2
86
108.1
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
43
54.2
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
46
57.8
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
61
76.3
2017 For Honor
65
82.1
2017 Project CARS 2
56
70.3
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
87
109.1
2016 Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
42
52.5
2016 Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
51
64.3
2016 Doom
99
124.9
2016 F1 2016
76
95.2
2016 Total War: Warhammer
58
72.6
2016 Battlefield 1
80
100.3
2016 Overwatch
75
94.9
2016 Dishonored 2
49
62.1
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
46
58.0
2015 Rocket League
140
176.0
2015 Need For Speed
70
88.0
2015 Project CARS
66
83.3
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
106
132.6
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
187
234.7
2009 League of Legends
234
293.3

Opløsning 3840x2160

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
År Spil Billeder pr. sekund
2019 Apex Legends
32
46.6
2019 Anthem
20
29.2
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
28
40.8
2019 Resident Evil 2
27
39.4
2019 Metro Exodus
18
25.9
2019 World War Z
36
52.1
2019 Gears of War 5
25
36.1
2019 F1 2019
31
44.6
2019 GreedFall
18
26.5
2019 Borderlands 3
16
22.9
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
24
34.9
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
17
25.5
2018 Final Fantasy XV
22
31.7
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
20
29.7
2018 Forza Horizon 4
34
49.8
2018 Fallout 76
33
47.6
2018 Hitman 2
21
30.8
2018 Just Cause 4
20
29.4
2018 Monster Hunter: World
19
27.5
2018 Strange Brigade
33
48.2
2018 Battlefield V
34
49.8
2017 Dawn of War III
31
45.6
2017 Ghost Recon Wildlands
25
36.7
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
23
33.9
2017 Destiny 2
37
54.2
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
21
30.8
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
21
31.2
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
36
52.8
2017 For Honor
28
41.0
2017 Project CARS 2
41
58.7
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
63
91.4
2016 Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
19
27.5
2016 Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
38
55.1
2016 Doom
45
65.7
2016 F1 2016
42
60.0
2016 Total War: Warhammer
28
41.4
2016 Battlefield 1
39
56.6
2016 Overwatch
34
49.0
2016 Dishonored 2
34
49.3
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
21
30.3
2015 Rocket League
57
82.1
2015 Need For Speed
41
58.7
2015 Project CARS
41
58.7
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
43
61.5
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
147
211.2
2009 League of Legends
82
117.3
RX Vega 56 with i7-7700K at 1080p and Ultra kvalitet settings

RX Vega 56 Specifikationer

RX Vega 56 Board Design

Board NumberD050-03
Length10.5 inches 267 mm
Outputs1x HDMI3x DisplayPort
Power Connectors2x 8-pin
Slot WidthDual-slot
TDP210 W

RX Vega 56 Clock Speeds

Boost Clock1474 MHz
GPU Clock1138 MHz
Memory Clock800 MHz 1600 MHz effective

RX Vega 56 Graphics Card

Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16
GenerationVega (RX Vega)
Launch Price399 USD
ProductionActive
Release DateAug 14th, 2017

RX Vega 56 Graphics Features

DirectX12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL2
OpenGL4.6
Shader Model6.1
Vulkan1.1.82

RX Vega 56 Graphics Processor

ArchitectureGCN 5.0
Die Size510 mm²
GPU NameVega 10
GPU VariantVega 10 XL (215-0894216)
Process Size14 nm
Transistors12,500 million

RX Vega 56 Memory

Bandwidth409.6 GB/s
Memory Bus2048 bit
Memory Size8192 MB
Memory TypeHBM2

RX Vega 56 Render Config

Compute Units56
ROPs64
Shading Units3584
TMUs224

RX Vega 56 Theoretical Performance

FP16 (half) performance21,131 GFLOPS (2:1)
FP32 (float) performance10,566 GFLOPS
FP64 (double) performance660.4 GFLOPS (1:16)
Pixel Rate94.34 GPixel/s
Texture Rate330.2 GTexel/s

Critics Reviews

• See the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 at Best Buy The Verdict If this were two separate reviews the Vega 56 would get a higher score than the Vega 64, but since it's one review I'm labeling both of ...
Conclusion. Radeon RX Vega 56 is a close derivative of Vega 64, so its behaviors largely carry over from AMD’s flagship. The company does cut this card’s board power rating by almost 30% ...
Years in development, the new Radeon RX Vega line is finally arriving - AMD's return to the higher-end of GPU performance after concentrating its efforts more on the mainstream and budget sectors ...
Similar to AMD's Radeon RX Vega 64, the Vega 56 offers two BIOSes with corresponding power profiles that can be selected using a switch on the card. If you don't change the driver-based profiles ...
Perhaps the most telling comparison, however, is that despite the 20 percent price reduction compared to the RX Vega 64, the RX Vega 56 is slower by less than 10 percent on average.
Radeon RX Vega 56 is the second AMD Vega card launched today. It comes at an affordable 9 price point, with a slightly reduced shader count that actually improves things greatly. For example, power efficiency now trades blows with some Pascal cards, which means less heat and noise, too.
On the AMD side of things, it is the AMD Radeon RX 480, or that card's successors, the Radeon RX 580 and Radeon RX 570. Therefore, the Vega 56 should be more than adequate for today's VR ...
Conclusion (RX Vega 56) The Radeon RX Vega 56 is easily the best card of this launch. It is cooler, quieter, and more efficient than the Radeon RX Vega 64 and delivers only 10 percent less ...
The AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 is the little sister of Vega 64. It comes in at a 20% lower price than the RX Vega 64, but only has 12.5% fewer stream processors, and runs lower operating frequencies.
Meet Radeon RX Vega 56 and RX Vega 64 Brad Chacos/IDG AMD sent PCWorld every version of Vega for testing, including both the air-cooled and liquid-cooled versions of the Radeon RX Vega 64.
The AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 is an upper mid-range graphics card, intended to beat Nvidia's GeForce GTX 1070 - a job it performs admirably as the benchmarks on this page demonstrate.
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 - the Digital Foundry verdict. If you're looking for an alternative to the GTX 1070, the bottom line is that you're generally getting around 10 to 12 per cent of additional ...
The Radeon RX Vega 56 is a high-end graphics card by AMD, launched in August 2017. Built on the 14 nm process, and based on the Vega 10 graphics processor, in its Vega 10 XL variant, the card supports DirectX 12.0.
Launching today is the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64, or just Vega 64 for short. Based on a fully enabled Vega 10 GPU, the Vega 64 will come in two physical variants: air cooled and liquid cooled.
Radeon RX Vega 56 utilizes the same Vega 10 processor found in Vega 64. It’s a 486 mm² behemoth sporting 12.5 billion transistors manufactured on GlobalFoundries’ 14LPP platform.
Vega 56 vs GTX 1070, Vega goes 6-2-2 = Winner Vega! Good job AMD, hopefully next gen you can make more headway in power efficiency. But this is a good card, even beats the factory OC 1070.
The AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 and Vega 64 preview. ... so thanks AMD! RX Vega vs. the World: a 15-round heavyweight battle ... The RX Vega 56 is the more compelling choice, given the lower price and ...

Diskussion og kommentarer

Del dine kommentarer
N
noggsboom 9 months ago
Rx580 or vega 56 or gtx 1070
I will buy a new gaming pc in march with a ryzen 7 2700, but i dont know which graphics card should i buy. In my country i can get the rx 580 around 120k ft, the vega 56 around 185k ft, and a gtx 1070 about 150-160k ft. Which should I buy? I already have my monitor, it supports freesync. (75hz, 1080x2560 resolution)
0 0
R
romenike 9 months ago
Should I buy the RX Vega 56 over the GTX 1070?
I'll be building a new rig in a few weeks. For a few days, I've been having trouble deciding on which graphics card I want to get. For a while, I was decided that I'd go with the 1070, but then I realized that Vega 56 performs just as well or better while offering Freesync, which my monitor does offer. For some reason, I still can't decide whether or not I should go for the Vega 56. Should I?
0 0
S
schoolsunkindness 9 months ago
On much smaller case blower type cooler is better due to heat being dump outside the case directly. But on much bigger case "open air" cooler usually end up being better. Also noise. Those blower type cooler can be very loud when the fan speed start ramping up.
0 0