Compare RX 590 vs TITAN Xp vs R9 Nano Benchmarks

AMD Radeon RX 590
NVIDIA TITAN Xp
AMD Radeon R9 Nano
AMD Radeon RX 590NVIDIA TITAN XpAMD Radeon R9 Nano
Price $ 279$ 1,199$ 485
Year 201820172015
Maximum Recorded Temperature 82C82C73C
Max Fan Noise 43dB50dB46dB
Recommended Power Supply 575W600W525W
Benchmark CPU Intel Core i7-8700K @ 3.70GHz ($369.89)Intel Core i7-7700K @ 4.20GHz ($354.99)Intel Core i7-4790K @ 4.00GHz ($306.99)
CPU Impact on FPS +0 FPS+0 FPS+0 FPS
CPU Impact on FPS % 0%0%0%
Benchmark Quality Settings Ultra Quality SettingsUltra Quality SettingsUltra Quality Settings
Average 1080p Performance 87 FPS91 FPS74 FPS
Average 1440p Performance 62 FPS70 FPS56 FPS
Average 4K Performance 36 FPS44 FPS35 FPS
Memory 8 GB12 GB4 GB
Overall Combination Score 82/10056/10072/100

Game Performance at selected quality settings

Change Quality Settings

1920x1080

AMD Radeon RX 590
NVIDIA TITAN Xp
AMD Radeon R9 Nano
Year Game Frames Per Second
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
112
146
79
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
44
64
37
2018 Final Fantasy XV
68
99
63
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
72
99
50
2018 Forza Horizon 4
76
116
63
2018 Fallout 76
101
129
68
2018 Hitman 2
79
101
53
2018 Just Cause 4
60
23
57
2018 Monster Hunter: World
64
25
61
2018 Battlefield V
104
123
65
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
63
86
53
2017 Destiny 2
110
166
102
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
56
94
53
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
76
116
64
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
82
32
78
2017 For Honor
110
42
104
2017 Project CARS 2
78
30
74
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
94
36
90
2016 Ashes of the Singularity
72
55
2016 Hitman
105
84
2016 Rise of the Tomb Raider
103
71
2016 The Division
81
65
2016 Overwatch
118
179
99
2016 Dishonored 2
57
22
54
2015 DiRT Rally
122
114
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
66
110
62
2015 The Witcher 3
88
59
2015 Total War: Attila
56
2015 Rocket League
320
123
305
2015 Need For Speed
89
34
84
2015 Project CARS
85
33
81
2014 Civilization: Beyond Earth
113
2014 Dragon Age: Inquisition
80
2014 Far Cry 4
75
2014 GRID Autosport
80
2014 Shadow of Mordor
103
2014 The Talos Principle
114
2013 Crysis 3
100
70
2013 Battlefield 4
90
89
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
220
84
209
2009 League of Legends
412
158
392

2560x1440

AMD Radeon RX 590
NVIDIA TITAN Xp
AMD Radeon R9 Nano
Year Game Frames Per Second
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
71
101
47
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
37
47
29
2018 Final Fantasy XV
49
71
45
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
46
70
35
2018 Forza Horizon 4
63
97
54
2018 Fallout 76
71
109
70
2018 Hitman 2
51
66
35
2018 Just Cause 4
44
17
42
2018 Monster Hunter: World
45
17
43
2018 Battlefield V
78
95
51
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
45
69
42
2017 Destiny 2
94
143
88
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
43
71
40
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
49
75
41
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
60
23
57
2017 For Honor
64
25
61
2017 Project CARS 2
55
21
52
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
85
33
81
2016 Ashes of the Singularity
55
49
2016 Hitman
75
64
2016 Rise of the Tomb Raider
62
51
2016 The Division
56
49
2016 Overwatch
81
124
68
2016 Dishonored 2
49
19
46
2015 DiRT Rally
85
82
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
46
83
45
2015 The Witcher 3
50
46
2015 Total War: Attila
40
2015 Rocket League
137
53
131
2015 Need For Speed
69
26
65
2015 Project CARS
65
25
62
2014 Civilization: Beyond Earth
90
2014 Dragon Age: Inquisition
57
2014 Far Cry 4
69
2014 GRID Autosport
81
2014 Shadow of Mordor
75
2014 The Talos Principle
85
2013 Crysis 3
46
47
2013 Battlefield 4
59
61
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
183
70
174
2009 League of Legends
229
88
218

3840x2160

AMD Radeon RX 590
NVIDIA TITAN Xp
AMD Radeon R9 Nano
Year Game Frames Per Second
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
35
54
33
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
22
33
20
2018 Final Fantasy XV
29
40
26
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
26
38
18
2018 Forza Horizon 4
43
64
35
2018 Fallout 76
39
60
39
2018 Hitman 2
30
38
20
2018 Just Cause 4
23
9
22
2018 Monster Hunter: World
22
8
20
2018 Battlefield V
41
56
24
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
29
44
27
2017 Destiny 2
46
71
44
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
24
41
23
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
26
41
22
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
41
16
39
2017 For Honor
32
12
30
2017 Project CARS 2
46
18
44
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
71
27
68
2016 Ashes of the Singularity
38
2016 Hitman
37
2016 Rise of the Tomb Raider
28
2016 The Division
28
2016 Overwatch
42
63
35
2016 Dishonored 2
38
15
37
2015 DiRT Rally
47
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
22
50
22
2015 The Witcher 3
28
2015 Total War: Attila
36
2015 Rocket League
64
25
61
2015 Need For Speed
46
18
44
2015 Project CARS
46
18
44
2014 Civilization: Beyond Earth
58
2014 Dragon Age: Inquisition
31
2014 Far Cry 4
38
2014 GRID Autosport
54
2014 Shadow of Mordor
42
2014 The Talos Principle
48
2013 Crysis 3
23
2013 Battlefield 4
45
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
165
63
157
2009 League of Legends
92
35
87

AMD Radeon RX 590 / Core i7-8700K @ 3.70GHz

It is clear that the RX 590 is a significantly more capable high-end card that can play AAA titles at 1080p/1440p with 50-60 frames per second. The price/performance ratio is excellent for RX 590 against the competition in budget mid-range cards. It is worth noting that the RX 590 is a very power hungry card and requires a decent power supply unit. In terms of memory, the RX 590 's 8192 MB RAM is more than enough for modern games and should not cause any bottlenecks.

NVIDIA TITAN Xp / Core i7-7700K @ 4.20GHz

In terms of cost, pricing clearly is a genuine issue here and the price of TITAN Xp is simply ridiculous. It is worth noting that the TITAN Xp is a very power hungry card and requires a decent power supply unit. In terms of memory, the TITAN Xp 's 12288 MB RAM is more than enough for modern games and should not cause any bottlenecks. In short the performance is exceptional, there's no question that this is one of the most powerful single GPU out there in 2017 .

AMD Radeon R9 Nano / Core i7-4790K @ 4.00GHz

At 1440p, R9 Nano can hit 50-60 fps on pretty much everything at ultra, just without antialiasing, less ambient occlusion and turned down shadows. Deciding whether to invest so much money in a high-end GPU like R9 Nano requires careful thought. With current 4096 MB RAM, the R9 Nano can have very few memory-related bottlenecks in more modern games.

Board Design

RX 590TITAN XpR9 Nano
Board Number C944-41PG611 SKU 30C882
Length 9.5 inches 241 mm10.5 inches 267 mm6 inches 152 mm
Outputs 1x HDMI3x DisplayPort1x HDMI3x DisplayPort1x HDMI3x DisplayPort
Power Connectors 1x 8-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin1x 8-pin
Slot Width Dual-slotDual-slotDual-slot
TDP 225 W250 W175 W

Clock Speeds

RX 590TITAN XpR9 Nano
Boost Clock 1545 MHz1582 MHz
GPU Clock 1469 MHz1405 MHz1000 MHz
Memory Clock 2000 MHz 8000 MHz effective1426 MHz 11408 MHz effective500 MHz 1000 MHz effective

Graphics Card

RX 590TITAN XpR9 Nano
Bus Interface PCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Generation Polaris (RX 500)GeForce 1000Pirate Islands (R9 300)
Launch Price 279 USD1,199 USD649 USD
Production ActiveActiveActive
Release Date Nov 15th, 2018Apr 6th, 2017Aug 27th, 2015

Graphics Features

RX 590TITAN XpR9 Nano
DirectX 12.0 (12_0)12.0 (12_1)12.0 (12_0)
OpenCL 21.22
OpenGL 4.54.64.5
Shader Model 66.16
Vulkan 1.1.821.1.821.1.82

Graphics Processor

RX 590TITAN XpR9 Nano
Architecture GCN 4.0PascalGCN 3.0
Die Size 244 mm²471 mm²596 mm²
GPU Name Polaris 30GP102Fiji
GPU Variant Polaris 30 XT (215-0922006)GP102-450-A1Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)
Process Size 12 nm16 nm28 nm
Transistors 5,700 million11,800 million8,900 million

Memory

RX 590TITAN XpR9 Nano
Bandwidth 256.0 GB/s547.6 GB/s512.0 GB/s
Memory Bus 256 bit384 bit4096 bit
Memory Size 8192 MB12288 MB4096 MB
Memory Type GDDR5GDDR5XHBM

Render Config

RX 590TITAN XpR9 Nano
Compute Units 3664
ROPs 329664
Shading Units 230438404096
TMUs 144240256

Theoretical Performance

RX 590TITAN XpR9 Nano
FP16 (half) performance 7,119 GFLOPS (1:1)189.8 GFLOPS (1:64)8,192 GFLOPS (1:1)
FP32 (float) performance 7,119 GFLOPS (1:1)12,150 GFLOPS8,192 GFLOPS
FP64 (double) performance 445.0 GFLOPS (1:16)379.7 GFLOPS (1:32)512.0 GFLOPS (1:16)
Pixel Rate 49.44 GPixel/s151.9 GPixel/s64.00 GPixel/s
Texture Rate 222.5 GTexel/s379.7 GTexel/s256.0 GTexel/s

Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments