R7 250 med Athlon 64 X2 Dual 4200+ benchmarks på Ultra kvalitet kvalitetsindstillinger

Den R7 250 er mere velegnet til budget pc-builds og mindre krævende spil. Hos indeværende 1024 MB RAM, den R7 250 kunne nyde seriøs hukommelse-beslægtet flaskehals i flere nyere idræt. R7 250 Strøm kravene er rimelige, og det er meget effektivt i forhold til konkurrenterne. Med hensyn til max belastning temperatur, R7 250 er kølingen fremragende til at holde det køligt og under kontrol. Denne kombination mellem R7 250 og AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4200+ har mindre end 15% flaskehals i mange spil og kan forårsage mindre fps tab. Denne kombination mellem R7 250 og AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4200+ har mindre end 8% flaskehals i mange spil og er perfekt match for at undgå fps tab.

 R7 250 med Athlon 64 X2 Dual 4200+ benchmarks på Ultra kvalitet kvalitetsindstillinger
AMD Radeon R7 250
Pris kr 624.2
År 2013
Maksimal indspillet temperatur 65C
Max blæserstøj 46.9dB
Anbefalet strømforsyning 415W
Benchmark CPU AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4200+ ($129.95)
CPU indvirkning på FPS -6.6 FPS
CPU indvirkning på FPS% -40.0%
Indstillinger for benchmark-kvalitet Ultra Quality Settings
Gennemsnitlig 1080p-ydeevne 8.8 FPS
Gennemsnitlig 1440p ydeevne 4.8 FPS
(Ultrawide) Gennemsnitlig 1440p ydeevne 4.1 FPS
Gennemsnitlig 4K-ydeevne 2.9 FPS
Hukommelse 1 GB
1080p Pris pr. Ramme kr 66.4
1440p Pris pr. Ramme kr 121.8
(Ultrawide) 1440p Pris pr. Ramme kr 142.6
4K pris pr. Ramme kr 201.6
Serie R7 250
Variant AMD Radeon R7 250
Samlet kombinations score 57/100 Acceptabelt

AMD 's xx50 -kort er altid blevet defineret af budget priser med ydeevne, der banker på døren til entry-level grafikkort - især når de er overklokket. Efter at have taget os tid til fuldt ud at teste GCN 1.0 grafikkortet inde i R7 250, kan vi uden tvivl sige, at det fortsætter trenden.

Spillets ydeevne Ultra kvalitet under indstillinger

Ændre kvalitetsindstillinger

Opløsning 1920x1080

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
År Spil Billeder pr. sekund
2019 Apex Legends
1
3.7
2019 Anthem
0
2.4
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
1
3.5
2019 Resident Evil 2
2
6.1
2019 Metro Exodus
1
2.7
2019 World War Z
2
5.0
2019 Gears of War 5
1
3.9
2019 F1 2019
2
4.9
2019 GreedFall
1
4.4
2019 Borderlands 3
1
3.1
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
2
6.0
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
0
2.3
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
1
3.7
2018 Just Cause 4
1
3.9
2018 Monster Hunter: World
1
4.2
2018 Strange Brigade
2
6.3
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
2
5.4
2017 For Honor
2
7.2
2017 Project CARS 2
2
5.1
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
2
6.2
2016 Dishonored 2
1
3.7
2015 Rocket League
8
21.1
2015 Need For Speed
2
5.9
2015 Project CARS
2
5.6
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
4
10.2
2013 Bioshock Infinite
5
13.0
2013 GRID 2
8
20.9
2013 Total War: Rome 2
7
17.1
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
5
14.4
2009 League of Legends
11
27.1
2008 Crysis: Warhead
4
11.9

Opløsning 2560x1440

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
År Spil Billeder pr. sekund
2019 Apex Legends
1
2.8
2019 Anthem
0
1.9
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
1
2.7
2019 Resident Evil 2
1
4.1
2019 Metro Exodus
0
2.1
2019 World War Z
1
3.7
2019 Gears of War 5
1
2.9
2019 F1 2019
1
3.5
2019 GreedFall
1
3.2
2019 Borderlands 3
0
2.2
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
1
4.3
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
0
1.9
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
1
2.9
2018 Just Cause 4
1
2.9
2018 Monster Hunter: World
1
2.9
2018 Strange Brigade
1
4.4
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
1
3.9
2017 For Honor
1
4.2
2017 Project CARS 2
1
3.6
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
2
5.6
2016 Dishonored 2
1
3.2
2015 Rocket League
3
9.0
2015 Need For Speed
1
4.5
2015 Project CARS
1
4.3
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
2
6.6
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
4
12.0
2009 League of Legends
6
15.0

Opløsning 3440x1440

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
År Spil Billeder pr. sekund
2019 Apex Legends
0
2.4
2019 Anthem
0
1.6
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
0
2.2
2019 Resident Evil 2
1
3.3
2019 Metro Exodus
0
1.8
2019 World War Z
1
3.1
2019 Gears of War 5
1
2.5
2019 F1 2019
1
3.1
2019 GreedFall
0
2.4
2019 Borderlands 3
0
1.8
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
1
3.7
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
0
1.7
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
1
2.5
2018 Just Cause 4
0
2.4
2018 Monster Hunter: World
0
2.3
2018 Strange Brigade
1
3.7
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
1
3.5
2017 For Honor
1
3.4
2017 Project CARS 2
1
3.5
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
2
5.5
2016 Dishonored 2
1
3.1
2015 Rocket League
2
7.1
2015 Need For Speed
1
4.0
2015 Project CARS
1
3.9
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
2
5.2
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
5
12.2
2009 League of Legends
4
11.3

Opløsning 3840x2160

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
År Spil Billeder pr. sekund
2019 Apex Legends
0
1.7
2019 Anthem
0
1.0
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
0
1.5
2019 Resident Evil 2
0
2.0
2019 Metro Exodus
0
1.3
2019 World War Z
0
2.1
2019 Gears of War 5
0
1.8
2019 F1 2019
0
2.2
2019 GreedFall
0
1.3
2019 Borderlands 3
0
1.2
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
1
2.6
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
0
1.2
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
0
1.8
2018 Just Cause 4
0
1.5
2018 Monster Hunter: World
0
1.4
2018 Strange Brigade
0
2.4
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
1
2.7
2017 For Honor
0
2.1
2017 Project CARS 2
1
3.0
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
1
4.7
2016 Dishonored 2
1
2.5
2015 Rocket League
1
4.2
2015 Need For Speed
1
3.0
2015 Project CARS
1
3.0
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
1
3.1
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
4
10.8
2009 League of Legends
2
6.0
R7 250 with Athlon 64 X2 Dual 4200+ at 1080p and Ultra kvalitet settings

R7 250 Specifikationer

R7 250

Critics Reviews

Radeon-based stock video cards are usually some variation on AMD's red-and-black theme, and PowerColor's version of the Radeon R7 250X we're looking at here doesn't stray too far from that tradition.
The Radeon R7 250 was an entry-level graphics card by AMD, launched in October 2013. Built on the 28 nm process, and based on the Oland graphics processor, in its Oland XT variant, the card supports DirectX 12.0.

Diskussion og kommentarer

Del dine kommentarer