i7-9700K vs Ryzen 5 3600 - Assassin's Creed Odyssey GTX 1080 - Game Performance Benchmarks


i7-9700K Ryzen 5 3600

Multi-Thread Performance

17589 Pts
19634 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2834 Pts
2900 Pts

Assassin's Creed Odyssey

i7-9700K vs Ryzen 5 3600 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey using GTX 1080 - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, 4K resolutions

i7-9700K Ryzen 5 3600

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
68.9 FPS
1080p
65.3 FPS
1440p
46.7 FPS
1440p
45.6 FPS
2160p
32.9 FPS
2160p
32.1 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
103.9 FPS
1080p
100.3 FPS
1440p
65.7 FPS
1440p
64.6 FPS
2160p
41.9 FPS
2160p
41.1 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
124.9 FPS
1080p
121.3 FPS
1440p
92.7 FPS
1440p
91.6 FPS
2160p
57.9 FPS
2160p
57.1 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
170.9 FPS
1080p
167.3 FPS
1440p
151.7 FPS
1440p
150.6 FPS
2160p
103.9 FPS
2160p
103.1 FPS
i7-9700K
  • The i7-9700K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i7-9700K has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
Ryzen 5 3600
  • The Ryzen 5 3600 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The Ryzen 5 3600 has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The Ryzen 5 3600 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • The Ryzen 5 3600 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The Ryzen 5 3600 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.

Compare i7-9700K vs Ryzen 5 3600 specifications

i7-9700K vs Ryzen 5 3600 Architecture

i7-9700K Ryzen 5 3600
CodenameCoffee LakeZen 2
GenerationCore i7 (Coffee Lake Refresh)Ryzen 5 (Zen 2)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR4
Part#unknownunknown
Production StatusActiveActive
ReleasedOct 2018Jul 2019

i7-9700K vs Ryzen 5 3600 Cache

i7-9700K Ryzen 5 3600
Cache L164K (per core)96K (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)512K (per core)
Cache L312MB (shared)32MB (shared)

i7-9700K vs Ryzen 5 3600 Cores

i7-9700K Ryzen 5 3600
# of Cores86
# of Threads812
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 630N/A
SMP # CPUs11

i7-9700K vs Ryzen 5 3600 Features

i7-9700K Ryzen 5 3600

i7-9700K vs Ryzen 5 3600 Notes

i7-9700K Ryzen 5 3600

i7-9700K vs Ryzen 5 3600 Performance

i7-9700K Ryzen 5 3600
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.6 GHz3.6 GHz
Multiplier36.0x36.0x
Multiplier UnlockedYesYes
TDP95 W65 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.9 GHzup to 4.2 GHz
Voltageunknownvariable

i7-9700K vs Ryzen 5 3600 Physical

i7-9700K Ryzen 5 3600
Die Sizeunknownunknown
FoundryIntelTSMC
PackageFC-LGA14C
Process Size14 nm7 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1151AMD Socket AM4
Transistorsunknown4,800 million
tCaseMax72°Cunknown

Compare i7-9700K vs Ryzen 5 3600 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments