NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
vs
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
GTX 1660 Ti RX Vega 64 Difference
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Price $ 279.0 $ 399.0 120 (43%)
Year 2019 2017 2 (0%)
Maximum Recorded Temperature 61C 86C 25 (41%)
Max Fan Noise 45.6dB 56.3dB 10.7 (23%)
Recommended Power Supply 500W 645W 145 (29%)
Benchmark CPU Intel Core i7-8700K @ 3.70GHz ($369.89) Intel Core i7-7700K @ 4.20GHz ($354.99)
CPU Impact on FPS +0.0 FPS +0.0 FPS 0 (0%)
CPU Impact on FPS % 0.0% 0.0% 0 (0%)
Benchmark Quality Settings Ultra Quality Settings Ultra Quality Settings
Average 1080p Performance 99.8 FPS 105.1 FPS 5.3 (5%)
Average 1440p Performance 73.6 FPS 78.9 FPS 5.3 (7%)
Average 4K Performance 43.7 FPS 46.7 FPS 3 (7%)
Memory 6 GB 8 GB 2 (33%)
1080p Cost Per Frame $ 2.8 $ 4.8 2 (71%)
1440p Cost Per Frame $ 3.8 $ 6.3 2.5 (66%)
4K Cost Per Frame $ 6.4 $ 10.7 4.3 (67%)
Overall Combination Score 84/100 84/100 0 (0%)
Our Verdict: Upgrading from GTX 1660 Ti to RX Vega 64 is not recommended as it is less than 30% of improvement in performance. In general, a reasonable upgrade is between 30% and 50% or more to justify the purchase of new hardware. The price/performance ratio is much better for GTX 1660 Ti .

Game Performance at selected quality settings

Change Quality Settings

1920x1080

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Year Game Frames Per Second
2019 Apex Legends
102.6
119.0
2019 Anthem
66.1
69.6
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
96.9
102.0
2019 Resident Evil 2
118.5
125.7
2019 Metro Exodus
52.8
56.0
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
120.6
135.0
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
50.3
57.0
2018 Final Fantasy XV
84.5
77.4
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
79.8
90.0
2018 Forza Horizon 4
99.8
91.0
2018 Fallout 76
133.0
134.8
2018 Hitman 2
103.6
105.0
2018 Just Cause 4
76.3
80.9
2018 Monster Hunter: World
82.2
87.1
2018 Battlefield V
105.4
125.0
2017 Dawn of War III
100.5
110.3
2017 Ghost Recon Wildlands
79.4
65.3
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
73.1
55.0
2017 Destiny 2
140.6
129.0
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
80.8
73.0
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
99.8
91.7
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
105.5
112.0
2017 For Honor
140.8
149.4
2017 Project CARS 2
99.8
105.8
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
120.8
128.2
2016 Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
65.1
82.7
2016 Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
83.4
85.7
2016 Doom
160.6
188.5
2016 F1 2016
101.6
105.4
2016 Total War: Warhammer
98.3
101.6
2016 Battlefield 1
123.1
140.9
2016 Overwatch
154.9
142.1
2016 Dishonored 2
72.8
77.2
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
95.1
83.7
2015 Rocket League
410.6
435.8
2015 Need For Speed
113.8
120.8
2015 Project CARS
109.2
115.8
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
281.6
298.8
2009 League of Legends
528.0
560.2

2560x1440

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Year Game Frames Per Second
2019 Apex Legends
76.4
90.0
2019 Anthem
52.4
55.2
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
75.2
79.2
2019 Resident Evil 2
79.8
84.7
2019 Metro Exodus
41.0
43.6
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
70.3
88.0
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
39.9
43.0
2018 Final Fantasy XV
58.9
55.8
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
53.2
61.0
2018 Forza Horizon 4
84.5
77.0
2018 Fallout 76
88.3
97.0
2018 Hitman 2
67.5
69.0
2018 Just Cause 4
56.3
59.8
2018 Monster Hunter: World
57.5
61.0
2018 Battlefield V
84.5
95.0
2017 Dawn of War III
75.6
91.2
2017 Ghost Recon Wildlands
59.4
59.2
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
57.9
53.0
2017 Destiny 2
120.6
110.0
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
61.7
56.0
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
65.2
59.5
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
76.3
80.9
2017 For Honor
82.2
87.1
2017 Project CARS 2
70.4
74.7
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
109.2
115.8
2016 Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
45.5
56.4
2016 Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
69.1
71.6
2016 Doom
114.3
139.1
2016 F1 2016
81.6
98.0
2016 Total War: Warhammer
73.8
77.7
2016 Battlefield 1
92.1
107.7
2016 Overwatch
107.1
98.0
2016 Dishonored 2
62.2
66.0
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
67.5
59.4
2015 Rocket League
176.0
186.8
2015 Need For Speed
88.0
93.4
2015 Project CARS
83.3
88.4
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
234.6
249.0
2009 League of Legends
293.3
311.2

3840x2160

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Year Game Frames Per Second
2019 Apex Legends
45.6
48.0
2019 Anthem
28.5
30.0
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
39.9
42.0
2019 Resident Evil 2
39.3
41.7
2019 Metro Exodus
25.8
27.4
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
31.3
38.0
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
28.5
30.0
2018 Final Fantasy XV
34.2
31.1
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
27.5
31.0
2018 Forza Horizon 4
55.1
51.0
2018 Fallout 76
48.4
53.0
2018 Hitman 2
39.9
40.0
2018 Just Cause 4
29.4
31.1
2018 Monster Hunter: World
27.5
29.3
2018 Battlefield V
45.6
53.0
2017 Dawn of War III
40.4
50.5
2017 Ghost Recon Wildlands
35.0
38.6
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
37.0
34.0
2017 Destiny 2
60.8
55.0
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
35.1
32.0
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
35.2
32.2
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
52.8
56.0
2017 For Honor
41.0
43.6
2017 Project CARS 2
58.6
62.2
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
91.5
97.1
2016 Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
25.0
30.4
2016 Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
54.1
59.2
2016 Doom
60.7
73.4
2016 F1 2016
53.2
64.6
2016 Total War: Warhammer
41.8
45.3
2016 Battlefield 1
50.6
59.0
2016 Overwatch
55.2
50.4
2016 Dishonored 2
49.3
52.3
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
32.6
31.1
2015 Rocket League
82.1
87.1
2015 Need For Speed
58.6
62.2
2015 Project CARS
58.6
62.2
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
211.2
224.1
2009 League of Legends
117.3
124.5
GTX 1660 Ti vs RX Vega 64 with i7-8700K vs i7-7700K at 1920x1080 and ultra vs ultra settings
GTX 1660 Ti vs RX Vega 64 with i7-8700K vs i7-7700K at 2560x1440 and ultra vs ultra settings
GTX 1660 Ti vs RX Vega 64 with i7-8700K vs i7-7700K at 4K and ultra vs ultra settings

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti / i7-8700K

It is clear that the GTX 1660 Ti is a significantly more capable high-end card that can play AAA titles at 1080p/1440p with 50-60 frames per second. The price/performance ratio is excellent for GTX 1660 Ti against the competition in budget mid-range cards. In terms of memory, the GTX 1660 Ti 's 6144 MB RAM is more than enough for modern games and should not cause any bottlenecks. With regards to max load temperature, the GTX 1660 Ti 's cooling is excellent at keeping it cool and under control. In short the performance is exceptional, there's no question that this is one of the most powerful single GPU out there in 2019 .

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 / i7-7700K

It is worth noting that the RX Vega 64 is a very power hungry card and requires a decent power supply unit. In terms of memory, the RX Vega 64 's 8192 MB RAM is more than enough for modern games and should not cause any bottlenecks. It is important to know that RX Vega 64 's max load temperature is very high and might require custom cooling solutions. In short the performance is exceptional, there's no question that this is one of the most powerful single GPU out there in 2017 .

GTX 1660 Ti vs RX Vega 64 Specifications Comparison

Board Design

GTX 1660 Ti RX Vega 64
Length9 inches 229 mm11 inches 279 mm
Outputs1x DVI1x HDMI1x DisplayPort1x HDMI3x DisplayPort
Power Connectors1x 8-pin2x 8-pin
Slot WidthDual-slotDual-slot
TDP120 W295 W

Clock Speeds

GTX 1660 Ti RX Vega 64
Boost Clock1770 MHz1536 MHz
GPU Clock1500 MHz1200 MHz
Memory Clock1500 MHz 12000 MHz effective945 MHz 1890 MHz effective

Graphics Card

GTX 1660 Ti RX Vega 64
Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
GenerationGeForce 1600Vega (RX Vega)
ProductionReleasedActive
Release DateFeb 22, 2019Aug 7th, 2017

Graphics Features

GTX 1660 Ti RX Vega 64
DirectX12.0 (12_1)12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL1.22
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.26.1
Vulkan1.1.961.1.82

Graphics Processor

GTX 1660 Ti RX Vega 64
ArchitectureTuringGCN 5.0
Die Size284 mm²510 mm²
GPU NameTU116Vega 10
Process Size12 nm14 nm
Transistors6,600 million12,500 million

Memory

GTX 1660 Ti RX Vega 64
Bandwidth288.0 GB/s483.8 GB/s
Memory Bus192 bit2048 bit
Memory Size6144 MB8192 MB
Memory TypeGDDR6HBM2

Render Config

GTX 1660 Ti RX Vega 64
ROPs4864
Shading Units15364096
TMUs96256

Theoretical Performance

GTX 1660 Ti RX Vega 64
FP16 (half) performance10,875 GFLOPS (2:1)25,166 GFLOPS (2:1)
FP32 (float) performance5,437 GFLOPS12,583 GFLOPS
FP64 (double) performance169.9 GFLOPS (1:32)786.4 GFLOPS (1:16)
Pixel Rate84.96 GPixel/s98.30 GPixel/s
Texture Rate169.9 GTexel/s393.2 GTexel/s

Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments