Ryzen 5 3500 vs i5-9400F - Call of Duty Modern Warfare GTX 1660 - Game Performance Benchmarks


Ryzen 5 3500 i5-9400F

Multi-Thread Performance

1655 Pts
12212 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2820 Pts
2387 Pts

Call of Duty Modern Warfare

Ryzen 5 3500 vs i5-9400F in Call of Duty Modern Warfare using GTX 1660 - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

Ryzen 5 3500 i5-9400F

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
106.9 FPS
1080p
107.1 FPS
1440p
76.9 FPS
1440p
77.1 FPS
2160p
46.0 FPS
2160p
46.0 FPS
w1440p
65.8 FPS
w1440p
65.9 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
166.7 FPS
1080p
166.9 FPS
1440p
126.2 FPS
1440p
126.5 FPS
2160p
81.4 FPS
2160p
81.4 FPS
w1440p
110.6 FPS
w1440p
110.7 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
226.4 FPS
1080p
226.7 FPS
1440p
175.5 FPS
1440p
175.9 FPS
2160p
116.8 FPS
2160p
116.8 FPS
w1440p
155.3 FPS
w1440p
155.5 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
345.9 FPS
1080p
346.4 FPS
1440p
274.2 FPS
1440p
274.7 FPS
2160p
187.6 FPS
2160p
187.6 FPS
w1440p
244.9 FPS
w1440p
245.1 FPS
Ryzen 5 3500
  • The Ryzen 5 3500 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The Ryzen 5 3500 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
i5-9400F
  • The i5-9400F has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The i5-9400F has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i5-9400F has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i5-9400F has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i5-9400F has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.

Compare Ryzen 5 3500 vs i5-9400F specifications

Ryzen 5 3500 vs i5-9400F Architecture

Ryzen 5 3500 i5-9400F
CodenameZen 2Coffee Lake
GenerationRyzen 5 (Zen 2)Core i5 (Coffee Lake Refresh)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR4
Part#unknownSRF6M
Production StatusActiveActive
ReleasedJul 2019Jan 2019

Ryzen 5 3500 vs i5-9400F Cache

Ryzen 5 3500 i5-9400F
Cache L196K (per core)64K (per core)
Cache L2512K (per core)256K (per core)
Cache L332MB (shared)9MB (shared)

Ryzen 5 3500 vs i5-9400F Cores

Ryzen 5 3500 i5-9400F
# of Cores66
# of Threads126
Integrated GraphicsN/AN/A
SMP # CPUs11

Ryzen 5 3500 vs i5-9400F Performance

Ryzen 5 3500 i5-9400F
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.6 GHz2.9 GHz
Multiplier36.0x29.0x
Multiplier UnlockedYesNo
TDP65 W65 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.2 GHzup to 4.1 GHz
Voltagevariablevariable

Ryzen 5 3500 vs i5-9400F Physical

Ryzen 5 3500 i5-9400F
Die Sizeunknownunknown
FoundryTSMCIntel
PackageFC-LGA1151
Process Size7 nm14 nm
SocketAMD Socket AM4Intel Socket 1151
Transistors4,800 millionunknown
tCaseMaxunknown72°C

Compare Ryzen 5 3500 vs i5-9400F in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments