Ryzen 7 2700X vs i3-9350F - Assassin's Creed Odyssey GTX 1080 - Game Performance Benchmarks


Ryzen 7 2700X i3-9350F

Multi-Thread Performance

16960 Pts
10458 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2190 Pts
2562 Pts

Assassin's Creed Odyssey

Ryzen 7 2700X vs i3-9350F in Assassin's Creed Odyssey using GTX 1080 - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, 4K resolutions

Ryzen 7 2700X i3-9350F

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
59.2 FPS
1080p
61.5 FPS
1440p
43.6 FPS
1440p
44.5 FPS
2160p
30.7 FPS
2160p
31.4 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
94.2 FPS
1080p
96.5 FPS
1440p
62.6 FPS
1440p
63.5 FPS
2160p
39.7 FPS
2160p
40.4 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
115.2 FPS
1080p
117.5 FPS
1440p
89.6 FPS
1440p
90.5 FPS
2160p
55.7 FPS
2160p
56.4 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
161.2 FPS
1080p
163.5 FPS
1440p
148.6 FPS
1440p
149.5 FPS
2160p
101.7 FPS
2160p
102.4 FPS
Ryzen 7 2700X
  • The Ryzen 7 2700X has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The Ryzen 7 2700X has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The Ryzen 7 2700X has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The Ryzen 7 2700X has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • The Ryzen 7 2700X has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
i3-9350F
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i3-9350F is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i3-9350F has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.

Compare Ryzen 7 2700X vs i3-9350F specifications

Ryzen 7 2700X vs i3-9350F Architecture

Ryzen 7 2700X i3-9350F
CodenameZenCoffee Lake
GenerationRyzen 7 (Zen+ (Pinnacle Ridge))Core i3 (Coffee Lake Refresh)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR4
Part#unknownunknown
Production StatusActiveActive
ReleasedApr 2018Apr 2019

Ryzen 7 2700X vs i3-9350F Cache

Ryzen 7 2700X i3-9350F
Cache L196K (per core)64K (per core)
Cache L2512K (per core)256K (per core)
Cache L316MB (shared)6MB (shared)

Ryzen 7 2700X vs i3-9350F Cores

Ryzen 7 2700X i3-9350F
# of Cores84
# of Threads164
Integrated GraphicsN/AUHD 630
SMP # CPUs11

Ryzen 7 2700X vs i3-9350F Features

Ryzen 7 2700X i3-9350F

Ryzen 7 2700X vs i3-9350F Notes

Ryzen 7 2700X i3-9350F

Ryzen 7 2700X vs i3-9350F Performance

Ryzen 7 2700X i3-9350F
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.7 GHz4 GHz
Multiplier37.0x40.0x
Multiplier UnlockedYesNo
TDP105 W91 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.35 GHzup to 4.6 GHz
Voltagevariablevariable

Ryzen 7 2700X vs i3-9350F Physical

Ryzen 7 2700X i3-9350F
Die Size192 mm²unknown
FoundryGlobalFoundriesIntel
PackageµOPGA-1331FC-LGA1151
Process Size12 nm14 nm
SocketAMD Socket AM4Intel Socket 1151
Transistors4800 millionunknown
tCaseMaxunknown72°C

Compare Ryzen 7 2700X vs i3-9350F in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments