AMD Radeon RX 470
vs
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti

AMD Radeon RX 470
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti
RX 470 GTX 780 Ti Difference
AMD Radeon RX 470 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti
Price $ 199.0 $ 699.0 500 (251%)
Year 2016 2013 3 (0%)
Maximum Recorded Temperature 75C 84C 9 (12%)
Max Fan Noise 49.4dB 52.3dB 2.9 (6%)
Recommended Power Supply 470W 600W 130 (28%)
Benchmark CPU Intel Core i7-6700K @ 4.00GHz ($334.99) Intel Core i7-3770K @ 3.50GHz ($248.98)
CPU Impact on FPS +0.0 FPS +0.0 FPS 0 (0%)
CPU Impact on FPS % 0.0% 0.0% 0 (0%)
Benchmark Quality Settings Ultra Quality Settings Ultra Quality Settings
Average 1080p Performance 54.3 FPS 62.3 FPS 8 (15%)
Average 1440p Performance 39.9 FPS 42.6 FPS 2.7 (7%)
Average 4K Performance 23.7 FPS 27.7 FPS 4 (17%)
Memory 4 GB 6 GB 2 (50%)
1080p Cost Per Frame $ 3.3 $ 11.2 7.9 (239%)
1440p Cost Per Frame $ 4.5 $ 16.4 11.9 (264%)
4K Cost Per Frame $ 7.6 $ 25.2 17.6 (232%)
Overall Combination Score 72/100 38/100 34 (47%)
Our Verdict: For the most part, the RX 470 is still capable of playing modern games, but you would have to reduce settings to sustain those higher framerates. If keeping graphics quality settings closer to ultra or high is important, the is an option for upgrade. Upgrading from RX 470 to GTX 780 Ti is not recommended as it is less than 30% of improvement in performance. In general, a reasonable upgrade is between 30% and 50% or more to justify the purchase of new hardware. The price/performance ratio is much better for RX 470 .

Game Performance at selected quality settings

Change Quality Settings

1920x1080

AMD Radeon RX 470
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti
Year Game Frames Per Second
2019 Apex Legends
54.0
63.0
2019 Anthem
34.8
40.6
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
51.0
59.5
2019 Resident Evil 2
65.4
74.0
2019 Metro Exodus
29.2
33.0
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
69.0
45.0
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
26.0
28.5
2018 Final Fantasy XV
54.0
50.4
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
48.0
37.9
2018 Forza Horizon 4
45.0
42.6
2018 Fallout 76
52.0
49.3
2018 Hitman 2
41.0
38.1
2018 Just Cause 4
42.1
47.6
2018 Monster Hunter: World
45.4
51.3
2018 Battlefield V
62.0
50.4
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
40.0
40.5
2017 Destiny 2
87.0
78.5
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
41.0
37.0
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
45.5
43.1
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
58.3
66.0
2017 For Honor
77.8
88.0
2017 Project CARS 2
55.1
62.3
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
66.7
75.5
2016 Overwatch
70.7
66.6
2016 Dishonored 2
40.2
45.4
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
47.7
44.1
2015 Rocket League
226.8
256.6
2015 Need For Speed
62.9
71.1
2015 Project CARS
60.3
68.2
2013 Crysis 3
54.2
53.4
2013 Battlefield 4
63.5
66.0
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
155.5
175.9
2009 League of Legends
291.6
329.9

2560x1440

AMD Radeon RX 470
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti
Year Game Frames Per Second
2019 Apex Legends
40.2
46.9
2019 Anthem
27.6
32.2
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
39.6
46.2
2019 Resident Evil 2
44.1
49.8
2019 Metro Exodus
22.7
25.7
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
47.0
25.0
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
24.0
22.4
2018 Final Fantasy XV
39.0
37.0
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
31.0
25.0
2018 Forza Horizon 4
38.0
35.8
2018 Fallout 76
45.0
39.2
2018 Hitman 2
27.0
24.6
2018 Just Cause 4
31.1
35.2
2018 Monster Hunter: World
31.8
35.9
2018 Battlefield V
43.0
37.0
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
28.0
20.2
2017 Destiny 2
74.0
67.3
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
31.0
29.1
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
29.4
28.2
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
42.1
47.6
2017 For Honor
45.4
51.3
2017 Project CARS 2
38.9
44.0
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
60.3
68.2
2016 Overwatch
49.0
46.3
2016 Dishonored 2
34.3
38.8
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
32.6
24.9
2015 Rocket League
97.2
110.0
2015 Need For Speed
48.6
55.0
2015 Project CARS
46.0
52.0
2013 Crysis 3
32.9
32.7
2013 Battlefield 4
41.2
42.7
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
129.6
146.6
2009 League of Legends
162.0
183.3

3840x2160

AMD Radeon RX 470
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti
Year Game Frames Per Second
2019 Apex Legends
24.0
28.0
2019 Anthem
15.0
17.5
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
21.0
24.5
2019 Resident Evil 2
21.7
24.6
2019 Metro Exodus
14.3
16.1
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
28.0
25.9
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
17.0
15.5
2018 Final Fantasy XV
23.0
22.4
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
17.0
12.9
2018 Forza Horizon 4
25.0
23.5
2018 Fallout 76
25.0
21.3
2018 Hitman 2
16.0
14.6
2018 Just Cause 4
16.2
18.3
2018 Monster Hunter: World
15.2
17.2
2018 Battlefield V
25.0
22.4
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
13.0
13.4
2017 Destiny 2
37.0
33.6
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
18.0
16.8
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
16.1
14.9
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
29.2
33.0
2017 For Honor
22.7
25.7
2017 Project CARS 2
32.4
36.6
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
50.5
57.2
2016 Overwatch
25.2
23.5
2016 Dishonored 2
27.2
30.8
2015 Rocket League
45.4
51.3
2015 Need For Speed
32.4
36.6
2015 Project CARS
32.4
36.6
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
116.6
131.9
2009 League of Legends
64.8
73.3
RX 470 vs GTX 780 Ti with i7-6700K vs i7-3770K at 1920x1080 and ultra vs ultra settings
RX 470 vs GTX 780 Ti with i7-6700K vs i7-3770K at 2560x1440 and ultra vs ultra settings
RX 470 vs GTX 780 Ti with i7-6700K vs i7-3770K at 4K and ultra vs ultra settings

AMD Radeon RX 470 / i7-6700K

For the most part, the RX 470 is still capable of playing modern games, but you would have to reduce settings to sustain those higher framerates. If keeping graphics quality settings closer to ultra or high is important, there are a few options for upgrades. With current 4096 MB RAM, the RX 470 can have very few memory-related bottlenecks in more modern games.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti / i7-3770K

It is worth noting that the GTX 780 Ti is a very power hungry card and requires a decent power supply unit. In terms of memory, the GTX 780 Ti 's 6144 MB RAM is more than enough for modern games and should not cause any bottlenecks. This combination between GTX 780 Ti and Intel Core i7-3770K @ 3.50GHz has less than 8% bottleneck in many games and is perfect match to avoid FPS loss. Deciding whether to invest so much money in a high-end GPU like GTX 780 Ti requires careful thought. This combination between GTX 780 Ti and Intel Core i7-3770K @ 3.50GHz is a perfect match to avoid FPS loss.

RX 470 vs GTX 780 Ti Specifications Comparison

Board Design

RX 470 GTX 780 Ti
Board NumberC940, D000-03, D009-07P2083 SKU 30
Length9.5 inches 241 mm10.5 inches 267 mm
Outputs1x HDMI3x DisplayPort2x DVI1x HDMI1x DisplayPort
Power Connectors1x 6-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Slot WidthDual-slotDual-slot
TDP120 W250 W

Clock Speeds

RX 470 GTX 780 Ti
Boost Clock1206 MHz928 MHz
GPU Clock926 MHz875 MHz
Memory Clock1650 MHz 6600 MHz effective1753 MHz 7012 MHz effective

Graphics Card

RX 470 GTX 780 Ti
Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
GenerationArctic Islands (RX 400)GeForce 700
Launch Price179 USD699 USD
ProductionActiveEnd-of-life
Release DateAug 4th, 2016Never Released

Graphics Features

RX 470 GTX 780 Ti
DirectX12.0 (12_0)12.0 (11_1)
OpenCL21.2
OpenGL4.54.6
Shader Model65.1
Vulkan1.1.821.1.82

Graphics Processor

RX 470 GTX 780 Ti
ArchitectureGCN 4.0Kepler
Die Size244 mm²561 mm²
GPU NameEllesmereGK110B
GPU VariantPolaris 10 PRO (215-0876204)GK110-425-B1
Process Size14 nm28 nm
Transistors5,700 million7,080 million

Memory

RX 470 GTX 780 Ti
Bandwidth211.2 GB/s336.6 GB/s
Memory Bus256 bit384 bit
Memory Size4096 MB6144 MB
Memory TypeGDDR5GDDR5

Render Config

RX 470 GTX 780 Ti
ROPs3248
Shading Units20482880
TMUs128240

Theoretical Performance

RX 470 GTX 780 Ti
FP32 (float) performance4,940 GFLOPS5,345 GFLOPS
FP64 (double) performance308.7 GFLOPS (1:16)222.7 GFLOPS (1:24)
Pixel Rate38.59 GPixel/s55.68 GPixel/s
Texture Rate154.4 GTexel/s222.7 GTexel/s

Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments