NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
vs
AMD Radeon RX 560

GTX 1050 TI RX 560 Difference
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti AMD Radeon RX 560
Price $ 159 $ 104 55 (42%)
Year 2016 2017 1 (0%)
Maximum Recorded Temperature 65C 62C 3 (5%)
Max Fan Noise 45dB 42dB 3.3 (8%)
Recommended Power Supply 425W 425W 0 (0%)
Benchmark CPU Intel Core i7-6700K @ 4.00GHz ($334.99) Intel Core i7-7700K @ 4.20GHz ($354.99)
CPU Impact on FPS +0 FPS +0 FPS 0 (0%)
CPU Impact on FPS % 0% 0% 0 (0%)
Benchmark Quality Settings Ultra Quality Settings Ultra Quality Settings
Average 1080p Performance 41 FPS 35 FPS 6.6 (17%)
Average 1440p Performance 30 FPS 24 FPS 5.7 (21%)
Average 4K Performance 17 FPS 14 FPS 3.1 (21%)
Memory 4 GB 4 GB 0 (0%)
Overall Combination Score 68/100 66/100 2 (3%)

Our Verdict: Upgrading from RX 560 to GTX 1050 TI is not recommended as it is less than 30% of improvement in performance. In general, a reasonable upgrade is between 30% and 50% or more to justify the purchase of new hardware. The price/performance ratio is much better for RX 560 .

Change Quality Settings

Game Performance at selected quality settings

1920x1080

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
AMD Radeon RX 560
Year Game Frames Per Second
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
20
18
2018 Battlefield V
45
43
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
36
36
2018 Fallout 76
43
32
2018 Final Fantasy XV
36
33
2018 Forza Horizon 4
37
29
2018 Hitman 2
34
25
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
30
27
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
35
27
2017 Dawn of War III
54
45
2017 Destiny 2
55
50
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
37
31
2017 Ghost Recon Wildlands
35
30
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
28
23
2016 Ashes of the Singularity
29
24
2016 Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
30
25
2016 Battlefield 1
53
44
2016 Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
30
25
2016 Doom
73
61
2016 F1 2016
49
41
2016 Hitman
52
43
2016 Overwatch
58
46
2016 Rise of the Tomb Raider
45
37
2016 The Division
38
32
2016 Total War: Warhammer
42
35
2015 DiRT Rally
60
50
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
33
27
2015 The Witcher 3
33
28
2013 Battlefield 4
44
37
2013 Crysis 3
38
31

2560x1440

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
AMD Radeon RX 560
Year Game Frames Per Second
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
16
6
2018 Battlefield V
33
26
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
20
22
2018 Fallout 76
38
17
2018 Final Fantasy XV
27
25
2018 Forza Horizon 4
31
25
2018 Hitman 2
22
16
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
19
17
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
25
18
2017 Dawn of War III
34
29
2017 Destiny 2
47
42
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
24
19
2017 Ghost Recon Wildlands
26
22
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
21
18
2016 Ashes of the Singularity
27
23
2016 Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
28
23
2016 Battlefield 1
38
32
2016 Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
20
17
2016 Doom
50
41
2016 F1 2016
39
32
2016 Hitman
37
31
2016 Overwatch
40
32
2016 Rise of the Tomb Raider
31
26
2016 The Division
27
23
2016 Total War: Warhammer
30
25
2015 DiRT Rally
42
35
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
23
19
2015 The Witcher 3
24
20
2013 Battlefield 4
29
24
2013 Crysis 3
23
19

3840x2160

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
AMD Radeon RX 560
Year Game Frames Per Second
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
11
10
2018 Battlefield V
16
14
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
18
16
2018 Fallout 76
21
9
2018 Final Fantasy XV
17
16
2018 Forza Horizon 4
21
16
2018 Hitman 2
13
10
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
11
10
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
13
8
2017 Dawn of War III
17
14
2017 Destiny 2
23
21
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
13
11
2017 Ghost Recon Wildlands
15
12
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
12
10
2016 Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
20
17
2016 Battlefield 1
21
17
2016 Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
10
9
2016 Doom
25
21
2016 F1 2016
22
19
2016 Overwatch
21
16
2016 Total War: Warhammer
16
13
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
11
9

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti / Core i7-6700K

The GTX 1050 TI 's power requirements are reasonable and it is very efficient compared to the competition. With regards to max load temperature, the GTX 1050 TI 's cooling is excellent at keeping it cool and under control. With current 4096 MB RAM, the GTX 1050 TI can have very few memory-related bottlenecks in more modern games. View Current Price List

AMD Radeon RX 560 / Core i7-7700K

The RX 560 is more suitable for budget PC builds and less demanding games. The price/performance ratio is excellent for RX 560 against the competition in budget graphics cards. The RX 560 's power requirements are reasonable and it is very efficient compared to the competition. With regards to max load temperature, the RX 560 's cooling is excellent at keeping it cool and under control. With current 4096 MB RAM, the RX 560 can have very few memory-related bottlenecks in more modern games. View Current Price List

GTX 1050 TI vs RX 560 Specifications Comparison

Board Design

GTX 1050 TI RX 560
Board NumberPG210C994
Length5.7 inches 145 mm6.7 inches 170 mm
Outputs1x DVI1x HDMI1x DisplayPort1x DVI1x HDMI1x DisplayPort
Power ConnectorsNoneNone
Slot WidthDual-slotDual-slot
TDP75 W75 W

Clock Speeds

GTX 1050 TI RX 560
Boost Clock1392 MHz1275 MHz
GPU Clock1291 MHz1175 MHz
Memory Clock1752 MHz 7008 MHz effective1750 MHz 7000 MHz effective

Graphics Card

GTX 1050 TI RX 560
Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
GenerationGeForce 1000Polaris (RX 500)
Launch Price139 USD99 USD
ProductionActiveActive
Release DateOct 25th, 2016Apr 18th, 2017

Graphics Features

GTX 1050 TI RX 560
DirectX12.0 (12_1)12.0 (12_0)
OpenCL1.22
OpenGL4.64.5
Shader Model6.16
Vulkan1.1.821.1.82

Graphics Processor

GTX 1050 TI RX 560
ArchitecturePascalGCN 4.0
Die Size132 mm²123 mm²
GPU NameGP107Polaris 21
GPU VariantGP107-400-A1Polaris 21 XT (215-0908004)
Process Size14 nm14 nm
Transistors3,300 million3,000 million

Memory

GTX 1050 TI RX 560
Bandwidth112.1 GB/s112.0 GB/s
Memory Bus128 bit128 bit
Memory Size4096 MB4096 MB
Memory TypeGDDR5GDDR5

Render Config

GTX 1050 TI RX 560
ROPs3216
Shading Units7681024
TMUs4864

Theoretical Performance

GTX 1050 TI RX 560
FP16 (half) performance33.41 GFLOPS (1:64)2,611 GFLOPS (1:1)
FP32 (float) performance2,138 GFLOPS2,611 GFLOPS
FP64 (double) performance66.82 GFLOPS (1:32)163.2 GFLOPS (1:16)
Pixel Rate44.54 GPixel/s20.40 GPixel/s
Texture Rate66.82 GTexel/s81.60 GTexel/s