Ryzen 3 3300X vs i3-9350KF - Call of Duty Modern Warfare GTX 1660 - Game Performance Benchmarks


Ryzen 3 3300X i3-9350KF

Multi-Thread Performance

13425 Pts
10458 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2742 Pts
2562 Pts

Call of Duty Modern Warfare

Ryzen 3 3300X vs i3-9350KF in Call of Duty Modern Warfare using GTX 1660 - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

Ryzen 3 3300X i3-9350KF

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
106.1 FPS
1080p
102.0 FPS
1440p
76.4 FPS
1440p
73.4 FPS
2160p
45.6 FPS
2160p
43.9 FPS
w1440p
65.3 FPS
w1440p
62.8 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
165.6 FPS
1080p
160.2 FPS
1440p
125.5 FPS
1440p
121.3 FPS
2160p
80.8 FPS
2160p
78.2 FPS
w1440p
109.8 FPS
w1440p
106.3 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
225.1 FPS
1080p
218.4 FPS
1440p
174.6 FPS
1440p
169.3 FPS
2160p
116.0 FPS
2160p
112.5 FPS
w1440p
154.4 FPS
w1440p
149.7 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
344.1 FPS
1080p
334.8 FPS
1440p
272.9 FPS
1440p
265.1 FPS
2160p
186.4 FPS
2160p
181.1 FPS
w1440p
243.5 FPS
w1440p
236.6 FPS
Ryzen 3 3300X
  • The Ryzen 3 3300X has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The Ryzen 3 3300X has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The Ryzen 3 3300X has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The Ryzen 3 3300X has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • The Ryzen 3 3300X is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The Ryzen 3 3300X has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
i3-9350KF
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i3-9350KF has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.

Compare Ryzen 3 3300X vs i3-9350KF specifications

Ryzen 3 3300X vs i3-9350KF Architecture

Ryzen 3 3300X i3-9350KF
CodenameZen 2Coffee Lake
GenerationRyzen 3 (Zen 2)Core i3 (Coffee Lake Refresh)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR4
Part#unknownunknown
Production StatusActiveActive
ReleasedMay 2020Apr 2019

Ryzen 3 3300X vs i3-9350KF Cache

Ryzen 3 3300X i3-9350KF
Cache L196K (per core)64K (per core)
Cache L2512K (per core)256K (per core)
Cache L316MB (shared)6MB (shared)

Ryzen 3 3300X vs i3-9350KF Cores

Ryzen 3 3300X i3-9350KF
# of Cores44
# of Threads84
Integrated GraphicsN/AUHD 630
SMP # CPUs11

Ryzen 3 3300X vs i3-9350KF Performance

Ryzen 3 3300X i3-9350KF
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.8 GHz4 GHz
Multiplier38.0x40.0x
Multiplier UnlockedYesNo
TDP65 W91 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.3 GHzup to 4.6 GHz
Voltagevariablevariable

Ryzen 3 3300X vs i3-9350KF Physical

Ryzen 3 3300X i3-9350KF
Die Sizeunknownunknown
FoundryTSMCIntel
PackageFC-LGA1151
Process Size7 nm14 nm
SocketAMD Socket AM4Intel Socket 1151
Transistorsunknownunknown
tCaseMaxunknown72°C

Compare Ryzen 3 3300X vs i3-9350KF in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments