i3-9350F vs i5-9400F - Assassin's Creed Odyssey GTX 1080 - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-9350F i5-9400F

Multi-Thread Performance

10458 Pts
12212 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2562 Pts
2387 Pts

Assassin's Creed Odyssey

i3-9350F vs i5-9400F in Assassin's Creed Odyssey using GTX 1080 - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, 4K resolutions

i3-9350F i5-9400F

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
61.5 FPS
1080p
64.3 FPS
1440p
44.5 FPS
1440p
45.3 FPS
2160p
31.4 FPS
2160p
31.9 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
96.5 FPS
1080p
99.3 FPS
1440p
63.5 FPS
1440p
64.3 FPS
2160p
40.4 FPS
2160p
40.9 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
117.5 FPS
1080p
120.3 FPS
1440p
90.5 FPS
1440p
91.3 FPS
2160p
56.4 FPS
2160p
56.9 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
163.5 FPS
1080p
166.3 FPS
1440p
149.5 FPS
1440p
150.3 FPS
2160p
102.4 FPS
2160p
102.9 FPS
i3-9350F
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i3-9350F has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
i5-9400F
  • The i5-9400F has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i5-9400F has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i5-9400F has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • The i5-9400F is more power efficient and generates less heat.

Compare i3-9350F vs i5-9400F specifications

i3-9350F vs i5-9400F Architecture

i3-9350F i5-9400F
CodenameCoffee LakeCoffee Lake
GenerationCore i3 (Coffee Lake Refresh)Core i5 (Coffee Lake Refresh)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR4
Part#unknownSRF6M
Production StatusActiveActive
ReleasedApr 2019Jan 2019

i3-9350F vs i5-9400F Cache

i3-9350F i5-9400F
Cache L164K (per core)64K (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)256K (per core)
Cache L36MB (shared)9MB (shared)

i3-9350F vs i5-9400F Cores

i3-9350F i5-9400F
# of Cores46
# of Threads46
Integrated GraphicsUHD 630N/A
SMP # CPUs11

i3-9350F vs i5-9400F Performance

i3-9350F i5-9400F
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency4 GHz2.9 GHz
Multiplier40.0x29.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoNo
TDP91 W65 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.6 GHzup to 4.1 GHz
Voltagevariablevariable

i3-9350F vs i5-9400F Physical

i3-9350F i5-9400F
Die Sizeunknownunknown
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA1151FC-LGA1151
Process Size14 nm14 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1151Intel Socket 1151
Transistorsunknownunknown
tCaseMax72°C72°C

Compare i3-9350F vs i5-9400F in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments