i3-8300 vs i3-9320 - Call of Duty Modern Warfare GTX 1660 - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-8300 i3-9320

Multi-Thread Performance

8715 Pts
10144 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2172 Pts
2552 Pts

Call of Duty Modern Warfare

i3-8300 vs i3-9320 in Call of Duty Modern Warfare using GTX 1660 - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-8300 i3-9320

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
97.8 FPS
1080p
101.8 FPS
1440p
70.4 FPS
1440p
73.3 FPS
2160p
42.0 FPS
2160p
43.8 FPS
w1440p
60.2 FPS
w1440p
62.6 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
154.6 FPS
1080p
159.9 FPS
1440p
117.1 FPS
1440p
121.2 FPS
2160p
75.3 FPS
2160p
78.1 FPS
w1440p
102.5 FPS
w1440p
106.0 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
211.5 FPS
1080p
218.1 FPS
1440p
163.8 FPS
1440p
169.1 FPS
2160p
108.6 FPS
2160p
112.3 FPS
w1440p
144.8 FPS
w1440p
149.3 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
325.2 FPS
1080p
334.4 FPS
1440p
257.2 FPS
1440p
264.8 FPS
2160p
175.1 FPS
2160p
180.8 FPS
w1440p
229.4 FPS
w1440p
236.1 FPS
i3-8300
  • The i3-8300 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The i3-8300 has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i3-8300 has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i3-8300 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
i3-9320
  • The i3-9320 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i3-9320 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.

Compare i3-8300 vs i3-9320 specifications

i3-8300 vs i3-9320 Architecture

i3-8300 i3-9320
CodenameCoffee LakeCoffee Lake
GenerationCore i3 (Coffee Lake)Core i3 (Coffee Lake Refresh)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR4
Part#SR3XYunknown
Production StatusActiveActive
ReleasedFeb 2018Apr 2019

i3-8300 vs i3-9320 Cache

i3-8300 i3-9320
Cache L164K (per core)64K (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)256K (per core)
Cache L38MB (shared)6MB (shared)

i3-8300 vs i3-9320 Cores

i3-8300 i3-9320
# of Cores44
# of Threads44
Integrated GraphicsN/AUHD 630
SMP # CPUs11

i3-8300 vs i3-9320 Features

i3-8300 i3-9320

i3-8300 vs i3-9320 Performance

i3-8300 i3-9320
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.7 GHz3.7 GHz
Multiplier37.0x37.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoNo
TDP62 W62 W
Turbo ClockN/Aup to 4.4 GHz
Voltagevariablevariable

i3-8300 vs i3-9320 Physical

i3-8300 i3-9320
Die Sizeunknownunknown
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA1151FC-LGA1151
Process Size14 nm14 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1151Intel Socket 1151
Transistorsunknownunknown
tCaseMax72°C72°C

Compare i3-8300 vs i3-9320 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments