AMD Radeon R9 280
vs
AMD Radeon R9 285

AMD Radeon R9 280
AMD Radeon R9 285
R9 280 R9 285 Forskel
AMD Radeon R9 280 AMD Radeon R9 285
Pris kr 2,299.5 kr 2,496.6 197.1 (9%)
År 2014 2014 0 (0%)
Maksimal indspillet temperatur 66C 70C 4 (6%)
Max blæserstøj 52.8dB 48.3dB 4.5 (9%)
Anbefalet strømforsyning 550W 540W 10 (2%)
Benchmark CPU Intel Core i7-4770K @ 3.50GHz ($284.99) Intel Core i7-4770K @ 3.50GHz ($284.99)
CPU indvirkning på FPS +0.0 FPS +0.0 FPS 0 (0%)
CPU indvirkning på FPS% 0.0% 0.0% 0 (0%)
Indstillinger for benchmark-kvalitet Ultra Quality Settings Ultra Quality Settings
Gennemsnitlig 1080p-ydeevne 40.7 FPS 42.2 FPS 1.5 (4%)
Gennemsnitlig 1440p ydeevne 29.8 FPS 30.4 FPS 0.6 (2%)
Gennemsnitlig 4K-ydeevne 16.3 FPS 17.1 FPS 0.8 (5%)
Hukommelse 3 GB 2 GB 1 (33%)
1080p Pris pr. Ramme kr 45.1 kr 38.8 6.3 (14%)
1440p Pris pr. Ramme kr 61.5 kr 53.8 7.7 (13%)
4K pris pr. Ramme kr 112.5 kr 95.7 16.8 (15%)
Variant AMD Radeon R9 280 AMD Radeon R9 285
Samlet kombinations score 55/100 57/100 2 (4%)
Vores dom: Opgradering fra R9 280 til R9 285 anbefales ikke, da det er mindre end 30% af forbedringen af ydeevnen. Generelt er en rimelig opgradering mellem 30% og 50% eller mere for at retfærdiggøre køb af ny hardware. Forholdet mellem pris og ydelse er meget bedre R9 280 .

Spillets ydeevne ved udvalgte kvalitetsindstillinger

Ændre kvalitetsindstillinger

1920x1080

AMD Radeon R9 280
AMD Radeon R9 285
År Spil Billeder pr. sekund
2019 Apex Legends
32
36.0
32
36.0
2019 Anthem
20
23.2
20
23.2
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
30
34.0
30
34.0
2019 Resident Evil 2
41
46.3
42
47.1
2019 Metro Exodus
18
20.6
18
21.0
2019 World War Z
40
45.0
43
48.0
2019 Gears of War 5
27
30.0
27
30.5
2019 F1 2019
33
37.6
34
38.3
2019 GreedFall
30
33.9
31
34.5
2019 Borderlands 3
21
23.8
21
24.2
2018 Forza Horizon 4
26
29.0
28
32.0
2018 Fallout 76
30
34.0
32
36.0
2018 Hitman 2
24
27.0
25
28.0
2018 Just Cause 4
26
29.8
27
30.3
2018 Monster Hunter: World
28
32.1
29
32.6
2018 Strange Brigade
43
48.3
44
49.2
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
27
30.0
43
48.0
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
26
29.4
28
31.5
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
37
41.2
37
41.9
2017 For Honor
49
55.0
50
55.9
2017 Project CARS 2
35
38.9
35
39.6
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
42
47.2
43
48.0
2016 Overwatch
40
45.5
44
49.0
2016 Dishonored 2
25
28.4
26
28.9
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
32
35.6
32
35.7
2015 Rocket League
144
160.3
146
163.1
2015 Need For Speed
39
44.4
40
45.2
2015 Project CARS
38
42.6
38
43.3
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
70
77.9
71
79.2
2013 Crysis 3
33
37.3
36
40.6
2013 Battlefield 4
46
51.5
41
45.8
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
98
109.9
100
111.8
2009 League of Legends
185
206.1
188
209.7

2560x1440

AMD Radeon R9 280
AMD Radeon R9 285
År Spil Billeder pr. sekund
2019 Apex Legends
21
26.8
21
26.8
2019 Anthem
14
18.4
14
18.4
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
21
26.4
21
26.4
2019 Resident Evil 2
24
31.1
25
31.7
2019 Metro Exodus
12
16.0
13
16.3
2019 World War Z
26
32.9
28
35.0
2019 Gears of War 5
17
21.8
17
22.1
2019 F1 2019
21
26.7
21
27.1
2019 GreedFall
19
24.5
19
24.9
2019 Borderlands 3
13
16.7
13
17.0
2018 Forza Horizon 4
20
25.0
21
27.0
2018 Hitman 2
13
17.0
14
18.0
2018 Just Cause 4
17
22.0
17
22.4
2018 Monster Hunter: World
17
22.4
18
22.8
2018 Strange Brigade
26
33.7
27
34.3
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
18
23.0
29
37.0
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
15
18.9
16
20.3
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
23
29.8
24
30.3
2017 For Honor
25
32.1
26
32.6
2017 Project CARS 2
22
27.5
22
28.0
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
34
42.6
34
43.3
2016 Overwatch
25
31.5
26
33.6
2016 Dishonored 2
19
24.3
19
24.7
2015 Rocket League
54
68.7
55
69.9
2015 Need For Speed
27
34.3
28
35.0
2015 Project CARS
26
32.5
26
33.1
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
40
50.4
41
51.3
2013 Crysis 3
29
36.6
27
34.7
2013 Battlefield 4
25
31.8
23
29.5
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
73
91.6
74
93.2
2009 League of Legends
91
114.5
93
116.5

3840x2160

AMD Radeon R9 280
AMD Radeon R9 285
År Spil Billeder pr. sekund
2019 Apex Legends
11
16.0
11
16.0
2019 Anthem
7
10.0
7
10.0
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
9
14.0
9
14.0
2019 Resident Evil 2
10
15.3
10
15.6
2019 Metro Exodus
7
10.1
7
10.3
2019 World War Z
13
18.9
14
20.2
2019 Gears of War 5
9
13.7
9
14.0
2019 F1 2019
11
16.9
12
17.2
2019 GreedFall
7
10.1
7
10.3
2019 Borderlands 3
6
8.7
6
8.9
2018 Forza Horizon 4
11
16.0
12
18.0
2018 Hitman 2
7
10.0
7
11.0
2018 Just Cause 4
7
11.4
8
11.7
2018 Monster Hunter: World
7
10.8
7
11.0
2018 Strange Brigade
12
18.3
13
18.6
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
9
13.0
14
21.0
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
7
10.5
7
11.2
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
14
20.6
14
21.0
2017 For Honor
11
16.0
11
16.3
2017 Project CARS 2
16
22.9
16
23.3
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
24
35.7
25
36.3
2016 Overwatch
11
16.1
12
17.5
2016 Dishonored 2
13
19.2
13
19.6
2015 Rocket League
22
32.1
22
32.6
2015 Need For Speed
16
22.9
16
23.3
2015 Project CARS
16
22.9
16
23.3
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
16
23.4
16
23.8
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
57
82.4
58
83.9
2009 League of Legends
32
45.8
32
46.6
R9 280 vs R9 285 with i7-4770K vs i7-4770K at 1080p and ultra vs ultra settings

AMD Radeon R9 280 / i7-4770K

Det er værd at bemærke, at R9 280 det er en meget strømslugende kort og kræver en anstændig strømforsyning. Denne kombination mellem R9 280 og Intel Core i7-4770K @ 3.50GHz har mindre end 8% flaskehals i mange spil og er perfekt match for at undgå fps tab. Denne kombination mellem R9 280 og Intel Core i7-4770K @ 3.50GHz er et perfekt match for at undgå fps tab. Med den 3072 nuværende MB RAM, R9 280 kan det have meget få Hukommelse-relaterede flaskehalse i mere moderne spil.

AMD Radeon R9 285 / i7-4770K

Hos indeværende 2048 MB RAM, den R9 285 kunne nyde seriøs hukommelse-beslægtet flaskehals i flere nyere idræt. Denne kombination mellem R9 285 og Intel Core i7-4770K @ 3.50GHz har mindre end 8% flaskehals i mange spil og er perfekt match for at undgå fps tab. Denne kombination mellem R9 285 og Intel Core i7-4770K @ 3.50GHz er et perfekt match for at undgå fps tab. Med den 2048 nuværende MB RAM, R9 285 kan det have meget få Hukommelse-relaterede flaskehalse i mere moderne spil.

R9 280 vs R9 285 Specifications Comparison

Board Design

R9 280 R9 285
Board NumberC386C766
Length10.83 inches 275 mm8.7 inches 221 mm
Outputs2x DVI1x HDMI2x mini-DisplayPort2x DVI1x HDMI1x DisplayPort
Power Connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin2x 6-pin
Slot WidthDual-slotDual-slot
TDP200 W190 W

Clock Speeds

R9 280 R9 285
GPU Clock827 MHz918 MHz
Memory Clock1250 MHz 5000 MHz effective1375 MHz 5500 MHz effective

Graphics Card

R9 280 R9 285
Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
GenerationVolcanic Islands (R9 200)Volcanic Islands (R9 200)
Launch Price279 USD249 USD
ProductionEnd-of-lifeEnd-of-life
Release DateMar 4th, 2014Sep 2nd, 2014

Graphics Features

R9 280 R9 285
DirectX12.0 (11_1)12.0 (12_0)
OpenCL1.22
OpenGL4.54.5
Shader Model5.16
Vulkan1.1.771.1.82

Graphics Processor

R9 280 R9 285
ArchitectureGCN 1.0GCN 3.0
Die Size352 mm²366 mm²
GPU NameTahitiTonga
GPU VariantTahiti PRO3 (215-0821330)Tonga PRO (215-0851128)
Process Size28 nm28 nm
Transistors4,313 million5,000 million

Memory

R9 280 R9 285
Bandwidth240.0 GB/s176.0 GB/s
Memory Bus384 bit256 bit
Memory Size3072 MB2048 MB
Memory TypeGDDR5GDDR5

Render Config

R9 280 R9 285
Compute Units2828
ROPs3232
Shading Units17921792
TMUs112112

Theoretical Performance

R9 280 R9 285
FP32 (float) performance3,344 GFLOPS3,290 GFLOPS
FP64 (double) performance836.0 GFLOPS (1:4)205.6 GFLOPS (1:16)
Pixel Rate29.86 GPixel/s29.38 GPixel/s
Texture Rate104.5 GTexel/s102.8 GTexel/s

Diskussion og kommentarer

Del dine kommentarer