R9 FURY med Athlon 64 X2 Dual 4200+ benchmarks på Ultra kvalitet kvalitetsindstillinger

På 1440p, R9 FURY kan ramme 50-60 fps på stort set alt på ultra, bare uden antialiasing, mindre omgivende okklusion og skruet ned skygger. Det er værd at bemærke, at R9 FURY det er en meget strømslugende kort og kræver en anstændig strømforsyning. Denne kombination mellem R9 FURY og AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4200+ vil forårsage alvorlige flaskehalse i mange spil og forårsage alvorlige fps tab. Med den 4096 nuværende MB RAM, R9 FURY kan det have meget få Hukommelse-relaterede flaskehalse i mere moderne spil.

 R9 FURY med Athlon 64 X2 Dual 4200+ benchmarks på Ultra kvalitet kvalitetsindstillinger
AMD Radeon R9 FURY
Pris kr 3,606.9
År 2015
Maksimal indspillet temperatur C
Max blæserstøj dB
Anbefalet strømforsyning 625W
Benchmark CPU AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4200+ ($129.95)
CPU indvirkning på FPS -38.0 FPS
CPU indvirkning på FPS% -50.0%
Indstillinger for benchmark-kvalitet Ultra Quality Settings
Gennemsnitlig 1080p-ydeevne 31.1 FPS
Gennemsnitlig 1440p ydeevne 23.2 FPS
(Ultrawide) Gennemsnitlig 1440p ydeevne 19.7 FPS
Gennemsnitlig 4K-ydeevne 13.7 FPS
Hukommelse 4 GB
1080p Pris pr. Ramme kr 116.0
1440p Pris pr. Ramme kr 155.4
(Ultrawide) 1440p Pris pr. Ramme kr 183.1
4K pris pr. Ramme kr 263.3
Serie R9 FURY
Variant AMD Radeon R9 FURY
Samlet kombinations score 52/100 Acceptabelt

Den gode nyhed er, med frigivelsen af R9 FURY X, R9 FURY 's pris får mere rabat. R9 FURY er meget dyrere end R9 390 da det koster en enorm kr 3606.9. Sammenlign dette med R9 390, AMD Radeon R9 390X, som oprindeligt kom til en pris på kr 2161.5, kr 2818.5. I mellemtiden er NVIDIA nærmeste ækvivalente kort GTX 980 der koster kr 3606.9.

Desværre var spilpræstation ikke så imponerende. Selv hvis R9 FURY konsekvent leverer billedhastigheder over R9 390, AMD Radeon R9 390X, er gevinsten ikke meget til at retfærdiggøre en opgradering. Hvorvidt det er en forsvarlig opgradering afhænger af, hvilket grafikkort du opgraderer fra. Brugere med en R9 390, AMD Radeon R9 390X ser ikke en bemærkelsesværdig stigning i billedfrekvensen efter at have betalt mere for denne R9 FURY. Tilsvarende vil dem, der holder på GTX 980 's GTX 780 grafikkort, ikke have en grund til at hoppe hold endnu.

Til 1080p Full HD kunne vi spille GreedFall, Final Fantasy XV, F1 2019, Far Cry New Dawn, Apex Legends på 61 fps til 72 fps og holdt billedhastighederne svævende rundt på 67 fps. Til 1440p Quad HD kunne vi spille Strange Brigade, World War Z, Battlefield V, Fallout 76 på 61 fps til 72 fps og holdt billedhastighederne svævende rundt på 67 fps.

Assassin's Creed Odyssey (2018)

Ultra kvalitet

Opløsning 1920x1080

År Grafikkort Pris Billeder pr. sekund
2018 AMD Radeon RX 590 kr 1,833
43.5 FPS
2015 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti kr 4,264
40.0 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 580 kr 1,505
39.3 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 FURY X kr 4,264
39.0 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 FURY kr 3,607
11.7 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 Nano kr 4,264
37.0 FPS
2014 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 kr 3,607
35.0 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 390X kr 2,819
34.0 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB kr 1,669
34.0 FPS
2016 AMD Radeon RX 480 kr 2,628
33.0 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB kr 1,117
32.3 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti kr 4,592
28.5 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 570 kr 1,110
27.2 FPS
2014 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 kr 2,162
26.7 FPS
2016 AMD Radeon RX 470 kr 1,176
26.0 FPS

R9 FURY sidder mellem R9 FURY X og R9 Nano og falder langsommere end R9 FURY X med 2.6 % og hurtigere end R9 Nano med 2.7 %. Det har en gennemsnitlig relativ ydelse mod hvert grafikkort her. Dets resultater kan faktisk ikke skelnes fra R9 FURY X . Mod sin rival - GTX 980 , er R9 FURY meget langsommere. Der er en stor margin i ydelsen, når man sammenligner R9 FURY med R9 FURY X .

Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018)

Ultra kvalitet

Opløsning 1920x1080

År Grafikkort Pris Billeder pr. sekund
2018 AMD Radeon RX 590 kr 1,833
71.9 FPS
2015 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti kr 4,264
66.0 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 580 kr 1,505
64.9 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 390X kr 2,819
56.0 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 FURY X kr 4,264
56.0 FPS
2016 AMD Radeon RX 480 kr 2,628
54.0 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 570 kr 1,110
52.0 FPS
2014 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 kr 3,607
52.0 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 FURY kr 3,607
15.7 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 Nano kr 4,264
50.0 FPS
2016 AMD Radeon RX 470 kr 1,176
48.0 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB kr 1,669
46.8 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB kr 1,117
44.4 FPS
2014 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 kr 2,162
43.6 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti kr 4,592
37.9 FPS

R9 FURY sidder mellem GTX 980 og R9 Nano og falder langsommere end GTX 980 med 2 % og hurtigere end R9 Nano med 2 %. Det har en gennemsnitlig relativ ydelse mod hvert grafikkort her. Dets resultater kan faktisk ikke skelnes fra GTX 980 . Mod sin rival - GTX 980 , er R9 FURY meget langsommere. Der er en stor margin i ydelsen, når man sammenligner R9 FURY med R9 FURY X .

Battlefield V (2018)

Ultra kvalitet

Opløsning 1920x1080

År Grafikkort Pris Billeder pr. sekund
2018 AMD Radeon RX 590 kr 1,833
103.5 FPS
2015 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti kr 4,264
94.0 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 580 kr 1,505
93.5 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 FURY X kr 4,264
86.0 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 FURY kr 3,607
25.6 FPS
2014 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 kr 3,607
73.0 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 390X kr 2,819
71.0 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 570 kr 1,110
71.0 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB kr 1,669
68.4 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 Nano kr 4,264
65.0 FPS
2016 AMD Radeon RX 480 kr 2,628
65.0 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB kr 1,117
64.9 FPS
2016 AMD Radeon RX 470 kr 1,176
62.0 FPS
2014 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 kr 2,162
60.4 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti kr 4,592
50.4 FPS

R9 FURY sidder mellem R9 FURY X og GTX 980 og falder langsommere end R9 FURY X med 3.6 % og hurtigere end GTX 980 med 13.7 %. Det har en gennemsnitlig relativ ydelse mod hvert grafikkort her. Mod sin rival - GTX 980 , er R9 FURY meget langsommere. Der er en stor margin i ydelsen, når man sammenligner R9 FURY med R9 FURY X .

Spillets ydeevne Ultra kvalitet under indstillinger

Ændre kvalitetsindstillinger

Opløsning 1920x1080

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
År Spil Billeder pr. sekund
2019 Apex Legends
6
22.2
2019 Anthem
4
14.3
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
6
21.0
2019 Resident Evil 2
7
25.6
2019 Metro Exodus
3
11.4
2019 World War Z
8
28.0
2019 Gears of War 5
5
16.6
2019 F1 2019
6
20.9
2019 GreedFall
5
18.8
2019 Borderlands 3
4
13.2
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
7
25.4
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
3
9.8
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
4
15.4
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
8
26.2
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
3
11.7
2018 Final Fantasy XV
6
20.0
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
4
15.7
2018 Just Cause 4
5
16.5
2018 Monster Hunter: World
5
17.8
2018 Strange Brigade
8
26.8
2018 Battlefield V
7
25.6
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
5
16.9
2017 Destiny 2
9
32.4
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
7
22.9
2017 For Honor
9
30.5
2017 Project CARS 2
6
21.6
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
8
26.2
2016 Dishonored 2
4
15.7
2015 Rocket League
27
88.9
2015 Need For Speed
7
24.6
2015 Project CARS
7
23.6
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
13
43.2
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
18
60.9
2009 League of Legends
35
114.3

Opløsning 2560x1440

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
År Spil Billeder pr. sekund
2019 Apex Legends
5
16.5
2019 Anthem
3
11.3
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
5
16.3
2019 Resident Evil 2
5
17.3
2019 Metro Exodus
2
8.9
2019 World War Z
6
20.5
2019 Gears of War 5
3
12.0
2019 F1 2019
4
14.8
2019 GreedFall
4
13.6
2019 Borderlands 3
2
9.3
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
5
18.3
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
2
8.0
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
3
12.0
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
4
15.4
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
2
9.2
2018 Final Fantasy XV
4
14.2
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
3
11.1
2018 Fallout 76
6
22.2
2018 Just Cause 4
3
12.2
2018 Monster Hunter: World
3
12.5
2018 Strange Brigade
5
18.7
2018 Battlefield V
6
20.6
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
4
13.6
2017 Destiny 2
8
27.7
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
5
16.5
2017 For Honor
5
17.8
2017 Project CARS 2
4
15.2
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
7
23.6
2016 Dishonored 2
4
13.5
2015 Rocket League
11
38.1
2015 Need For Speed
5
19.0
2015 Project CARS
5
18.0
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
8
27.9
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
15
50.8
2009 League of Legends
19
63.5

Opløsning 3440x1440

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
År Spil Billeder pr. sekund
2019 Apex Legends
4
14.1
2019 Anthem
2
9.4
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
4
13.3
2019 Resident Evil 2
4
13.8
2019 Metro Exodus
2
7.7
2019 World War Z
5
17.3
2019 Gears of War 5
3
10.5
2019 F1 2019
3
12.9
2019 GreedFall
3
10.3
2019 Borderlands 3
2
7.6
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
4
15.6
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
2
7.0
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
3
10.5
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
4
13.8
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
2
8.4
2018 Final Fantasy XV
3
12.0
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
2
8.9
2018 Fallout 76
5
18.5
2018 Just Cause 4
3
9.9
2018 Monster Hunter: World
3
9.9
2018 Strange Brigade
4
15.4
2018 Battlefield V
4
15.3
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
3
11.9
2017 Destiny 2
6
22.3
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
4
14.9
2017 For Honor
4
14.3
2017 Project CARS 2
4
14.9
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
7
23.2
2016 Dishonored 2
3
12.9
2015 Rocket League
9
29.9
2015 Need For Speed
5
17.0
2015 Project CARS
5
16.4
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
6
21.8
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
15
51.6
2009 League of Legends
14
47.6

Opløsning 3840x2160

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
År Spil Billeder pr. sekund
2019 Apex Legends
3
9.9
2019 Anthem
1
6.2
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
2
8.6
2019 Resident Evil 2
2
8.5
2019 Metro Exodus
1
5.6
2019 World War Z
3
11.8
2019 Gears of War 5
2
7.6
2019 F1 2019
2
9.4
2019 GreedFall
1
5.6
2019 Borderlands 3
1
4.8
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
3
10.9
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
1
5.1
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
2
7.6
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
3
10.5
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
2
6.5
2018 Final Fantasy XV
2
8.3
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
1
5.5
2018 Fallout 76
3
12.3
2018 Just Cause 4
1
6.3
2018 Monster Hunter: World
1
6.0
2018 Strange Brigade
3
10.2
2018 Battlefield V
2
8.0
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
2
8.6
2017 Destiny 2
4
13.9
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
3
11.4
2017 For Honor
2
8.9
2017 Project CARS 2
3
12.7
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
6
19.8
2016 Dishonored 2
3
10.7
2015 Rocket League
5
17.8
2015 Need For Speed
3
12.7
2015 Project CARS
3
12.7
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
3
12.9
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
14
45.7
2009 League of Legends
7
25.4
R9 FURY with Athlon 64 X2 Dual 4200+ at 1080p and Ultra kvalitet settings

Sammenlign mod konkurrenter

R9 FURY Specifikationer

R9 FURY Board Design

Board NumberC88003
Outputs1x HDMI3x DisplayPort
Power Connectors2x 8-pin
Slot WidthDual-slot
TDP275 W

R9 FURY Clock Speeds

GPU Clock1000 MHz
Memory Clock500 MHz 1000 MHz effective

R9 FURY Graphics Card

Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16
GenerationPirate Islands (R9 300)
Launch Price549 USD
ProductionActive
Release DateJul 10th, 2015

R9 FURY Graphics Features

DirectX12.0 (12_0)
OpenCL2
OpenGL4.5
Shader Model6
Vulkan1.1.82

R9 FURY Graphics Processor

ArchitectureGCN 3.0
Die Size596 mm²
GPU NameFiji
GPU VariantFiji PRO CB (215-0862046)
Process Size28 nm
Transistors8,900 million

R9 FURY Memory

Bandwidth512.0 GB/s
Memory Bus4096 bit
Memory Size4096 MB
Memory TypeHBM

R9 FURY Render Config

Compute Units56
ROPs64
Shading Units3584
TMUs224

R9 FURY Theoretical Performance

FP16 (half) performance7,168 GFLOPS (1:1)
FP32 (float) performance7,168 GFLOPS
FP64 (double) performance448.0 GFLOPS (1:16)
Pixel Rate64.00 GPixel/s
Texture Rate224.0 GTexel/s

Critics Reviews

Conclusion. AMD is putting reviewers in a tough spot with Fury. On one hand, the Fiji GPU with HBM is a remarkable feat of engineering. HBM is only in its infancy, but the technology already shows ...
The AMD Radeon R9 Fury Nano is one of the most exciting graphics cards I’ve seen for years and, at only 6in long, it’s also one of the smallest. ... Verdict. AMD’s latest card is one of its ...
Conclusion: Fiji delivers, but also faces formidable competition. Unfortunately we are bringing you our Radeon R9 Fury X review a week late. AMD had limited samples ready for the release and only ...
Verdict. If AMD and Nvidia’s flagship cards are too expensive then the AMD Radeon R9 Fury is a good option for high-end gameplay. Be warned, though – its power consumption is high. ...
AMD Radeon R9 Fury: the Digital Foundry verdict If you're looking for the cheapest single-chip GPU that can run a good proportion of games well at 4K resolution, the Radeon R9 Fury is a quality ...
Last week, AMD lifted the veil in its Radeon R7 and R9 300 series of products and publicly demoed its latest flagship, the Radeon R9 Fury X, at a small venue adjacent to E3. While the Radeon R7 ...
The R9 Fury X's power consumption is a real achievement by AMD. Given what we had seen in the past by the Radeon R9 290X and R9 390X, we had just naturally assumed that the Fury X would use a lot ...
The AMD Radeon R9 Fury X also supports the Asynchronous Shader technology AMD talked about recently. Asynchronous Shaders are a feature of new or next-gen APIs like DirectX 12, Vulkan, and AMD’s ...
AMD's Radeon R9 Fury X is released today, introducing HBM memory for graphics cards. The new card is built around a watercooled Fiji GPU, which enabled AMD to design a very compact card that will fit into many small-form-factor cases. Gaming performance at 4K is good and roughly matches the GTX 980 Ti.
In our review of AMD’s Radeon R9 Fury, we discovered that the Fury X’s air-cooled sibling packs a performance punch that justifies its competitive price tag. In fact, it punishes Nvidia’s ...
Radeon R9 Fury X specs. The Fiji processor in the R9 Fury X is based on AMD's third generation GCN architecture, previously found in the R9 295/380, and codenamed Tonga.
While AMD introduced its highly anticipated Radeon R9 Fury X in June, we’re taking a deeper look at its power consumption and pump noise. Since we were able to procure our own retail board, we ...
The Fury X uses an all-new chunk of silicon dubbed Fiji, as opposed to the die in the Radeon R9 290X, which was called Hawaii. Fiji is the beefiest GPU AMD has ever crafted, and it sports a ...
AMD says the Fury X is a reference design only, though the air-cooled Radeon R9 Fury scheduled for a July 14 release will have vendor-customized designs available.
Catching up to the present, this month marks an important occasion for AMD with the launch of their new flagship GPU, Fiji, and the flagship video card based on it, the Radeon R9 Fury X.
AMD's Radeon R9 Fury X is released today, introducing HBM memory for graphics cards. The new card is built around a watercooled Fiji GPU, which enabled AMD to design a very compact card that will fit into many small-form-factor cases. Gaming performance at 4K is good and roughly matches the GTX 980 Ti.
A bit over two weeks ago AMD launched their new flagship video card, the Radeon R9 Fury X.Based on the company’s new Fiji GPU, the R9 Fury X brought with it significant performance improvements ...
AMD does find itself in a somewhat strange position, what with arming Radeon R9 390X and 390 with 8GB and all. Still, we just don’t think the flagship’s halved capacity is much of a handicap.
Reference AMD Radeon R9 Fury specs. ... Of course, as Fiji is AMD’s latest and greatest GPU, the Nitro R9 Fury also supports AMD’s latest and greatest software features, like FreeSync, Virtual ...

Diskussion og kommentarer

Del dine kommentarer