AMD Radeon RX 470
vs
AMD Radeon R9 290

RX 470 R9 290 Difference
AMD Radeon RX 470 AMD Radeon R9 290
Price $ 280 $ 310 30 (10%)
Year 2016 2013 3 (0%)
Maximum Recorded Temperature 75C 94C 19 (22%)
Max Fan Noise 49dB 60dB 10.7 (20%)
Recommended Power Supply 470W 625W 155 (28%)
Benchmark CPU Intel Core i7-6700K @ 4.00GHz ($334.99) Intel Core i7-3770K @ 3.50GHz ($248.98)
CPU Impact on FPS +0 FPS +0 FPS 0 (0%)
CPU Impact on FPS % 0% 0% 0 (0%)
Benchmark Quality Settings Ultra Quality Settings Ultra Quality Settings
Average 1080p Performance 55 FPS 66 FPS 10.9 (18%)
Average 1440p Performance 40 FPS 47 FPS 7.1 (16%)
Average 4K Performance 22 FPS 34 FPS 11.9 (43%)
Memory 4 GB 4 GB 0 (0%)
Overall Combination Score 69/100 64/100 5 (8%)

Our Verdict: Upgrading from RX 470 to R9 290 is not recommended as it is less than 30% of improvement in performance. In general, a reasonable upgrade is between 30% and 50% or more to justify the purchase of new hardware.

Change Quality Settings

Game Performance at selected quality settings

1920x1080

AMD Radeon RX 470
AMD Radeon R9 290
Year Game Frames Per Second
2018
52
61
2018
45
53
2018
41
48
2017
46
53
2017
41
43
2016
42
45
2016
74
67
2016
71
83
2016
63
59
2016
55
48
2015
86
99
2015
48
51
2015
48
47
2013
64
74
2013
54
57

2560x1440

AMD Radeon RX 470
AMD Radeon R9 290
Year Game Frames Per Second
2018
38
45
2018
27
31
2017
29
34
2017
31
33
2016
39
41
2016
53
51
2016
49
57
2016
43
42
2016
40
37
2015
60
70
2015
33
36
2015
35
36
2013
41
50
2013
33
37

3840x2160

AMD Radeon RX 470
AMD Radeon R9 290
Year Game Frames Per Second
2018
25
30
2018
16
18
2017
16
19
2017
18
19
2016
25
29

AMD Radeon RX 470 / Core i7-6700K

For the most part, the RX 470 is still capable of playing modern games, but you would have to reduce settings to sustain those higher framerates. If keeping graphics quality settings closer to ultra or high is important, there are a few options for upgrades. It appears that the RX 470 is a more capable mid-range card that can play AAA titles at 1080p with 60 frames per second. The price/performance ratio is excellent for RX 470 against the competition in budget mid-range cards. With current 4096 MB RAM, the RX 470 can have very few memory-related bottlenecks in more modern games. amzn_assoc_placement = "adunit0"; amzn_assoc_search_bar = "false"; amzn_assoc_tracking_id = "alexdwilsons-20"; amzn_assoc_ad_mode = "search"; amzn_assoc_ad_type = "smart"; amzn_assoc_marketplace = "amazon"; amzn_assoc_region = "US"; amzn_assoc_title = "Best AMD Radeon RX 470 Offers"; amzn_assoc_default_search_phrase = "AMD Radeon RX 470"; amzn_assoc_default_category = "Electronics"; amzn_assoc_linkid = "315127406b2046a2d339d6502b652881"; amzn_assoc_design = "in_content"; amzn_assoc_default_browse_node = "172282";

AMD Radeon R9 290 / Core i7-3770K

At 1440p, R9 290 can hit 50-60 fps on pretty much everything at ultra, just without antialiasing, less ambient occlusion and turned down shadows. It is clear that the R9 290 is a significantly more capable high-end card that can play AAA titles at 1080p/1440p with 50-60 frames per second. It is worth noting that the R9 290 is a very power hungry card and requires a decent power supply unit. It is important to know that R9 290 's max load temperature is very high and might require custom cooling solutions. This combination between R9 290 and Intel Core i7-3770K @ 3.50GHz has less than 8% bottleneck in many games and is perfect match to avoid FPS loss. This combination between R9 290 and Intel Core i7-3770K @ 3.50GHz is a perfect match to avoid FPS loss. With current 4096 MB RAM, the R9 290 can have very few memory-related bottlenecks in more modern games.
amzn_assoc_placement = "adunit0"; amzn_assoc_search_bar = "false"; amzn_assoc_tracking_id = "alexdwilsons-20"; amzn_assoc_ad_mode = "search"; amzn_assoc_ad_type = "smart"; amzn_assoc_marketplace = "amazon"; amzn_assoc_region = "US"; amzn_assoc_title = "Best AMD Radeon R9 290 Offers"; amzn_assoc_default_search_phrase = "AMD Radeon R9 290"; amzn_assoc_default_category = "Electronics"; amzn_assoc_linkid = "315127406b2046a2d339d6502b652881"; amzn_assoc_design = "in_content"; amzn_assoc_default_browse_node = "172282";

RX 470 vs R9 290 Specifications Comparison

Board Design

RX 470 R9 290
Board NumberC940, D000-03, D009-07C671
Length9.5 inches 241 mm10.83 inches 275 mm
Outputs1x HDMI3x DisplayPort2x DVI1x HDMI1x DisplayPort
Power Connectors1x 6-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Slot WidthDual-slotDual-slot
TDP120 W275 W

Clock Speeds

RX 470 R9 290
GPU Clock926 MHz947 MHz
Memory Clock1650 MHz 6600 MHz effective1250 MHz 5000 MHz effective

Graphics Card

RX 470 R9 290
Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
GenerationArctic Islands (RX 400)Volcanic Islands (R9 200)
Launch Price179 USD399 USD
ProductionActiveEnd-of-life
Release DateAug 4th, 2016Nov 5th, 2013

Graphics Features

RX 470 R9 290
DirectX12.0 (12_0)12.0 (12_0)
OpenCL22
OpenGL4.54.6
Shader Model66
Vulkan1.1.821.1.82

Graphics Processor

RX 470 R9 290
ArchitectureGCN 4.0GCN 2.0
Die Size244 mm²438 mm²
GPU NameEllesmereHawaii
GPU VariantPolaris 10 PRO (215-0876204)Hawaii PRO (215-0852020)
Process Size14 nm28 nm
Transistors5,700 million6,200 million

Memory

RX 470 R9 290
Bandwidth211.2 GB/s320.0 GB/s
Memory Bus256 bit512 bit
Memory Size4096 MB4096 MB
Memory TypeGDDR5GDDR5

Render Config

RX 470 R9 290
Compute Units3240
ROPs3264
Shading Units20482560
TMUs128160

Theoretical Performance

RX 470 R9 290
FP32 (float) performance4,940 GFLOPS4,849 GFLOPS
FP64 (double) performance308.7 GFLOPS (1:16)606.1 GFLOPS (1:8)
Pixel Rate38.59 GPixel/s60.61 GPixel/s
Texture Rate154.4 GTexel/s151.5 GTexel/s