AMD Radeon RX 560
vs
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

AMD Radeon RX 560
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
RX 560 GTX 750 Ti Difference
AMD Radeon RX 560 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Price $ 99.0 $ 279.0 180 (182%)
Year 2017 2014 3 (0%)
Maximum Recorded Temperature 62C 65C 3 (5%)
Max Fan Noise 41.7dB 39dB 2.7 (6%)
Recommended Power Supply 425W 410W 15 (4%)
Benchmark CPU Intel Core i7-7700K @ 4.20GHz ($354.99) Intel Core i7-4770K @ 3.50GHz ($284.99)
CPU Impact on FPS +0.0 FPS +0.0 FPS 0 (0%)
CPU Impact on FPS % 0.0% 0.0% 0 (0%)
Benchmark Quality Settings Ultra Quality Settings Ultra Quality Settings
Average 1080p Performance 33.0 FPS 28.7 FPS 4.3 (13%)
Average 1440p Performance 23.4 FPS 18.1 FPS 5.3 (23%)
Average 4K Performance 13.6 FPS 11.2 FPS 2.4 (18%)
Memory 4 GB 2 GB 2 (50%)
1080p Cost Per Frame $ 3.0 $ 5.2 2.2 (73%)
1440p Cost Per Frame $ 4.2 $ 8.2 4 (95%)
4K Cost Per Frame $ 7.3 $ 13.3 6 (82%)
Overall Combination Score 66/100 56/100 10 (15%)
Our Verdict: Upgrading from GTX 750 Ti to RX 560 is not recommended as it is less than 30% of improvement in performance. In general, a reasonable upgrade is between 30% and 50% or more to justify the purchase of new hardware. The price/performance ratio is much better for RX 560 .

Game Performance at selected quality settings

Change Quality Settings

1920x1080

AMD Radeon RX 560
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Year Game Frames Per Second
2019 Apex Legends
24
27.0
16
18.0
2019 Anthem
15
17.4
10
11.6
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
22
25.5
15
17.0
2019 Resident Evil 2
30
34.2
26
29.3
2019 Metro Exodus
13
15.3
11
13.1
2019 World War Z
38
43.0
21
24.1
2018 Just Cause 4
19
22.0
16
18.8
2018 Monster Hunter: World
21
23.7
18
20.3
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
20
23.0
27
30.0
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
27
30.5
23
26.1
2017 For Honor
36
40.7
31
34.8
2017 Project CARS 2
25
28.8
22
24.6
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
31
34.9
26
29.9
2016 Dishonored 2
18
21.0
16
18.0
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
24
27.2
31
35.3
2015 Rocket League
106
118.7
91
101.5
2015 Need For Speed
29
32.9
25
28.1
2015 Project CARS
28
31.5
24
27.0
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
51
57.6
44
49.3
2013 Crysis 3
28
31.4
21
24.0
2013 Battlefield 4
33
36.8
28
31.7
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
73
81.4
62
69.6
2009 League of Legends
137
152.6
117
130.5

2560x1440

AMD Radeon RX 560
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Year Game Frames Per Second
2019 Apex Legends
16
20.1
10
13.4
2019 Anthem
11
13.8
7
9.2
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
15
19.8
10
13.2
2019 Resident Evil 2
18
23.1
15
19.7
2019 Metro Exodus
9
11.9
8
10.2
2019 World War Z
25
31.4
14
17.6
2018 Just Cause 4
13
16.3
11
13.9
2018 Monster Hunter: World
13
16.6
11
14.2
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
14
17.5
18
23.0
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
17
22.0
15
18.8
2017 For Honor
18
23.7
16
20.3
2017 Project CARS 2
16
20.3
13
17.4
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
25
31.5
21
27.0
2016 Dishonored 2
14
18.0
12
15.4
2015 Rocket League
40
50.8
34
43.5
2015 Need For Speed
20
25.4
17
21.8
2015 Project CARS
19
24.1
16
20.6
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
29
37.3
25
31.9
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
54
67.8
46
58.0
2009 League of Legends
67
84.8
58
72.5

3840x2160

AMD Radeon RX 560
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Year Game Frames Per Second
2019 Apex Legends
8
12.0
5
8.0
2019 Anthem
5
7.5
3
5.0
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
7
10.5
4
7.0
2019 Resident Evil 2
7
11.4
6
9.7
2019 Metro Exodus
5
7.5
4
6.4
2019 World War Z
12
18.1
7
10.1
2018 Just Cause 4
5
8.5
5
7.2
2018 Monster Hunter: World
5
8.0
4
6.8
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
7
10.0
9
13.0
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
10
15.3
9
13.1
2017 For Honor
8
11.9
7
10.2
2017 Project CARS 2
11
17.0
10
14.5
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
18
26.4
15
22.6
2016 Dishonored 2
9
14.2
8
12.2
2015 Rocket League
16
23.7
14
20.3
2015 Need For Speed
11
17.0
10
14.5
2015 Project CARS
11
17.0
10
14.5
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
12
17.3
10
14.8
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
42
61.0
36
52.2
2009 League of Legends
23
33.9
20
29.0
RX 560 vs GTX 750 Ti with i7-7700K vs i7-4770K at 1080p and ultra vs ultra settings
RX 560 vs GTX 750 Ti with i7-7700K vs i7-4770K at 1440p and ultra vs ultra settings
RX 560 vs GTX 750 Ti with i7-7700K vs i7-4770K at 4K and ultra vs ultra settings

AMD Radeon RX 560 / i7-7700K

The RX 560 is more suitable for budget PC builds and less demanding games. The price/performance ratio is excellent for RX 560 against the competition in budget graphics cards. The RX 560 's power requirements are reasonable and it is very efficient compared to the competition. With regards to max load temperature, the RX 560 's cooling is excellent at keeping it cool and under control. With current 4096 MB RAM, the RX 560 can have very few memory-related bottlenecks in more modern games.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti / i7-4770K

The GTX 750 Ti is more suitable for budget PC builds and less demanding games. With current 2048 MB RAM, the GTX 750 Ti can have serious memory-related bottlenecks in more modern games. The GTX 750 Ti 's power requirements are reasonable and it is very efficient compared to the competition. With regards to max load temperature, the GTX 750 Ti 's cooling is excellent at keeping it cool and under control. This combination between GTX 750 Ti and Intel Core i7-4770K @ 3.50GHz has less than 8% bottleneck in many games and is perfect match to avoid FPS loss. This combination between GTX 750 Ti and Intel Core i7-4770K @ 3.50GHz is a perfect match to avoid FPS loss. With current 2048 MB RAM, the GTX 750 Ti can have very few memory-related bottlenecks in more modern games.

RX 560 vs GTX 750 Ti Specifications Comparison

Board Design

RX 560 GTX 750 Ti
Board NumberC994P2010 SKU 50
Length6.7 inches 170 mm5.71 inches 145 mm
Outputs1x DVI1x HDMI1x DisplayPort2x DVI1x mini-HDMI
Power ConnectorsNoneNone
Slot WidthDual-slotSingle-slot
TDP75 W60 W

Clock Speeds

RX 560 GTX 750 Ti
Boost Clock1275 MHz1085 MHz
GPU Clock1175 MHz1020 MHz
Memory Clock1750 MHz 7000 MHz effective1350 MHz 5400 MHz effective

Graphics Card

RX 560 GTX 750 Ti
Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
GenerationPolaris (RX 500)GeForce 700
Launch Price99 USD149 USD
ProductionActiveEnd-of-life
Release DateApr 18th, 2017Feb 18th, 2014

Graphics Features

RX 560 GTX 750 Ti
DirectX12.0 (12_0)12.0 (11_0)
OpenCL21.2
OpenGL4.54.6
Shader Model65.1
Vulkan1.1.821.1.82

Graphics Processor

RX 560 GTX 750 Ti
ArchitectureGCN 4.0Maxwell
Die Size123 mm²148 mm²
GPU NamePolaris 21GM107
GPU VariantPolaris 21 XT (215-0908004)GM107-400-A2
Process Size14 nm28 nm
Transistors3,000 million1,870 million

Memory

RX 560 GTX 750 Ti
Bandwidth112.0 GB/s86.40 GB/s
Memory Bus128 bit128 bit
Memory Size4096 MB2048 MB
Memory TypeGDDR5GDDR5

Render Config

RX 560 GTX 750 Ti
ROPs1616
Shading Units1024640
TMUs6440

Theoretical Performance

RX 560 GTX 750 Ti
FP32 (float) performance2,611 GFLOPS1,389 GFLOPS
FP64 (double) performance163.2 GFLOPS (1:16)43.40 GFLOPS (1:32)
Pixel Rate20.40 GPixel/s17.36 GPixel/s
Texture Rate81.60 GTexel/s43.40 GTexel/s

Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments
O
ouncesubpanel 6 months ago
I try to choose between 3 graphics cards:
GTX 1050 2GB
RX560 2GB
GTX 750Ti 4GB

I want to play in games (BF1, GTA5, Witcher 3 and etc) on high quality settings(not ultra and without MSAA) in 1280x1024 resolution. And how do you think, 750ti 4GB will better because of 4GB Vram, or what ? What must I buy ?

The price is about the same.
0 0
B
bogeycycle 6 months ago
The GTX 750Ti will never win here. The VRAM doesn't actually mean much, it''s just the memory size of what the GPU can handle. The 750Ti wont even handle much anyway. I'd highly suggest going for the GTX 1050, as it wins with the RX 560 in terms of Clock Speed, Pixel Rate, Render Output Processors and wins in most benchmarks with the RX. Additionally, it has even higher OC capabilities than the RX 560. But if you're going for 1024p gaming, they will come out close anyway The only thing that will change is with DX 12, where you should get the RX 560
0 0