AMD Radeon VII
vs
NVIDIA TITAN V

AMD Radeon VII
NVIDIA TITAN V
Radeon VII TITAN V Difference
AMD Radeon VII NVIDIA TITAN V
Price $ 699.0 $ 2,999.0 2300 (329%)
Year 2019 2017 2 (0%)
Maximum Recorded Temperature 86C 84C 2 (2%)
Max Fan Noise 56.3dB 50.5dB 5.8 (10%)
Recommended Power Supply 645W 600W 45 (7%)
Benchmark CPU Intel Core i7-9700K @ 3.60GHz ($409.99) Intel Core i7-7700K @ 4.20GHz ($354.99)
CPU Impact on FPS +0.0 FPS +0.0 FPS 0 (0%)
CPU Impact on FPS % 0.0% 0.0% 0 (0%)
Benchmark Quality Settings Ultra Quality Settings Ultra Quality Settings
Average 1080p Performance 130.8 FPS 141.9 FPS 11.1 (8%)
Average 1440p Performance 98.1 FPS 110.4 FPS 12.3 (13%)
Average 4K Performance 58.3 FPS 69.0 FPS 10.7 (18%)
Memory 16 GB 12 GB 4 (25%)
1080p Cost Per Frame $ 5.3 $ 21.1 15.8 (298%)
1440p Cost Per Frame $ 7.1 $ 27.2 20.1 (283%)
4K Cost Per Frame $ 12.0 $ 43.5 31.5 (262%)
Overall Combination Score 62/100 65/100 3 (5%)
Our Verdict: Upgrading from Radeon VII to TITAN V is not recommended as it is less than 30% of improvement in performance. In general, a reasonable upgrade is between 30% and 50% or more to justify the purchase of new hardware. The price/performance ratio is much better for Radeon VII .

Game Performance at selected quality settings

Change Quality Settings

1920x1080

AMD Radeon VII
NVIDIA TITAN V
Year Game Frames Per Second
2019 Apex Legends
135.0
162.0
2019 Anthem
87.0
104.4
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
127.5
153.0
2019 Resident Evil 2
151.5
181.8
2019 Metro Exodus
67.5
81.0
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
168.8
176.8
2018 F1 2018
162.8
144.0
2018 Far Cry 5
132.5
98.2
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
71.2
71.2
2018 Final Fantasy XV
96.7
123.0
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
112.5
119.7
2018 Forza Horizon 4
113.7
133.1
2018 Fallout 76
168.5
142.3
2018 Hitman 2
131.3
110.7
2018 Just Cause 4
101.1
117.0
2018 Monster Hunter: World
108.9
126.0
2018 Battlefield V
156.3
162.5
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
68.7
105.4
2017 Shadow of War
130.0
124.8
2017 Total War: Warhammer II
96.6
103.8
2017 Wolfenstein II
212.8
233.8
2017 Destiny 2
161.3
200.9
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
91.2
107.2
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
114.6
133.1
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
140.0
162.0
2017 For Honor
186.8
216.0
2017 Project CARS 2
132.3
153.0
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
160.3
185.4
2016 Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
107.1
105.6
2016 Battlefield 1
176.1
144.5
2016 Overwatch
177.6
206.3
2016 Dishonored 2
96.5
111.6
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
104.6
125.7
2015 Rocket League
544.7
630.0
2015 Need For Speed
151.0
174.6
2015 Project CARS
144.8
167.4
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
373.5
432.0
2009 League of Legends
700.3
810.0

2560x1440

AMD Radeon VII
NVIDIA TITAN V
Year Game Frames Per Second
2019 Apex Legends
100.5
120.6
2019 Anthem
69.0
82.8
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
99.0
118.8
2019 Resident Evil 2
102.0
122.4
2019 Metro Exodus
52.5
63.0
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
110.0
122.3
2018 F1 2018
126.4
131.1
2018 Far Cry 5
105.0
96.4
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
53.7
57.2
2018 Final Fantasy XV
69.7
90.6
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
76.2
92.9
2018 Forza Horizon 4
96.2
111.6
2018 Fallout 76
121.3
134.8
2018 Hitman 2
86.2
72.3
2018 Just Cause 4
74.7
86.4
2018 Monster Hunter: World
76.2
88.2
2018 Battlefield V
118.7
126.8
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
66.2
83.0
2017 Shadow of War
88.6
99.5
2017 Total War: Warhammer II
71.6
86.4
2017 Wolfenstein II
147.1
177.9
2017 Destiny 2
137.5
172.3
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
70.0
82.2
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
74.4
86.3
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
101.1
117.0
2017 For Honor
108.9
126.0
2017 Project CARS 2
93.4
108.0
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
144.8
167.4
2016 Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
89.5
92.5
2016 Battlefield 1
134.6
139.1
2016 Overwatch
122.5
142.5
2016 Dishonored 2
82.5
95.4
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
74.2
106.2
2015 Rocket League
233.4
270.0
2015 Need For Speed
116.7
135.0
2015 Project CARS
110.5
127.8
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
311.2
360.0
2009 League of Legends
389.1
450.0

3840x2160

AMD Radeon VII
NVIDIA TITAN V
Year Game Frames Per Second
2019 Apex Legends
60.0
72.0
2019 Anthem
37.5
45.0
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
52.5
63.0
2019 Resident Evil 2
50.2
60.3
2019 Metro Exodus
33.0
39.6
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
47.5
65.2
2018 F1 2018
76.2
87.0
2018 Far Cry 5
56.2
62.5
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
37.5
40.2
2018 Final Fantasy XV
38.9
52.0
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
38.7
52.7
2018 Forza Horizon 4
63.7
74.1
2018 Fallout 76
66.2
74.1
2018 Hitman 2
50.0
42.9
2018 Just Cause 4
38.9
45.0
2018 Monster Hunter: World
36.6
42.3
2018 Battlefield V
66.2
75.0
2017 Ghost Recon Wildlands
48.3
56.2
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
42.5
53.6
2017 Shadow of War
52.6
63.6
2017 Total War: Warhammer II
36.5
49.6
2017 Wolfenstein II
86.7
108.9
2017 Destiny 2
68.7
86.6
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
40.0
46.4
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
40.2
46.9
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
70.0
81.0
2017 For Honor
54.5
63.0
2017 Project CARS 2
77.7
90.0
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
121.4
140.4
2016 Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
38.0
47.2
2016 Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
74.0
84.1
2016 Doom
91.7
121.3
2016 Total War: Warhammer
56.6
75.3
2016 Battlefield 1
73.7
91.2
2016 Overwatch
63.0
73.1
2016 Dishonored 2
65.4
75.6
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
38.9
59.7
2015 Rocket League
108.9
126.0
2015 Need For Speed
77.7
90.0
2015 Project CARS
77.7
90.0
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
280.1
324.0
2009 League of Legends
155.6
180.0
Radeon VII vs TITAN V with i7-9700K vs i7-7700K at 1920x1080 and ultra vs ultra settings
Radeon VII vs TITAN V with i7-9700K vs i7-7700K at 2560x1440 and ultra vs ultra settings
Radeon VII vs TITAN V with i7-9700K vs i7-7700K at 4K and ultra vs ultra settings

AMD Radeon VII / i7-9700K

It is worth noting that the Radeon VII is a very power hungry card and requires a decent power supply unit. In terms of memory, the Radeon VII 's 16384 MB RAM is more than enough for modern games and should not cause any bottlenecks. It is important to know that Radeon VII 's max load temperature is very high and might require custom cooling solutions. Deciding whether to invest so much money in a high-end GPU like Radeon VII requires careful thought. 4K gaming is joyous on this Radeon VII , and with a little tweaking to your AA settings, it'd be hard to imagine a title not capable of 60 fps on average.

NVIDIA TITAN V / i7-7700K

In terms of cost, pricing clearly is a genuine issue here and the price of TITAN V is simply ridiculous. For those on 1080p or even 1440p monitors, the TITAN V is very expensive and there are better value choices in the short term. It is worth noting that the TITAN V is a very power hungry card and requires a decent power supply unit. In terms of memory, the TITAN V 's 12288 MB RAM is more than enough for modern games and should not cause any bottlenecks. 4K gaming is joyous on this TITAN V , and with a little tweaking to your AA settings, it'd be hard to imagine a title not capable of 60 fps on average.

Radeon VII vs TITAN V Specifications Comparison

Board Design

Radeon VII TITAN V
Board Number-PG500 SKU 0
Length12 inches 305 mm10.5 inches 267 mm
Outputs1x HDMI 3x DisplayPort1x HDMI3x DisplayPort
Power Connectors2x 8-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Slot WidthDual-slotDual-slot
TDP295 W250 W

Clock Speeds

Radeon VII TITAN V
Boost Clock1800 MHz1455 MHz
GPU Clock1450 MHz1200 MHz
Memory Clock 1000 MHz 850 MHz 1700 MHz effective

Graphics Card

Radeon VII TITAN V
Bus InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
GenerationVega II GeForce 1000
Launch Price699 USD2,999 USD
ProductionUnreleasedActive
Release DateFeb 7th, 2019Dec 7th, 2017

Graphics Features

Radeon VII TITAN V
DirectX12.0 (12_1)12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL22
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.26.1
Vulkan1.1.861.1.82

Graphics Processor

Radeon VII TITAN V
ArchitectureGCN 5.1Volta
Die Size331 mm²815 mm²
GPU NameVega 20GV100
GPU VariantVega 20 XTGV100-400-A1
Process Size7 nm12 nm
Transistors13,230 million21,100 million

Memory

Radeon VII TITAN V
Bandwidth1,024 GB/s652.8 GB/s
Memory Bus4096 bit3072 bit
Memory Size16384 MB12288 MB
Memory TypeHBM2HBM2

Render Config

Radeon VII TITAN V
ROPs6496
Shading Units38405120
TMUs240320

Theoretical Performance

Radeon VII TITAN V
FP16 (half) performance27,648 GFLOPS (2:1)29,798 GFLOPS (2:1)
FP32 (float) performance13,824 GFLOPS14,899 GFLOPS
FP64 (double) performance6,912 GFLOPS (1:2)7,450 GFLOPS (1:2)
Pixel Rate115.2 GPixel/s139.7 GPixel/s
Texture Rate432.0 GTexel/s465.6 GTexel/s

Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments