AMD Radeon RX 560
vs
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

RX 560 GTX 1050 TI Difference
AMD Radeon RX 560 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
Price $ 104 $ 159 55 (42%)
Year 2017 2016 1 (0%)
Maximum Recorded Temperature 62C 65C 3 (5%)
Max Fan Noise 42dB 45dB 3.3 (8%)
Recommended Power Supply 425W 425W 0 (0%)
Benchmark CPU Intel Core i7-7700K @ 4.20GHz ($354.99) Intel Core i7-6700K @ 4.00GHz ($334.99)
CPU Impact on FPS +0 FPS +0 FPS 0 (0%)
CPU Impact on FPS % 0% 0% 0 (0%)
Benchmark Quality Settings Ultra Quality Settings Ultra Quality Settings
Average 1080p Performance 35 FPS 41 FPS 6.6 (17%)
Average 1440p Performance 24 FPS 30 FPS 5.7 (21%)
Average 4K Performance 14 FPS 17 FPS 3.1 (21%)
Memory 4 GB 4 GB 0 (0%)
Overall Combination Score 66/100 68/100 2 (3%)

Our Verdict: Upgrading from RX 560 to GTX 1050 TI is not recommended as it is less than 30% of improvement in performance. In general, a reasonable upgrade is between 30% and 50% or more to justify the purchase of new hardware. The price/performance ratio is much better for RX 560 .

Change Quality Settings

Game Performance at selected quality settings

1920x1080

AMD Radeon RX 560
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
Year Game Frames Per Second
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
18
20
2018 Battlefield V
43
45
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
36
36
2018 Fallout 76
32
43
2018 Final Fantasy XV
33
36
2018 Forza Horizon 4
29
37
2018 Hitman 2
25
34
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
27
30
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
27
35
2017 Dawn of War III
45
54
2017 Destiny 2
50
55
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
31
37
2017 Ghost Recon Wildlands
30
35
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
23
28
2016 Ashes of the Singularity
24
29
2016 Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
25
30
2016 Battlefield 1
44
53
2016 Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
25
30
2016 Doom
61
73
2016 F1 2016
41
49
2016 Hitman
43
52
2016 Overwatch
46
58
2016 Rise of the Tomb Raider
37
45
2016 The Division
32
38
2016 Total War: Warhammer
35
42
2015 DiRT Rally
50
60
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
27
33
2015 The Witcher 3
28
33
2013 Battlefield 4
37
44
2013 Crysis 3
31
38

2560x1440

AMD Radeon RX 560
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
Year Game Frames Per Second
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
6
16
2018 Battlefield V
26
33
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
22
20
2018 Fallout 76
17
38
2018 Final Fantasy XV
25
27
2018 Forza Horizon 4
25
31
2018 Hitman 2
16
22
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
17
19
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
18
25
2017 Dawn of War III
29
34
2017 Destiny 2
42
47
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
19
24
2017 Ghost Recon Wildlands
22
26
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
18
21
2016 Ashes of the Singularity
23
27
2016 Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
23
28
2016 Battlefield 1
32
38
2016 Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
17
20
2016 Doom
41
50
2016 F1 2016
32
39
2016 Hitman
31
37
2016 Overwatch
32
40
2016 Rise of the Tomb Raider
26
31
2016 The Division
23
27
2016 Total War: Warhammer
25
30
2015 DiRT Rally
35
42
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
19
23
2015 The Witcher 3
20
24
2013 Battlefield 4
24
29
2013 Crysis 3
19
23

3840x2160

AMD Radeon RX 560
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
Year Game Frames Per Second
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
10
11
2018 Battlefield V
14
16
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
16
18
2018 Fallout 76
9
21
2018 Final Fantasy XV
16
17
2018 Forza Horizon 4
16
21
2018 Hitman 2
10
13
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
10
11
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
8
13
2017 Dawn of War III
14
17
2017 Destiny 2
21
23
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
11
13
2017 Ghost Recon Wildlands
12
15
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
10
12
2016 Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
17
20
2016 Battlefield 1
17
21
2016 Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
9
10
2016 Doom
21
25
2016 F1 2016
19
22
2016 Overwatch
16
21
2016 Total War: Warhammer
13
16
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
9
11

AMD Radeon RX 560 / Core i7-7700K

The RX 560 is more suitable for budget PC builds and less demanding games. The price/performance ratio is excellent for RX 560 against the competition in budget graphics cards. The RX 560 's power requirements are reasonable and it is very efficient compared to the competition. With regards to max load temperature, the RX 560 's cooling is excellent at keeping it cool and under control. With current 4096 MB RAM, the RX 560 can have very few memory-related bottlenecks in more modern games. View Current Price List

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti / Core i7-6700K

The GTX 1050 TI 's power requirements are reasonable and it is very efficient compared to the competition. With regards to max load temperature, the GTX 1050 TI 's cooling is excellent at keeping it cool and under control. With current 4096 MB RAM, the GTX 1050 TI can have very few memory-related bottlenecks in more modern games. View Current Price List

RX 560 vs GTX 1050 TI Specifications Comparison

Board Design

RX 560 GTX 1050 TI
Board NumberC994PG210
Length6.7 inches 170 mm5.7 inches 145 mm
Outputs1x DVI1x HDMI1x DisplayPort1x DVI1x HDMI1x DisplayPort
Power ConnectorsNoneNone
Slot WidthDual-slotDual-slot
TDP75 W75 W

Clock Speeds

RX 560 GTX 1050 TI
Boost Clock1275 MHz1392 MHz
GPU Clock1175 MHz1291 MHz
Memory Clock1750 MHz 7000 MHz effective1752 MHz 7008 MHz effective

Graphics Card

RX 560 GTX 1050 TI
Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
GenerationPolaris (RX 500)GeForce 1000
Launch Price99 USD139 USD
ProductionActiveActive
Release DateApr 18th, 2017Oct 25th, 2016

Graphics Features

RX 560 GTX 1050 TI
DirectX12.0 (12_0)12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL21.2
OpenGL4.54.6
Shader Model66.1
Vulkan1.1.821.1.82

Graphics Processor

RX 560 GTX 1050 TI
ArchitectureGCN 4.0Pascal
Die Size123 mm²132 mm²
GPU NamePolaris 21GP107
GPU VariantPolaris 21 XT (215-0908004)GP107-400-A1
Process Size14 nm14 nm
Transistors3,000 million3,300 million

Memory

RX 560 GTX 1050 TI
Bandwidth112.0 GB/s112.1 GB/s
Memory Bus128 bit128 bit
Memory Size4096 MB4096 MB
Memory TypeGDDR5GDDR5

Render Config

RX 560 GTX 1050 TI
ROPs1632
Shading Units1024768
TMUs6448

Theoretical Performance

RX 560 GTX 1050 TI
FP16 (half) performance2,611 GFLOPS (1:1)33.41 GFLOPS (1:64)
FP32 (float) performance2,611 GFLOPS2,138 GFLOPS
FP64 (double) performance163.2 GFLOPS (1:16)66.82 GFLOPS (1:32)
Pixel Rate20.40 GPixel/s44.54 GPixel/s
Texture Rate81.60 GTexel/s66.82 GTexel/s