i5-10600K vs i5-9400 - Call of Duty Modern Warfare GTX 1660 - Game Performance Benchmarks


i5-10600K i5-9400

Multi-Thread Performance

14000 Pts
11750 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2850 Pts
2377 Pts

Call of Duty Modern Warfare

i5-10600K vs i5-9400 in Call of Duty Modern Warfare using GTX 1660 - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i5-10600K i5-9400

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
111.0 FPS
1080p
107.1 FPS
1440p
79.5 FPS
1440p
77.1 FPS
2160p
47.5 FPS
2160p
46.0 FPS
w1440p
67.9 FPS
w1440p
65.9 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
172.0 FPS
1080p
166.9 FPS
1440p
129.8 FPS
1440p
126.5 FPS
2160p
83.7 FPS
2160p
81.4 FPS
w1440p
113.6 FPS
w1440p
110.7 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
233.0 FPS
1080p
226.7 FPS
1440p
180.1 FPS
1440p
175.9 FPS
2160p
119.9 FPS
2160p
116.8 FPS
w1440p
159.2 FPS
w1440p
155.5 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
355.0 FPS
1080p
346.4 FPS
1440p
280.8 FPS
1440p
274.7 FPS
2160p
192.2 FPS
2160p
187.6 FPS
w1440p
250.5 FPS
w1440p
245.1 FPS
i5-10600K
  • The i5-10600K has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The i5-10600K has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i5-10600K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i5-10600K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i5-10600K has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
i5-9400
  • The i5-9400 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i5-9400 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.

Compare i5-10600K vs i5-9400 specifications

i5-10600K vs i5-9400 Architecture

i5-10600K i5-9400
CodenameComet LakeCoffee Lake
GenerationCore i5 (Comet Lake)Core i5 (Coffee Lake Refresh)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR4
Part#unknownSR3X5
Production StatusActiveActive
ReleasedMay 2020Oct 2018

i5-10600K vs i5-9400 Cache

i5-10600K i5-9400
Cache L164K (per core)64K (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)256K (per core)
Cache L312MB (shared)9MB (shared)

i5-10600K vs i5-9400 Cores

i5-10600K i5-9400
# of Cores66
# of Threads126
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 630UHD 630
SMP # CPUs11

i5-10600K vs i5-9400 Features

i5-10600K i5-9400

i5-10600K vs i5-9400 Notes

i5-10600K i5-9400

i5-10600K vs i5-9400 Performance

i5-10600K i5-9400
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency4.1 GHz2.9 GHz
Multiplier41.0x29.0x
Multiplier UnlockedYesNo
TDP95 W65 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.8 GHzup to 4.1 GHz
Voltagevariablevariable

i5-10600K vs i5-9400 Physical

i5-10600K i5-9400
Die Sizeunknownunknown
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA1200FC-LGA1151
Process Size14 nm14 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1200Intel Socket 1151
Transistorsunknownunknown
tCaseMax72°C72°C

Compare i5-10600K vs i5-9400 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments