i7-8700K vs Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 6000+ - Forza Horizon 4 GTX 1660 Ti - Game Performance Benchmarks


i7-8700K Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 6000+

Multi-Thread Performance

15970 Pts
1604 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2703 Pts
898 Pts

Forza Horizon 4

i7-8700K vs Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 6000+ in Forza Horizon 4 using GTX 1660 Ti - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i7-8700K Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 6000+

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
99.8 FPS
1080p
34.8 FPS
1440p
84.5 FPS
1440p
29.5 FPS
2160p
55.1 FPS
2160p
19.2 FPS
w1440p
74.7 FPS
w1440p
26.1 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
157.3 FPS
1080p
64.0 FPS
1440p
136.7 FPS
1440p
55.5 FPS
2160p
95.0 FPS
2160p
38.2 FPS
w1440p
123.1 FPS
w1440p
49.9 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
214.8 FPS
1080p
93.2 FPS
1440p
188.9 FPS
1440p
81.5 FPS
2160p
135.0 FPS
2160p
57.1 FPS
w1440p
171.6 FPS
w1440p
73.7 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
329.8 FPS
1080p
151.7 FPS
1440p
293.3 FPS
1440p
133.4 FPS
2160p
214.8 FPS
2160p
95.1 FPS
w1440p
268.5 FPS
w1440p
121.3 FPS
i7-8700K
    Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 6000+

      Compare i7-8700K vs Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 6000+ specifications

      i7-8700K vs Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 6000+ Architecture

      i7-8700K Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 6000+

      i7-8700K vs Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 6000+ Cache

      i7-8700K Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 6000+

      i7-8700K vs Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 6000+ Cores

      i7-8700K Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 6000+

      i7-8700K vs Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 6000+ Features

      i7-8700K Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 6000+

      i7-8700K vs Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 6000+ Notes

      i7-8700K Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 6000+

      i7-8700K vs Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 6000+ Performance

      i7-8700K Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 6000+

      i7-8700K vs Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 6000+ Physical

      i7-8700K Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 6000+

      Compare i7-8700K vs Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 6000+ in more games


      Discussion and Comments

      Share Your Comments
      4
      4790k 1 month ago
      4790k more power efficient and generate less heat? not mine!!!
      0 0
      P
      preplanupswing 1 year ago
      I9 9900k/i7 9700k or i7 8700kHey folks.I resently sold my i5 6600 with some other stuff expecting to upgrade when the 9th Gen Intel chips released. (which I thought was September 1st. Not October..) now the question is? Should I wait for October and watch the price fall of the i7 8700k or pay more and get the 9th Gen. My budget is only capable of the pricerange of the i7 8700k. Is it worth to wait and see the change in price? Or?
      0 0
      P
      packagerooted 1 year ago
      I decided to buy the 8086k since there was a good deal on Amazon for more than the 8700k.I'm going to run on an AsRock Taichi and should get at least 5.1-5.3 on water cooling.We know that the i7 9700k is 8C/8T and there's literally a couple of games that can truly take advantage of more than 4 cores, let alone 6 or 8!Plus quite a lot of games still benefit from HT, so makes the decision between 8700k/8086k and the 9700k much easier.Assuming my 8086k is a well binned chip and I can sit at 5.1-5.3 on all cores, I truly don't see how the 9700k or even the 9900k could offer much more than a modest improvement.It's not a different CPU architecture, it's just soldered coffee lake so for gaming any benefits over a nicely binned 8700k/8086k are not worth the extra money, and if you already have this chip, certainly not worth the upgrade if you use your PC mostly for gaming.If you have other things you do, streaming or video production then sure, the 9700/9900 will be a good option, but if you are like me and 99% gaming, there's likely no value for the additional cost that intel will of course charge.Cheers.
      0 0
      W
      whispersbrain 1 year ago
      i7 4790 or i7 8700kHi all , I'm currently using a i7 4790 with a 1080ti ,16gb 1600 ram @ 1440p 144hz , no massive issues just feel i should be getting more fps from my card (60-80 fps on new tombraider ultra , 60/70 on AC origins drops below 50 sometimes on ultra)I've been looking at i7 8700k mobo 16gb ddr4 bundles for and £700 would i get much benefit from this expensive upgrade?
      0 0
      C
      creamedmax 2 years ago
      i7 8700 vs i7 8700K(No overclocking)I have been using the i5 4590 and now I am going for a full upgrade which includes RAM,MOB etc.The internet is blowing up about how awesome the i7 8700K is for gaming but nobody seems to talk about the i7 8700.Can someone please tell me which one to go for,the non K version or the K version.Please keep in mind that I will not be overclocking even if I get the K version and will the difference in gaming performance be significant when both CPUs are running at stock settings.
      0 0
      H
      hangfly 2 years ago
      The 8700 would be by a long shot the better deal for you if Intel had the H and B series motherboards out right now, but it's going to be a while if they even come. If I were you I'd probably get the cheapest z370 board you can find, an i7 8700, and some slightly above bargain basement RAM. Even the non-OC intel processors can support 2666MHz RAM speed this generation and you will want to take advantage of it. 2133MHz RAM is going to limit your speed by a noticeable amount.
      0 0
      U
      unsubtlerapadash 1 year ago
      I5 9600K vs I7 8700KI have just upgraded to a 1080 TI and I will be needing a new CPU to go with it. Right now I am thinking about one of these two. Cant seem to find many great benchmark comparisons between them. The I5 9600K is about 70 euroes cheaper, but is it worth it to spend the extra 70 euroes for the 8700K?I am gaming on 1080p 144hz.
      0 0
      C
      chapmarried 1 year ago
      The 9600K performance is identical to 8600k, except for the regular 5 to 6% increase in IPC as far as Intel processors go.The 8700K is definitely worth the extra price. Esp. with games like AC odyssey come with turd level of CPU usage optimization.The 8700K is roughly 50% faster than 9600K in multi-core performance.You will anyway buy a high end mobo for OCing. If 70 Euros are hard to come by for you, then go for the 9600K or if you are just contemplating the price vs performance ratio, the 8700K is a worthy processor for the 70 Euro hike.
      0 0
      M
      metacarpalwham 1 year ago
      I7-8700k too hot?So I recently installed an i7-8700k with a Hyper Evo 212 as the cooler and I'm not sure if my temps are where they should be, also before asked yes its running at stock and not overclocked.When I check the bios after a shut down shortly after following a game being played, it says its at 60-63 or so. But when I'm using programs such as HWinfo or CPUID HwMonitor, it says that sometimes my maximum it hits is like 78-80 or so while staying at around 60ish.Today is relatively a hotter day then usual in California (93 degrees) So I'm not sure if that comes into play. Or if I potentially seated my Evo incorrectly? Not sure.I have an AsRock Z370 mPro4 as my motherboard and any help would be greatly appreciated.
      0 0
      D
      dryeastward 1 year ago
      I7 8700k or i5 8600k for gamingHi, it's my first time building a pc so I have very little knowledge about processors.Both the i7 8700k and i5 8600k have similar single core and quad core performance according to user benchmark, I have heard that most games don't use more than 4 cores.So I'll be playing in a 1440p 144hz IPS g-sync monitor with GTX 1080 and mostly games like counter strike,pubg and fortnite
      0 0