NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060
vs
AMD Radeon R9 Nano

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060
AMD Radeon R9 Nano
GTX 1060 R9 Nano Difference
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 AMD Radeon R9 Nano
Price $ 184.0 $ 649.0 465 (253%)
Year 2016 2015 1 (0%)
Maximum Recorded Temperature 76C 73C 3 (4%)
Max Fan Noise 47.1dB 45.8dB 1.3 (3%)
Recommended Power Supply 470W 525W 55 (12%)
Benchmark CPU Intel Core i7-6700K @ 4.00GHz ($334.99) Intel Core i7-4790K @ 4.00GHz ($306.99)
CPU Impact on FPS +0.0 FPS +0.0 FPS 0 (0%)
CPU Impact on FPS % 0.0% 0.0% 0 (0%)
Benchmark Quality Settings Ultra Quality Settings Ultra Quality Settings
Average 1080p Performance 69.5 FPS 72.9 FPS 3.4 (5%)
Average 1440p Performance 49.9 FPS 55.2 FPS 5.3 (11%)
Average 4K Performance 29.5 FPS 33.6 FPS 4.1 (14%)
Memory 6 GB 4 GB 2 (33%)
1080p Cost Per Frame $ 3.7 $ 8.9 5.2 (141%)
1440p Cost Per Frame $ 5.1 $ 11.8 6.7 (131%)
4K Cost Per Frame $ 8.6 $ 19.3 10.7 (124%)
Overall Combination Score 80/100 62/100 18 (22%)
Our Verdict: Upgrading from GTX 1060 to R9 Nano is not recommended as it is less than 30% of improvement in performance. In general, a reasonable upgrade is between 30% and 50% or more to justify the purchase of new hardware. The price/performance ratio is much better for GTX 1060 .

Game Performance at selected quality settings

Change Quality Settings

1920x1080

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060
AMD Radeon R9 Nano
Year Game Frames Per Second
2019 Apex Legends
63.0
72.0
2019 Anthem
40.6
46.4
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
59.5
68.0
2019 Resident Evil 2
78.8
87.9
2019 Metro Exodus
35.1
39.1
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
72.9
79.0
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
34.0
37.0
2018 Final Fantasy XV
51.3
63.0
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
46.8
50.0
2018 Forza Horizon 4
70.2
63.0
2018 Fallout 76
78.3
68.0
2018 Hitman 2
61.2
53.0
2018 Just Cause 4
53.6
56.5
2018 Monster Hunter: World
57.7
60.9
2018 Battlefield V
68.4
65.0
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
49.5
53.0
2017 Destiny 2
81.9
102.0
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
52.2
53.0
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
70.6
63.7
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
74.2
78.3
2017 For Honor
98.9
104.4
2017 Project CARS 2
70.0
73.9
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
84.9
89.6
2016 Ashes of the Singularity
43.1
55.2
2016 Hitman
60.4
83.8
2016 Rise of the Tomb Raider
74.2
71.2
2016 The Division
53.0
64.6
2016 Overwatch
109.6
98.7
2016 Dishonored 2
51.1
53.9
2015 DiRT Rally
99.3
114.2
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
61.4
62.1
2015 The Witcher 3
52.6
59.2
2015 Total War: Attila
46.8
55.9
2015 Rocket League
288.4
304.5
2015 Need For Speed
79.9
84.4
2015 Project CARS
76.6
80.9
2014 Civilization: Beyond Earth
107.1
113.2
2014 Dragon Age: Inquisition
75.6
79.6
2014 Far Cry 4
70.2
75.0
2014 GRID Autosport
104.4
80.1
2014 Shadow of Mordor
80.1
103.0
2014 The Talos Principle
87.3
113.9
2013 Crysis 3
60.5
70.2
2013 Battlefield 4
85.3
88.8
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
197.8
208.8
2009 League of Legends
370.8
391.5

2560x1440

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060
AMD Radeon R9 Nano
Year Game Frames Per Second
2019 Apex Legends
46.9
53.6
2019 Anthem
32.2
36.8
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
46.2
52.8
2019 Resident Evil 2
53.0
59.2
2019 Metro Exodus
27.3
30.4
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
42.3
47.0
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
25.6
29.0
2018 Final Fantasy XV
36.0
45.0
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
30.6
35.0
2018 Forza Horizon 4
59.4
54.0
2018 Fallout 76
52.2
70.0
2018 Hitman 2
39.6
35.0
2018 Just Cause 4
39.6
41.8
2018 Monster Hunter: World
40.4
42.6
2018 Battlefield V
49.5
51.0
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
36.9
42.0
2017 Destiny 2
70.2
88.0
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
39.6
40.0
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
46.0
41.3
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
53.6
56.5
2017 For Honor
57.7
60.9
2017 Project CARS 2
49.4
52.2
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
76.6
80.9
2016 Ashes of the Singularity
40.1
49.0
2016 Hitman
44.5
64.4
2016 Rise of the Tomb Raider
48.6
50.7
2016 The Division
38.2
48.5
2016 Overwatch
75.6
67.9
2016 Dishonored 2
43.7
46.1
2015 DiRT Rally
68.4
82.3
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
40.6
44.6
2015 The Witcher 3
39.1
45.9
2015 Total War: Attila
30.6
39.8
2015 Rocket League
123.6
130.5
2015 Need For Speed
61.8
65.2
2015 Project CARS
58.5
61.8
2014 Civilization: Beyond Earth
80.1
90.2
2014 Dragon Age: Inquisition
50.4
56.8
2014 Far Cry 4
50.4
68.8
2014 GRID Autosport
79.2
81.3
2014 Shadow of Mordor
55.8
75.0
2014 The Talos Principle
61.2
84.6
2013 Crysis 3
37.8
46.8
2013 Battlefield 4
54.5
60.6
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
164.8
174.0
2009 League of Legends
206.0
217.5

3840x2160

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060
AMD Radeon R9 Nano
Year Game Frames Per Second
2019 Apex Legends
28.0
32.0
2019 Anthem
17.5
20.0
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
24.5
28.0
2019 Resident Evil 2
26.1
29.1
2019 Metro Exodus
17.2
19.1
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
27.0
33.0
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
16.2
20.0
2018 Final Fantasy XV
21.6
26.0
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
16.2
18.0
2018 Forza Horizon 4
39.6
35.0
2018 Fallout 76
28.8
39.0
2018 Hitman 2
23.4
20.0
2018 Just Cause 4
20.6
21.8
2018 Monster Hunter: World
19.4
20.4
2018 Battlefield V
26.1
24.0
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
21.6
27.0
2017 Destiny 2
35.1
44.0
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
22.5
23.0
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
19.8
22.4
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
37.1
39.1
2017 For Honor
28.8
30.4
2017 Project CARS 2
41.2
43.5
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
64.3
67.9
2016 Ashes of the Singularity
26.1
38.0
2016 Hitman
22.5
37.2
2016 Rise of the Tomb Raider
23.4
27.6
2016 The Division
23.4
27.7
2016 Overwatch
39.1
35.0
2016 Dishonored 2
34.6
36.5
2015 DiRT Rally
32.4
46.6
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
31.5
22.1
2015 The Witcher 3
22.5
28.0
2015 Total War: Attila
15.3
35.5
2015 Rocket League
57.7
60.9
2015 Need For Speed
41.2
43.5
2015 Project CARS
41.2
43.5
2014 Civilization: Beyond Earth
45.0
57.7
2014 Dragon Age: Inquisition
26.1
30.8
2014 Far Cry 4
27.0
37.6
2014 GRID Autosport
45.9
54.2
2014 Shadow of Mordor
30.6
42.0
2014 The Talos Principle
34.2
48.4
2013 Crysis 3
27.0
23.3
2013 Battlefield 4
37.8
44.9
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
148.3
156.6
2009 League of Legends
82.4
87.0

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 / Core i7-6700K @ 4.00GHz

At 1440p, GTX 1060 can hit 50-60 fps on pretty much everything at ultra, just without antialiasing, less ambient occlusion and turned down shadows. It is clear that the GTX 1060 is a significantly more capable high-end card that can play AAA titles at 1080p/1440p with 50-60 frames per second. The price/performance ratio is excellent for GTX 1060 against the competition in budget mid-range cards. In terms of memory, the GTX 1060 's 6144 MB RAM is more than enough for modern games and should not cause any bottlenecks.

AMD Radeon R9 Nano / Core i7-4790K @ 4.00GHz

At 1440p, R9 Nano can hit 50-60 fps on pretty much everything at ultra, just without antialiasing, less ambient occlusion and turned down shadows. Deciding whether to invest so much money in a high-end GPU like R9 Nano requires careful thought. With current 4096 MB RAM, the R9 Nano can have very few memory-related bottlenecks in more modern games.

GTX 1060 vs R9 Nano Specifications Comparison

Board Design

GTX 1060 R9 Nano
Board NumberPG410 SKU 30C882
Length9.823 inches 250 mm6 inches 152 mm
Outputs1x DVI1x HDMI3x DisplayPort1x HDMI3x DisplayPort
Power Connectors1x 6-pin1x 8-pin
Slot WidthDual-slotDual-slot
TDP120 W175 W

Clock Speeds

GTX 1060 R9 Nano
GPU Clock1506 MHz1000 MHz
Memory Clock2002 MHz 8008 MHz effective500 MHz 1000 MHz effective

Graphics Card

GTX 1060 R9 Nano
Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
GenerationGeForce 1000Pirate Islands (R9 300)
Launch Price299 USD649 USD
ProductionActiveActive
Release DateMar 8th, 2018Aug 27th, 2015

Graphics Features

GTX 1060 R9 Nano
DirectX12.0 (12_1)12.0 (12_0)
OpenCL1.22
OpenGL4.64.5
Shader Model6.16
Vulkan1.1.821.1.82

Graphics Processor

GTX 1060 R9 Nano
ArchitecturePascalGCN 3.0
Die Size314 mm²596 mm²
GPU NameGP106Fiji
GPU VariantGP106-400-A1Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)
Process Size16 nm28 nm
Transistors7,200 million8,900 million

Memory

GTX 1060 R9 Nano
Bandwidth192.2 GB/s512.0 GB/s
Memory Bus192 bit4096 bit
Memory Size6144 MB4096 MB
Memory TypeGDDR5HBM

Render Config

GTX 1060 R9 Nano
ROPs4864
Shading Units12804096
TMUs80256

Theoretical Performance

GTX 1060 R9 Nano
FP16 (half) performance68.36 GFLOPS (1:64)8,192 GFLOPS (1:1)
FP32 (float) performance4,375 GFLOPS8,192 GFLOPS
FP64 (double) performance136.7 GFLOPS (1:32)512.0 GFLOPS (1:16)
Pixel Rate82.03 GPixel/s64.00 GPixel/s
Texture Rate136.7 GTexel/s256.0 GTexel/s

Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments